2896
Comments (247)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-3
randomusers239874 -3 points ago +2 / -5

Hahahahaha no they didn't, what the fuck are you smoking? Perhaps in the 1600 and 1700 hundreds that may be true, but science has been done for the sake of science for a long long time. Modern science doesn't care about questions, it cares about truth.

Spez:

And regarding Steve Jobs, that's pretty arrogant of you to assert every person that had an imagination is a philosopher. I, as a person who has a background in science, can think of many more fantastic things than any philosopher. Philosophers don't know how things work, so they make shit sci-fi that only normies could like.

0
ProudWhiteMan 0 points ago +2 / -2

You're dense aren't you? Brush up on your history because science initially was done to prove and disprove concepts philosophers in antiquity postulated as questions and often theorized the right answer without the scientific method. What do you think newton did when the apple fell on his head before he theorized gravity? Is that science or he philosophized why did this apple fall? When Eistein thought up the theory of relativity do you think he was just writing numbers on a chalkboard or he philosophized with the knowledge of his day and the past to derive his theory and then proved it. Thinking things out and rationalizing them is step one in the scientific process, that is philosophy. Just because you don't understand what philosophy is doesn't make it useless.

Now shooo and go take your covid shot..

0
randomusers239874 0 points ago +1 / -1

I do understand what it is, you don't, which is why you think it's useful. Go jerk off the with your other philosophy morons about your opinions that don't matter, the men are talking.

0
ProudWhiteMan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Boy you've made it abundantly clear you don't understand what philosophy is and you have a very narrow and biased opinion of what it is. I gave your ignorant ass several examples of the value of philosophy and yet you haven't been able to provide a single counter example. You're spending too much time with liberals if you think this is how you make a point.