736
posted ago by JaneHanc0ck ago by JaneHanc0ck +736 / -0

She's spent the last two days saying things like: "I don't trust my government but I trust science." and "I really really don't want to get it." and "I want to be able to travel to Europe again, so I'm willing to get it for that."

Even with all her anxiety and mistrust, she still got it. Only a few hours after, she said she didn't feel good, and didn't think it was just in her head.

People are so brainwashed, they're going against their own common sense and survival instincts.

UPDATE: She said her brain was foggy all day yesterday, and she doesn't really remember the days events. She said it made her and her husband who also took it very very tired. And the injection site was very painful also.

Comments (122)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
20
WU_HAN_FRU 20 points ago +21 / -1

Do you understand the difference between a vaccine and mRNA therapy?

Do you realize which one J & J is [was?], and which the other two are?

Do you realize that if you knew what a vaccine is, what it does, and had an elementary notion of how vaccines work, it would be impossible to say the stupid shit you just said?

10
believe_in_something 10 points ago +10 / -0

Id agree with you that all those who say these things are:

  1. Not looking at the full picture
  2. Seem to be okay in participating in a vacc trial with a higher likelihood of death (if we +uncertainty) than the virus itself.

This Vacc and other things (staying indoors without exercising) are doing to the immune system (suppressing it).

What to do instead of Vacc:

  1. Exersize
  2. Take Vitamin D and C. Especially during winter and fall.
  3. If you get the virus take there are many readily available and effective treatments
-17
Deplora -17 points ago +3 / -20

The mRNA is not a "therapy"; it's just a different vaccine vector. J&J and AstraZeneca use adenovirus vectors, and both of those vaccines have had a small but significant incidence of serious clotting complications, almost certainly related to an immune reaction to the combination of the adenovirus vectors and COVID-19 antigens. The Moderna (mRNA-vectored) vaccine has had a high incidence of mild skin reactions, along with a very few extremely serious skin reactions. That profile is not different from skin reactions associated with some very common drugs, but given the availability and comparable effectiveness of the Pfizer (also mRNA-vectored) alternative, I prefer to go with Pfizer.

15
WU_HAN_FRU 15 points ago +15 / -0

I didn't hack into your bank account and steal all your money.

I was just using a "different income vector."

15
br1337 15 points ago +15 / -0

According to VAERS they have killed more people than all shots in the last ten years combined, over 3000 now? and that is just the immediate.

In the SEC filings they are categorized as gene therapy.

Read some of the reactions on this forum @ https://vestibular.org/forum/dizziness/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/

-19
Deplora -19 points ago +2 / -21

You have no idea what you're talking about. VAERS is a collection of reports, not conclusions. Every person who died shortly after receiving a vaccine is included. Interpreting that to mean that all these people were "killed by the vaccine" is just ignorant. If you're going to believe that, you might as well believe the "COVD death" statistics that included people who died in vehicle crashes and falling off ladders, who just happened to test positive for COVID-19 shortly before their deaths. The initial roll-out of the vaccine was limited to people in very high risk groups -- high risk for death from any cause, as well as for death from COVID. Most were very old, many living in nursing homes (including people on DNR or hospice status due to non-COVID-related conditions). A lot of these people were going to die anyway. If there was a national reporting system for deaths within a week of eating applesauce, you'd be claiming it showed that "applesauce killed" hundreds of people.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you inject applesauce into your veins, I'm quite certain it will kill you. Don't inject unknown substances into your body. Note: Applesauce manufactures do not hold immunity from liability. They also don't manufacture their products from aborted fetal tissue and heavy metals.

2
Smurfection 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you concerned about long term side effects?

2
powershellder 2 points ago +2 / -0

VAERS is a collection of reports, but it’s the only system we have to track vaccine issues.

And scientists have several studies showing it under reports tremendously.

And if you die from anaphylactic shock within a few hours of eating applesauce and nothing else was new, you know damn well we should investigate apple sauce.

1
br1337 1 point ago +1 / -0

You keep calling it a vaccine, its not, the SEC filing lists it as gene therapy. Over half of medical employees are refusing to take it, they know what's up. I mean why keep performing the mental gymnastics needed to convince yourself to take the experimental drug, just go take it! there is obviously a surplus of shots. Be sure to check back in 6 months to 1.5 years from now and let us know how its going. In the animal trails the vaccine failed in the maiming and death it caused to ferrets, rats, and monkeys extrapolated out to human life is about that amount of time. I will be on the edge of my seat! Trust the science! this shot is NOT the next Thalidomide. Don't worry about the complexity of litigation for any maiming either, they are liability immune!

1
DaughterOfLiberty 1 point ago +2 / -1

No word on the long term effects. Covid is just a flu. Had it and no big deal. Why are you scared of the flu but not injecting yourself with some experimental dna? You deserve to be the string of dead people coming when this vaccine starts killing people.