Facemasks are not only a scam, evidence is quite overwhelming that they are flat out dangerous and represent a serious health risk.
Here are the salient points of the study, published by the National Institutes of Health, which is the primary agency of the United States government responsible for biomedical and public health research.
-
99% of the detected cases with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or have mild condition, which contradicts with the virus name (severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2). 1
-
The case fatality rate [of SARS-CoV-2] is considerably less than 1%. 2
-
The majority of deaths were among older and chronically ill individuals, supporting the possibility that the virus may exacerbate existing conditions but rarely causes death by itself (emphasis, mine) 7, 8
-
Facemasks restrict breathing, causing hypoxemia and hypercapnia and increase the risk for respiratory complications, self-contamination and exacerbating of existing chronic conditions. (9 - World Health Organization. Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19. Geneva, Switzerland; 2020), 10, 11, (12 - World Health Organization. Advice on the use of masks in the community, during home care and in health care settings in the context of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. Geneva, Switzerland; 2020)
-
- The practice of wearing facemasks has compromised safety and efficacy profile, 2. Both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, 3. Waring facemasks has adverse physiological and psychological effects, 4. long-term consequences of wearing facemasks on health are detrimental.
-
According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm [nanometers (billionth of a meter)], while medical and non-medical facemasks’ thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a meter)], which is more than 1000 times larger. Due to the difference in sizes between SARS-CoV-2 diameter and facemasks thread diameter (the virus is 1000 times smaller), SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass through any facemask. 13
-
Asymptomatic individuals do not transmit or infect other people. 14
-
Using separate analysis of 23 observational studies, this meta-analysis found no protective effect of medical mask or N95 respirators against SARS virus. 15
-
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) made similar recommendation, stating that only symptomatic persons should consider wearing facemask, while for asymptomatic individuals this practice is not recommended. Consistent with the CDC, clinical scientists from Departments of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology in Australia counsel against facemasks usage for health-care workers. (16 - Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Implementation of Mitigation Strategies for Communities with Local COVID-19 Transmission. Atlanta, Georgia; 2020.), 17
-
The WHO repeatedly announced that “at present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID-19) on the effectiveness face masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection of respiratory viruses, including COVID-19”[2]. Despite these controversies, the potential harms and risks of wearing facemasks were clearly acknowledged. These including self-contamination due to hand practice or non-replaced when the mask is wet, soiled or damaged, development of facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis or worsening acne and psychological discomfort. Vulnerable populations such as people with mental health disorders, developmental disabilities, hearing problems, those living in hot and humid environments, children and patients with respiratory conditions are at significant health risk for complications and harm. (18 - World Health Organization. Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19. Geneva, Switzerland; 2020.)
-
With respect to cloth facemask, a Randomized Control Trial using four weeks follow up compared the effect of cloth facemask to medical masks and to no masks on the incidence of clinical respiratory illness, influenza-like illness and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infections among 1607 participants from 14 hospitals [19]. The results showed that there were no difference between wearing cloth masks, medical masks and no masks for incidence of clinical respiratory illness and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infections. However, a large harmful effect with more than 13 times higher risk [Relative Risk = 13.25 95% CI (1.74 to 100.97) was observed for influenza-like illness among those who were wearing cloth masks. The study concluded that cloth masks have significant health and safety issues including moisture retention, reuse, poor filtration and increased risk for infection, providing recommendation against the use of cloth masks. 19
-
Psychologically, wearing facemask fundamentally has negative effects on the wearer and the nearby person. 20
-
Long-term practice of wearing facemasks has strong potential for devastating health consequences. Prolonged hypoxic-hypercapnic state compromises normal physiological and psychological balance, deteriorating health and promotes the developing and progression of existing chronic diseases. ... Chronic stress along with hypoxic and hypercapnic conditions knocks the body out of balance, and can cause headaches, fatigue, stomach issues, muscle tension, mood disturbances, insomnia and accelerated aging. (Summary quoted from study - refer to previous sources)
Interesting.
It seems that some of your links are broken.
<links a study that provides no evidence>
good job mate
way to anti-science it up
Clearly you didn't read the study and reference the sources.
Way to be a low energy lazy fuck.
Edit: and I literally laid out the key points of the study that postulate why masks are posing a significant health risk.
SAYING masks cause hypoxia is not the same as PROVING they do by linking a study
which you didn't