1105
Comments (100)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Nogozone 1 point ago +4 / -3

You can’t shoot someone for trespassing. End of discussion.

1
CoryInTheHouse1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

But they are they racist?

1
BlackPillBot 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can if you’re black and the trespasser is a conservative white person. Black supremacy is here backed by their Bolshevik masters. Plan accordingly.

0
CovfefeNegro 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well YEAH you can shoot trespassers if they pose a threat or present a danger.

Especially when they defeat multiple barriers to enter and keep coming even after being warned of their danger.

WTLiteral does 'end of discussion' mean to you, do you imagine you are Twitters or facebook or something?

https://files.catbox.moe/6e9lht.jpg

2
peltast 2 points ago +3 / -1

"...defeat multiple barriers...after being warned of their danger..." Are you fucking joking????

"Defeat"??? This is fucking bizarre, and a steaming heap. I already told somebody else that their justification was the most ignorant thing I'd ever read, so, I don't want to be redundant. How does one 'defeat' a barrier? How does defeating a barrier (::rolleyes::) present a danger or threat?

And, why does doing anything 'after being warned of their danger' present a threat??

And, to say "especially" when they do these anodyne things!!

I don't know whether to challenge you to a duel, or just slap your face, or weep at the stupidity.

1
Nogozone 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, you CAN’T shoot trespassers unless they face an IMMEDIATE deadly threat. Jumping through a window without a weapon would have been a great opportunity to have deployed less than lethal force. Such as a TASER. Deadly Use of force is based on Ability, Opportunity, jeopardy, preclusion. None of those elements were met in this case.