3000
True Colors (pic8.co)
posted ago by gabman ago by gabman +3001 / -1
Comments (99)
sorted by:
108
STONKATRUCK 108 points ago +114 / -6

I'm okay with bringing back segregation. As long as they don't get to benefit from white contributions in current civilization. Also no muh reparations. Watch how fast that shit ends.

54
South_Florida_Guy 54 points ago +58 / -4

It might be the only way to go at this point. Abraham Lincoln was right about segregation!

60
STONKATRUCK 60 points ago +61 / -1

For his next trick he was going to send them all back.

Why would anyone choose to live in a country thats 'systematically racist?' Colonialism is bad right? So go off to a country that didn't practice it.

23
South_Florida_Guy 23 points ago +24 / -1

Angry, deranged leftists (and actors) ruin everything!

44
STONKATRUCK 44 points ago +45 / -1

ACAB! BUT GIMMIE THAT JAB!

DEFUND THE POLICE! BUT TRAIN THEM BETTER! ALSO THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT SHOULD HAVE GUNS!

DOWN WITH GUBMENT! ITS SYSTEMICALLY RACIST! BUT AGREES WITH GUBMENT BANNING GUNS!

Their hypocrisy is endless and senseless.

14
RegularAmerican 14 points ago +14 / -0

I had an argument with someone who said he wants a big of a government as possible. I asked him are you sure? You did spend 3 years of your life in prison for a non violent drug offense. He was like oh yeah huh

8
BlackPillBot 8 points ago +8 / -0

That’s very typical of the low IQ Bolshevik pets. They never think of the long term, or even the shorter term consequences of their pie in the sky policies to “save” humanity that their Bolshevik masters have sold to them, that we all know is just a way to manipulate them to gain more power and control.

9
OGpsywar 9 points ago +10 / -1

DEFUND THE POLICE! BUT TRAIN THEM BETTER! ALSO THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT SHOULD HAVE GUNS!

They want to Fire every cop and then only hire them back after an SJ means-testing process that they'll run.

Naturally Excluding from re-hire all the ones having any Wrong-Think .. (or Wrong-Skin).

"Only cops having guns" is 100% consistent for them, .. since the result would be Them as the Cops.

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

That will not work out the way they expect:

We find no evidence of anti-Black or anti-Hispanic disparities across shootings, and White officers are not more likely to shoot minority civilians than non-White officers. Instead, race-specific crime strongly predicts civilian race. This suggests that increasing diversity among officers by itself is unlikely to reduce racial disparity in police shootings.

Hiring quotas to over-represent POC/non-white police did not reduce the number of POCs shot by police: it merely changed the race of the officer doing the shooting, as the crime rate only went up. "Defunding the police" is a ridiculous idea that will only benefit the Protected Criminal class, while increasing crime and making the world a less-safe place in general.

Moar fun with that (including a link to the study I quoted) here.

1
operatorstorm712 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, they know what they're about -- those POC police are not the PC POC....the ones that they want.

Ones you're talking about are multiracial white supremacists and need to be on the other end of the gun (along with their families) -- according to the left and their useful idiots.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everything they touch dies!

1
BlackPillBot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lincoln is celebrated by so many, even here, but fucked this country over in so many ways it’s almost hard to believe.

“Nor did Lincoln support equal rights, as he made clear in a speech on September 18, 1858: "I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races .... I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

For much of his career, Lincoln believed that colonization—or the idea that a majority of the African American population should leave the United States and settle in Africa or Central America—was the best way to confront the problem of slavery. His two great political heroes, Henry Clay and Thomas Jefferson, had both favored colonization; both were enslavers who took issue with aspects of slavery but saw no way that Black and white people could live together peaceably. Lincoln first publicly advocated for colonization in 1852, and in 1854 said that his first instinct would be “to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia” (the African state founded by the American Colonization Society in 1821).

Nearly a decade later, even as he edited the draft of the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation in August of 1862, Lincoln hosted a delegation of freed Black men and women at the White House in the hopes of getting their support on a plan for colonization in Central America. Given the “differences” between the two races and the hostile attitudes of white people towards Black people, Lincoln argued, it would be “better for us both, therefore, to be separated.”

