I think it's because they want the most "solid" case when they prosecute, and present evidence of actionable intent to carry out an attack. The defense will probably claim entrapment and that the person being charged would never had done it if not for the FBI agents prodding him along. Problem is, when you push someone along to do something but fail to arrest them before they actually fucking do some terrorism...
I think it's because they want the most "solid" case when they prosecute, and present evidence of actionable intent to carry out an attack. The defense will probably claim entrapment and that the person being charged would never had done it if not for the FBI agents prodding him along. Problem is, when you push someone along to do something but fail to arrest them before they actually fucking do some terrorism...