Tyson was trying to argue that anything you hear from someone in a white lab coat is true whether you like it or not.
Interpreting that as him saying that "science" as a process is true doesn't make sense. He was trying to conflate "science" with "facts" for an easy mindless soundbite that his fan base would clap for.
Instead he got dragged by the social media intern of a questionable sandwich meat company.
he's not wrong. science (the process) is true whether you believe in it or not
the conclusions from science are always up for debate
so yeah, steakumms didn't really clapback anyone. they argued semantics
and yes neil degrasse is completely full of himself and an insufferable douchnozzle
Tyson was trying to argue that anything you hear from someone in a white lab coat is true whether you like it or not.
Interpreting that as him saying that "science" as a process is true doesn't make sense. He was trying to conflate "science" with "facts" for an easy mindless soundbite that his fan base would clap for.
Instead he got dragged by the social media intern of a questionable sandwich meat company.
science results in truth
or do you have another opinion on this
because that is the one ALL scientists agree on