Lincoln’s support of colonization provoked great anger among Black leaders and abolitionists, who argued that African Americans were as much natives of the country as white people, and thus deserved the same rights. (SOUND FAMILIAR? SOME THINGS NEVER CHANGE) After he issued the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln never again publicly mentioned colonization, and a mention of it in an earlier draft was deleted by the time the final proclamation was issued in January 1863.”

The above is just another example of how he fucked this country even though he understood the reality, and consequences of his decision IMHO. It’s a harsh blackpill for many to swallow, but history has proven him beyond correct all the way up until this very moment, and this country will never be allowed to recover from it, and so goes western civilization.😞

Edit: Before anyone starts bringing up exceptions to the rule, realize I don’t care, because I live my life by the rules, not the exceptions to them.

8
Im_too_BASED 8 points ago +8 / -0

Abraham Lincoln was right about segregation.

🌎🧑🏻‍🚀🔫🧑🏻‍🚀

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Malcolm X was right about segregation".

18
ThoughtExperiment 18 points ago +18 / -0

It should be pretty obvious to everyone that the extremists like BLM want 1950s style segregation that benefits them. They want the good fountain and the whites to drink from the crappy one. They want to enter businesses through the front door while whites enter through the whites only side entrance. They want to sit at the front of the bus while whites are forced to the back. They want their kids to go to the good schools while white kids suffer in underfunded schools, and so on and so forth.

The left has so thoroughly lost its mind that when they call me a racist, or a fascist, I just lean into it and highlight the similarities between "my" fascist/racist beliefs and theirs. It drives them absolutely nuts, because the comparisons are so obvious and I'm not playing into their strategy of putting me on a defensive footing where I'm trying to explain why I'm not a fascist/racist.

So when leftists talk about eliminating free speech, I tell them that, as a fascist, I also am against free speech, and invite them to attend my next book burning.

2
based_trekkie 2 points ago +3 / -1

They want to be the Whites of the 1950's.....

Not equals...

5
Testamernt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here's my problem with that though. They can't have nice things because they always destroy the nice things as quickly as possible. And then the more sensible ones among them are still too stupid to figure out why it keeps happening, are in denial that it keeps happening for the reasons it does, or are cognitively dissonant to the point that they can't bring themselves to admit and flat out ignore the fact that they know why an American black run society wouldn't work. The American Black culture is especially destructive and self-defeating.

I think the people that are all in with the Butt Licking Moron movement are actually romanticizing the idea in their low IQ, hypocritical minds that they'd somehow be waited on hand and foot by their white slaves as they sit in their plantation houses living like they're in one of Biggie's rap videos.

The hood has stripped the dignity from the average low/low-middle income black person and has forced them into an endless victim mentality. I applaud those that are able to escape that mentality of victimhood and entitlement.

They're the ones that understand the problems with the culture they've escaped and it's sad that they are ostracized for it which makes it almost impossible for them to affect any real change in the perception of their culture to everyone else.

When 6% = 52% they're gonna have a hard time fighting that stereotype when it's absolutely true. The real kicker is that if they did get (by some miracle or sci-fi merging of alternate timelines or something) a black dominant society in America is how hard they'd be blaming whitey the moment it fails that it wouldn't even be funny. And why do they always blame whitey for their problems? Because a victim can't be at fault and that's all they will ever be is perpetual victims.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
1
BlackPillBot 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want the good fountain and the whites to drink from the crappy one. They want to enter businesses through the front door while whites enter through the whites only side entrance. They want to sit at the front of the bus while whites are forced to the back. They want their kids to go to the good schools while white kids suffer in underfunded schools, and so on and so forth.

The funny part is that they could honestly have all that, if it was up to only whites, and most of them are so domesticated, and neutered, that they wouldn’t even balk at it. Unfortunately for them, it isn’t only up to whites. It’s mostly up to them, and the sad reality that can no longer be denied by anyone with an IQ above 70, is that they are their own worst enemies, and can never have any of that because of so many of them constantly, and consistently self sabotaging with their own bad life choices, and behaviors. Far too many of them destroy everything they touch, while blaming everyone esle(mostly huh whyte peepo), but themselves.

