I wouldn't hate on someone because they had cancer. I wouldn't celebrate their cancer or urge people to purposefully give their kids their kids cancer either. Lots of people are unhappy with their body or parts of their body. We will all eventually get wrinkles (Chicago anti-aging by gunfire trend exempted). Swapping genders isn't the answer, at least according to 41% of the people who did so.
I don't embrace his gayness, I embrace his politics and especially leadership. I don't support gay marriage, but I also don't support any government recognized marriage.
Why do we need the governments permission in the form of a marriage license to document our bonds of love anyway? Is it not supposed to be an oath taken in the eyes of God.
But to actually answer your question, government made a legal version of "marriage" originally to give tax breaks in order to incentivize nuclear families and to increase birth rates. Seeing as the overwhelming majority of the country at the time personally defined "marriage" as "man+woman" (still do), that is how the legal definition of "marriage" was written into law.
Fast forward some decades later and the LGBTBBQASAURUS movement demands the same tax incentives for themselves.
We don't "need" the government's permission for an actual religious marriage at all. You can have a religious marriage (actual marriage) whenever you want. You just won't get those sweet, sweet financial benefits from the government if you only go that route.
Honestly, from a sheer risk/reward standpoint, the average man probably loses more from divorce than the couple would gain from the cumulative sum of all tax incentives anyways. I don't know what there is to do about that. Maybe the government shouldn't dick people around like they do. Take the arbitration out of marriage and divorce and just grant the tax breaks based on people living together. Is that so hard?
"based faggot" yeah that makes alot of sense. Especially since being a conservative is first and foremost being anti-Christian and openly homosexual. Lmao what a joke we've become as a nation.
i really dont care what ppl do in their homes as long as they keep it private....they will have to answer for it when they die...its our job to set the example and show love to everyone..doesnt mean we have to celebrate or condone their lifestyle
Homosexuality is sin. You choose to be gay. Just as one chooses to murder. All sin is equal in the eyes of God. Your only salvation is to accept Christ and repent.
Nah, it isn’t. And being gay is not the same as murdering. That’s retarded. Have you ever heard of the concept of “punishment fits the crime”? If all sins are equal, does that mean you think our justice system should dole out life sentences for jaywalking?
Your branch of conservatism lost the fucking culture war. Those like me believe the government shouldn't even be involved in marriage and we certainly aren't willing to focus all our energy on attacking homosexuals. Return to Bush era bullshit if you want faggot, you lost and your branch will never gain majority power with the conservative movement ever again.
If it wasn't the basis of his personality he wouldn't be wearing gay hats, openly talking about his homosexuality, and endorsing other gays. Not to mention even without his gayness he is terrible in general.
Im not a new account and i downvoted you. You are the one with a new account talking retard shit. If you were a true conservative, you would give zero shits what someone does in their bedroom as long as its between two consensual adults. If you want to police who someone wants to love, date or marry, you are far from being a conservative who wants less policing and less government overreach.
Dude imagine thinking that gay ppl are the cause of everything wrong with America. Talk about being back in the 2000s with shitty Bush lvl era conservatism
Cuckservatism is what is causing nationalism to lose lol. Being a lolbert or cuckservative will not save you from the commies, you will just sit on your asses until they try and send you to the gulags or take your guns but the thing is they could just import in millions of low iq savages and give them guns to force you to comply. Lolbertarianism and cuckservatism both mean accepting that you will lose and letting it happen because you don't want to "police who someone loves". There is no love in a relationship between faggots, just like no one can have love for a pedo or tranny. Quit kidding yourselves.
Funny because I don’t see you calling them out or focusing on the bigger threat which is the financial systems, credit scores, and centralized banks. Instead you’re whining about gays.
I'm not going to cast the first stone here. I've got my own problems.
That said, if you're reveling in your sin, pouring the filth all over yourself and encouraging other to join you, nope, I'm out. Pull your shit together. Learn virtue and self control, or condemn yourself to hell.
