I made a point like that online about the pigs blood and pig head and I got attacked by some fags I knew from college. “It doesn’t represent everyone”, “just because it doesn’t align with your values” all that shit. Like witness intimidation are terrorism and crimes, that’s not arguable but the retarded left defends it anyway.
lol I have pet Pigs so thats shit to use like a horse head in the bed to intimate people. those people are sick and need to be jailed no bail. I named all my piggies after trailer park boys characters fyi ;)
the prosecuting in this case is def Mr Layhe incarnate. fools each and everyone of them. you disgraced your self truly.. everything they said about this was foolish and stupid in the responce when the judge just laid down the facts... mad max intimidation of witnesses is real and fucking stupid..
A Missionary treated a Cannibal tribe to a case of Pepsi to try and civilize them a bit to modern wonders. He came back a month later and saw a couple victims laying ready to be cooked with their penises cut off, and several penises hanging from a tree being dried. He asked the Chief what the penises were hanging there for. "We were waiting for you to bring a case of Coca Cola". "Everyone knows "things" go better with Coke" !
Then there is the story of the Cannibal who passed his cousin in the jungle.
Why argue? They're not going to listen, if that's how they think.
Interfering with a trial is interfering with a trial. This is one of those moments in life, that if the trial is overturned because of Water's big ugly mouth, you have every right to point at them and go "Hahahahah! Hahahahahaha! Hah!"
If anyone also watches The IT Crowd, think "laughing clown".
Disagree. There are plenty of people who are close to reaching their own breaking points and we damn well should be reaching out to them. Think about all of the people who haven't spoken up yet because they don't want to lose what they have.
I think we’re screwed. I have been trying to red pill many of my friends for years. They are too scared to think for themselves. They don’t listen to me because “you’re not a doctor”, “I’m inclined to believe the CDC”, etc etc. Tens of millions of Americans cannot think critically and are absolute buffoons. It’s too late. Those of us who are awake will have to band together in the coming years. I do not see a scenario in which we avoid a second civil war.
You may be correct about avoiding the unthinkable, but I'm going to do everything I can to resolve this peacefully. That is the American way and it is the rational approach. That means we have to win the Culture War and red-pilling is a big part of that.
I will continue to use reason until the time for other tools becomes necessary.
Im with ya buddy. I do not seek confrontation but you better believe I will never back down. I do everything I can to help educate the people in my immediate circle, but sometimes it’s like banging my head against the wall. Eventually I feel like giving up. If I can’t convince people that I KNOW are reasonable and trust me, i have no hope for the general public.
Alex Jones man.. dudes been right this entire time. evil is real. just waiting for those City dogs to try the country folks.. with Pigs. lol. never trust a man with a pig farm (snatch)
Why is Water's so against being black that she wears a white person's wig ? Does that make her feel "less black" ? Truth be told the Bitch is likely bald as a cue ball !
Compare and contrast with what they did to Roger Stone under the guise of "witness intimidation" who just told people that they had a right to remain silent if they choose.
No matter how many voter reform bills get passed, until we’ve truly gotten to bottom of Nov.3 including the origins of covid-19, forget about being able to move on with any sense of closure. BTW where’s that Durham report?
They are actually very good lawyers all of them. They did a pretty good job on the case by misrepresenting facts and testimony and hiding bad facts from the jury.
They are evil people for trying to imprison someone who doesn't deserve it, but they are certainly good at their job.
The prosecution was a pretty bad, from my "fan of court videos" vantage. He was using beyond loaded language and all of the favorite tricks of someone trying to "prove" a case they don't have a strong suit for.
Usually it's the defense doing that, not the State.
A prosecutor does have an obligation to justice and not just winning, but you're right that a prosecutor will never get in trouble for prosecuting someone innocent or over-charging someone. For Chauvin, the prosecution dumped a ton of evidence on the defense at the last minute, which is also a violation of ethical standards.
A frivolous prosecution can ruin someone even if they are ultimately acquitted. Two examples are Kyle Rittenhouse and the McCloskeys. At least Chauvin has the police union picking up the tab for his legal fees.
The idea that a prosecutor brags about his win rate percentage is ridiculous. If a prosecutor wins 100% of his cases that means (1) The system is unfairly stacked in favor of prosecutors, or (2) The prosecutor never takes on a hard case. For example, the teenage child of a billionaire commits a serious crime, and the prosecutor offers a sweetheart plea deal instead of going to trial and risking losing against a billionaire's legal team.
A lot of "too big to jail" people get away with it, partially because prosecutors refuse to take tough cases. You're never going to have a 100% chance of winning against someone politically influential. Example: Jon Corzine robbed MF Global's customers, and prosecutors didn't think they had a 100% chance of winning, so they didn't bother.
I agree. The same for defence lawyers. Johnny Cochran used to brag that he had a 100% win in his court cases. If you only take on the cases you know you will win then any defence lawyer can claim 100% win.
Yes, but O J Simpson was never a 100% win case. Not even a 5% win. The whole world knows he was guilty. It was a jury that didn't do their sworn duty. That is what the state in this case is hoping for. A threatened, and intimidated jury afraid to do what is right. Wrongly fired, charged, and prosecuted as a sacrificial offering to a black aggression, that supports their criminal element, and that will burn, and loot to avoid the rule of law being enforced !
The prosecution is held by standards not to hide information, lie, twist facts, or violate the rights of a defendant. The defense is allowed to use every trick in the book to mitigate, misrepresent, and withhold damming evidence they might know, and the state doesn't. In this case it is clear those roles are completely reversed. Even the bulk of the prosecution "expert" witnesses clearly had an agenda, some not even charging for their "services", but because they "had an interest in the case" ? They mostly had one purpose, and that was as "experts" to ignore, and down play the several life threatening factors that already existed in making Floyd a walking dead man because of his health, and behavior !