Here’s a blatant example of what I’m talking about.

https://youtu.be/s1PL3xQu16w

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

the sad reality that can no longer be denied by anyone with an IQ above 70

Which is why most of them are able to go on denying it.

2
basedvirginian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just watched that entire video and I have never felt more helpless in my life. Idk what to do to fix it. It seems so entrenched...

3
BlackPillBot 3 points ago +3 / -0

You would think it would be over the top if you didn’t know any better, but I grew up in a commie chocolate city shithole, and I can confirm very similar experiences growing up. Even had family who was a teacher in the public school system here, and she had similar stories. She retired right before it got exponentially bad. It was always pretty bad, but it went full retard in the mid to late 90s IMHO.

Have you ever heard of Howard Sterns experiences?

https://youtu.be/f_m4jDAyg4w

https://youtu.be/X1Na3vzbpeI

PURE INSANITY!!!

Mind you, he’s a far left liberal admitting all of this. That tells you how bad it actually was. You’re also talking about multiple generations ago, and it’s only gotten worse.

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

You seem to be describing what is happening right now in South Africa and Zimbabwe.

This is the future of whites in America.

Think about it - they blame all whites in America for slavery - South African whites never enslaved anybody - all they did was legally enforce segregation, yet the whole world demonized them.

12
XlDEN 12 points ago +20 / -8

Yes. Segregation laws were enacted as a means to preserve civilization.

27
STONKATRUCK 27 points ago +28 / -1

Wouldn't have even been necessary if Abe Lincoln wasn't assassinated.

Black countries for black people, Asian countries for Asian people, Indian countries for Indian people yatta yatta, white countries for everyone!

Blah blah blah, white people are evil blah blah blah so fucking leave to where you are accepted.

Also why do they choose to live by white people if they are so fucking bad? Are feminists leaving in droves to go off to countries that don't even let them drive cars? No they stay here and advocate for men pretending to be women dominating their sports while complaining about men keeping them down.

7
XlDEN 7 points ago +9 / -2

Ideally, yes, depending on his ability to actually accomplish that.

You can bet there would have been (opposition).

3
STONKATRUCK 3 points ago +4 / -1

Considering the 'opposition' killed him before accomplishing his goal I would say you are correct captain hindsight.

5
BlackPillBot 5 points ago +5 / -0

He cucked long before they could kill him from everything I’ve read, but who knows anymore. It’s hard to believe any history now after watching how they have completely manipulated, and lied anout what is happening live right before our very “lying” eyes. If shit doesn’t change drastically real soon, Trump will be portrayed in history books within the next decade as a Nazi dictator, and supporters as evil incarnate.

3
XlDEN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Except that particular opposition didn’t kill him for that reason.

1
BlackPillBot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except it has had the exact, and easily predicted opposite effect, and people like Lincoln knew this, but cucked to the bleeding heart SJWs of his time, and failed us, and the country anyway.

The only thing worse than forced segregation is forced integration. The overwhelming majority of blacks were so much better off in many ways under JimCrow, and it’s fairly obvious why now. Check out Jesse Lee Peterson’s YouTube. He openly talks about this all the time, and he’s spot on.

The bottom line is that many blacks “thrived” because they weren’t integrated, and only had to compete, and worry about each other, and felt they had more purpose/skin in the game. They were also more willing to shame bad behavior within their own communities, and ranks before integration, and it wasn’t life destroying if a person who looked different openly did the same like it most definitely is today. They can no longer do that without admitting what everyone else knows already, based off of easily observable, and provable patterns over the last 50 years, that have only gotten stronger, and harder to ignore/deny. They, as a whole, are much to prideful, and tribalistic to ever even think of doing this on any large scale, and because of this nothing will ever change for the better. It will only continue to get worse while their communities continue to falter at their own hands, and behaviors, while dragging the rest of the country, and western civilization down with it. Unfortunately they will also continue to blame the huh whyte man, and da sis tum, instead of looking within and calling a spade a spade, all while their Bolshevik masters laugh. 😞

Edit: Please don’t bring up any extreme exceptions to the rule that prove the rule. I’ll just laugh at you.

4
XlDEN 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. Under segregation blacks performed much better for the reasons you cite. There is nothing bad about “forced segregation.” The inherent incompatible behavioral differences between SubSaharans and their Modern Human counterparts are uncomfortable on small scales and incompatible on larger scales.

