They didn’t have pens, paper, ink, printing press. They had a camp and a rock surface and they chose to use it. And this makes it less important because you choose to call it graffiti? Why? Is cave art graffiti? How about Egyptian hieroglyphs? Or Viking runes? Or tombstones? Or engravings on plaques? Doesn’t matter what you call it, man. It’s shouldn’t be destroyed. And that’s my point. You don’t know it’s context, so who are you to say it doesn’t matter? Let it be and don’t destroy it.
Call it what you want to call it. I think it should be preserved. And nothing you have stated has changed my mind. I’m not incredulous at all. It history. And it’s art. And it should be protected from rock climbing bolts and the like.
They didn’t have pens, paper, ink, printing press. They had a camp and a rock surface and they chose to use it. And this makes it less important because you choose to call it graffiti? Why? Is cave art graffiti? How about Egyptian hieroglyphs? Or Viking runes? Or tombstones? Or engravings on plaques? Doesn’t matter what you call it, man. It’s shouldn’t be destroyed. And that’s my point. You don’t know it’s context, so who are you to say it doesn’t matter? Let it be and don’t destroy it.
Yes, cave art is graffiti too. I explained why. Your incredulous disbelief isn't a substitute for an argument otherwise.
Call it what you want to call it. I think it should be preserved. And nothing you have stated has changed my mind. I’m not incredulous at all. It history. And it’s art. And it should be protected from rock climbing bolts and the like.
Protected by who?