537
Comments (34)
sorted by:
21
kyle6969 21 points ago +21 / -0

I mean, if you can’t tell the difference between a man and a woman, maybe you should just fuck off.

21
CynicalTwit22 21 points ago +21 / -0

A broken clock is right twice a day

11
JustinAthol 11 points ago +11 / -0

A negligent discharge of a weapon in the military would result in a court martial.

5
OldGreg 5 points ago +5 / -0

Article 15 in most cases I’ve seen. Still, they aren’t something to take lightly.

8
theRealPizzabandit 8 points ago +8 / -0

I mean if you can't take a gunshot to the torso, maybe you shouldn't be a felon resisting arrest.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
0
skatestraight 0 points ago +2 / -2

She criticizes both sides, which is rather refreshing these days. I don't see the problem

9
1776DeusVult 9 points ago +9 / -0

She is a reprehensible vehement leftist and piece of shit, fuck her and possibly you for not seeing a problem in windbags like her being listened to by anybody at anytime regardless if they’re saying things you occasionally agree with.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
ZhouBai-Den 4 points ago +4 / -0

She was 100% right the first time.

3
grenades_and_ham 3 points ago +3 / -0

Her pussy is haunted.

Plus, she has two kills more than any of my previously owned weapons.

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you can't keep your legs closed, maybe you shouldn't be an actress.

2
Arwyn3x 2 points ago +2 / -0

The conversation we should be having is over the design of tasers. Do they need to resemble hand guns so closely?

What if it was shaped like a flashlight and you had to hold it underhand like a knife and squeeze it with all for fingers and your thumb too?

3
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is nothing wrong with the design. They are shaped the way they are primarily for retention purposes and ease of deployment. They really don't resemble handguns that closely, are colored differently, and are carried on the weak side of the body specifically to avoid any potential confusion. This case was a rare occurrence and a major fuck up on the part of the officer.

3
Vox_Dobad 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, I guess that's worth looking into, but it's more of a lack of training from what I understand.

I forget the man's name (former NYPD), but he was on Buck Sexton's show yesterday. He said most cops, particularly those in smaller departments due to budget restrictions, only put a few hundred rounds down range per year.

I knew it was bad, but that number blew my mind. They should be training to the point of muscle memory, continuously, with all their weapons, as well as having strenuous hand to hand training. And you don't even need to always train with live rounds to make your sidearm, in effect, an extension of your person. That part at least largely renders the budget concern moot.

2
whippeat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Furthermore, the majority of officers have NEVER drawn their weapons in the course of duty

1
somedaysoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Taser has done a lot to make sure they don't act and feel like firearms. The weight, safety, trigger pull, general feel are all way off from an actual firearm.

But yeah, some people still fuck it up. She should have probably been at the range a bit more becoming familiar with her equipment.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are usually kept on the opposite side of the belt. The lady sounds like s typical female police officer. Unable to handle pressure.

2
Food4thought 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you can't tell the difference between a policeman or a policewoman.... it's 2021

2
MakinBacon 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you have warrants maybe you should take care of them, or not wrestle with cops, or obey traffic rules, or not commit the crime in the first place, 10.7 MILLION Americans manage to survive arrests every year. Sucks that a dumbass with a gun messed up, how did they get to that point in the first place? I just can't care about this distraction anymore.

How are those audits going and our govt supporting everything EXCEPT America?

2
remember1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's okay with using 'policeman' but not okay with using 'policewoman' because it casts women in a bad light, so she uses 'policeperson'.

2
muslimporn 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not the mistake she made. She drew on instinct and didn't take the time to check because she was rushing and busy trying to get a shot in.

2
Jon888 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can just call them cops, but yeah you can't "accidentally" shoot people. If I wouldn't get away with that shit then neither should the cops.

1
acasper 1 point ago +1 / -0

She’s not wrong.

1
Trump2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Person of police

1
mytummyhurts 1 point ago +1 / -0

The one time in my life I'll agree with this dolt. Not the policeperson part, the other thing.

1
Dev404 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay dimwit. Looks like that sentence used up all your brain power already. Try again tomorrow.

1
reagan2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen. (and a woman).

1
AUS4MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody's gonna mention how it apparently took her an entire day to woke-amend herself? 🤣

1
AlphaOmegaAZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Butterman: What made you wanna be a policeman?

Angel: Police officer.

Butterman: What made you wanna be a policeman officer?

1
RealKAGGER 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, it this a shitpost? This can’t be real.

3
BidenSniffsLittleKid [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's real, check it

1
Rageofpepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe if they didn’t defund the police there she would have been better trained and know the difference

1
Titan93 1 point ago +1 / -0

Policechestfeeder Policethingthatbleeds