I loved how he called it a vague statement essentially. He knows damn well what she said and what it means to the trail but is sucking up to his masters who demanded conviction.
That is going to be a hard moral choice for any thinking juror. With all the doxing / harassing the establishment media does to unbelievers and the highly charged atmosphere around this case - they are putting their life and their family's lives on the line if they do the right thing here.
I believe they are likely gonna have no choice but bring this up. I would if I were a juror. I would propose innocent and let them shit their pants then point out how the media, Democrats and US Politicians have tainted the case.
If I were on that jury, my family absolutely would not be at home right now, and I'd go straight from the courthouse to the airport to GTFO of town after the verdict is announced.
Al the jurors have high powered rifles trained at their families heads the moment they set foot out of the courtroom, basically. You think any will risk that?
Bro the news media doxxed a fucking firefighter over a $10 donation to Rittenhouse and showed his property on live TV. One of the witnesses got doxed and his home vandalized with blood and a pigs head on a stake.
What he said isn't an exaggeration anymore. Those jurors are walking targets if they vote the 'wrong' way.
OMG a pig head and a snake. You pussies are such fear mongering faggots. Did you respond with tweets and posts doxing the journalist, the boss of the journalist? Did you mail the poor bastard security cameras or offer up surveillance help? No. You doom for the left like little faggots.
I don't have a Twitter, and the house already had security cameras mounted. They didn't help. BLM killed 30 people in the riots last year and permanently injured dozens more. They set homes on fire with families inside, destroyed businesses, and ruined livelihoods. They're backed by our government in a very literal sense, they get arrested and released without any charges, and have money to burn to continue. They literally assassinated two Trump supporters, unprovoked, on camera for no reason.
The jury is going to vote guilty because their family is under threat from regular citizens, congress people, and Tim Walz and Jacob Frey are demanding a guilty verdict from a live conference on TV. They're going to vote guilty because they don't want their home torched, or to be targeted and attacked in the street after their identity is leaked, or bomb threats at their kids school.
Its not dooming to realize that a lot of these jurors are normies who are terrified of what happens if they don't vote guilty. Whoever of them is brave enough to force either a hung jury or acquittal at this point deserves a kings ransom.
You sound like a lefty describing the "Capital Insurrection." Or someone who believes in COVID hysteria!
Democrats are to blame. I have a gun and don't live in a Democrat state. Faggots here push not to vote or get involved. If you were truly concerned you would be cussing at the moderation of this site for allowing commies to spew their stupidity. You would be front and center on your state elections. You would be doxing ANTIFA running behind BLM.
Yes, it has to be unanimous. One juror can cause deliberation to go on indefinitely if they stick to their guns. See "Twelve Angry Men". (The '57 version, not the remake.
Actual lawyers can correct me, but I believe criminal cases have to be unanimous, but civil cases can have other voting outcomes, and it's different per state.
You guys vastly misunderstand this situation. Chauvin will 100% be going to jail. The left has done everything they can to scare the shit out of the jurors, so to keep the riots small and out of their neighborhoods they're going to convict him
Don't get me wrong, he's not guilty and SHOULD get off, but he will not.
You're misunderstanding a jury trial. As a juror, when you're in there and you're deciding the fate of another human being, it's not like sitting behind the computer and typing up a witty response. There are heroes and patriots who will do what is right no matter what the potential consequences. I know, I was on a murder trial.
There are two clips floating around on this subject. One he denied motion for mistrial (at this time). The other he basically said that her comments alone would be grounds for an appeal.
I honestly think it was the right call, would be better he gets off sooner than later (ie it's less emotional to lose a game in the first quarter instead of triple overtime)
Mad max probably knows the trial is over and this was the best way to fuel the riots
He did. I am no expert, but mistrial and appeal are definitely two different things. The judge did slam mad max pretty hard though right before he denied a mistrial, everyone knows that she has fucked up the trial to some extent
The Judge denied the Defense's motion for mistrial at THIS trial. What the Judge indicated though was if Chauvin is found guilty here and the defense appeals that conviction, the actions from Waters may be good enough grounds for a mistrial.
No, he didn't have proof that the jury heard Water's big ugly mouth running. That is what would trigger a mistrial, in this specific set of circumstances.
Go read up on how Nixon's comments about Manson during his trial almost got a mistrial, but the judge, after questioning the jury, determined that it hadn't impacted them much at all.
Not defending Waters, but her impact on the jury only matters in terms of the trial. If any of the jurors admit to hearing her during the trial and right now while deliberating, then a judge can use that to throw the verdict out.
Your response it totally spot on lol I get having beef with the Judge for whatever reason but don't make it because of this. Although I disagree with the Judge's ruling it wasn't out of line for him to deny the request. I think there were a LOT of things even before the trial that created impartiality. I think the jurors should have been sequestered - the Defense made a good point after the jury was dismissed, this case permeates every aspect of our lives now. In addition, the fact that the 27 million dollar civil suit was awarded (if you want to call it that) right before the trial is poisoning the well too which I am sure was another reason the Defense motioned for a change of venue (I think they did but not sure).
The judge may also be trying to spare Chauvin the cost and trauma of another trial, when he could very well be acquitted. His chances of acquittal are probably better now than in a second trial, since the prosecution screwed so much up with their own backfiring witnesses, and they wouldn't make the same mistakes if they got a mulligan.
As much as the defense counsel would enjoy being paid for two trials, they may not have intended the motion to succeed anyway. Instead, they now have the judge's comments about Maxine Waters's jury intimidation on record and in their pocket, should they need them on appeal. The most likely outcome is a hung jury anyway, which ends up functionally equivalent to a mistrial from my understanding.
