It's a whole lot better than nothing. It reduces politicians' ability to vote against their supporters' interests, and then claim innocence / good intentions afterwards (i.e. commit fraud).
Republican voters give their representatives far too much leeway in how they vote once elected. They spew vague bullshit and bromides because primary voters tolerate it.
Also it serves as a way for Republican voters to actually come to a consensus on what they actually want. There is far too much disagreement and ignorance, even on this forum, about what policies and laws should be supported.
I'm working with some of the grass roots groups on their messaging. It is indeed hard to find consensus on all of the policies, so you keep it simple; just a few universal principles, but it's still a challenge.
For example; I won't support anyone who doesn't support the reduction of the Federal Gov't's power. Not many candidates for national office will be willing to sign that.
u/War_Hamster
I see your posts here daily. Can't say I'd disagree with any of your stances. I've been trying to get involved locally as much as possible. It is hard in a Wolf dictated, liberal Hell hole like PA.
Is there any links or references you could kindly point me towards to further help and delve into these grass root groups? I'd appreciate it. You seem to be one of the most pro active users here. I can respect that.
The Constitutional Sheriff group is one I'm just getting acquainted with, but they are also doing good and important things.
My best advice to get involved locally, though, is to just show up at protests or meetings locally. You'll meet wonderful people and you'll figure out which groups' energy and goals match your own.
Additional thought; take your time and feel out any group. Talk to both the leaders and the casual members. There are always grifters, and all of these groups want money and/or cheap labor. Look for well organized groups that focus on education and not fundraising.
Im wondering if it’s possible to make a MAGA Pledge a type of legal contract? Candidates running for office are essentially promising a service in exchange for a political position
If we can’t recall the potential RINO expeditiously, then maybe lawfare will get their attention
It's tricky, because we are supposed to be electing people who we think will represent their districts the best to make their own decisions on issues. Otherwise, we're a direct democracy and not a representative government.
The key here is to use a Pledge as a litmus test that also allows them some independence. Things like not taking lobbyist money could be in there, but nothing too policy specific.
The real solution is to have an engaged voting population and transparency. That should take care of most vetting needs, but we don't have either just yet.
We've talked about a MAGA Pledge on here before. Absent an enforcement mechanism, it's not very effective, but it might help out the Precinct Project.
It's a whole lot better than nothing. It reduces politicians' ability to vote against their supporters' interests, and then claim innocence / good intentions afterwards (i.e. commit fraud).
Republican voters give their representatives far too much leeway in how they vote once elected. They spew vague bullshit and bromides because primary voters tolerate it.
Also it serves as a way for Republican voters to actually come to a consensus on what they actually want. There is far too much disagreement and ignorance, even on this forum, about what policies and laws should be supported.
I'm working with some of the grass roots groups on their messaging. It is indeed hard to find consensus on all of the policies, so you keep it simple; just a few universal principles, but it's still a challenge.
For example; I won't support anyone who doesn't support the reduction of the Federal Gov't's power. Not many candidates for national office will be willing to sign that.
Commendations to you, fren. Few people actually get involved. You're part of the future solution.
u/War_Hamster I see your posts here daily. Can't say I'd disagree with any of your stances. I've been trying to get involved locally as much as possible. It is hard in a Wolf dictated, liberal Hell hole like PA. Is there any links or references you could kindly point me towards to further help and delve into these grass root groups? I'd appreciate it. You seem to be one of the most pro active users here. I can respect that.
Hello LadyPedette, thanks for the kind words.
I've got a buddy in PA, but it's too late to call him.
You responded earlier about the Precinct Project post, and that's a good group.
I'm also just starting to get involved with this very well-organized group: https://conventionofstates.com
The Constitutional Sheriff group is one I'm just getting acquainted with, but they are also doing good and important things.
My best advice to get involved locally, though, is to just show up at protests or meetings locally. You'll meet wonderful people and you'll figure out which groups' energy and goals match your own.
Additional thought; take your time and feel out any group. Talk to both the leaders and the casual members. There are always grifters, and all of these groups want money and/or cheap labor. Look for well organized groups that focus on education and not fundraising.
Im wondering if it’s possible to make a MAGA Pledge a type of legal contract? Candidates running for office are essentially promising a service in exchange for a political position
If we can’t recall the potential RINO expeditiously, then maybe lawfare will get their attention
Breach of Contract does seem like a practical and relatively simple method to get what we think we are getting.
It's tricky, because we are supposed to be electing people who we think will represent their districts the best to make their own decisions on issues. Otherwise, we're a direct democracy and not a representative government.
The key here is to use a Pledge as a litmus test that also allows them some independence. Things like not taking lobbyist money could be in there, but nothing too policy specific.
The real solution is to have an engaged voting population and transparency. That should take care of most vetting needs, but we don't have either just yet.
u/War_Hamster ....Precinct Peoject" ??? I was unaware. Thank you for sharing , am doing my research now.
Good luck. I've spoken with them, but in CA the rules are a bit different so there's not much we can do here.
Watch out for RINO's, but it looks like we're making good progress in a lot of places.