Other people on this forum have presented the same argument about the central banks, and I asked them why Germany felt it had to invade Poland, France, Russia, britain, etc.. and if I remember correctly their response was that when Germany lef the central bank they were isolated by other countries so their only defense was offence. Or something like that. Sort of an off idea, I guess they think Napoleon also had to invade other countries to protect France's sovereignty.
If all countries have central banks, it is completely stupid to attribute success to central banks as the reason for one's success.
Central banks violate private property and the free market.
If you can print money and lend it to yourself at whatever interest rates you decide and you go to buy someone else's goods or property, that person is giving you a loan against his will, and in the other case, if you lend that money back to add your share, someone is subsidizing your business against his will, giving you de facto control of their property.
If you can manipulate interest rates to decide the value of money there is no free market.
It's not hard commie.
They are the very opposite of the values of freedom and sovereignty upon which America was founded.
you are very cute. But do you not realize the central banks are fueled by the US dollar? Why do you think Jews own US media and banking system? If you want to live in a 4th world country that trades donkeys for your daughter then feel free.
I guess they think Napoleon also had to invade other countries to protect France's sovereignty.
Not sure how in depth you are going, but, the fact that France was invaded by a multitude of neighboring countries at the end of their Revolution and Napoleon was battling them, would fit the bill. So, yes, it was to protect France's sovereignty.
That makes some sense. Germany left the central bank and was isolated financially. In their desperation they lashed out with war, which boosted their economy with mass war industry. But I am sure Hitler was not stupid, in fact the Nazis seem to have been well above average intelligence. His war was a suicide mission, and he must have known it. Many countries currently are isolated by the west, like Russia/Iran/N Korea/Syria/Venezuela, etc.. You don't see them going to war with their neighbors outside of Russia and Ukraine.
Something went horribly wrong in Germany and Hitler made some really really bad calls especially with his allegiance with Stalin and then backstabbing him which set the stage for him to be used as the scapegoat while the world sided with communism. He may even have been sabotaged by inside men, or on drugs. Ive heard both theories.
What I do know is the truth will never be known because our kind and wonderful leaders at the time and their wonderful Soviet allies killed everyone who could have known the real story. Surely just a coincedence...
Except the world did not side with communism. Russia still gets no credit for their fight against Nazi Germany. And USSR was constantly in a state of emergency due to Europe and American threats. Communism in America is relatively new idea. It's a practical way for criminal politicians to keep control in the new era of alternative media. Before the modern alternative media, the uniparty war criminals knew the media controlled the narrative. Now they understand people are getting red pilled and their new method of control is not only the propaganda media but also forceful government takeover.
Other people on this forum have presented the same argument about the central banks, and I asked them why Germany felt it had to invade Poland, France, Russia, britain, etc.. and if I remember correctly their response was that when Germany lef the central bank they were isolated by other countries so their only defense was offence. Or something like that. Sort of an off idea, I guess they think Napoleon also had to invade other countries to protect France's sovereignty.
https://www.16chan.xyz/.media/00ac71310fa315d09dda64fbf9f85db2-applicationpdf.pdf
I will read this over the weekend. thx!
Also you forget that the central banks are part of what made America the most prosperous country in the modern era.
A statement pulled straight out of your ass.
If all countries have central banks, it is completely stupid to attribute success to central banks as the reason for one's success.
Central banks violate private property and the free market.
If you can print money and lend it to yourself at whatever interest rates you decide and you go to buy someone else's goods or property, that person is giving you a loan against his will, and in the other case, if you lend that money back to add your share, someone is subsidizing your business against his will, giving you de facto control of their property.
If you can manipulate interest rates to decide the value of money there is no free market.
It's not hard commie.
They are the very opposite of the values of freedom and sovereignty upon which America was founded.
you are very cute. But do you not realize the central banks are fueled by the US dollar? Why do you think Jews own US media and banking system? If you want to live in a 4th world country that trades donkeys for your daughter then feel free.
Not sure how in depth you are going, but, the fact that France was invaded by a multitude of neighboring countries at the end of their Revolution and Napoleon was battling them, would fit the bill. So, yes, it was to protect France's sovereignty.
fair point. I keep forgetting about many aspects of the French Revolution including foreign hostility.
Its probably because of debt. Governments pay of debt by creating war. The US does that today.
That makes some sense. Germany left the central bank and was isolated financially. In their desperation they lashed out with war, which boosted their economy with mass war industry. But I am sure Hitler was not stupid, in fact the Nazis seem to have been well above average intelligence. His war was a suicide mission, and he must have known it. Many countries currently are isolated by the west, like Russia/Iran/N Korea/Syria/Venezuela, etc.. You don't see them going to war with their neighbors outside of Russia and Ukraine.
Something went horribly wrong in Germany and Hitler made some really really bad calls especially with his allegiance with Stalin and then backstabbing him which set the stage for him to be used as the scapegoat while the world sided with communism. He may even have been sabotaged by inside men, or on drugs. Ive heard both theories.
What I do know is the truth will never be known because our kind and wonderful leaders at the time and their wonderful Soviet allies killed everyone who could have known the real story. Surely just a coincedence...
Except the world did not side with communism. Russia still gets no credit for their fight against Nazi Germany. And USSR was constantly in a state of emergency due to Europe and American threats. Communism in America is relatively new idea. It's a practical way for criminal politicians to keep control in the new era of alternative media. Before the modern alternative media, the uniparty war criminals knew the media controlled the narrative. Now they understand people are getting red pilled and their new method of control is not only the propaganda media but also forceful government takeover.