111
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
ArcOfAmbition 7 points ago +9 / -2

State Legislatures certified, then house and Senate.

Rand Paul along with Bobert are 2 politicians that should be treated as sus. They are bought and paid for by Koch. Koch and his paid minions did more to stop MAGA policy than Democrats. He controls politicians, aides and staffers within 3 parties.

8
Japan4Salt 8 points ago +9 / -1

Really? Lauren Boebert is suspect?

5
ArcOfAmbition 5 points ago +7 / -2

I like her but she was carried financially by Koch SuperPAC. The way I see it, they will vote in favor of lower taxes. Bobert will fight for 2A but any America First policy goes to the side UNLESS it helps Koch. If we get 24+ MAGA/AF people in office they will likely side with them but they could go against us. We will never have complete majority but having core majority helps. I don't want to discourage from not voting for either if the only option is a Democrat. However we should look at their state/district and consider primary options if they show signs. Right now Collins and Murkowski and other serious traitors are targets. We have to get the worst out and move to a 2nd wave later. That 1st wave will cause 2nd wave targets to come around to outside. That's how Democrat radicals changed the DNC.

2
Japan4Salt 2 points ago +3 / -1

At this point she could go without Koch help and be grassroots funded like MTG. Maybe some folks should contact her with their concerns.

I think she's a winner and I like her obvious passion for the America First issues.

3
ArcOfAmbition 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know the terms of accepting money from a SuperPAC and how long it takes before stepping away and joining another. I really don't have issues with the one SuperPAC she is with but I know Koch has history of pushing other agenda down all of his politicians. Koch is not AmericaFirst and he will fight every policy that gets voted on. However, he will allow them to voice their support for AF and to pretend support of AF by proposing intentional loses. That's what I hate about these politicians, they say 1 thing but do another.

2
Biggusdichus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup

2
Donaldsweiner 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn’t know that either

2
Cantshadowbanthemall 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is an idealist. His reasons fit that idealism. I disagree with him, 100%, but I see his reasoning