I’ve seen it several times now that the “vaccines”only lower symptoms, not prevent infection. But I read through the FDA emergency use applications for Pfizer and moderna and they both claim that the primary measure was to prevent infection, which supposedly they did. The raw data isn’t available yet, so of course they could be exaggerating or lying about the 90-95% efficacy, but where is the claim coming from that they don’t prevent infections? Any sources I could reference when discussing this?
Comments (15)
sorted by:
No point in explaining this to people. If they want their corporate death medicine let them deal with the blood clots. Nobody has ever been pressured to take a supposedly safe vaccine before
I was told by a doctor that we don't even need a vaccine for something for which there is a cure. There "allegedly" is a cure for CV already, yet they won't let us have those meds. How do they explain THAT???? (That's rhetorical, I already know how they explain that.) They lie and say those medications to treat it do not work and are suddenly "dangerous", etc., etc., etc. after being prescribed and considered very safe and on the market for 40 & 70 years. But for our own good they say, we can't have them now?