"Your honor, we got caught red-handed, stealing a presidential election in the United States, give us $2 billion and look the other way." - Dominion Fraud Systems.
"Smartmatic’s desperate attempt to suggest I was a part of a civil conspiracy to harm the company is not only false but also still does not allow me to be sued in New York," Powell said Thursday in a statement. "Smartmatic fails to even remotely allege any way that I was a part of a conspiracy. And for the record, I was not."
Powell also says her comments cannot be considered defamatory because the information she shared about the Smartmatic voting machines is "backed by sworn affidavits, expert reports, and other corroborating evidence." She also argues the First Amendment protects her statements about Smartmatic because they are "political speech and were made in connection with active litigation."
"I stand by my statements about Smartmatic today," Powell said." I believe every allegation I have made about Smartmatic and the vulnerability of these machines is true. This case is meritless and should be thrown out entirely."
Sydney is a FAILED Q-tard LARPer. All hype and none of the goods as usual
It’s just the daily dose of bullshit from the QTARD grifters Sydney and Lin who just exist to swindle money from Trump supporters.
All they do is endless hopium LARPs and none of them come true. They say “bombshell evidence dropping 2 days from now” and NOTHING HAPPENS.
idk why cucks on our side jack off to her so much. she has done nothing for trump and even Trump said during his Oval Office meeting with her that she was ”embarrassing”
She and Lin are nothing more than QTARD grifters.
SPEZ: all the downvotes don't DEBOOONK the fact that sidney powell's 'kraken/spyder' LARP turned into an epic FAIL and she has NO EVIDENCE for her LARPS
Powell and Wood have not given up fighting for election integrity and I appreciate their perseverance. I also personally find it hard to believe a "grifter" would be recently recognized as a Top 5 law firm for professionalism and excellence: Link
Let’s not forget her client. General flynn pushed Q just as hard as everyone else which I think is even more insane since he’s a General who once served at the top of our national security.
I do not equate Wood with Powell and don't really understand why everyone in here consistently lumps the two of them together. I've thought Wood was a nutcase ever since that 'press conference' in GA when he told everyone not to vote. His decline in mental health, or whatever was going on with him, was even more on display after that. While I think Sidney was at times misguided and promised more than she was able to deliver, I do NOT think she is a nutjob.
"vulnerability" implies a level of non-intentionality, which is not true in Smartmatic case. It's like saying making yourself vulnerable to bullets by robbing a bank, or vulnerable to cardiac arrest by swallowing bag of meth/fentanyl pills
And here I am wondering why nobody is pointing out that one of Smartmatic’s first contracts in the United States was for San Francisco when Newsom was the mayor and why a company who has evaded CFIUS investigations on multiple occasions was allowed to design the voting system for the most populous voting area in the United States starting in 2019 (Los Angeles County). Huh. Weird.
If you read the actual legal filing, it really does make the argument that nobody reasonable would have believed her. It's just that it's part of a larger defense. But yeah, it's really in there.
That's the media spin. The actual brief her attorney's provided use the "reasonable person" argument in an explanation of a prior case in comparison of her remarks during a political rally. Those remarks, if you actually read the brief, are stated opinions based on the evidence she presented.
But by all means, please do continue to spread the media's propaganda Dingus.
What that means to you and what that means under the law are not the same. You should get online and buy a cheap book on defamation law basics to read. Can probably pick one up for like $4. I'd bet her filing also contains the case law citations that explain what the law is that she is relying upon. That would be a free way to understand the argument. What she said is protected speech. And not because people would automatically assume she is full of shit. That is a fake news argument because she is not saying that.
Legal filings are 150% privileged against defamation. You can say outlandish shit in legal filings and cannot be sued for defamation. Powell said these statements in connection to litigation
the standard is the statements must be objectively verifiable facts made "knowingly false or in reckless disregard of the truth." Here, Powell has substantial evidence in the form of sworn witness affidavits, expert testimony, and other statistical evidence upon which she based her claims. No reasonable person could say that this opinion was knowingly false, and when you have a basis for the statement with evidence, it was not in reckless disregard of the truth.
