3681
Comments (199)
sorted by:
205
Greenhills 205 points ago +206 / -1

She’ll still be re-elected.

214
Rudy_DankMemer 214 points ago +219 / -5

re-elected

Funky way of spelling: installed by Dominion

69
Not_your_King 69 points ago +70 / -1

If only that was the only problem in California. Dominion, ballot harvesting, drop boxes, heavy cult/corruption presence.

29
clearsighted 29 points ago +29 / -0

Ballot harvesting is really the biggest problem.

19
AllTheWayTrump 19 points ago +19 / -0

That and Dems having unfiltered access to voting rolls and the voting history of those on the rolls.

43
Alexius_von_Meinong 43 points ago +44 / -1

Who needs elections when you can have your goons stuff ballots at 4 am?

16
RexCollumSilvarum 16 points ago +18 / -2

Who needs goons when you can connect voting machines to the internet and use an algorithm to give your Potatus as many votes as he needs?

19
RogueLeaderX 19 points ago +20 / -1

In California in that district? This is one of the few times I might believe a Den legit won.

People in that district are retarded.

9
FireannDireach 9 points ago +11 / -2

A lot of counties in Ca use Dominion:

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ovsta/frequently-requested-information/voting-systems-used-counties/how-use-your-countys-voting-system/dominion-voting-systems-imagecast-evolution

But oddly enough, LA County did not. They used something called VSAP 2.1

https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/news-releases-and-advisories/2020-news-releases-and-advisories/ap20091-los-angeles-county-vsap-21-voting-system-certified

Waters has had her seat guaranteed forever, however, she's either got the goods on someone high up, or she's involved in something that protects her.

Waters isn't going anywhere, sadly. Our rino problem prohibits it.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

3200 fps says otherwise.

7
christianknight 7 points ago +12 / -5

Vote red 2022! 😂😂😂🤡🤡

5
Monz 5 points ago +5 / -0

To be fair, no one challenges her in her district . They will vote a brick with a D on it. That's how indoctrinated they are.

46
Ponzo 46 points ago +47 / -1

She has not been elected in many many years. The establishment picks her everytime because shes a sellout. Look at the house she lives in vs the district she serves.

24
jubyeonin 24 points ago +24 / -0

She has. Her district is low IQ and has low voter turnout. They just vote for her because her name is familiar and she has a (D) next to it.

Edit: And no, her district is not in Orange County, for those unfamiliar with the area. She has Inglewood, which is a slum.

12
Ponzo 12 points ago +14 / -2

OC was red before they introduced ballot harvesting, then suddenly votes were "found" too which made the county blue.

7
jubyeonin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Her district is in LA County.

1
Ponzo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know but it was an example of how voting does not matter in cali

4
Dum_spiro_spero 4 points ago +4 / -0

As Ice Cube said, "Inglewood always up to no good".

1
jubyeonin 1 point ago +1 / -0

His retarded ass be right sometimes.

17
pushbackv2 17 points ago +17 / -0

Inmates still run the asylum.

3
Carry_Your_Name 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wrong, asylums were torn down, inmates were released to the streets. They were the homeless bums wandering around like zombies.

2
TrumpLandslideWon202 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yah, exactly, they are running the asylum.

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Real life Arkham?

9
Czshad2 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why do these evil monsters always live so long. Surely their evil rots their heart.

5
coffeeisbitter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Organ harvesting baby parts.

1
k614 1 point ago +1 / -0

My theory is that they are so evil, that the devil doesn't even want anything to do with them.

5
julianleroux 5 points ago +5 / -0

On this one thing, the globalists and I agree:

Fuck Democracy

108
SkeletorsTeeth 108 points ago +109 / -1

Would be nice to see just 1 of these scumbags go to jail...they are only becoming more brazen

57
TheUsurper 57 points ago +66 / -9

There is only one way these people will be stopped. That’s not a threat retards at the FBI, that’s the history of revolution.

25
RegularAmerican 25 points ago +25 / -0

Don't insult retards by comparing them to those pedophiles

9
TheFountainhead 9 points ago +9 / -0

I just laughed loud enough to be looked at like I’m a retard hahaha

1
HocusLocus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Next time you laugh play this Maxine Waters dialogue loudly over it so as not to attract so much attention.

