I think God just wanted a cool dinosaur planet and then got busy with other projects. Hooo boy, when he comes back to check on us, is he gonna be surprised! 😆
How do you solve biogenesis? How does revolution deal with the first AND second laws of thermodynamics. Lucy has been debunked, neadrathals we’re literally just humans with LARGER brains. There is evidence for a global flood on every rock planet.....but earth? How does evolution explain sea fossils on the tops of mountains? How does evolution explain that NOTHING has evolved out of its kind? A white and black moth turning into a black and white moth isn’t evolution....a single celled organism has never evolved into a double cell organism. Animals aren’t evolving into new species they are changing along their kinds. Not one scientific dating method we use actually works. They all contradict each other, this is even known in the science world. If we are evolving where is humanities next evolution if we’ve been here for 500,000 years? Where is our gills? Our bigger brains (they are shrinking)? Better eye sight etc? There is absolutely zero proof other than you have been told it forever. There are hundreds of cave glyphs and written records of “dragons” which meant “rare, but great beast.” Then we invented the word dinosaur and vuala......
Science means something observable and repeatable. How do we know it’s millions of years if it’s not observable and repeatable? They literally shout “the science has been settled!” Then by definition THATS NOT SCIENCE! Science is supposed to be challenged and if not, it’s a cult. If you actually spend some time diving into it there are hundreds of examples of evolution getting called out, but like everything else Godly, it’s buried.
I am willing to entertain these ideas of alternatives but to me evolution denial is up there with flat earthers, alien believers and moon landing conspiracy theorists. To me evolution makes perfect sense - and to explain the sea fossils on mountains there is a perfectly sound theory - plate techtonics and continental drift. I always suspect people that reject evolution don't understand it. For instance, it doesn't mean we evolved from apes, and neanderthals having bigger brains does not go against it. Evolution isn't a force of organisms improving over time, but a force of the fittest organisms surviving in their environment and being selected sexually over massive time scales. And it's not opposed to Adam and Eve or Noah at all. Think of it like the big bang - the material explanation for God's ways. Read Genesis 1 with the knowledge of astrophysics and it all lines up perfectly. Same is true for evolution and creation. Evolution is the material understanding of God's creation. But, like I said, I am willing to entertain the theories against evolution. I have heard them all of my life though and I have never once had any doubts.
If one has gone through life and accepted evolution based on normalization of it at every level, so much so that it is not even questioned or considered to be questioned, then one is the product of brainwashing. For those of you that see this and for the first time think, "huh, some people don't believe in evolution? I thought it was proven?", then you are the product of brainwashing.
For every major point of evolution, the most liquid and changing theory ever invented, there is an equal (and arguably greater) counter explanation. As many greater people than me have pointed out, the Bible and God is not required to understand or accept this. It's a matter of analyzing and interpreting data from our world and from science. Many scientists don't believe in evolution. It has holes to big to fill, that there are better explanations for.
If you know nothing of what I speak, and you are interested, you must teach yourself and be willing to learn. Here are a few beginner resources:
What exactly is the border between believing in evolution and believing in survival of the fittest, natural selection, and eugenics?
evolution to me is just an explanation of why the children of degenerates and dregs grow up to be degenerates and dregs. What exactly is the alternative explanation for this called? or is evolution in your context strictly related to origins?
I've been a lifelong Christian, went to grad school in engineering (took multiple grad level physics and statistics courses), never once had any problem with my faith interfering with my exposure to ideas and theories surrounding origins of life..
What I was taught highlighted the inconsistencies and gaps in our understanding and showed that there are so many things in the universe that we don't understand and cant fathom.. Its to the extent that my belief in God was actually encouraged more than dissuaded - all of my Professors considered elites in their professions all similarly holding ideas of faith. To me, it seems that the only real explanations to the universe are intelligent design - either by a creator or by simulation. I see in no way how evolution is contrary to those ideas.
What exactly is the border between believing in evolution and believing in survival of the fittest, natural selection, and eugenics?
Evolution is a broad theory encompassing many topics, including common ancestor, natural selection, survival of the fittest... The border of these are defined in the theory. They are each identifiably different.
evolution to me is just an explanation of why the children of degenerates and dregs grow up to be degenerates and dregs. What exactly is the alternative explanation for this called? or is evolution in your context strictly related to origins?
The alternate theory for this? None that I know of. Evolution is also not a theory for this either. I believe it's common knowledge that children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren of "degenerates and dregs" (highly subjective terms) can become non-degenerates and non-dregs. In fact, if you were able to trace your ancestry back 2000 years and observe them along the way, by your own standard, you'd likely consider some of your ancestors "degenerates and dregs".
