FYI, SARS-CoV-2 was COVID-19's name before the CCP told everyone to rename it. A closely related virus, SARS-CoV-1, a successful vaccine was never truly developed for and SARS-1 definitely exhibited antibody dependent enhancement (ADE mentioned in the Nature paper). Both viruses are coronaviruses.
In fact one of the reasons why Taiwan did so well in WuFlu management is because the Taiwanese thought they were dealing with something like SARS-1 and had vowed to never repeat what happened during SARS-1 in 2003.
Fraudci and "scientists" are not telling you the full risk. For an example of how badly poorly tested vaccinations can go look up Philippines and dengue virus vaccinations. Oh, if you're not familiar with that one, dengue virus is the prototypical virus that exhibit ADE.
You want to scare the living daylight out of her? Send her this paper. She follows science right?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5
FYI, SARS-CoV-2 was COVID-19's name before the CCP told everyone to rename it. A closely related virus, SARS-CoV-1, a successful vaccine was never truly developed for and SARS-1 definitely exhibited antibody dependent enhancement (ADE mentioned in the Nature paper). Both viruses are coronaviruses.
In fact one of the reasons why Taiwan did so well in WuFlu management is because the Taiwanese thought they were dealing with something like SARS-1 and had vowed to never repeat what happened during SARS-1 in 2003.
Fraudci and "scientists" are not telling you the full risk. For an example of how badly poorly tested vaccinations can go look up Philippines and dengue virus vaccinations. Oh, if you're not familiar with that one, dengue virus is the prototypical virus that exhibit ADE.