64
posted ago by Ben45 ago by Ben45 +64 / -0

The whole point of this website is to allow us to have our own discussions. Yet we still allow the marxists to control the narrative on our own website we made to get away from them. This message is not to be critical, I just want to make a specific point.

I will use the recent Daunte Wright thing as an example. Why would we pay attention to something like this? Another event of a cop doing their job. Another event that the marxists will lose their shit over for no reason. Let them be bitchy about it. I frankly could not give a single shit about this Wright guy or what happened to him. The left does. Ok. Great for them. I do not think we should be giving any attention to their temper tantrums. When someone tells me about the latest Floyd overdosing or committing suicide by cop, I want my first reaction to be "That happened? So what." I don't even want to even know it ever happened because I do not care in the first place.

If we keep allowing the left to control the talking points, on our own damn anonymous chat boards, how are we going to ever have any control over the narrative in real life, in politics.

We have all fell for the trap, especially with the Kirby Floyd Fentanyl loser fiasco. We have been falling for this trap, as conservatives, for years now. Zimmerman, Martin, Floyd, Taylor, and now Wright.

We need to let go some (emphasis on some) of the stupid things they throw hissy fits about. Black people committing suicide by cop is one of those things. Instead, we need to keep in mind that we do have the power to control conversation, not just react to it. And we need to use that power. Our God given first amendment right.

Comments (6)
sorted by:
4
Grindelwald 4 points ago +4 / -0

Twana Brawley model is used until the race industry hustlers get their reparations and the DNC controls are secure.

2
Ben45 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

exactly

I don't see any benefit to us by engaging and paying any attention to their intraparty fighting

1
IAbsolutelyDare 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every time they run their narrative, we should dig up what's always been behind it:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cPojxyYXHAc

Apologies for the bad audio.

2
BahamaDon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Turn up the meme cannon to eleven please?

Eleven is one more than ten.

2
Ben45 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes, we need more memes. We've been lacking in the meme department since the Steal of 2020. We're starting to get back on track but it's nowhere near as great as it could be. There's so much material to draw from.

2
VolareVia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alright I'll start. I've come to the belief that a federalist-style democracy is not decentralized enough to prevent corruption. Look at where almost all the corruption is. It's the federal government. You want small government? I give you...drum-roll

Distributism. Essentially, it's constitutional monarchy. The federal government is run by a king who is completely unelected. Some might say that makes him unnaccountable. But here's the key. For this to work, all important powers must be divested from the federal government and given to the state governments, which would continue to have elections as per usual. So the king would not be unnaccountable. He would be accountable to the state legislatures. He would also be removed from most concerns of politics and be able to rule without having to ever vie for re-election. This breaks the cycle of politicians lying about fixing problems to get re-elected.

The constitution would stay, with minor revisions to remove the BS, the SC would go, the military would go, and all federal agencies would go. Anything carried out at the national level would be done with the consent of a certain number of states. Otherwise state governments and even municipalities would have most of the power over their own citizens.