I love Trump but talking shit now is worthless. While speaking of the supreme cunts not doing everything they could/should have, why didn't he sign the insurrection act? Not only that, he appointed 3 of those people to the supreme court that he's now bitching about.
Most of us have pondered this same question. And it is perhaps the most important question concerning his legacy.
With that said, how do you know that he didn't? Did you know that Michael Flynn's brother was promoted to 4-star general after Biden was inaugurated, and now commands the all army forces stationed in the Pacific? (Without a doubt the most critical geo-political theatre of the modern age.) I can't imagine Biden approves of this move, and yet he hasn't replaced Flynn. If Biden controlled the military, then logic dictates that he would replace the brother of his most vocal critic from the military. So why hasn't he?
This isn't hopium. I'm actually pretty despondent over what I'm seeing unfolding. But the fact remains that if Trump did sign the IA, and the military was given the authority to engage in "Devolution" (look it up) and implement the Law of War doctrine, then it wouldn't be broadcast on Fox News and the MSM. Not until the enemy threat was neutralized. So you and I wouldn't know it.
In any event, nobody can deny the intentional destruction of the USA we are now witnessing at Biden's command.
A guys can hope, but don't pretend that the military would just dink around on a super secret plan as the very enemy they were fighting controlled the country and its foreign relations. That's not something you let slide for half a hear, and counting. Would be incredible if true, but every passing day makes that more and more bull shit.
My thoughts, exactly. But then I thought about it more.
If the military has in fact been engaged, it is because our government has been infiltrated by a very capable and hostile foreign threat. (Most of us agree that this is the case.) It is because we are in fact at war. If that is true, then one cannot deny the reality of war. It is ugly and destructive, and unforgiving. It would be arrogant of us to believe that collateral damage is completely avoidable. No war has ever been fought without hardship and suffering.
Right now, that collateral damage is mostly economic. (Under this hypothetical, the political developments since January 20 would all become null and void at the conclusion of the conflict.) Of course economic damage results in the loss of life, due to depression, suicide, etc., but in comparison to open violence (civil war) it is a drop in the bucket.
I'll admit, it is a frustrating line of thinking. What could they possibly be waiting for? Well, perhaps they are waiting for We The People to mobilize and take action to reclaim our local/state governments. That would show support for anything the military would do at the top/federal level, and prevent open violence do the confusion/chaos that the MSM could surely create.
(Remember: if America descends into violent civil war, then we are done. China, Iran, and our other enemies would pick sides and escalate the conflict until the mainland was weak enough for invasion. So Priority 1 for any military strategy would be to prevent widespread civil unrest and violent uprisings.)
It would seem our best course of action is to take steps to retake control of local governments. That should be our priority, regardless of whether or not Trump and the military have something planned. But if they do, they are going to need the regional support of provincial governments, in order to properly implement Devolution.
I love Trump but talking shit now is worthless. While speaking of the supreme cunts not doing everything they could/should have, why didn't he sign the insurrection act? Not only that, he appointed 3 of those people to the supreme court that he's now bitching about.
Most of us have pondered this same question. And it is perhaps the most important question concerning his legacy.
With that said, how do you know that he didn't? Did you know that Michael Flynn's brother was promoted to 4-star general after Biden was inaugurated, and now commands the all army forces stationed in the Pacific? (Without a doubt the most critical geo-political theatre of the modern age.) I can't imagine Biden approves of this move, and yet he hasn't replaced Flynn. If Biden controlled the military, then logic dictates that he would replace the brother of his most vocal critic from the military. So why hasn't he?
This isn't hopium. I'm actually pretty despondent over what I'm seeing unfolding. But the fact remains that if Trump did sign the IA, and the military was given the authority to engage in "Devolution" (look it up) and implement the Law of War doctrine, then it wouldn't be broadcast on Fox News and the MSM. Not until the enemy threat was neutralized. So you and I wouldn't know it.
In any event, nobody can deny the intentional destruction of the USA we are now witnessing at Biden's command.
A guys can hope, but don't pretend that the military would just dink around on a super secret plan as the very enemy they were fighting controlled the country and its foreign relations. That's not something you let slide for half a hear, and counting. Would be incredible if true, but every passing day makes that more and more bull shit.
My thoughts, exactly. But then I thought about it more.
If the military has in fact been engaged, it is because our government has been infiltrated by a very capable and hostile foreign threat. (Most of us agree that this is the case.) It is because we are in fact at war. If that is true, then one cannot deny the reality of war. It is ugly and destructive, and unforgiving. It would be arrogant of us to believe that collateral damage is completely avoidable. No war has ever been fought without hardship and suffering.
Right now, that collateral damage is mostly economic. (Under this hypothetical, the political developments since January 20 would all become null and void at the conclusion of the conflict.) Of course economic damage results in the loss of life, due to depression, suicide, etc., but in comparison to open violence (civil war) it is a drop in the bucket.
I'll admit, it is a frustrating line of thinking. What could they possibly be waiting for? Well, perhaps they are waiting for We The People to mobilize and take action to reclaim our local/state governments. That would show support for anything the military would do at the top/federal level, and prevent open violence do the confusion/chaos that the MSM could surely create.
(Remember: if America descends into violent civil war, then we are done. China, Iran, and our other enemies would pick sides and escalate the conflict until the mainland was weak enough for invasion. So Priority 1 for any military strategy would be to prevent widespread civil unrest and violent uprisings.)
It would seem our best course of action is to take steps to retake control of local governments. That should be our priority, regardless of whether or not Trump and the military have something planned. But if they do, they are going to need the regional support of provincial governments, in order to properly implement Devolution.