3112
Comments (117)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
59
muslimporn 59 points ago +62 / -3

As a scientist and an expert, a statement which ironically carries more weight as self proclaimed than being media proclaimed I can say I honestly cannot know for sure despite being able to make some damn good arguments for it. I can say that I know a few ways to try to find out.

That they have been blocking people who are in the same class gives the game away. They know it's at least possible. In science a theory becomes strong when you try to disprove it and fail, when it's the last left standing. When they don't want to allow a process that could disprove claims of fraud then the gig is up.

I have a theory which is that big tech has enough data to know. They can't openly use it but I suspect they gather up so much data including things like private messages about harvesting as well as data on who will vote for what that they can probably tell.

I strongly suspect they know or at least have data that strongly indicates the election was stolen. I mean they don't even want s process to try to verify it that's a teaser. I really suspect they do truly know and that's why they're hands off rather than warmer colder.

What we're seeing is desperation. I always tend to suspect there's something behind that. My calculations tell me that fraud is a high probability but I suspect their own data is even worse.

55
contribulation 55 points ago +55 / -0

Big Tech doesn't need big data sets to know there was a fraud.

Big Tech funded the fraud.

33
residue69 33 points ago +34 / -1

Zuckerberg's $400 million.

5
Lord_Kek 5 points ago +5 / -0

need to deport that 🦎

21
masticator_nord 21 points ago +21 / -0

Yeah, when you actively contribute to the fraud you can be sure, with a high degree of certainty, that there was fraud.

16
Latin_Patriot_MAGA 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's like telling the FBI fags to investigate ELECTORAL FRAUD, they will not investigate because they are complicit too.

37
ThoughtCrimeConvict 37 points ago +37 / -0

No offence fren, but me thinks you need to science faster.

7
Shadilady 7 points ago +7 / -0

😆

8
TheDeSantis 8 points ago +8 / -0

I mean why source private data when these people understand the public data is so damning.

That’s the real issue and why this rush to censorship existed in the first place.

4
saltlegger 4 points ago +6 / -2

Right now they're more dangerous than they ever were because they're cornered. Something big and bloody is about to kick off. I really and truly believe this. Call it the deep States last desperate push to get out of the ambush or maybe it's last agonal breath. I suspect that Phoenix is going to get nuked.

1
muslimporn 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know that kind of mentality in series like Star Gate where they can't tell the public because they believe it will cause mass panic?

They are behaving in that way. It only makes sense if they know the election was stolen. That's even more dangerous as a truth than as a lie. If it's allowed to come out that the election really was stolen think of the repercussions of that including mass unrest. The threat is double over when they're involved.

1
figgle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't be coy, you know for sure.