This newish faith based “everyone is the same” religion will absolutely lead to the destruction of civilization.

7
WhiteLash 7 points ago +7 / -0

Segregation currently exists for people who can't or won't wear a mask.

3
RegularAmerican 3 points ago +3 / -0

Soon for everyone who refuses weekly jabs

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
24
Bt443407 24 points ago +26 / -2

Ooof. This is too real.

Eh, fuck’em.

20
bubadmt 20 points ago +21 / -1

This is clearly doctored. It would say KANGZ ONLY in all gold letters.

4
Genericwhitemale 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kek

18
deleted 18 points ago +20 / -2
17
TrumpWonByALandslide 17 points ago +18 / -1

Why isn't it on fire?

14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
10
letsgogogo2 10 points ago +11 / -1

EBT no longer exists after we segregate because we fund it for them. Exact reason THEY will never let this happen. Fucking leeches

2
RationalThought 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes you can. They pay out cash onto the card as well as stamps. A family of four can expect (FOR EACH, ONLY IF UNMARRIED) about 450. That is if each child lives at home, is over 18 (applies themselves through social services (NOT SS mind you), and on section 8. This is monthly and not on top of the actual food stamps themselves, which in themselves PER person can be up to 500. This is not including living off of section 8 though it does happen. You usually do not get as much as if you are full on the dime. Now that is all just EBT, this is not including your SS check, applicable to ALL residents minus your children on EBT. If you get lucky in that life and your kids have a different last name (remember, all kids are above 18 already, and on the dole), you can ALL take SS. Tune of about 1200 for people that have worked a single day (PAID tax), to 800 for people that have not (the two kids). Section 8 not only pays 80 percent but your utilities are paid 80 percent as well. A typical bill for a four "family" home is about 600 with everything included. If it is a 2 bedroom it is about 280. Depends on region of course. I did not spell everything out here for a reason. If you knew how easy you could live life unmarried to a woman you are with, while taking care of your kids, no one would work. I do not mean people here. Work forces people to move, it shapes the person. It is a good thing. Not having it leads to a degenerate lifestyle, IF YOU do not already have the mentality of worth. I deal with this everyday.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or maybe ceramic and stainless steel are not inflammable? And a sink is usually wet?

5
STONKATRUCK 5 points ago +5 / -0

They are too focused on the business that put the retarded "we support blm" sign to notice the water fountain?

5
TDAF 5 points ago +6 / -1

It is. The building in the background. It's art. C'mon man.

3
TrumpWonByALandslide 3 points ago +3 / -0

I meant the sink should be broken and on fire.

2
TDAF 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got it. Just playin' with you, fren.

1
bubadmt 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is, look in the top left.

14
Trilby 14 points ago +15 / -1

I get it. Once blacks only was bad and sad. Now blacks only is special! Whitey, take a hike.

9
Kekintosh2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

Those colored people, oops I mean people of color(all better) sure are special

4
STONKATRUCK 4 points ago +5 / -1

People of color? Idk If you ask me white people are true 'people of color they have any variation of skin/eye/hair color. Seems to me the true people of 'color' are of white decent. How many colors can you make out of brown?

4
Carry_Your_Name 4 points ago +5 / -1

See, not only do the commies lie, but oftentimes the polar opposite of their lie is the truth.

11
learntocode 11 points ago +11 / -0

The people asking for this stupid shit aren't your everyday American Black. It is the salary class and the investor class who are using welfare slaves to crush the working class.

10
MAGA_MEXICAN_CHILI 10 points ago +10 / -0

The whole objective is to separate everyone, have everyone fighting each other while them run in the background looting and taking whatever they please. Then when the sides stop fighting, figuring out that the core conflict or forgot what they are fighting for is frivolous both sides already have the chains attached without them realizing they became the new property while they stole everything from under their noses.

All this conflict serves as a distraction, it serves a purpose to usher in a two tier Utopia. Their Perfect Utopia, is the movie Elysium. The 'true believers' of the party and their families will live in the state of the art...no need or want filled world. While the rest of us slave away to fuel their pleasure. They will call it the 'Utopia' we deserve due to not believing hard enough, or the useful idiots whom believed but did not fit the requirements to live in Eden. That's their end goal, They will use Blacks, They will use Hispanics, They will try to use Asians...then eventually they will start fracturing Whites along ethic lines (Scotts, French, Italians). Its all to drive us all down to the dirt, where they think we belong.

