I think she would be more likely to stick to her guns though after going through the past four years. Another GOPer could come along, say all the right things now, then turn out to be another Mitch McConnell who knows what to say and when; who knows how to do just enough to be reelected but never does enough to actually create the change we need.
While I agree with that, many of us here don’t like the idea of political dynasties. I understand that name/branding is important in Hollywood for ugly people, but it’s just unsettling. And it’s still ultimately policy. I trust that she will stick up to the media/DNC more, but I also wanna win and this will have to be accepted that this would be a step closer to those political dynasties that are so unsettling.
I think she would be more likely to stick to her guns though after going through the past four years. Another GOPer could come along, say all the right things now, then turn out to be another Mitch McConnell who knows what to say and when; who knows how to do just enough to be reelected but never does enough to actually create the change we need.
While I agree with that, many of us here don’t like the idea of political dynasties. I understand that name/branding is important in Hollywood for ugly people, but it’s just unsettling. And it’s still ultimately policy. I trust that she will stick up to the media/DNC more, but I also wanna win and this will have to be accepted that this would be a step closer to those political dynasties that are so unsettling.
Yea I agree, I don’t want any more Bushes or Clintons. Just gotta be aware of the pros and cons of both arguments