1364
Comments (23)
sorted by:
22
Grunt422 22 points ago +22 / -0

Prosecution. "your Honor, we object to that". "To What" ? "To what I just said" ! "Why" ? "Uh maybe because it's true". Judge "Where did you go to school" ?

14
IamM 14 points ago +14 / -0

Prosecution: "Sir, I have multiple diplomas in gender studies and feminism."

Judge: "So why are you telling me this now?"

Prosecution: "Because if this trial doesn't end in the next 15mins I'll be late for my shift at Burger King."

15
sustainable_saltmine 15 points ago +16 / -1

and if he had been wearing a mask, his oxygen level would have been in the 80s at most

-11
gushgosh -11 points ago +3 / -14

Wrong, masks don't lower your oxygen level or increase your carbon dioxide levels, they do raise your blood pressure or heart rate.

If they don't stop the virus, much less oxygen.

4
Durdurdurkistan 4 points ago +5 / -1

Humans consume about 25% of the available oxygen in one breath of air. I'm assuming that's a "half life" situation. If it isn't a half life situation then we consume the oxygen in 4 breaths. If it is a half life situation then biological performance will be further compromised with every breath.

0
gushgosh 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well, no, because humans do not face any significant oxygen loss by holding their breaths for 40 seconds. (I tested myself)

What usually kills you is the acidosis from carbon dioxide, not the lack of oxygen, though of course they correlate but why you can lose a pint of blood in donation without feeling shortness of breath. If what you were saying was correct, we should expect acidosis to develop chronically after donating blood, it doesn't.

1
Durdurdurkistan 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re delusional if you think masks don’t have an impact on respiration.

0
gushgosh 0 points ago +1 / -1

I never said that, I said they have no impact on oxygen and carbon dioxide levels.

They do lead to an increase of breath rate and/or depth, which leads to increased heart rate and blood pressure.

3
Necrovoter 3 points ago +4 / -1

For people whose lungs aren't working optimally, they can lower your oxygen level as they restrict the air flow coming in. There has been test data for decades on how much they restrict air flow.

1
gushgosh 1 point ago +1 / -0

But people who's lungs don't function properly already have low oxygen.

And yes, it restricts air flow, like any "filter", so to speak.

15
gushgosh 15 points ago +15 / -0

Weird part is that the judge took that evidence out of the trial because it was submitted late, by the prosecution, even though the tests were done early.

Which is why the defense couldn't use it.

I heard people say he was pumped later which why it was high, makes no sense if he was already dead with heart stopped.

7
mrsray 7 points ago +7 / -0

hahaha, that setup was awesome

6
RuprechtThaMonkeyBoy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kamala: So I started sucking...

6
UrTVisLying2U 6 points ago +6 / -0

Checkmate

5
Matticus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I run lower than that, normally

2
Tuckclusive 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish i had that kind of O2, i sit at 94 on my best days but most of the time im at 92. my doctors want me to wear a mask but also have proof that my O2 can drop into the high 80s if i walk for at least six mins.

1
Matticus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same. Shit sucks

3
George_Abraham_Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thought the same thing at first, but if they gave him oxygen in the ambulance before testing the blood, it would be 98% when they got around to the test.

4
Cmdrpaul 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not if the heart had stopped, which is what we are told, no?

2
Cmdrpaul 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was defense counsel's first substantive point in closing, too. I didn't really hear a response to it in rebuttal, but it was too long to watch all of it.

1
TheDespotofCartoons 1 point ago +1 / -0

This evidence is like a breath of fresh air...

1
DepartmentOfDefiance 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aaaaaaaand.... Guilty anyways.

1
Drewdrewdrew2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Need the clip