2558
Comments (183)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
BoffoTheClown 10 points ago +10 / -0

iirc, it was supposed to be a hatchet job, an ott pisstake of the book. Except it backfired because everyone loved it, they realised the truth in it, and its still being memed hard 25 years later.

8
Bogey 8 points ago +8 / -0

Heinlein wrote an idealized libertarian/liberal society. Where you can do anything as long as you're responsible for it.

Verhoven read it and said "wow, that's so fascistic" and tailored the movie as such.

5
CisSiberianOrchestra 5 points ago +5 / -0

Verhoeven admits that he never even finished the book because he found it "depressing."

3
LibertarianXian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea and didn't do justice to the very cool cyborg-ish military equipment depicted in the book. That was one of my biggest disappointments about the film. Maybe it was partly a budget thing because those war suits would've cost a lot in CGI and material.

3
CisSiberianOrchestra 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was a budget issue. I've read articles that have stated that power armor wasn't included in the film because it would have made the movie too expensive to make.