The judge has to assume the jury, which was sequestered with no access to media at the time Maxine made these comments, haven't heard them until they give him a reason to believe otherwise.
I think the judge has been fine throughout the entire trial and stuck to the letter of the law really well. He didn't fall for the prosecutions bullshit objections and overruled almost every single one that I heard lodged.
that's because every rational American knows charges never should have been brought forward in the first place - but marxist AG's and wokism has led to this superfluous trial
As I understand it. He is saying those involved in the trial caused no problems, thus no mistrial. But if he is convicted, she is an outside force that threatened the deciders and if they went with what she wants, maybe the threats worked and thus a reason for mistrial. That would be after verdict and thus after trial and thus on appeal. But who knows I eat raw meat and live in a cave, so my thinking probably shouldn’t be listened to.
I believe for this trial, they'd have to prove that the members of the jury were exposed to Water's big ugly mouth - which they wouldn't admit to, as they were ordered to not watch the news, and would be replaced instantly if they admitted it.
If someone had stood up in the courtroom and repeated what Waters said, like what happened in the Mason trial regarding Nixon's comments, he would have had to act.
But Water's big ugly mouth may have guaranteed an appeal and overturning of the results of this trial, or a mis-trial.
And Nancy will continue to support and protect her big ugly mouth, no doubt.
This trial goes through. If Chauvin is found guilty then the defense will appeal it and it is possible the appeal court will toss out the conviction based on Walter's statements.
Maxine is trying to start a terrible race war that would take the lives of thousands or 10’s of thousands of lives.
But Maxine doesn’t care.
She can just sit home inside one of her mansions, guarded by armed
security and tall walls, and watch it all on T.V.
Maxine has no business going near a microphone, and Obama TV networks that go along with Maxine’s [email protected] wish for America share responsibility.
But they won't be. And it will be forgotten in the coming race war that's kicking off very, very soon. The media WANTS the jurors attacked if they don't get maximum punishment here.
It's all theater. before she became the brave anti-blumpf resistance, she was unanimously considered the most corrupt member of congress by the public—nothing ever happened to her. Nothing ever will happen to her until she dies at 110, still in office.
Doesn't matter, the jury was gone by that point. As far as the jury is concerned, anything he says after he sends them to deliberate doesn't exist, and they won't hear it until they render a verdict either way.
Man all the comments here calling Waters and the Dems stupid are so misguided....
They want an innocent verdict or a mistrial so they can continue their stupid campaign against white supremacy. If the jury finds chauvin guilty (which they shouldn't), then the won't have any grounds to stand on calling america a racist country. However, if they get an innocent verdict, then they can call the american people racist and race-bait.
Better yet, if they get a guilty verdict but a mistrial, they can complain about the evil white supremacy in the American system of governance (i.e., innocence until proven guilty).
This is all part of their profoundly evil scheme to destroy this country.
The judge should order the state to detain all rioters and ship them to Maxine's residence with a Jumbotron. Once they're all settled in announce the mistrial and let the commies fall where they may.
Chauvin will get off. He's factually innocent and juries have gotten these cases right time and again. You think they can unanimously pressure an entire jury into a guilty verdict? OK. It wont happen.
They can and they are. The jurors all have massive targets on their backs. Not just them, their families too. The democrats have made that quite clear.
Yah I've heard the old "OJ" canard before. How long ago was that again? Kind of a unique case with DNA being new and a key prosecution witness lying about being a racist. Never again will you see a defendant asked to wear a piece of evidence, either.
That wasnt even a case against the police, which are even harder to convict. Thankfully we still give them some benefit of the doubt when their department trained techniques fail against feral criminals.
After seeing what Roger Stone went through for alleged witness tampering, I want nothing less than the SWAT team outside her house at 4 am, make it a Fox News exclusive.
So find Chauvin guilty or the cities burn and the jurors themselves burn. This type of juror and witness tampering, intimidation used to be illegal. That was in the non-clown world timeline though. Anything goes in the clown world.
I am being honest. Call me a pussy, but if I was a juror, I would be too scared to find Chauvin not guilty. You know the media is going to dox the names of the jurors at the end of the trial and a sitting US Representative gave the mob a green light to burn my house down and torture my relatives.
He was really "unhappy" with the DC elected people. They should keep their opinions to themselves. They are damaging the Juducial (co-equal) branch of government. I think his statement that what she said could get the trial "overturned on appeal" is enough, all by itself, to get it overturned.
The longer it takes the more likely for it to be a hung jury. People are fucking retarded, zero chance they found 12 reasonable people that are not afraid of mob intimidation
You have to admit, America is the land of opportunity where the mentally ill can get elected to Congress, an alcoholic can become Speaker of the House, someone with Alzheimer's can become Potatus, and a pedophile can be on the Supreme Court.
Don't forget to riot no matter which way the Chauvin trial turns out. I need a new 4K TV from Target so I can hear the Somali news. Portland can save money by turning off street lights since the fires will light it up.
witness intimidation confirmed.. lock her up..
I made a point like that online about the pigs blood and pig head and I got attacked by some fags I knew from college. “It doesn’t represent everyone”, “just because it doesn’t align with your values” all that shit. Like witness intimidation are terrorism and crimes, that’s not arguable but the retarded left defends it anyway.
Also my nickname for one of my.golden retriever pups. Look at my "long pig"
https://ibb.co/WPDkbqd
Lookit those paws!