10
Liberty0rdeath 10 points ago +10 / -0

There are 3 boxes...

25
pushbackv2 25 points ago +25 / -0

Criminals are a protected class.

Patriots and conservatives are Public Enemy No. 1

Every branch of the judiciary and law enforcement is compromised and cucked.

2
TrumpLandslideWon202 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every branch of everything man.

14
PEPEpeepee 14 points ago +14 / -0

We'll see one shot to death before prison I guarantee it.

15
RabidZoo 15 points ago +15 / -0

The left tried to get Scalise.

10
PEPEpeepee 10 points ago +11 / -1

Seems the left have more balls than the right.

12
RabidZoo 12 points ago +12 / -0

Less to lose and a sympathetic judicial branch. Plus they're typically fucking whackjobs or junkies...that helps their cause.

4
brutustyberius 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dems already tried it.

9
Liberty0rdeath 9 points ago +9 / -0

What country are we if the rule of law is not carried out and fair judgement taken because of intimidation? Scary times.

2
TrumpLandslideWon202 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is pretty much China now.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try not to be afraid, Son

7
theblackprince 7 points ago +7 / -0

The fact they never do should tell you a lot.

85
R3000 85 points ago +85 / -0

As Trump pointed out...Maxine Waters is an extremely low IQ individual

11
IHEARTGOODCOMMUNISTS 11 points ago +12 / -1

CNN: “Judge in Chauvin trial defends Waters, says comments not prejudicial, instead blames Republican Congressmen for discussing trial in public”

2
iSignedUpForThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously??

8
trump1aj 8 points ago +8 / -0

No not seriously...

8
paulej 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is one case where it did not take a stable genius to see that. :)

39
rochrealtor 39 points ago +39 / -0

WOW!

19
deleted 19 points ago +25 / -6
21
BingusCombat 21 points ago +21 / -0

How did he do this

9
Barracuda 9 points ago +9 / -0

Pede Power

9
julianleroux 9 points ago +10 / -1

UNICODE U+0E49 THAI CHARACTER MAI EK THO

IMPRESSIVE LENGTH

6
Peppers 6 points ago +12 / -6

ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้༼◉Д◉༽ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้

4
ChippingToe 4 points ago +9 / -5

ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้༼◉Д◉༽ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้

2
GODwins76 2 points ago +6 / -4

ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้༼◉Д◉༽ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้

2
christianknight 2 points ago +6 / -4

ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้༼◉Д◉༽ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้

1
GODwins76 1 point ago +6 / -5

ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้༼◉Д◉༽ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
37
BasedMedicalDoctor 37 points ago +38 / -1

When is a verdict expected? Jury deliberating longer than 4 hours is a bad sign for prosecution is it not

33
james43552352345 33 points ago +33 / -0

Yup. If there was consensus then they all would pretty much agree in the deliberations quickly. If there is disagreement then it means one or more jurors wants not guilty and then they'll likely try to pressure the person into saying guilty. There was one guy on the jury who said he was going to leave Minneapolis "soon" which totally sounds like a based juror to me. He could say not guilty and then bounce out of them. Might have already secured a place outside of Minneapolis already.

14
BasedMedicalDoctor 14 points ago +14 / -0

I’m sure he’s terrified the other jurors will leak his identity though. Is it against the law for a juror to name another juror?

15
james43552352345 15 points ago +15 / -0

From my understanding of jury process. When you go through jury selection you are told to never say your first/last name so the other jurors shouldn't know your name unless you're dumb and tell them. In this situation, the other jurors would have to take a picture of your face and leak it and then people would have to use facial recognition to identify you. I would say the probability of this happening in this specific case is very low.

If another juror took a picture of you then you could probably go to the judge and say that the other juror is doing misconduct and tampering the jury.

3
BasedMedicalDoctor 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent.

0
Hanging_Chad 0 points ago +3 / -3

IME, the attorneys call on potential jurors by name for questioning

11
james43552352345 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think you are thinking of the witnesses on the stand. The actual jurors in this case aren't even shown. The attorneys absolutely could not call them by name. They say stuff like "Juror #12" instead.

1
TrumpLandslideWon202 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not true, you are given a number and only ever called juror # whatever.