1
operatorstorm712 1 point ago +1 / -0

This right here. Take the upvote.

  • and all the while they push learned helplessness, endless depression, and degeneracy on our kids -- look at the entertainment "stars" who are popular and what their message is; it's operant conditioning; we're literally the cattle to those bastards who rule/want to rule us all
10
KoofasaForTrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

I’ll never understand how a bunch of white racists talked a bunch of black people into segregation again. That’s the true Jim Crow legacy.

9
paulej 9 points ago +10 / -1

Democrats on the left, Democrats on the right.

4
StillplayenSometimes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here i am stuck in the middle with you

1
paulej 1 point ago +1 / -0

What I meant was that it was Democrats who pushed for segregations many years ago, and it's Democrats again pushing for segregation today. Democrats seem to be the party of racism, while arguing that Republicans are.

Politically, though, I really am somewhere in the middle. I liked Trump's America-first policies and focus on blue collar Americans. And, admittedly, that is why I had historically voted for Democrats in the past. I support blue collar workers, because I support people who will get up and put in an honest days' work and who strive to make a better life for themselves and their family.

Sadly, Democrats seem to be embracing socialism and encouraging slothful lifestyles. They support people who whine about equality rather than working hard to make something of themselves. Society cannot function this way. Nothing in life is fair, but to cut people off at the knee caps by allowing illegal immigrants to take jobs and also exporting good jobs to other countries, is wrong. It hurts Americans. I get the impression that most of our elected officials actually do not give a shit about the people of this country. But they'll come out and say things like "we need to cancel $50K in student debt" in an effort to "buy" votes. They're happy to give away other people's money all day long that way, but it is not an effective or proper way to govern.

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats were against the civil right movement. The legislation only got passed when LBJ's great society also got passed.

9
jrgreen73 9 points ago +10 / -1

Millions of people of color all over the world want to come here and live in a country that is supposedly over-run with White Supremacists.

Go figure

5
VonTyger 5 points ago +5 / -0

Vaccinated only!

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
2
RegularAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

I stopped using them when I saw a heroin syringe sitting in one. See I was scared before covid!

4
AmericanBerserker225 4 points ago +5 / -1

Malcom and Martin would be so proud

4
ModelMinority 4 points ago +4 / -0

Many Blacks and Hispanics don't want to assimilate into a decent mannered society. They want their own cultures. So I say let them stay away and for good. Don't come onto the other side unless you get a good education (and not through affirmative action) and learn manners.

3
independentbystander 3 points ago +4 / -1

THIS

All my life, I have been hearings SJWs/joggers screeching and acting out violently with demands for equal access to all public areas of their choosing. I saw "de-segregation" implemented, and endured the horde of low-IQ joggers turning my school into a day-care with "prison rules." I was also ordered at the time to refer to them as "colored people," and that worked just fine for decades.

Now the Tolerant Left/Baizuo and BLM are demanding their own facilities, college dorms, and possibly their worst demand: race-based immunity from arrest/prosecution (despite causing the majority of crime in general, and committing the majority of murders of other black people.) It is preposterous that the worst-behaved least-motivated people in our society can run amok rioting/looting/setting fires and attacking innocents and Police... yet still be taken seriously when they screech "defund the police."

They are not satisfied with BET, the Miss Black America pageant, full control of the Academy Awards voting and rules, their own categories and Participation Trophies from the Grammy awards, or any of the other infinite pandering they have been provided thus far. They have their own TV networks, own their own record and movie-production companies, and they have Hollywood/MSM and Big Sports utterly groveling to glorify them. They also have the NAACP, yet would insta-riot nationwide if we suggested that we have the right to a NAAWP. Moar fun with that, we are now being ordered to refer to them as "People Of Color," because it's "RACIST!!! reee" to say "colored people" (as we had been previously ordered to do.) And... only the smartest among them even know what the CP in NAACP means, or they would be screeching to "cancel" them or change their name- with no clue what that organization's purpose is.

