And why exactly is a proven medical treatment based on literal decades of research and having already gone through numerous clinical trials for treatments not just of covid, but for things like cancer etc, using rather straightforward existing cell mechanisms to simply make a single protein from the virus so your immune system can gain immunity just like it would if you injected the weakened virus itself, as traditional vaccines do.... how is that a crime against humanity?
Its absolutely not a proven medical treatment, and youve invalidated everything you say with that ridiculous bullshit.
In fact, mRNA treatments have repeatedly failed animal testing by leading to the deaths of the test subjects - and theres no evidence at all that this wont occur in humans.
Nor does it result in a traditional immunity, as the 6 month booster shot requirement clearly proves.
Id go on, but I'm sure youre already in denial and everyone else has already concluded that you have nothing of value to add.
First, yes, it did go through multiple phases of clinical trials, enough to justify its use in what was considered, rightly or wrongly, the current crisis. Ideally as with most other vaccines, it would have gone through several more years of expanding clinical trials before full public release. You can criticize that for valid reasons, but you can't sit and pretend that those trials simply never happened, or weren't based on years of research on similar vaccines, or literally decades of research on mRNA vaccines in general, etc.
As for the animal testing you refer to... when was that? Credible sources please. Because I've looked at the clinical trials for recent vaccines for flu, covid, cancer, etc... over the past almost 10 years now, and seen glowing results.
I keep seeing this claim of animals dying, but without sources or context. So please provide them to backup your claim that is contrary to the actual recent multiple phases of clinical trials on top of lab testing etc.
Further, you do realize that some "traditional" vaccines also require booster shots, right? Tetanus being a prime example for one that simply fades over time, but others require new vaccines on a regular basis due to high mutation rates, like the flu.
You're making bold claims and I'd like you to provide some evidence to back them up if you expect to persuade any reasonable person that what you're saying is correct and we should change our position.
It's the same pretzel logic applied to all backwards ideology. Islam externalizes the responsibility of the individual...she showed her hair like a whore so she made me have sex with her. I wear the mask so you don't get sick...like no dumbass healthy people don't spread anything and the hot girl didn't make you assault her.
How are people so stupid as to not understand the difference between "you're 90% less likely to get it" and "you're 0% less likely to get it"?
Which would you rather be? 90% safer, or 0%?
You may say that you don't think the virus is very dangerous and personally don't feel at high risk, which is fine, but you have to be literally retarded to not understand that "not perfect" is not the same as "entirely ineffective."
FL, TX, SD are fully open and haven't seen any of the dreaded "waves" Dr. Fraud predicted. Explain that, Adriana.
There we go with the folks word again.
Wrong. Everyone is unvax because there is no vax. mRNA are crimes against humanity.
And why exactly is a proven medical treatment based on literal decades of research and having already gone through numerous clinical trials for treatments not just of covid, but for things like cancer etc, using rather straightforward existing cell mechanisms to simply make a single protein from the virus so your immune system can gain immunity just like it would if you injected the weakened virus itself, as traditional vaccines do.... how is that a crime against humanity?
Please explain.
Its absolutely not a proven medical treatment, and youve invalidated everything you say with that ridiculous bullshit.
In fact, mRNA treatments have repeatedly failed animal testing by leading to the deaths of the test subjects - and theres no evidence at all that this wont occur in humans.
Nor does it result in a traditional immunity, as the 6 month booster shot requirement clearly proves.
Id go on, but I'm sure youre already in denial and everyone else has already concluded that you have nothing of value to add.
So please dont explain.
First, yes, it did go through multiple phases of clinical trials, enough to justify its use in what was considered, rightly or wrongly, the current crisis. Ideally as with most other vaccines, it would have gone through several more years of expanding clinical trials before full public release. You can criticize that for valid reasons, but you can't sit and pretend that those trials simply never happened, or weren't based on years of research on similar vaccines, or literally decades of research on mRNA vaccines in general, etc.
As for the animal testing you refer to... when was that? Credible sources please. Because I've looked at the clinical trials for recent vaccines for flu, covid, cancer, etc... over the past almost 10 years now, and seen glowing results.
I keep seeing this claim of animals dying, but without sources or context. So please provide them to backup your claim that is contrary to the actual recent multiple phases of clinical trials on top of lab testing etc.
Further, you do realize that some "traditional" vaccines also require booster shots, right? Tetanus being a prime example for one that simply fades over time, but others require new vaccines on a regular basis due to high mutation rates, like the flu.
You're making bold claims and I'd like you to provide some evidence to back them up if you expect to persuade any reasonable person that what you're saying is correct and we should change our position.
Thanks.
Talking to her would be a waste of breath.
If you are vaccinated, why would you care?
It's the same pretzel logic applied to all backwards ideology. Islam externalizes the responsibility of the individual...she showed her hair like a whore so she made me have sex with her. I wear the mask so you don't get sick...like no dumbass healthy people don't spread anything and the hot girl didn't make you assault her.
its part of the narrative the MSM are paid to push on the public. Everything leads back to Agenda 2030.
The jab has the virus in it
Let me guess, no actual data
I doubt there is any data to support that claim.
How are people so stupid as to not understand the difference between "you're 90% less likely to get it" and "you're 0% less likely to get it"?
Which would you rather be? 90% safer, or 0%?
You may say that you don't think the virus is very dangerous and personally don't feel at high risk, which is fine, but you have to be literally retarded to not understand that "not perfect" is not the same as "entirely ineffective."