1
Hanging_Chad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guess it’s different in civil cases since that’s the only kind of cases I’ve gone through jury selections for

2
TrumpLandslideWon202 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's how it worked during jury selection for the one civil case I was called for. We were assigned jurer numbers down in the waiting room and then in the court room they would call you up by # for questions. It might vary based on location 🤷‍♂️

5
80960KA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is it against the law for a juror to name another juror?

Leak it to the press "anon".

8
james43552352345 8 points ago +8 / -0

Under normal situations, the other jurors wouldn't know your name to begin with. When you're doing jury service the clerk gives you an anonymous badge to wear. If your name was leaked it would have to be an inside job or some very sophisticated scheme. In this trial, I would think they are taking no chances with allowing misconduct to occur.

5
80960KA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is there really anything normal about anything that's happened in the last year and a half?

3
kazimiera 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saw a news brief earlier - whether it was an outside link, I can't remember. But the reporter was telling her camera about the jury . She made the statement," we already have the list with personal info on the 14 jurors, and that they'll be ditching 2 of them; probably the 2 white women. And one juror lives in that city close to the trial court.

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Antifa doesn't follow the law. The one or more dissenters will probably be coerced into voting guilty by the rest of the jury

13
RegularAmerican 13 points ago +13 / -0

The ticker on the local news channel is like a countdown right now there's 2 hours and something minutes until america burns down either way

6
BasedMedicalDoctor 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wtf? What are they claiming the countdown is for

2
RegularAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was on KTLA 5 local news in so cal. I assumed that other networks might be doing it too. Idk I haven't watched any tv in days other than in passing

10
TownHallBall 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's what I've always heard.

9
BasedMedicalDoctor 9 points ago +10 / -1

Good. Only takes one single juror to make it a hung jury.

7
bidenrapeskids 7 points ago +7 / -0

Anyone know where the updates will be made?

7
The_Expert 7 points ago +7 / -0

Follow the smoke

7
farstriderr 7 points ago +8 / -1

Well yeah, because if your case is proven beyond reasonable doubt it should be clear given the evidence. Thus, little debate can be had over the facts.

The other option is one holdout juror who is ignoring the facts, as in the murder trial I was on. Sometimes no matter how clear the facts are, dummies will ignore them and vote guilty or not guilty because of their political beliefs.

8
BasedMedicalDoctor 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well others on that jury I’m sure will vote guilty cuz of their political beliefs, so whatever. I’m fine with one holding out in this context, as he really isn’t guilty of anything. Manslaughter would be their best hope.

3
Long_time_lurker 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's hard to say, that's up to the jury. There's a verdict watch here:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/04/chauvin-trial-verdict-watch/

36
BumpForTrump 36 points ago +37 / -1

What fucking function. Honestly, sounds like this judge is one of the good ones left, but I have no faith or confidence of our judical, legislative and especially executive branch.

We have been usurped. I think we were before even Trump, but he shined a light on how bad the problem really is.

We need to know the names of the people REALLY pulling the strings, now the puppets in washington and Perkin Coie is a great place to start.

14
1776pill 14 points ago +14 / -0

Just looked up that firm, they are into all the big tech companies and they represent the clintons. Also, it’s a great rabbit hole for plenty of Wikipedia early life if you’re into that game.

2
Monky 2 points ago +5 / -3

We need to know the names of the people REALLY pulling the strings

Oy vey...

26
Kaarous 26 points ago +26 / -0

Ha, rule of law, we don't have that in America. The rule of law hasn't been a thing since they let a Kenyan run for President.

10
RegularAmerican 10 points ago +10 / -0

They're going to railroad him still

19
RizzlieDoodad 19 points ago +19 / -0

Mistrial

10
Eugene_Beastly 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's over for the prosecution, I don't see how they will be able to convict him of anything.

It could have been a mistrial after the Floyd settlement, but then the judge denied a change of venue, twice, then denied sequestration, twice. Any conviction already had a high likelihood of being sent back.

Now there is blood being smeared on witnesses homes and representatives threatening the jury.

Any chance they had to get a conviction on Chauvin was just binned. Make sure you have food, water, and ammunition because they might go for the suburbs this time.

8
james43552352345 8 points ago +8 / -0

Watch it kick off in June to get the summer riots going.

18
Alpha_Lemming 18 points ago +18 / -0

Mad max is a dem, they will pack the bench with 19 judges of their choice on the appeal, like they are doing with SCOTUS.

