She's spent the last two days saying things like: "I don't trust my government but I trust science." and "I really really don't want to get it." and "I want to be able to travel to Europe again, so I'm willing to get it for that."
Even with all her anxiety and mistrust, she still got it. Only a few hours after, she said she didn't feel good, and didn't think it was just in her head.
People are so brainwashed, they're going against their own common sense and survival instincts.
UPDATE: She said her brain was foggy all day yesterday, and she doesn't really remember the days events. She said it made her and her husband who also took it very very tired. And the injection site was very painful also.
Even worse, probably you read NYT, Nature mag, Science mag articles designed as propaganda for the medical industry and think you are read unbiased scientific articles rather than puff pieces
I read original research papers, not magazine articles or the inane NYT.
That's good. But always remember to be critical of the ABSTRACT. Always Question it, as it alludes to whom paid for the research. And how you should be viewing said papers.
I don't think you know what an abstract is. That's not where payment or other potential conflict information appears. The abstract is just a very brief summary of the underlying study protocol and results.
Earlier in the day. I spent a half an hour typing out a response to the comment below, detailing your lack of reading comprehension before realizing that the responder was not in fact you. His brute mannerisms should have given this away, yet I posted, and subsequentially deleted a reply none the less. How embarrassing that was for me to realized my error.
With that in my. I now realize I was in error, for speaking harshly of you, with out explaining what I found egregious in your thought process.
Allow me to elaborate the short of the matter, without the harsh rebuttal I had originally put in place for the insulting mannerisms of Berkely.
It is my belief that you are not Questioning the methodology and origin, as detailed in in the papers you read. It is your responsibility to Question every aspect of a paper. This includes the abstract, and logical methodology presented to you there in.
You don't need a literal paper trail of payments to read the intent of the author's paper, nor is this needed to Question their good faith in issuing said paper.
My link in the above reply was meant to detail blatant tells that can be found in papers, alluding to their actual intent. Namely, in the abstract and the conclusion. And again. Please see fit to Question everything. Though Questioning my understanding of what an abstract is, I did find quite offensive.
I'm sorry. I no longer believe that you are capable of critical thinking. This is not a skill you posses.
Both Nature & Science mags are scientific journals which publish original research papers. Odds are if you are reading a medical study, it was published in one of those or similar.
Have you read about this one?
‘Research’ papers from Liberal run Universities. Doctors are morons or they would be pushing Vitamin D and losing weight. Are you fat?
Honestly, idk why you're being downvoted by tards. It's a literal bioweapon from China. For it to be a hoax would mean that EVERY country and researcher would be in on it. That being said, the media was very irresponsible in their coverage of it all and overblown its fatalities. But it doesn't mean that long term effects aren't there. I got the Johnson and Johnson because I don't trust mRNA vaccines. So long as I don't get long term damage or have to go to the hospital, I'm fine
It's the religious retards as per usual.
You do understand that "every country and researcher" does not include the dissenters, whose opinion you have not been allowed by your owners to read or hear?
Your actual reason for trusting the prick is that everyone whose opinion you were allowed to hear, agreed with the people doing the allowing.
So your opinion is based on nothing.
In the meantime, you assert that covid19 is "a literal bioweapon from China'. Presumably you are sitting on concrete evidence that the rest of the world needs to hear?
Because otherwise youre talking out of your ass.
Again.