408
Comments (29)
sorted by:
7
SherrieT 7 points ago +7 / -0

I was asked by a POC to show ID at Kroger today to purchase cold medicine. I complied but told her it was racist. She pretended like she didn’t hear me.

3
CahalTheMad 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol They KNOW they're hypocrite trash, and don't care. That's why they have zero credibility.

2
Guruchild 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t fucking shop at Kroger. At least Walmart isn’t hiding what they’re about. Kroger is trash from the bottom to the top.

1
Headline_Correction 1 point ago +1 / -0

GD i wish we had Publix in KY

5
jimbo_slice1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s mind bottling

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

*boggling.

Unless I didn't get your pun.

1
jimbo_slice1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blades of Glory - Will Ferrell. Cmon man!

5
itpeeswhenibern 5 points ago +5 / -0

Guns should be sold from a rack on aisle 3 in the hardware store.

2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd rather it be parts so we can pick and choose to make our own. Most firearms can have variety of configurations so being able to pick what you want from the start instead of having to modify it later, spending extra to do so, would be a plus from me.

3
spezisacuckold 3 points ago +3 / -0

Por que no los dos

2
MapleBaconWaffles 2 points ago +2 / -0

I imagine the free market would provide both options.

3
coffeeisbitter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because they don't give a shit about voting or 2A. These questions are witty maybe 6 years ago, but by now it's boring and stale, everyone should know every Leftard is evil at heart and the only thing coming out of their mouth is bullshit excuse to do evil things.

2
Guruchild 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even entertaining their bullshit flimsy excuse of an argument about voter suppression proves one to be a smoothbrain retarded commie monkey. Opposing voter ID is only for cheating. There is no other argument.

2
PDXTrumpSupporter 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, the right should have been campaigning for decades at this point that election day should be a national holiday and that we should quadruple the number of voting stations so that people don't have to stand in the rain for 3 hours just to vote. And expand voting hours until late into the evening. And make first issuance of a state ID from the DMV free for anyone who can show low income. And set up community ride/escort programs for free to take anyone low-income or disabled who qualifies to get a ride/escort to the DMV - or the Social Security office for that free card/ID if necessary.

All that would cost a little money, but a drop in the bucket in the grand scheme of things, then the left would have jack shit to call them out on as vote-suppressors.
The shit-heads who vote badly won't go through all of that in #'s to make a difference, yet the offer will be on offer so there's no ammunition to claim suppression.
Republicans are fucking fools. But at least they aren't nearly as shitty as Democrats when it comes to vision/agenda.

1
coffeeisbitter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spot on, the same for gun grabbing too. The only appropriate response is "Fuck off cheater" and "Fuck off tyrant", respectively.

2
PDXTrumpSupporter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously. I was on every gun-debate subreddit ten fucking years ago posting awesome shit like it was my part time job, every damned day, and it did absolutely nothing. It all just gets rehashed for literally years, but w/ zero impact.
We are an idiocracy where logic/reason/evidence/debate have almost nothing to do with our political outcomes anymore.
People like Jonathan Haidt and Jordan Peterson explain the neuro-psychology of this. Peoples' core temperamental preferences determine their social/political belief, 99% of the time. As in "feelings don't care about your facts" for nearly every voter. We do not live in a Ben Shapiro world, which everyone here would prefer, where the best reasoning/logic wins the day. We are not that at all.

2
coffeeisbitter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. And deriving from this, logically those of us who are capable of reasoning would have an advantage over the retards because we can better grasp reality. We ought to rule over the retards because we are better than them. However, for one, we have been condition to treat retards as "equals" and be fearful of using any power because it's "muh authoritarianism muh liberty" and some shit. For two, those of us non-retards who are not afraid of using power are not usually born into the ruling class. We don't have dads who give us a small loan of a million dollars and connections to kickstart a massive business. For three, those non-retards who are not afraid of power and were born into the right circumstances, almost all turn out to be pedophilic baby-eating assholes. The world is so fucked and the odds are so stacked against the Good.

The Founding Fathers and the United States was probably a impossible miracle that happens only once in a billion kinds of sentient species throughout the entire universe. They were strong non-retards who were not afraid to use power to do good and were able to obtain such power.

Frankly speaking, we can only have liberty when Good non-retards rule over the retards with an iron fist. If Good non-retards don't hold on to power by trying to let retards share power, the assholes will exploit it and take over instead, and it's all fucked up from there. It makes so much sense why there used to be so much limitations to voting; the Founders knew about these retards 300 years ago and they absolutely did not want retards fucking with the system.

3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is though

3
masticator_nord 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a poor argument/line of reasoning. The people arguing against voter ID want 2A suppression, and they're not worried about being inconsistent or hypocritical in their beliefs. And the normies who you're otherwise trying to convince that voter ID is a good thing to scared of guns to see anything else.

Plus, it leaves you open to the accusation that you're not being consistent in advocating for voter ID, but not ID for gun purchases.

You have to hit them where it hurts. Ask how requiring ID to buy alcohol isn't alcohol suppression. It's basically prohibition round 2!

2
PDXTrumpSupporter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I partly disagree. Electoral integrity requires proof of identity, for the sake of the democratic process itself functioning reliably. There's no way around that. Whereas a militia of the people doesn't require that anyone identify themselves for it to function for the security of a free state.
That's a big fundamental difference.
So there IS a logic to ID for voting but no ID for 2A.

2
masticator_nord 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't mean to imply that there's not a logic to it. The problem is, the rhetoric around guns is so warped that it's going to be difficult/impossible to convince a lot of people of anything if you're coming at it from a pro 2A angle.

I think alcohol is a better angle since most people would find it ridiculous to suggest that black people are unable to buy it legally. But that's in essence what you're saying when you say they're unable to get ID to vote.

2
spezisacuckold 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is.

1
3rdAccount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because we vote for retards who allows it to happen. Then we bend over and take it by voting for them again and again.

1
ubermk3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course, the answer is obvious. It's all about destroying and subjugating America.

1
MAGAsian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pointing out logic doesn't work against Leftists because they actively WANT 2nd Amendment suppression.

1
Headline_Correction 1 point ago +1 / -0

**Q: What does "shall not infringe" mean? A: Not a fucking thing apparently **

1
Guruchild 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because so far, guns aren’t being used to cheat elections.

1
DeadOverRed 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess you missed Jan 6 and every day since.

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong kind of firearms suppression.