Every high profile trial will have as many judges as it takes to get the outcomes they want.

14
IAbsolutelyDare 14 points ago +15 / -1

So this guy respects the law and is appalled at the idea of bowing down to mob rule?

How the hell did he become a judge?!?!?!?

4
RedditIs4Retards 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't rush your judgment.. Wait until the verdict

14
nocomply55 14 points ago +15 / -1

God bless, a real judge. Starting to think the y didn't exist. Admonish the stupid bitch.

12
Mean_MAGA_Facka 12 points ago +12 / -0

"The Judge rubs the guilty verdict on the Chavin or it gets the MAXINE again"

9
The_End_Is_Now 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well, then hold her in contempt and issue a warrant for her arrest.

7
LibertyStillMatters 7 points ago +7 / -0

She needs to be removed from office. I get it, she’s a democrat and ‘rules for thee and not for me’, but we need to put the pressure in our congressman and women to call for her removal or we will primary them. We just went through a hoax impeachment where present Trump said ‘cheer them on’ and half the country said that was a call for violence. Don’t think your emails and phone calls are meaningless!

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
9
Republic_or_Nothing 9 points ago +9 / -0

Trump didn't do anything about blm/antifa because he's a federalist. He believes the Federal government shouldn't interfere with state issues unless requested. Governors of shit hole states refused his help.

4
Blue_Country_Refugee 4 points ago +4 / -0

And when he did help they attacked him anyway I swear it's no win with these lunatics

1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
6
pup1pup 6 points ago +6 / -0

Have ANY media outlets asked Biden if he will condemn her statements? You know they would if the parties were switched.

6
IG_Farben 6 points ago +6 / -0

Her monkey ass is an afront to all good americans. Along with Piglosi

6
Mean_MAGA_Facka 6 points ago +6 / -0

Give MAD MAXINE what she wants and there will be an end to the horror!

https://youtu.be/YE7SvkKEDeQ?t=278

3
RabidZoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

She could start with a facelift. Her jowels look like Obamas browneye...bubblegum. Oof.

2
Gadsen1440 2 points ago +2 / -0

She is one of the most repulsive creatures I have ever seen

1
love_and_peace 1 point ago +1 / -0

*lori lightfoot has entered the chat*

6
NimbleNavigator20202 6 points ago +6 / -0

HAHAHAHA FUCK YOU, YOU LOW IQ BITCH

5
JustHereForTheSalmon 5 points ago +5 / -0

More like Wig gave a reason for this fiasco to continue well into the future, and for her army to burn, loot, and murder into perpetuity.

5
Redditcensorsyouandi 5 points ago +5 / -0

If this werent clown world the trial would be over and we would be enjoying the biblical irony that Mad Maxine was the kill shot for this bogus case.

If these dipshits actually wanted justice for George they should pressure the cops to arrest his drug dealer.

4
brutustyberius 4 points ago +4 / -0

That doesn’t pay.

4
TraumaHotel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Judicial branch is commie infested like everything else.

4
GoBlue12 4 points ago +4 / -0

Waters is a bitch! You can’t tell me that the 4 jurors that ABC has said where they live have any incentive but guilty so they don’t get killed! The only thing this officer is guilty of in my mind is he should of called for an ambulance! Period!

4
tiamat 4 points ago +4 / -0

James browns hair is smarter than her

4
Toollespaulhero 4 points ago +4 / -0

He shouldn’t need to appeal because he’s innocent

2
Curlybill 2 points ago +2 / -0

It took a lot of scrolling to get to someone else like minded. The judge just shattered the presupposition of innocence with his own remarks and folks here are calling him based. Its absurd all of it.

4
Spawnlingman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Opponenets of her need to be at her house and be VERY confrontational when she tries to get in to her home.

3
kams912 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn't what she said the exact definition of jury tampering, or jury intimidation? Very illegal.

3
Tenspot20 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does the judge call for the immediate arrest of Maxine Waters?

3
thisisatestof2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Judge should’ve declared a mistrial In my opinion. No matter how much you deny it or want to, what Maxine said has Had massive influence on the jury.

3
USAF4Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just words at this point. I can’t to read headline “Maxine Waters Arrested Without Bail!”

