1068
Pride (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by xxx-zodiac ago by xxx-zodiac +1068 / -0
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Toobin247 1 point ago +1 / -0

Appreciate that you admit that. I don’t t deny the race shit that’s going on, it just doesn’t mean I agree with the conclusions certain people come to. I’ll actually find myself nodding in agreement with what Fuentes says. Then he’ll say something so off the mark I stop listening to him. It ruins his credibility. That’s why I call him divisive.

As far as dick riders I meant Fuentes dick riders. I was being incendiary.

My mantra is kill your idols (figuratively, in your mind). I scrutinize the people I look up to and listen too and agree with. It’s healthy to maintain a certain level of scepticism. No one is perfect. Men are men, not gods.

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm hardly a Fuentes fanboy, his demo really skews a lot younger than me (I think fortnite is gay), but the guy gets so much hate from weak, fake, "conservatives" for saying perfectly reasonable actual right wing things I have to defend him.

1
Toobin247 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m in the camp where I agree with it...to a point. When it turns to authoritarian rants and racial discrimination for the wrong reasons it pisses me off.

I agree 3rd wave feminism is bad... but I don’t agree that women aren’t equal in terms of rights.

I agree that whites are being targeted, but that doesn’t mean non whites aren’t equal in terms of having rights.

People like Fuentes understand the problem up to the point of who the real boogeyman is. Its the marxists and commies and actual fascists (not the conservative whites that are labeled as such) and they come in all colors.

Demographics only matter insofar as how they are being used and indoctrinated by marxists.

On the individual level race and gender don’t make someone an enemy.

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree 3rd wave feminism is bad... but I don’t agree that women aren’t equal in terms of rights.

Yeah I think women voting/having political power is probably one of the single most destructive things that can happen to a society historically. Maybe it just always comes with decadence and a shaky foundation, an indicator more than a cause. I dunno.

I agree that whites are being targeted, but that doesn’t mean non whites aren’t equal in terms of having rights.

Very rarely do I hear anyone talking about bringing back Jim Crow, even from the far far right. Far far right opinion is almost universally "send them back", not "aparthied".

Demographics only matter insofar as how they are being used and indoctrinated by marxists.

Complete nonsense. Chinese, sophisticated as they can be, are never going to build the European derived type of society I want to live in, it will at best be a Chinese copy of European culture. Even more stark difference with Africans, where the nice European-made infrastructure started to crumble as soon as the Europeans left. Humans are not generic swappable worker units, that's a globohomo viewpoint not reality.

On the individual level race and gender don’t make someone an enemy.

They don't make someone a friend either.

1
Toobin247 1 point ago +1 / -0

Complete nonsense. Chinese, sophisticated as they can be, are never going to build the European derived type of society I want to live in, it will at best be a Chinese copy of European culture. Even more stark difference with Africans, where the nice European-made infrastructure started to crumble as soon as the Europeans left. Humans are not generic swappable worker units, that's a globohomo viewpoint not reality.

Not at all. This argument is pure conjecture and dishonest. Many western defenders and contributors come from other races and backgrounds. And this is where I break with people like Fuentes. Who cares about the skin color that upholds western ideals? If that’s all a political ideology boils down to then it’s weak as fuck.

White marxists are destroying this world just like marxists of any other color. Shit look at a BLM rally. Heavily white because white are indoctrinated as well and they are trying to stifle your freedom. On the other hand you have black conservatives for example who fight for the same individual freedoms we should all be enjoying. Denying this fact is short sighted. And why I’ll dig on groypers endlessly.

Very rarely do I hear anyone talking about bringing back Jim Crow, even from the far far right. Far far right opinion is almost universally "send them back", not "aparthied".

Send them back where exactly? You going to forcefully remove people based on skin color even if they were born here? Even the ones that want the same security in our country that you do? What about the whites that oppose the west? Do the get sent back too?

Yeah I think women voting/having political power is probably one of the single most destructive things that can happen to a society historically. Maybe it just always comes with decadence and a shaky foundation, an indicator more than a cause. I dunno.

Of your arguments this one is the most sound, but it’s because you’re making an observation without asserting a definite solution. There’s nothing wrong with identifying problem patterns, but jumping to certain conclusions without further review creates a shaken argument. Also, the world in which we live isn’t how it was in our founding fathers’ day. Women still have individual rights as humans. Whether voting law changes have effected the outcome of the west or not is a sound observation. But trying to revert it brings problems. For example, even though I’m not a land owner I would actually support only land owners being able to vote since they have a vested interest in the country. Then one realizes that Bill Gates owns a huge chunk of our farmland. Clearly we would not benefit from him running the show based on that reversal back to the old way.