Not much of a free speech platform then, though I get the pornography block. Most platforms do block (hardcore) pornography, or at least, age restrict it.
Definitely not a fan of blocking cussing or blasphemy though . . . reeks of Sharia law.
Well shucks, who needs profane language anyways? I'll tell ya who, a nickel backed worthless son of a buck, thats who. We are more evolved here. Joggers and riggers beware...
Everyone might want to think about the following: the Founders are the ones who came up with free speech and they also said that the Constitution would only work for religious and moral people. When blasphemy immorality are embraced, you won't be able to keep the Constitution. The Founder's knew the direct correlation.
Yes. The self control has to come from God. 'those who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants' . There is a direct correlation between liberty and Godliness and between tyranny and ungodliness. The Founder's knew it and that's why they said that the Constitution is wholly inadequate for any people other than religious and moral.
And you can't blaspheme a false so-called Abrahamic "God" either. But now you have to pick a diety, don't you. If Mike Lindell claims that blasphemy only includes defaming the Christian Trinity and/or the Jewish Yahweh, but doesn't include the Islamic Allah, or any other religion's god(s), then maybe you have a point. Otherwise, it's moronically vague.
The Founders who coined the 'free speech' that you want, said it would be yours in tandem with morals and religion , which were the morals and religion of Jesus Christ. Christ/Christianity is referenced in all the founding documents and discussion that birthed those papers. Not deism. Not other Gods. Christianity. The Founders said that you will lose the Constitition if you lose the morals of the Christian religion. And this is exactly what is happening.
He's a heavily religious person, so this is not a surprise.
The site can block curse words without limiting speech. A lot of sites already do so by replacing bad words with astrix. Not hard to figure out what word the author was trying to use.
Blocking porn? Good. Not every site on the internet needs to have porn plastered across it. Its easy to find if that's what you are looking for. Hell, I get annoyed when porn is posted here. Time and place...
pornography you have to block because then it becomes unusable for most. blasphemy is ok (assuming it is not hard to accidentally do) but swearing is a no-go for most. but perhaps it will work? it would definitely be a positive thing if people didnt mind adhering to it. more i think about it, the better i like this idea actually. i think swearing is a big part of why social media sites generally feel crappy to be on.
People have been jerking this guy off for too long. He's not our savior. Not everything he touches turns to gold. Go look at my pillow.com, the site sucks. Why would anyone expect different?
Fuck, I'm out.
Not much of a free speech platform then, though I get the pornography block. Most platforms do block (hardcore) pornography, or at least, age restrict it.
Definitely not a fan of blocking cussing or blasphemy though . . . reeks of Sharia law.
Agreed. I’ll stick with Gab.
Block swearing?! WTF?
Is offended, but does not swear. :)
Swearing acronyms probably ok.
This is for old folks. Good on Mike as he can get them off Facebook where most of them probably don't want to see it.
I can understand wanting no porn, but other than that there shouldn't be restrictions, except obviously for illegal content.
Then it’s not a free speech platform dumbfuck Q tard
...that will keep the commies out. (and most everyone else too)
I appreciate what mike is trying to do, but this isn’t going to go anywhere
Well shit, that fucking sucks.
Well said 🤣
That's a difficult proposition given that commies make me swear incessantly. I tone it a bit online but ain't being told no.
Well shucks, who needs profane language anyways? I'll tell ya who, a nickel backed worthless son of a buck, thats who. We are more evolved here. Joggers and riggers beware...
That's gonna be a hard pass.
Everyone might want to think about the following: the Founders are the ones who came up with free speech and they also said that the Constitution would only work for religious and moral people. When blasphemy immorality are embraced, you won't be able to keep the Constitution. The Founder's knew the direct correlation.
And enforcing things on others destroys our freedoms just as quickly. Self control is the only control worth having.
Yes. The self control has to come from God. 'those who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants' . There is a direct correlation between liberty and Godliness and between tyranny and ungodliness. The Founder's knew it and that's why they said that the Constitution is wholly inadequate for any people other than religious and moral.
That includes "blasphemy" against Islam, right?
Blasphemy is the act of defaming God. Islam is Satanic. You can't blaspheme Satan.
And you can't blaspheme a false so-called Abrahamic "God" either. But now you have to pick a diety, don't you. If Mike Lindell claims that blasphemy only includes defaming the Christian Trinity and/or the Jewish Yahweh, but doesn't include the Islamic Allah, or any other religion's god(s), then maybe you have a point. Otherwise, it's moronically vague.
The Founders who coined the 'free speech' that you want, said it would be yours in tandem with morals and religion , which were the morals and religion of Jesus Christ. Christ/Christianity is referenced in all the founding documents and discussion that birthed those papers. Not deism. Not other Gods. Christianity. The Founders said that you will lose the Constitition if you lose the morals of the Christian religion. And this is exactly what is happening.
It's his site, so I guess he can do whatever the fuck he wants. Go pillow dude
I'm 100% in agreement w the porn blocking but I can't support the 1A restriction. Not that I was joining anyway, P.W is my only social media.
He's a heavily religious person, so this is not a surprise.
The site can block curse words without limiting speech. A lot of sites already do so by replacing bad words with astrix. Not hard to figure out what word the author was trying to use.
Blocking porn? Good. Not every site on the internet needs to have porn plastered across it. Its easy to find if that's what you are looking for. Hell, I get annoyed when porn is posted here. Time and place...
Shucky darn.
Doesnt have the same punch as you know what
pornography you have to block because then it becomes unusable for most. blasphemy is ok (assuming it is not hard to accidentally do) but swearing is a no-go for most. but perhaps it will work? it would definitely be a positive thing if people didnt mind adhering to it. more i think about it, the better i like this idea actually. i think swearing is a big part of why social media sites generally feel crappy to be on.
So we can't talk about Islam without accepting it's true, because otherwise "blasphemy", right?
christian blasphemy is the only real blasphemy. well see how they define it. aloha snackbars can go blow themselves up.
I hope that's intended to be sarcastic....
tongue-in-cheek, but not a bad outcome
Okay, sparky, how is that free speech?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTNv2dOBFJk
FREE SPEECH BTW
"Somebody cursed. I'm triggered. REEEEEE!!!!"
Prepare to fail if I cant say fuck when I want
Fuck jesus wide rectum, I'm out! lol!
People have been jerking this guy off for too long. He's not our savior. Not everything he touches turns to gold. Go look at my pillow.com, the site sucks. Why would anyone expect different?