For #2, nothing Powell said can be "objectively verified." Like "Joe Smith has zero computer experience, never went to college, and is unqualified to work as systems administrator at XYZ voting company." When Joe Smith actually worked at microsoft as an engineer for 15 years, has a masters in computer science from MIT, and has been in charge of a large server operation with good employment reviews for the last 5 years. Such statements can be objectively shown to be false. Dominion can't hide their source code and then claim that Powell acted in reckless disregard for the truth. Powell formed her opinion based off the observations of others. For now, until this is officially the People's Republic of America, that is protected speech.
No. It's not. You and the dude below you, I'm going to nickname you dunning and Kruger
In her lawsuit, the argument she's using is one that argues the average person wouldn't believe her statements outright, its opinion until it's proven in court which she never had the chance to do
Provide the thinnest shred of specific evidence that Sidney Powell has anything whatsoever to do with qanon or that she is a grifter, and I for one will be glad to let you turn The Donald into the Trump-ally hateporn hub you so desperately want it to be.
This is only about the thousandth time I’ve personally made this same request.
She spread the whole bullshit about the CIA server raid where the military got in a gunfight with Gina Haspel and that the military was gonna save us all since they were already acting under Trump’s behest.
She spread all sorts of QTARD crap like that between Nov 3 and Jan 20. Maybe you forgot, but she spread bullshit about the server raid, said the election was hacked by Hugo Chavez, and other insane shit meant to derail the lawsuits. She spread the EXACT shit that the QTARDS did on the chans.
And she would always say “evidence coming out any day now” and then couple days later...NOTHING. She never showed ANY evidence to prove the CIA raid, or to prove haspel was dead, or any of that shit. NO EVIDENCE.
And while her PAC raked in millions, she kept begging for donations while literally doing jack shit to help Trump. DJT himself called her “embarrassing” when he met her.
What evidence do you have that bullshit that she peddled including the server raid or the kraken or anything was real? That’s right, you don’t. She is just another QFAG LARPer.
2 billion dollars lol
Your honor she hurt our feelings, give us 2 billion.
"Your honor, we got caught red-handed, stealing a presidential election in the United States, give us $2 billion and look the other way." - Dominion Fraud Systems.
"Smartmatic’s desperate attempt to suggest I was a part of a civil conspiracy to harm the company is not only false but also still does not allow me to be sued in New York," Powell said Thursday in a statement. "Smartmatic fails to even remotely allege any way that I was a part of a conspiracy. And for the record, I was not."
Powell also says her comments cannot be considered defamatory because the information she shared about the Smartmatic voting machines is "backed by sworn affidavits, expert reports, and other corroborating evidence." She also argues the First Amendment protects her statements about Smartmatic because they are "political speech and were made in connection with active litigation."
"I stand by my statements about Smartmatic today," Powell said." I believe every allegation I have made about Smartmatic and the vulnerability of these machines is true. This case is meritless and should be thrown out entirely."
Sydney is a FAILED Q-tard LARPer. All hype and none of the goods as usual
It’s just the daily dose of bullshit from the QTARD grifters Sydney and Lin who just exist to swindle money from Trump supporters.
All they do is endless hopium LARPs and none of them come true. They say “bombshell evidence dropping 2 days from now” and NOTHING HAPPENS.
idk why cucks on our side jack off to her so much. she has done nothing for trump and even Trump said during his Oval Office meeting with her that she was ”embarrassing”
She and Lin are nothing more than QTARD grifters.
SPEZ: all the downvotes don't DEBOOONK the fact that sidney powell's 'kraken/spyder' LARP turned into an epic FAIL and she has NO EVIDENCE for her LARPS
Powell and Wood have not given up fighting for election integrity and I appreciate their perseverance. I also personally find it hard to believe a "grifter" would be recently recognized as a Top 5 law firm for professionalism and excellence: Link
Let’s not forget her client. General flynn pushed Q just as hard as everyone else which I think is even more insane since he’s a General who once served at the top of our national security.
t. guy that never read the lawsuits she filed.
your mom grifts deez nuts
We’ve got ourselves another QTARD LARPer here.
That's the only position she can take. They now have to prove she doesn't believe it.
If only she had some sort of proof that she said she had, this will be very easy for her to win.
If her entire defense is “ it doesn’t matter if I’m wrong because I believe it“ then that double proves she was full of shit the whole time.
The single most disappointing thing about the site in the entire election, is that retards are still posting and upvoting Wood and Powell.
