20
posted ago by ThisIsHowItStarts ago by ThisIsHowItStarts +20 / -0

Of ALL the vaccines- J&J is by far the best. It makes sense the deep state would want to get rid of the one that does not have the mRNA - so they can push the bad one! Now J&J is on hold, all those vaccine hungry fools will rush to get whatever they can. Not saying ANY vaccine is good per se, just that J&J is in the way of their evil plans!

Comments (8)
sorted by:
5
BvetvetPede 5 points ago +5 / -0

From what I understand - the J&J "vaccine" uses an inactivated cold virus as opposed to mRNA to introduce the spike protein code into your bodies cells. It still hijacks the cells to produce copies of the viral spike protein and there is still risk of the viral spike protein code being incorporated into your cellular DNA. You still have your own body producing COVID spike proteins to generate an immune response without any controls to turn it off.

There is one vaccine right now in Phase 3 clinical trials that seems like it would be the least risky if you find yourself in a position that you are forced to take a vaccine (like in the military as soon as FDA grants full approval or Obiden waives the EUA restriction and makes it mandatory for the DoD). It may get EUA approval as early as May. It is by Novavax - and as near as I can tell is not an mRNA gene therapy "vaccine" but actually produced much like normal vaccines are, where they take a portion of the spike protein, combine it with an adjuvant which increases the immune response, and inject it into the body. It does not hijack your cell to produce more copies of the protein thus it doesn't over sensitize your immune system to the the SARs-COV2 virus. Very few reported side effects and adverse reactions - but who knows what the real truth is since everything is censored so much now.

I don't recommend taking any of these vaccines for a disease that is 99.98% survivable, unless you have concurrent severe medical issues that place you at the top of the high risk category. There is no way to know what long term effects and consequences there are from these "vaccines" - I am appalled at the so called scientific community that has just rolled over and fallen in lock step with Fauci, big pharm, deep state, etc on this. They should have been the honest brokers on this but failed (much like the SCOTUS and teh stolen election). More recent studies are showing that natural immunity, may be much more longer lasting than they have been saying. If you have been exposed and have antibodies already to COVID - no reason you should take a jab. If you have no choice and are being forced to take the jab, try to go with the Novavax when it becomes available - as it is the only one that is not experimental gene therapy.

4
maga_gal 4 points ago +4 / -0

I really dont give af. I won't take any of them.

2
learntocode 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that one of the big pharmaceutical companies wants to make sure they "win" the fake vaccine market and spread the suppressed facts about AstraZeneca. So, in revenge, AstraZeneca spread the suppressed facts about Johnson and Johnson. These corporations have a lot of money and a lot of access to levers of power, particularly right now, across many levels of civil and commercial life in the U.S.

1
Karma_Bus_Route_20 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be ironic if the truth came out because the companies got too greedy and started spilling the beans about how nasty their competitors' products are.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a weird coincidence, to be sure. I don't doubt that they actually discarded all of the mixed up batch before it was even packaged into doses, so I don't believe there were any AstraZeneca vaccine ingredients in the J&J doses that left the manufacturing site. COVID-19 itself is known to cause "sticky" blood and clotting, but I don't think the mechanism is fully understood yet. If certain specific aspects of the natural immune reaction are at least partly to blame, this could explain why more than one (but not all) COVID vaccine is showing a few cases of this kind of side effect.

1
residue69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would they discard it when it could be sold to NGOs and used in third world countries?

BAYER KNOWINGLY SOLD AIDS INFECTED DRUGS – THOUSANDS CONTRACTED HIV

Internal documents show that after this company positively, absolutely knew that they had a medication that was infected with the AIDS virus, they took the product off the market in the U.S. and then they dumped it in France, Europe, Asia and Latin America. The medicine is called Factor VIII. It was an injection medicine that was used for hemophiliacs, mostly children, children who had been born with an incurable disease.

EXCLUSIVE: Clinton Foundation AIDS Program Distributed ‘Watered-Down’ Drugs To Third World Countries

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the FDA was involved and if they didn't didn't discard it, the facility would not have been allowed to continue manufacturing any kind of drugs or vaccines.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

The J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines share a mechanism, using an adenovirus vector, instead of the mRNA used in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Per an FDA official, an unusual immune response to this vector may explain the rare but significant number of harmful blood clotting reactions.

From https://www.foxnews.com/health/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-compare-moderna-pfizer :

Vaccines developed by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech operate on a newer platform with mRNA, or messenger RNA, technology, while Johnson & Johnson’s candidate involves a more traditional modified adenovirus vector vaccine with a durable protein exterior encasing the DNA, lending itself to a longer shelf-life. . . . J&J uses a human adenovirus to create its vaccine while AstraZeneca uses a chimpanzee version. The AstraZeneca vaccine is not yet authorized for use in the U.S.

. . . Dr. Peter Marks, director at FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, told reporters on Tuesday a probable cause behind the clotting that occurred among vaccine recipients might include a similar mechanism seen with AstraZeneca's product, another adenoviral vector vaccine being rolled out in Europe, in which a rare immune response occurred post-vaccination, leading to activation of platelets and "extremely rare" blood clots.