The whole thing is an exercise in control-freak obsession on their part. It's much like the old tale of being ordered to dig holes and fill them up again. The point is the thrill of ordering people around as to what they are allowed to think/say/do in public, not what the object of the "demand of the moment" is. (Meanwhile of course, they claim free rein to re-define/make up words on the fly, invent new genders, and flounce about any way they please while inventing new ways to make unreasonable demands.)

tl;dr Screw these assholes. No quarter. No more.

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

you misspelled "no whites"

2
Gmelindag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh?

1
GeoG85 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you see that leaf design?

Almost texture like realism, how can you say no???

1
Space_Force 1 point ago +1 / -0

Truly Progressive.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
theAvatar 1 point ago +1 / -0

All of the water fountains I’ve seen have permanent signs saying they are temporarily closed for over a year now.

1
niconicoreeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

wow so retro, its ok to be racist, I'm a democrat 😂

1
Sour_Limey 1 point ago +2 / -1

'Progressive' - Whatever they shout about, they're the opposite.

1
z89101 1 point ago +1 / -0

whites best use 3rd world drink filters.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +3 / -2

I'm not an idiot, but I also do not really understand this.

Frame one, on the left. They are marching with signs.

Frame two, on the right, everything is the same except the marchers with signs also have arson. And the blacks only sign has more embellishments.

Maybe I am dumb. Can someone explain this to me? Frame one is a peaceful protest. Frame two is a mostly peaceful protest?

I guess I understand but can someone ELIAOC?

8
Carry_Your_Name 8 points ago +9 / -1

Frame 1: Civil Right movement to end segregation; Frame 2: Undoing of the Civil Right movement to bring back segregation.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Concise, thanks.

5
STONKATRUCK 5 points ago +6 / -1

Because no matter if they get their way completely they will still hate whites and burn everything down? They don't want equality, they HATE whites and want them eliminated.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +4 / -3

That I understand, but this particular comic is not conveying what you are suggesting.

Not to say it is not absolutely true. But this comic isn't nailing that particular point home. In fact it isn't really nailing any point home. Kind of ambiguous and confusing. And that is coming from someone highly open to abstract interpretations.

5
Rune_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

The other point being made is that they fought to desegregate and now are fighting to be segregated. That’s why the second one is like “YAY BLACKS ONLY” kind of style on the sign. That’s the reality of now.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was helpful, thanks for the explanation.

2
STONKATRUCK 2 points ago +4 / -2

You are reading into it too much dude lol just stahp.*

*That's what I was going to write and leave it at that. However, if you are going to be this persistent let me break it down with my understanding, sweetypie summerchild schnookems.

The panel on the left shows blacks peacefully protesting a situation they wholeheartedly deem unfair. The panel on the right reflects the fact that all these woke companies are already catering to these people. Companies like Nike, coke, dicks yatta yatta calling for 'diversity ' teaching white people that work for them that they are complete garbage.

To me the right panel signifies that while they are getting all the support they want they are even more violent as if running the last leg of the race. What that tells me is that it is not about equality at all. It's about contempt for the race of people they have been taught to hate from birth. Furthermore, they are blind to the support they actually do have and want a complete 'poc' utopia where you become the slave and don't even notice the privileges over other they are granted. By the water fountain gleaming with black privilege they actually do have they ignore the fact that they actually have it.

Does that sum it up for your summer child sweetypie schnookums?

They want you eliminated, assuming you are white, or at least look white enough for them to hate you. They don't give a fuck about the logistics, as long as you look like you should be hated they will hate you.

3
Jaqen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Appreciate the effort and perspective. Not so much the snark but I’ll survive.

3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +3 / -0

1960s vs 2020s, among other points

1
Spicy_Spine 1 point ago +2 / -1

It means segregation is back in style, except now it’s hip and special.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +3 / -1

I love this site, but I really hate these antisemitic trolls from Stormfront.

0
Jaqen 0 points ago +2 / -2

OK, I can mostly follow you, but this comic does not convey what you've laid out.

I am open to learning something here, but this particular comic seems to miss the mark.

1
ProState 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought the spout was smiling.

1
Dimedog 1 point ago +1 / -0

I say bring it back. That'll give whites reason to fight for the best real estate

-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6