Gonna be a big boy
lol I have pet Pigs so thats shit to use like a horse head in the bed to intimate people. those people are sick and need to be jailed no bail. I named all my piggies after trailer park boys characters fyi ;)
the prosecuting in this case is def Mr Layhe incarnate. fools each and everyone of them. you disgraced your self truly.. everything they said about this was foolish and stupid in the responce when the judge just laid down the facts... mad max intimidation of witnesses is real and fucking stupid..
And Maxine waters is Randy bobandy. Pimping himself out for cheeseburgers again.
haha true. a man's gotta eat. 50 bucks or coupons for cheeseburgers.. id pay to see her say it.
Omg what a sweet pup! I have two goldens who I taught to say “Trump” for treats lol they’re the best!
Looks like a good ole pup. Best wishes fellow patriot!
That is one cute pupper
Try our new Arby's Barbequed Long Pig sandwich. Now being market tested in Minneapolis, Portland, Atlanta, Seattle.
Served with fava bean fries.
And a nice chianti.
https://youtu.be/IhRp31dpREA
donner party checkin in
sooooo ravenous
donner party of 8.. no 7. I mean six.. five.. four. how long is this wait.. party of 2. oh nevermind.
-Woodhouse
A man of culture.
raises glass
A Missionary treated a Cannibal tribe to a case of Pepsi to try and civilize them a bit to modern wonders. He came back a month later and saw a couple victims laying ready to be cooked with their penises cut off, and several penises hanging from a tree being dried. He asked the Chief what the penises were hanging there for. "We were waiting for you to bring a case of Coca Cola". "Everyone knows "things" go better with Coke" !
Then there is the story of the Cannibal who passed his cousin in the jungle.
Why argue? They're not going to listen, if that's how they think.
Interfering with a trial is interfering with a trial. This is one of those moments in life, that if the trial is overturned because of Water's big ugly mouth, you have every right to point at them and go "Hahahahah! Hahahahahaha! Hah!"
If anyone also watches The IT Crowd, think "laughing clown".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4vbMv9gbmM
The Infowar is over. Waking people up now is pointless. Prepare your family and friends, and get ready for the shit to hit the fan.
Disagree. There are plenty of people who are close to reaching their own breaking points and we damn well should be reaching out to them. Think about all of the people who haven't spoken up yet because they don't want to lose what they have.
Red-pilling still matters.
I think we’re screwed. I have been trying to red pill many of my friends for years. They are too scared to think for themselves. They don’t listen to me because “you’re not a doctor”, “I’m inclined to believe the CDC”, etc etc. Tens of millions of Americans cannot think critically and are absolute buffoons. It’s too late. Those of us who are awake will have to band together in the coming years. I do not see a scenario in which we avoid a second civil war.
You may be correct about avoiding the unthinkable, but I'm going to do everything I can to resolve this peacefully. That is the American way and it is the rational approach. That means we have to win the Culture War and red-pilling is a big part of that.
I will continue to use reason until the time for other tools becomes necessary.
Im with ya buddy. I do not seek confrontation but you better believe I will never back down. I do everything I can to help educate the people in my immediate circle, but sometimes it’s like banging my head against the wall. Eventually I feel like giving up. If I can’t convince people that I KNOW are reasonable and trust me, i have no hope for the general public.
Prepare for SHTF, obviously.
Get your defeatism scrubbed up on the double, then drop and give me 50, soldier!
Alex Jones man.. dudes been right this entire time. evil is real. just waiting for those City dogs to try the country folks.. with Pigs. lol. never trust a man with a pig farm (snatch)
Weak.
WEAK
Lay off the black pills.
^ This guy gets it. ^
Our family loved the IT crowd. (not trying to forum slide here).
One of our favorite scenes is "I'm disabled"
Water park fire will always be my favorite. :)
I'm uh leg disabled lol
"Why do you think I'm gay?"
"You invited me to a gay play called gay and laughed at every gay joke and all your friends are gay."
"I thought that I could pull it off because you look so much like a man."
That show was great. I was so sad when it ended!
Moss in the claw machine for me. Or Jen dealing with the smoking ban.
Why is Water's so against being black that she wears a white person's wig ? Does that make her feel "less black" ? Truth be told the Bitch is likely bald as a cue ball !
Compare and contrast with what they did to Roger Stone under the guise of "witness intimidation" who just told people that they had a right to remain silent if they choose.
No.
Fucking.
Shit.
Pisses me off
17 fbi by land sea and air for a walk yourself in warrent..
The best thing you can do with leftists is not associate. You are better than them, and all they do is bring you down to their level.
It's impossible to be virtuous when you hang out with slime.
she will argue that she has already set 3 decades of encouraging violence with protest as precedent.
then will argue that it is moot now that the cities have already been burnt
Mad Maxine will no doubt use Hillary's famous line: "At this point, what difference does it make?"
After the guys who attacked Reginald Denny during the Rodney King riots were released, Maxine Waters went to the block party to congratulate them.
Absolute Satan.
She won't have to argue anything at all because our DOJ and entire judicial system is a political farce.
He said the congresswoman's "opinion" doesn't really matter. How do you intimidate with opinions? Wonder why he used that word 🤔
It's like...they selectively follow the Constitution and enforcing the First. Or something like that. I know, crazy talk, right?
that judge should have sequestered but I loved his based opinion she done fuck all this up epic
i never wanted to reach out to a man so bad as I watch Chauvin writing non-stop through out all of this
I really pray that the jury digs deep and does the right thing
Antifa Maxine??
Max Waters AKA James Brown wannabe !.
james brown called.. he wants his wig back
Not sure he wants it back after she doused it with 8 ounces of 40 weight oil.
The state's position is that they are fucking retarded.
How those dumbasses passed the bar is a mystery
How Biden passed the electoral college is also a mystery...
The electoral college is just like actual colleges, a moneymaking grift with no legitimacy left.
