In the Floyd situation, you could at least argue that Chauvin didn't kill the guy. He died of a drug overdose and so on. There is evidence to support it (fent in the blood).
But in this case? She is totally fucked. The best case you can make is "it was an accident" and there is legal precedence for how that holds up in court as a defense. It doesn't.
This shooting was unjustified. Unlike the Floyd one. That's why women should stay in the kitchen.
Edit: I know Floyd wasn't shot. I meant to say that Chauvin's actions were justified.
In the Floyd situation, you could at least argue that Chauvin didn't kill the guy. He died of a drug overdose and so on. There is evidence to support it (fent in the blood).
But in this case? She is totally fucked. The best case you can make is "it was an accident" and there is legal precedence for how that holds up in court as a defense. It doesn't.
It makes it second, instead of first, degree, unless I'm missing some relevant details.
But yes, she's unlikely to just get off scott free.
correct