I thought someone had been removed because he had mentioned that he was going to judge on facts not emotions. I didn't know you had the right to speak about your mission. Anyway, let's say they were tainted, but then, you do participate in the trial and get to see evidence and testimonies first hand - how do you feel sending someone to jail if you know he's not guilty?
Anyway, I don't believe in an acquittal, but 10 year for manslaughter, reduced to 5. And I don't believe the jury will judge on facts. I might be wrong but there's been too much pressure from the media.
Based on “reporting” there was a female on the jury who registered to vote just to be in the pool to possibly be selected for this case. Couple of other odd things were revealed in that report
Majority of them were tainted before this began...some by their own admission during jury selection.
the justice system is a fucking joke
I thought someone had been removed because he had mentioned that he was going to judge on facts not emotions. I didn't know you had the right to speak about your mission. Anyway, let's say they were tainted, but then, you do participate in the trial and get to see evidence and testimonies first hand - how do you feel sending someone to jail if you know he's not guilty?
Anyway, I don't believe in an acquittal, but 10 year for manslaughter, reduced to 5. And I don't believe the jury will judge on facts. I might be wrong but there's been too much pressure from the media.
Based on “reporting” there was a female on the jury who registered to vote just to be in the pool to possibly be selected for this case. Couple of other odd things were revealed in that report
The New York Times is threatening to dox them.
Let him do whatever they want.... if he's found guilty he will almost certainly be awarded a retrial on appeal based off of that one fact alone....
That’s why a 26 year veteran cop “accidentally” shot that kid. They wanted to send a message to the jury.
Definitely