How exactly is evolution a scam? I believe in God and also don't deny the evidence of evolution
I think God just wanted a cool dinosaur planet and then got busy with other projects. Hooo boy, when he comes back to check on us, is he gonna be surprised! 😆
How do you solve biogenesis? How does revolution deal with the first AND second laws of thermodynamics. Lucy has been debunked, neadrathals we’re literally just humans with LARGER brains. There is evidence for a global flood on every rock planet.....but earth? How does evolution explain sea fossils on the tops of mountains? How does evolution explain that NOTHING has evolved out of its kind? A white and black moth turning into a black and white moth isn’t evolution....a single celled organism has never evolved into a double cell organism. Animals aren’t evolving into new species they are changing along their kinds. Not one scientific dating method we use actually works. They all contradict each other, this is even known in the science world. If we are evolving where is humanities next evolution if we’ve been here for 500,000 years? Where is our gills? Our bigger brains (they are shrinking)? Better eye sight etc? There is absolutely zero proof other than you have been told it forever. There are hundreds of cave glyphs and written records of “dragons” which meant “rare, but great beast.” Then we invented the word dinosaur and vuala......
Science means something observable and repeatable. How do we know it’s millions of years if it’s not observable and repeatable? They literally shout “the science has been settled!” Then by definition THATS NOT SCIENCE! Science is supposed to be challenged and if not, it’s a cult. If you actually spend some time diving into it there are hundreds of examples of evolution getting called out, but like everything else Godly, it’s buried.
I am willing to entertain these ideas of alternatives but to me evolution denial is up there with flat earthers, alien believers and moon landing conspiracy theorists. To me evolution makes perfect sense - and to explain the sea fossils on mountains there is a perfectly sound theory - plate techtonics and continental drift. I always suspect people that reject evolution don't understand it. For instance, it doesn't mean we evolved from apes, and neanderthals having bigger brains does not go against it. Evolution isn't a force of organisms improving over time, but a force of the fittest organisms surviving in their environment and being selected sexually over massive time scales. And it's not opposed to Adam and Eve or Noah at all. Think of it like the big bang - the material explanation for God's ways. Read Genesis 1 with the knowledge of astrophysics and it all lines up perfectly. Same is true for evolution and creation. Evolution is the material understanding of God's creation. But, like I said, I am willing to entertain the theories against evolution. I have heard them all of my life though and I have never once had any doubts.
If one has gone through life and accepted evolution based on normalization of it at every level, so much so that it is not even questioned or considered to be questioned, then one is the product of brainwashing. For those of you that see this and for the first time think, "huh, some people don't believe in evolution? I thought it was proven?", then you are the product of brainwashing.
For every major point of evolution, the most liquid and changing theory ever invented, there is an equal (and arguably greater) counter explanation. As many greater people than me have pointed out, the Bible and God is not required to understand or accept this. It's a matter of analyzing and interpreting data from our world and from science. Many scientists don't believe in evolution. It has holes to big to fill, that there are better explanations for.
If you know nothing of what I speak, and you are interested, you must teach yourself and be willing to learn. Here are a few beginner resources:
What exactly is the border between believing in evolution and believing in survival of the fittest, natural selection, and eugenics?
evolution to me is just an explanation of why the children of degenerates and dregs grow up to be degenerates and dregs. What exactly is the alternative explanation for this called? or is evolution in your context strictly related to origins?
I've been a lifelong Christian, went to grad school in engineering (took multiple grad level physics and statistics courses), never once had any problem with my faith interfering with my exposure to ideas and theories surrounding origins of life..
What I was taught highlighted the inconsistencies and gaps in our understanding and showed that there are so many things in the universe that we don't understand and cant fathom.. Its to the extent that my belief in God was actually encouraged more than dissuaded - all of my Professors considered elites in their professions all similarly holding ideas of faith. To me, it seems that the only real explanations to the universe are intelligent design - either by a creator or by simulation. I see in no way how evolution is contrary to those ideas.
Evolution is a broad theory encompassing many topics, including common ancestor, natural selection, survival of the fittest... The border of these are defined in the theory. They are each identifiably different.
The alternate theory for this? None that I know of. Evolution is also not a theory for this either. I believe it's common knowledge that children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren of "degenerates and dregs" (highly subjective terms) can become non-degenerates and non-dregs. In fact, if you were able to trace your ancestry back 2000 years and observe them along the way, by your own standard, you'd likely consider some of your ancestors "degenerates and dregs".
thanks