Thanks I appreciate you explaining. I skimmed over the abstract of it just didn't have time to look any of it up. We lost in 1913 when the century long fight against central banking was lost. People think the first great depression was bad, this will be the first GREAT depression. You see the thing is, they didn't discontinue the graph, they are only discontinuing the graphs public availability.
You're 100% correct in your interpretation of 1913.
About the discontinued graph; it's not that they discontinued this one, although they've discontinued other data for nefarious reasons. The link I sent was discontinued, but there's a link to the new version of the non-discontinued data. The interesting part is why the did this, and it's not for presentation purposes.
I'll leave it as a mystery, but I'm betting you can solve it.
Oh, and for some more fun, I hope you're familiar with this site. Given your understanding of 1913, I think you'll appreciate it if you're not already familiar:
I wouldn't mind a little nudge in the right direction, there is so much shit going on that it gets difficult to figure what to reseaech more into. I was not familiar with the site you posted, but I will keep my eyes on it. I had done a paper a long while back on the origins of the Federal Reserve and saw the things such as Senator Nelson Aldrich, how his family married into the Rockefellers, ect. and major "conflict of interests", for the lack of a better term, of Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller becoming the Vice President in the 70s and things of that nature. Interesting enough, Charles Lindbergh, Sr. was adamant and very vocal against the inception of the Fed. Of course his great grandson was kidnapped and never found, among other instances such as Abraham Lincoln blocking the Rothschilds from funding both sides of the civil war. It's all interconnected and that only scratches the surface.
Graph showing how much money is circulating. Went from 3 trillion or so to what 18 trillion in the past 2 years.
Took all the way to 2001 to pass 1 trillion.
More money in the system buying things, the price of things goes up. Goods are not unlimited but made up money is.
Thanks I appreciate you explaining. I skimmed over the abstract of it just didn't have time to look any of it up. We lost in 1913 when the century long fight against central banking was lost. People think the first great depression was bad, this will be the first GREAT depression. You see the thing is, they didn't discontinue the graph, they are only discontinuing the graphs public availability.
You're 100% correct in your interpretation of 1913.
About the discontinued graph; it's not that they discontinued this one, although they've discontinued other data for nefarious reasons. The link I sent was discontinued, but there's a link to the new version of the non-discontinued data. The interesting part is why the did this, and it's not for presentation purposes.
I'll leave it as a mystery, but I'm betting you can solve it.
Oh, and for some more fun, I hope you're familiar with this site. Given your understanding of 1913, I think you'll appreciate it if you're not already familiar:
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/money-supply-charts
The sad thing is that I could find most of what I learned through school accredited resources
I wouldn't mind a little nudge in the right direction, there is so much shit going on that it gets difficult to figure what to reseaech more into. I was not familiar with the site you posted, but I will keep my eyes on it. I had done a paper a long while back on the origins of the Federal Reserve and saw the things such as Senator Nelson Aldrich, how his family married into the Rockefellers, ect. and major "conflict of interests", for the lack of a better term, of Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller becoming the Vice President in the 70s and things of that nature. Interesting enough, Charles Lindbergh, Sr. was adamant and very vocal against the inception of the Fed. Of course his great grandson was kidnapped and never found, among other instances such as Abraham Lincoln blocking the Rothschilds from funding both sides of the civil war. It's all interconnected and that only scratches the surface.