No matter how many voter reform bills get passed, until we’ve truly gotten to bottom of Nov.3 including the origins of covid-19, forget about being able to move on with any sense of closure. BTW where’s that Durham report?
No closure until we strip the Feds of their power altogether and restore the nation to a Constitutional Republic.
And bring the criminals to justice.
Sticky this. Then frame it in gold.
Still convinced Durham is a deepfake
Its as real as he is.
Kek
ding ding ding
astronaut.jpg --- Always was.
No it’s not. It’s clear as day that the left cheated.
And nobody paid the price for it.
Look fat, here’s the deal. I’m a proud Democrat running for the Senate and i beat Joe Biden fair and square. Period. Bet on that, jack. Come on, man!
I heard it, in his voice, in my head. Didn't know if I should laugh or cry.
Not when you consider some of the members include Lightfoot, the Clintons, and Cuomo.
Hahahhahahah
They are actually very good lawyers all of them. They did a pretty good job on the case by misrepresenting facts and testimony and hiding bad facts from the jury.
They are evil people for trying to imprison someone who doesn't deserve it, but they are certainly good at their job.
The prosecution was a pretty bad, from my "fan of court videos" vantage. He was using beyond loaded language and all of the favorite tricks of someone trying to "prove" a case they don't have a strong suit for.
Usually it's the defense doing that, not the State.
Well, they were trying a case that was overcharged for political reasons. Not an easy task when the evidence isn't on your side.
this
Actually, prosecutors have an obligation to justice, not convicting the innocent via any means necessary.
No. They keep score of their wins. That’s how they earn promotions.
A prosecutor does have an obligation to justice and not just winning, but you're right that a prosecutor will never get in trouble for prosecuting someone innocent or over-charging someone. For Chauvin, the prosecution dumped a ton of evidence on the defense at the last minute, which is also a violation of ethical standards.
A frivolous prosecution can ruin someone even if they are ultimately acquitted. Two examples are Kyle Rittenhouse and the McCloskeys. At least Chauvin has the police union picking up the tab for his legal fees.
The idea that a prosecutor brags about his win rate percentage is ridiculous. If a prosecutor wins 100% of his cases that means (1) The system is unfairly stacked in favor of prosecutors, or (2) The prosecutor never takes on a hard case. For example, the teenage child of a billionaire commits a serious crime, and the prosecutor offers a sweetheart plea deal instead of going to trial and risking losing against a billionaire's legal team.
A lot of "too big to jail" people get away with it, partially because prosecutors refuse to take tough cases. You're never going to have a 100% chance of winning against someone politically influential. Example: Jon Corzine robbed MF Global's customers, and prosecutors didn't think they had a 100% chance of winning, so they didn't bother.
I agree. The same for defence lawyers. Johnny Cochran used to brag that he had a 100% win in his court cases. If you only take on the cases you know you will win then any defence lawyer can claim 100% win.
Yes, but O J Simpson was never a 100% win case. Not even a 5% win. The whole world knows he was guilty. It was a jury that didn't do their sworn duty. That is what the state in this case is hoping for. A threatened, and intimidated jury afraid to do what is right. Wrongly fired, charged, and prosecuted as a sacrificial offering to a black aggression, that supports their criminal element, and that will burn, and loot to avoid the rule of law being enforced !
The prosecution is held by standards not to hide information, lie, twist facts, or violate the rights of a defendant. The defense is allowed to use every trick in the book to mitigate, misrepresent, and withhold damming evidence they might know, and the state doesn't. In this case it is clear those roles are completely reversed. Even the bulk of the prosecution "expert" witnesses clearly had an agenda, some not even charging for their "services", but because they "had an interest in the case" ? They mostly had one purpose, and that was as "experts" to ignore, and down play the several life threatening factors that already existed in making Floyd a walking dead man because of his health, and behavior !
As Mark Dice has been saying... "They are servants of Satan!"
There is no limit to the number of times someone can fail the bar. Only need to pass it once.
What is a yute?
Sorry, the two DEFENDANTS
Most of the time they pass it when they're young, fresh out of law school so their knowledge is sharp. After 20 years, it gets rusty to say the least.
they're paid liars. They'd say clouds are green and would stick to it until the bitter end because that's what they're paid to do. Spin narrative.
It depends on what time of the day it is annnnnd how what flavored heavy metal particulates are in the aerosol sprayers..during that trip
I loved how he called it a vague statement essentially. He knows damn well what she said and what it means to the trail but is sucking up to his masters who demanded conviction.
He's a coward and paid off or doesn't want pig heads on his steps...justice is dead.
F.U.D.
A page from MIcrosoft's strategy book
I can't believe the state said that diarrhea face's comments were vague
They didn't have official letterhead? Inadmissable!
He said that the defense’s statements were vague because he didn’t directly quote Maxine Waters.
I’ll be surprised if the jury deliberated for more than an hour. They’ve already been given instructions to find him guilty.
This is far from an impartial jury. They are scared for their lives.
That is going to be a hard moral choice for any thinking juror. With all the doxing / harassing the establishment media does to unbelievers and the highly charged atmosphere around this case - they are putting their life and their family's lives on the line if they do the right thing here.
I believe they are likely gonna have no choice but bring this up. I would if I were a juror. I would propose innocent and let them shit their pants then point out how the media, Democrats and US Politicians have tainted the case.
Balls said the Queen, if I had some I'd be King.
i feel like they would un-ironically kill themselves if they locked him away knowing he's innocent
If I were on that jury, my family absolutely would not be at home right now, and I'd go straight from the courthouse to the airport to GTFO of town after the verdict is announced.
What country are we if laws are not followed and fair judgement ruled out because of intimidation?
A Chinese client state?
