2695
Comments (276)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-6
YourOwnGreatGrandma -6 points ago +3 / -9

There’s 0 evidence that Barr did anything to backstab Trump. All this is is Barr following normal protocol.

The fact that you’re trusting unnamed sources from Washington Post really says it all. You know they have slandered Barr dozens of times as a way of hurting Trump and you still believe this shit...

Another user summed up the state of this site pretty well:

Suddenly everyone is not just a legal analyst but a specialist in the uber nerdy niche specialty of Costitutional Law. Plus its cringe how any time someone doesn't do exactly what arm chair opines wants its TRAITOR screeching time. That word used to mean something unimaginably horrible. Now its no more potent than muh racist.

9
fthecoup 9 points ago +9 / -0

There’s 0 evidence that Sessions did anything to backstab Trump. All this is Sessions following normal protocol.

There’s 0 evidence that Brennan did anything to backstab Trump. All this is Brennan following normal protocol.

There’s 0 evidence that Wray did anything to backstab Trump. All this is Wray following normal protocol.

There’s 0 evidence that Comey did anything to backstab Trump. All this is Comey following normal protocol.

There’s 0 evidence that McCabe did anything to backstab Trump. All this is McCabe following normal protocol.

There’s 0 evidence that Kemp did anything to backstab Trump. All this is Kemp following normal protocol.

There’s 0 evidence that Kelly did anything to backstab Trump. All this is Kelly following normal protocol.

There’s 0 evidence that Clapper did anything to backstab Trump. All this is Clapper following normal protocol.

............

2
60gunnuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not all of what you state is wrong, but much of it is in point of FACT - Bullshit. Thing is, I don't feel like referencing through my 356 pages of .docx 11 calibri single spaced format notes I've maintained since the March 2017 Evelyn Farkas "our friends on the hill" interview on MSNBC. My life changed forever that day after listening to her - 4 times in a row to make sure I heard what that stinking neo-marxist skank stated. I doubt she realized what she let go, but did shortly after as she got busy trying to clean it up. It didn't work. Not for this old boy at least. Now I've taken my hatred for these serpents into my soul hoping to let it go when the Reckoning comes full due. Tempis Fugit. Here's FARKAS in the UKRAINE. Do you recognize the name of the company embroidered on that blue jacket she's wearing? LOOK HARD. https://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ENGETE0U0AIdIg8.jpg

-4
YourOwnGreatGrandma -4 points ago +1 / -5

True for Sessions. False for everyone else.

6
fthecoup 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh.

BTW, Barr did a great job covering for those Ruby Ridge assassins, don't you agree??

2
60gunnuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

BARR defended fbi jackboot murderer Lon Horiuchi. Pro Bono. He buried it in his pre-appointment hearing before con gress... buried on pg. 29 OF 29 2nd from last paragraph. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/01/28/2019/barr-responses-to-booker-questions-for-the-record Horiuchi was acquitted of murder (State of Idaho charged) then reduced to manslaughter which he also beat thanks to BARR. Horiuchi went onto WACO where he narrowly escaped a capital charge there because his issued sniper match rifle was in short order sent in for a barrel change rendering bullet to barrel forensics impossible as the barrel "was scrapped" (surprise) by dotGuv armorers.

-3
YourOwnGreatGrandma -3 points ago +1 / -4

I agree that most people who talk about Waco and Ruby Ridge have no idea wtf they’re talking about and they always end up defending a serial pedophile