She says, " Our data from the cdc today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, do not get sick". Where is the data? It was just released that at least 5800 vaccinated people have indeed become sick and 74 have died.
Pfizer's own data that I already linked literally says their vaccine efficacy is based on symptoms, not asymptomatic cases and transmission. The flu vaccine efficacy rate is actually based on how effective it is at preventing you from getting the flu. Do you really not see the difference? A typical vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the illness, there is no evidence this type of vaccine does that. The vaccine manufacturers have said from the beginning that their efficacy rates are based on symptomatic cases and they do not have data on asymptomatic infections and transmission. This has been repeated countless times by health officials and vaccine developers, most recently in Pfizer's press release April 1st 2021: "Analysis of 927 confirmed symptomatic cases of COVID-19 demonstrates ..."
The link you provided was a single statement about "data that suggests" without actually releasing the data. In fact, the data they have released shows 5800 vaccinated people became infected and 74 of them died. That's a fatality rate of 1.28% of those vaccinated, while the general fatality rate in the US among those infected (even without a vaccine) is 1.8%.
Where is the data? It was just released that at least 5800 vaccinated people have indeed become sick and 74 have died.
the vaccine has a 90% immunity rate. You do understand statistics right? that means 10% of people are still susceptible to the virus, but fortunately they have much milder cases.
I already linked literally says their vaccine efficacy is based on symptoms, not asymptomatic cases and transmission.
Exactly so that also means there is no evidence that asymptomatic people transmit. Show me evidence that asymptomatic vaccinated people transmit. The null hypothesis is that they wont.
Why is there no evidence? Asymptomatic spread was considered such a huge risk that entire nations were shut down. So why didn't vaccine manufacturers gather data on asymptomatic infection amd transmission? They could have very easily required test subjects to get weekly covid testing, like many employers, especially in the healthcare field did (and still are). Instead they based their supposed efficacy rate on reported acute respiratory symptoms and subsequent positive covid tests. EVERY OTHER VACCINE IN HISTORY prevents the spread of disease. Yet, they have no idea if mRNA "vaccines" do. Ask yourself why? Ask yourself if that makes any sense whatsoever.
She says, " Our data from the cdc today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, do not get sick". Where is the data? It was just released that at least 5800 vaccinated people have indeed become sick and 74 have died.
https://archive.is/2021.04.15-140601/https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/14/health/breakthrough-infections-covid-vaccines-cdc/index.html
There is no evidence that covid vaccines prevent transmission, as the WHO's Chief Scientist admitted back in December.
https://www.businessinsider.com/who-says-no-evidence-coronavirus-vaccine-prevent-transmissions-2020-12
Pfizer's own data that I already linked literally says their vaccine efficacy is based on symptoms, not asymptomatic cases and transmission. The flu vaccine efficacy rate is actually based on how effective it is at preventing you from getting the flu. Do you really not see the difference? A typical vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the illness, there is no evidence this type of vaccine does that. The vaccine manufacturers have said from the beginning that their efficacy rates are based on symptomatic cases and they do not have data on asymptomatic infections and transmission. This has been repeated countless times by health officials and vaccine developers, most recently in Pfizer's press release April 1st 2021: "Analysis of 927 confirmed symptomatic cases of COVID-19 demonstrates ..."
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-confirm-high-efficacy-and-no-serious
The link you provided was a single statement about "data that suggests" without actually releasing the data. In fact, the data they have released shows 5800 vaccinated people became infected and 74 of them died. That's a fatality rate of 1.28% of those vaccinated, while the general fatality rate in the US among those infected (even without a vaccine) is 1.8%.
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
Exactly so that also means there is no evidence that asymptomatic people transmit. Show me evidence that asymptomatic vaccinated people transmit. The null hypothesis is that they wont.
Why is there no evidence? Asymptomatic spread was considered such a huge risk that entire nations were shut down. So why didn't vaccine manufacturers gather data on asymptomatic infection amd transmission? They could have very easily required test subjects to get weekly covid testing, like many employers, especially in the healthcare field did (and still are). Instead they based their supposed efficacy rate on reported acute respiratory symptoms and subsequent positive covid tests. EVERY OTHER VACCINE IN HISTORY prevents the spread of disease. Yet, they have no idea if mRNA "vaccines" do. Ask yourself why? Ask yourself if that makes any sense whatsoever.