I do not equate Wood with Powell and don't really understand why everyone in here consistently lumps the two of them together. I've thought Wood was a nutcase ever since that 'press conference' in GA when he told everyone not to vote. His decline in mental health, or whatever was going on with him, was even more on display after that. While I think Sidney was at times misguided and promised more than she was able to deliver, I do NOT think she is a nutjob.
They are lumped in together
...because they’re charlatans of the same cloth.
...because they were in press releases together.
...because they appeared impressed with releases and an awful low budget rally together.
It doesn’t make sense to separate these two scammers.
I hope she countersues for $6 Billion!
Isn't she a high-end defense lawyer fighting for her life? Dominion doesn't stand a chance.
"vulnerability" implies a level of non-intentionality, which is not true in Smartmatic case. It's like saying making yourself vulnerable to bullets by robbing a bank, or vulnerable to cardiac arrest by swallowing bag of meth/fentanyl pills
She has spoken several times about Smartmatic being intentionally designed to be vulnerable in order to steal elections.
I love this woman! Time to donate another $25 to Sidney! I love her so much!
Can't wait till discovery.
Praying she will win.
And here I am wondering why nobody is pointing out that one of Smartmatic’s first contracts in the United States was for San Francisco when Newsom was the mayor and why a company who has evaded CFIUS investigations on multiple occasions was allowed to design the voting system for the most populous voting area in the United States starting in 2019 (Los Angeles County). Huh. Weird.
Meanwhile, Lin Wood has a pudding pop and talks with his toes.
If you read the actual legal filing, it really does make the argument that nobody reasonable would have believed her. It's just that it's part of a larger defense. But yeah, it's really in there.
That's the media spin. The actual brief her attorney's provided use the "reasonable person" argument in an explanation of a prior case in comparison of her remarks during a political rally. Those remarks, if you actually read the brief, are stated opinions based on the evidence she presented.
But by all means, please do continue to spread the media's propaganda Dingus.
What that means to you and what that means under the law are not the same. You should get online and buy a cheap book on defamation law basics to read. Can probably pick one up for like $4. I'd bet her filing also contains the case law citations that explain what the law is that she is relying upon. That would be a free way to understand the argument. What she said is protected speech. And not because people would automatically assume she is full of shit. That is a fake news argument because she is not saying that.
For #2, nothing Powell said can be "objectively verified." Like "Joe Smith has zero computer experience, never went to college, and is unqualified to work as systems administrator at XYZ voting company." When Joe Smith actually worked at microsoft as an engineer for 15 years, has a masters in computer science from MIT, and has been in charge of a large server operation with good employment reviews for the last 5 years. Such statements can be objectively shown to be false. Dominion can't hide their source code and then claim that Powell acted in reckless disregard for the truth. Powell formed her opinion based off the observations of others. For now, until this is officially the People's Republic of America, that is protected speech.
No. It's not. You and the dude below you, I'm going to nickname you dunning and Kruger
In her lawsuit, the argument she's using is one that argues the average person wouldn't believe her statements outright, its opinion until it's proven in court which she never had the chance to do
Yep. She literally admits in the lawsuits that she’s just a QTARD grifter who LARPs all day and nobody should take her seriously.
Provide the thinnest shred of specific evidence that Sidney Powell has anything whatsoever to do with qanon or that she is a grifter, and I for one will be glad to let you turn The Donald into the Trump-ally hateporn hub you so desperately want it to be.
This is only about the thousandth time I’ve personally made this same request.
She spread the whole bullshit about the CIA server raid where the military got in a gunfight with Gina Haspel and that the military was gonna save us all since they were already acting under Trump’s behest.
She spread all sorts of QTARD crap like that between Nov 3 and Jan 20. Maybe you forgot, but she spread bullshit about the server raid, said the election was hacked by Hugo Chavez, and other insane shit meant to derail the lawsuits. She spread the EXACT shit that the QTARDS did on the chans.
And she would always say “evidence coming out any day now” and then couple days later...NOTHING. She never showed ANY evidence to prove the CIA raid, or to prove haspel was dead, or any of that shit. NO EVIDENCE.
And while her PAC raked in millions, she kept begging for donations while literally doing jack shit to help Trump. DJT himself called her “embarrassing” when he met her.
What evidence do you have that bullshit that she peddled including the server raid or the kraken or anything was real? That’s right, you don’t. She is just another QFAG LARPer.
She's so sus.........
She is a QTARD grifter.