3
XlDEN 3 points ago +3 / -0

He also said her comments don’t matter.

3
Crlsniper 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the jury convicts he will Appel and the city will riot then and again at the second trial. Max just made it into the city’s best interest to let him walk and only deal with one riot.

3
Skyrison 3 points ago +3 / -0

This bitch needs to seriously just go the fuck away already… Fucking shit stain on our country

2
notCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

If only it was so easy to pit egos against one another. The founders did well when they designed the system to funcion off of warring agendas throughtout the government, but they didn't see such a weak bunch of pussies coming along and working together to hand their power over to China for a quick buck.

2
Chuj 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maxine gave Chauvin a 2nd chance if needed. The mostly peaceful protesters are never going to understand, so they will just freak out.

Burn. Loot. Murder. Coming to a town near you

2
henri_derelicte 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comments like the ones Waters made make it incredibly difficult for someone to receive a fair trial. If you can’t get a fair trial, the defendant walks free

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

That moment was glorious. Don't know if the Judge is based or a faggot? Somewhat fair? Ruled against both sides controversially in similar amounts?

2
VonTyger 2 points ago +2 / -0

They need a reason to kick this can down the road since it's lose-lose for the establishment and Mad Maxine may have given it to them.

2
RedditIsCommunist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Starting to think this was just part of the plan for rigging the trial.

2
COanon 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are going to riot no matter what. This trial will be just another excuse to destroy businesses and to grab a TV.

2
MasksAreChildAbuse 2 points ago +2 / -0

She knows what shes doing. No matter what happens the dems get what they want....

  1. If hes convicted, it would simply mean they can control even highly visible judges and jurors without blowback and chose to do so. Weve already seen it in hundreds of cases and with jury info leaked to press its clear they are trying to do it here. If they are successful waits to be seen.

  2. If they dont think they can convict him, the next best option would be to have the case ruled in his favor based on a technicality. This way they can rile up not only the 100% braindead populace, but also even some of the normie/well meaning populace who just dont have time to know the details of the incident, or even the medical effects of it, and just saw the knee image in MSM and think its a fair representation. This would get the biggest crowd to riot.

  3. The least best, but still effective option, is if he outright wins and is proven innocent in a court of law, just rile up the brain dead people to riot with fake news stories about how there was a miscarriage of justice. Normie can still fall prey, but less will and it becomes slightly more difficult to deoending where they fall on the brain dead, normie, based gradient.

2
Cyber1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know some people think that motion to have her kicked out that MTG brought up was pure theatrics, but I think we should really get behind that idea. Maxine if fucking unhinged, a bafoonish clown who has no place holding public office like this.

2
Loki13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Silly judge progressives have no respect for the law.....

2
xxx-zodiac 2 points ago +2 / -0

If she was in the house or senate at the time she said it she is Un-touchable.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
GODwins76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice

2
Ez_mac 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine if Trump said what she did. The media, Dems, and RINO’s would be foaming at the mouth to impeach

2
MAGAsian 2 points ago +2 / -0

But still denied a mistrial

2
magnokor 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you get enough criminals into an area, they elect a criminal, and they never ever get replaced.

Of course, nobody would want to live there.

Maxine Waters doesn't even live in her district? Maxine represents District 43 which includes the high crime/high gang area of South Central LA - a region of Los Angeles so bad even Maxine won't live there.

Has always been a criminal.

Has done a million times the inciting that she accuses others of.

When asked what should happen if Chauvin isn’t convicted on murder charges, she replied, “We gotta stay on the street, we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational, we’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

What they really said to the paid terrorists was burn down more cities.

Also a threat to those on the jury.

You either go guilty on everything, or your houses burn down.

Where there is crime and chaos, there are Democrats in charge forever.

Minnesota has been turned from a, sometimes, sensible state into one of DNC power. Crime and legal immigration were what they used.

2
FuckU/Spez 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the type of shit that comes out of California... I really fucking hope to leave this cancerous cesspool with awesome weather for a red state this year. Texas, North Dallas looking real good.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +1 / -0

I FUCKING HOPE CHAUVIN APPEALS BECAUSE OF WHAT MAD MAXINE SAID AND HE IS DECLARED NOT FUCKING GUILTY JUST TO GIVE THE DEM PARTY THE FUCKING FINGER!