I can't answer your question, but here we are.
Considering the words and behavior from the powers that be regarding this situation, they should be.
From what I read, not a single white male over 40 on the jury. So much for ‘jury of your peers’
That’s why there is reason for mistrial on appeal.
guilty verdict requires all jurors to vote guilty correct?
Al the jurors have high powered rifles trained at their families heads the moment they set foot out of the courtroom, basically. You think any will risk that?
Then they shouldn't have accepted the position of being on the jury. Fear is not an excuse for finding an innocent man guilty.
Your comment only helps the left. You may believe your exaggeration to be real but it's not. You only help them by sharing fiction.
Bro the news media doxxed a fucking firefighter over a $10 donation to Rittenhouse and showed his property on live TV. One of the witnesses got doxed and his home vandalized with blood and a pigs head on a stake.
What he said isn't an exaggeration anymore. Those jurors are walking targets if they vote the 'wrong' way.
OMG a pig head and a snake. You pussies are such fear mongering faggots. Did you respond with tweets and posts doxing the journalist, the boss of the journalist? Did you mail the poor bastard security cameras or offer up surveillance help? No. You doom for the left like little faggots.
I don't have a Twitter, and the house already had security cameras mounted. They didn't help. BLM killed 30 people in the riots last year and permanently injured dozens more. They set homes on fire with families inside, destroyed businesses, and ruined livelihoods. They're backed by our government in a very literal sense, they get arrested and released without any charges, and have money to burn to continue. They literally assassinated two Trump supporters, unprovoked, on camera for no reason.
The jury is going to vote guilty because their family is under threat from regular citizens, congress people, and Tim Walz and Jacob Frey are demanding a guilty verdict from a live conference on TV. They're going to vote guilty because they don't want their home torched, or to be targeted and attacked in the street after their identity is leaked, or bomb threats at their kids school.
Its not dooming to realize that a lot of these jurors are normies who are terrified of what happens if they don't vote guilty. Whoever of them is brave enough to force either a hung jury or acquittal at this point deserves a kings ransom.
You sound like a lefty describing the "Capital Insurrection." Or someone who believes in COVID hysteria!
Democrats are to blame. I have a gun and don't live in a Democrat state. Faggots here push not to vote or get involved. If you were truly concerned you would be cussing at the moderation of this site for allowing commies to spew their stupidity. You would be front and center on your state elections. You would be doxing ANTIFA running behind BLM.
Yes, it has to be unanimous. One juror can cause deliberation to go on indefinitely if they stick to their guns. See "Twelve Angry Men". (The '57 version, not the remake.
Actual lawyers can correct me, but I believe criminal cases have to be unanimous, but civil cases can have other voting outcomes, and it's different per state.
I've sat on one jury for a criminal case (assault & battery), and the verdict had to be unanimous.
I sat on several courts martial panels in the military, however, and those did NOT need to be unanimous.
You guys vastly misunderstand this situation. Chauvin will 100% be going to jail. The left has done everything they can to scare the shit out of the jurors, so to keep the riots small and out of their neighborhoods they're going to convict him
Don't get me wrong, he's not guilty and SHOULD get off, but he will not.
You're misunderstanding a jury trial. As a juror, when you're in there and you're deciding the fate of another human being, it's not like sitting behind the computer and typing up a witty response. There are heroes and patriots who will do what is right no matter what the potential consequences. I know, I was on a murder trial.
Good, her low IQ anger is fucking things up for her own side.
It's what she wants. More riots equals more power for the left.
Correct, BLM/Antifa riots are tacitly government-sanctioned to advance their agenda.
You underestimate her. She is a deep state bitch that is trying to inflame a race war.
Not good. The title is a lie. He said he's not labeling it a mistrial
There are two clips floating around on this subject. One he denied motion for mistrial (at this time). The other he basically said that her comments alone would be grounds for an appeal.
I honestly think it was the right call, would be better he gets off sooner than later (ie it's less emotional to lose a game in the first quarter instead of triple overtime)
Mad max probably knows the trial is over and this was the best way to fuel the riots
We crossed that line long ago. Accelerate.
I thought the judge said he wouldn't call a mistrial.
He did. I am no expert, but mistrial and appeal are definitely two different things. The judge did slam mad max pretty hard though right before he denied a mistrial, everyone knows that she has fucked up the trial to some extent
The Judge denied the Defense's motion for mistrial at THIS trial. What the Judge indicated though was if Chauvin is found guilty here and the defense appeals that conviction, the actions from Waters may be good enough grounds for a mistrial.
Basically he doesn't have the balls to do his fucking job so he's going to kick it down the road to some other fucker to deal with. Fuckin coward
No, he didn't have proof that the jury heard Water's big ugly mouth running. That is what would trigger a mistrial, in this specific set of circumstances.
Go read up on how Nixon's comments about Manson during his trial almost got a mistrial, but the judge, after questioning the jury, determined that it hadn't impacted them much at all.
Not defending Waters, but her impact on the jury only matters in terms of the trial. If any of the jurors admit to hearing her during the trial and right now while deliberating, then a judge can use that to throw the verdict out.
Hes absolutely spineless because he didn't even question the jury and just immediately said hes "confident" they stayed way from news.
Okay, stay mad at him. Have fun.
Your response it totally spot on lol I get having beef with the Judge for whatever reason but don't make it because of this. Although I disagree with the Judge's ruling it wasn't out of line for him to deny the request. I think there were a LOT of things even before the trial that created impartiality. I think the jurors should have been sequestered - the Defense made a good point after the jury was dismissed, this case permeates every aspect of our lives now. In addition, the fact that the 27 million dollar civil suit was awarded (if you want to call it that) right before the trial is poisoning the well too which I am sure was another reason the Defense motioned for a change of venue (I think they did but not sure).
The judge may also be trying to spare Chauvin the cost and trauma of another trial, when he could very well be acquitted. His chances of acquittal are probably better now than in a second trial, since the prosecution screwed so much up with their own backfiring witnesses, and they wouldn't make the same mistakes if they got a mulligan.
As much as the defense counsel would enjoy being paid for two trials, they may not have intended the motion to succeed anyway. Instead, they now have the judge's comments about Maxine Waters's jury intimidation on record and in their pocket, should they need them on appeal. The most likely outcome is a hung jury anyway, which ends up functionally equivalent to a mistrial from my understanding.
No doubt Chauvin’s lawyer is being paid for by the police union. The union would also pay his legal fees for a new trial, appeal, etc.
I bet she got paid sweet uniparty bux. Think how much funding both sides can take in if this all goes sideways.
The judge has to assume the jury, which was sequestered with no access to media at the time Maxine made these comments, haven't heard them until they give him a reason to believe otherwise.
I think the judge has been fine throughout the entire trial and stuck to the letter of the law really well. He didn't fall for the prosecutions bullshit objections and overruled almost every single one that I heard lodged.
Not sure they were sequestered. I keep reading that they weren’t
They sequestered after Friday.
He also said you might get this trial overturned on appeal
That statement by the judge alone is almost enough to guarantee it. That's unheard of.
So is a member of Congress appealing for riots in the media, and the Speaker of the House saying they did nothing wrong.
That's where we are currently.
that's because every rational American knows charges never should have been brought forward in the first place - but marxist AG's and wokism has led to this superfluous trial
As I understand it. He is saying those involved in the trial caused no problems, thus no mistrial. But if he is convicted, she is an outside force that threatened the deciders and if they went with what she wants, maybe the threats worked and thus a reason for mistrial. That would be after verdict and thus after trial and thus on appeal. But who knows I eat raw meat and live in a cave, so my thinking probably shouldn’t be listened to.
I believe for this trial, they'd have to prove that the members of the jury were exposed to Water's big ugly mouth - which they wouldn't admit to, as they were ordered to not watch the news, and would be replaced instantly if they admitted it.
If someone had stood up in the courtroom and repeated what Waters said, like what happened in the Mason trial regarding Nixon's comments, he would have had to act.
But Water's big ugly mouth may have guaranteed an appeal and overturning of the results of this trial, or a mis-trial.
And Nancy will continue to support and protect her big ugly mouth, no doubt.
Maybe he should have sequestered them.
The state wants to burn and at this point it deserves it.
Any officer not calling in sick at this point is complicit.
Meh. For something in the news this much, impossible for a good enough sequester.
This trial goes through. If Chauvin is found guilty then the defense will appeal it and it is possible the appeal court will toss out the conviction based on Walter's statements.
mistrial no but an appeal if found guilty I think has a lot of merit behind it.
Who is going to stop her. States and locals don’t like arresting congress and Nancy is supporting her.
Maxine is trying to start a terrible race war that would take the lives of thousands or 10’s of thousands of lives.
But Maxine doesn’t care.
She can just sit home inside one of her mansions, guarded by armed security and tall walls, and watch it all on T.V.
Maxine has no business going near a microphone, and Obama TV networks that go along with Maxine’s [email protected] wish for America share responsibility.
Her security isn't that good. A couple dozen Patriots could get rid of her
It's all theater. That Droopy dogfaced hag has been shouting "FIRE" in a crowded theater for decades now with zero repercussions.
I think it's time to start dishing out real-world repercussions to these fucking parasites
ABC is outing some of the jurors and where they live! WTF that has to be criminal!
If true, they need to be hauled into a courtroom.
But they won't be. And it will be forgotten in the coming race war that's kicking off very, very soon. The media WANTS the jurors attacked if they don't get maximum punishment here.
Sauce
It's all theater. before she became the brave anti-blumpf resistance, she was unanimously considered the most corrupt member of congress by the public—nothing ever happened to her. Nothing ever will happen to her until she dies at 110, still in office.
And celebrated and remembered for a week for her tireless activism, passion, and strong wohmanness.
They will name a bill after her to "increase" Voter turnout. IE cheat more fraudulently.
Did the judge just telegraph a predetermined verdict for the trial?
Doesn't matter, the jury was gone by that point. As far as the jury is concerned, anything he says after he sends them to deliberate doesn't exist, and they won't hear it until they render a verdict either way.
I thought that too. Why need to overturn it if there's equal chance of not guilty verdict. He seems pretty sure of guilty.
This was probably the plan.
If they vote not guilty, riots.
If they vote guilty, trial is easily overturned on appeal and then there are riots.
So you're saying there's a chance of a riot?
There's a 30% chance that they're already rioting.
Man all the comments here calling Waters and the Dems stupid are so misguided....
They want an innocent verdict or a mistrial so they can continue their stupid campaign against white supremacy. If the jury finds chauvin guilty (which they shouldn't), then the won't have any grounds to stand on calling america a racist country. However, if they get an innocent verdict, then they can call the american people racist and race-bait.
Better yet, if they get a guilty verdict but a mistrial, they can complain about the evil white supremacy in the American system of governance (i.e., innocence until proven guilty).
This is all part of their profoundly evil scheme to destroy this country.
If he's found guilty they'll find another wuhsuprimisy banner to run with.
They will never stop as long as they are able.
And that's all there is to it.
"then the won't have any grounds to stand on calling america a racist country".
They already don't, and look what they've accomplished...
Well touche. I made the mistake of believing democrats are reasonable people
No if he's found guilty he can call for a new trial
No, but he will have an easier time getting a new trial
And in 2-3 years after he is murdered in prison he might even get it.
So you know, on second thought, the plan is for him to walk and she's making sure of it. That's what they want.
"SHOWVIN TRIAL"
Sounds about right. Make sure it’s almost impossible for justice.
this what happens when you politicize a tragedy
fucking idiotic democrats just out for blood
The judge should order the state to detain all rioters and ship them to Maxine's residence with a Jumbotron. Once they're all settled in announce the mistrial and let the commies fall where they may.
Intentional. A mistrial is the best way to keep this case in the headlines.
A congresswoman advocating for a specific verdict in a trial is fucking despicable.
LOL Maxine Waters is as dumb as she is ugly.
FUCK MAD MAX
For some reason I can't keep looking at the retarded partitions and useless masks and the idiots wearing them.
Mistrial
Let the mob turn on her, then stick the rest of the pieces in jail.
IMPEACH FAUX DE FIBRES!!!
Kek!!!!
Chauvin will get off. He's factually innocent and juries have gotten these cases right time and again. You think they can unanimously pressure an entire jury into a guilty verdict? OK. It wont happen.
They can and they are. The jurors all have massive targets on their backs. Not just them, their families too. The democrats have made that quite clear.
Ok and if that doesn't happen? I'll happily admit if I'm wrong but this ain't the first jury they've threatened.
Can you name a more significant jury in modern times than this one?
Here to eat some crow. You were right
Came back to say you were right I was wrong
Yeah remember when O.J. was factually guilty and the jury convicted him? That was cool.
Hold on, I'm being passed a note here...
Yah I've heard the old "OJ" canard before. How long ago was that again? Kind of a unique case with DNA being new and a key prosecution witness lying about being a racist. Never again will you see a defendant asked to wear a piece of evidence, either.
That wasnt even a case against the police, which are even harder to convict. Thankfully we still give them some benefit of the doubt when their department trained techniques fail against feral criminals.
Did you know that one of the OJ jurors is on record stating that their not guilty verdict was payback for the Rodney King verdict?
Meh one old lady they probably paid to be on that show. "True crime" TV shows are hardly evidence.
Will you or will you not eat crow when Chauvin walks? I think he will be acquitted outright or on appeal. No chance on the murder charges.
I had thought he might win on appeal until the jury came back with guilty verdicts on all charges.
Sorry, my dude, but moving forward, juries in America are going to decide justice based on identity.
Sad but true
After seeing what Roger Stone went through for alleged witness tampering, I want nothing less than the SWAT team outside her house at 4 am, make it a Fox News exclusive.
Fox would probably tip her off, buy her a ticket overseas
So find Chauvin guilty or the cities burn and the jurors themselves burn. This type of juror and witness tampering, intimidation used to be illegal. That was in the non-clown world timeline though. Anything goes in the clown world.
Did this dumb ass state prosecutor hear what Maxine said??
I am being honest. Call me a pussy, but if I was a juror, I would be too scared to find Chauvin not guilty. You know the media is going to dox the names of the jurors at the end of the trial and a sitting US Representative gave the mob a green light to burn my house down and torture my relatives.
Yep. You're a pussy
I dont get why the judge cant order the seal of jurors for a few years
WAKE UP PEOPLE
THE LEFT DOES NOT FACE CONCEQUENCES
YOU ARE BEING PACIFIED
LMFAO if BITCH maxpad Waters fucked up the trial! I am certain Pelosi will dispoot her eviction from congress cause black privilege though...
What a dumb bitch
Ooooo that’s going to leave a mark!
Streamable has blacklisted this site. This video will be TOS. Stop using their site.
https://odysee.com/
https://d.tube/
https://bittube.tv/
https://videy.co/
https://tv.gab.com/
https://bitchute.com/
https://rumble.com/
https://www.socialdown.com/tw/twitter-video-downloader/
https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl
https://nitter.net/
https://www.savetweetvid.com/
https://archive.is/
Making popcorn
This won’t be overturned just like the sham election
FUCK YOU BLAXINE!!!! Drop fuckin dead u leather faced cuntrag!!!!
He was really "unhappy" with the DC elected people. They should keep their opinions to themselves. They are damaging the Juducial (co-equal) branch of government. I think his statement that what she said could get the trial "overturned on appeal" is enough, all by itself, to get it overturned.
The prosecution seems perfectly willing to allow threats of violence to help them.
Is there a chance we get a verdict tonight? Monday night raw baby.
The longer it takes the more likely for it to be a hung jury. People are fucking retarded, zero chance they found 12 reasonable people that are not afraid of mob intimidation
BAH GAWD, STOP THE DAMN TRIAL, THAT KNEE HAD A FAMILY!
Tomorrow earliest. They're gonna get at least one night of room service.
I'm thinking first thing Wednesday morning. We'll see. If they start requesting information from the judge, could be longer.
You have to admit, America is the land of opportunity where the mentally ill can get elected to Congress, an alcoholic can become Speaker of the House, someone with Alzheimer's can become Potatus, and a pedophile can be on the Supreme Court.
Don't forget to riot no matter which way the Chauvin trial turns out. I need a new 4K TV from Target so I can hear the Somali news. Portland can save money by turning off street lights since the fires will light it up.
this would be GENIUS!! make the left pissed off at their own- hahaha!!! i would love for this trial to be overturned/ mistried on account of maxine.
I’m willing to bet it’s a hung jury.
They gonna riot anyway.
No Lives Matter.
I fucking hate lawyers.
You. Fuckimg. Dumbass... lol
Judge told defense that their call for a mistrial is denied, but that they can appeal the verdict if not favorable to them.
wait the video is gone? terms of service wtf
Is a verdict tonight at all likely. Getting kinda late no?