CA is one of the states where the precincts work a bit differently. We actually have to go one level up instead of filling the precinct chairs, but it's still a worthy endeavor.
I'm still gathering the details but will post them here when I've got them.
No, you kill corruption (GOP and the whole uniparty) with a new party. Otherwise the controlled opposition show continues.
The big question is: How do you get political power when your votes doesn't count anymore? I would like to know peaceful answer to that, because in history it hasn't worked once without a bloodshed.
why the fuck are people still clinging on to the GOP here? after all the years they fucked us at the exact same rate the DEMS did?
this site is shills but don't let it make you think the GOP will EVER, EVER work for you.
if you want to pull an Alien and burst out of its chest killing the host and forming an entirely different organism, well ok but that's a different top. That's the BNP nigga, the Brand New Party.
They need to be driven out from within. New party will go the way of the libertarians or greens: doomed to oblivion but useful enough to pull votes from the strong contenders so all the races are close enough for fraud...
Tranny Republicans have no appeal, the only demographic that loves trannies are hardcore liberals, and they'd never vote for a Republican. Black and latinos in California certainly aren't going to vote for that abomination.
Nope. I am sure the ayatollah would soon ally with them in order to poke Israel. Israel poked the bear called Iran and Iran re waiting for an opportunity to laugh at the incompetence of the USA's mid-east strategy and Israel.
Part of me wants to say if they do the job well who cares. The other side says, because parading people who are deeply mentally disturbed around as successful examples to follow is just another means of destroying sanity and what is right.
It's the forcing of the issue that really grinds my gears. If there is such a massive contingent of trans people waiting to make public office then it is what it is but none of it seems organic. It seems like a push to support illegitimate people for the purpose of control. The argument has nothing to do with not wanting transgender people (I mean it is but that's not my point) it's about using "progress" to wedge.
Son, there has been no place for people of faith in politics for a long time now. You have to get off your bun and make a place for people of faith in politics.
Personally LGBT people don't bother me when they do their own thing, live their own life, and don't force their way of living on kids. Beyond that I just see them as troubled people still capable of being decent folk.
Still, no way in hell would I want even their best as my representative, as a friend? Coworker? Sure. But sorry LGBT folks, you don't represent normal people nor are you mentally ready to handle thr stresses of governing.
It's not that I care if a grown ass man wants to dress up like a woman and play make believe, it's that they push it on children and at an age where it's basically a death sentence, or at least a sterilization sentence. As a matter of genetic survival when something with that aggressive of a probability of ending your line comes along you push back or cease to exist.
Viruses are to genes as propaganda is to memes. You don't have to be a christian to have an immune response to this attack.
I think most transsexuals actually just have mental problems and will sort themselves out in time.
That being said i don't want any restrictions on my speech, or other rights, to accommodate transsexuals. Don't want them protected from hate speech or whatever, i don't want any preferential treatment of them compared to any other group.
But i can't say that i agree in legislation to keep these poor confused deviant dumbasses out of government employment. If they have the qualifications for the job then the other stuff isn't important. We can't discriminate based on sexual preference. And it's definitely not a winning issue.
Personally, I think we shouldn't say being gay is normal. It's not. It may be accepted socially, but it's not a natural thing. I put it up there with bestiality and other forms of abnormal sexual intercourse. I don't think we should chastise these people, however, I would never put these types of behavior as something to strive for. The problem now is when you say that, you are looked as a bigot or homophobic. I am merely looking at it as "What is the best for my family and society as in general." Right now our society is being degraded and we are dumbing down our people to the lowest common dominator. If a society EVER wants to strive to get better, you need high goals to strive for. Bottom line, our society has made working for a higher purpose, mentally and physically a sin. Societies like Sodom and Gomorrah will be the result.
Anyone who shies away from calling it what it is: MENTAL ILLNESS... has no place in the discussion for me.
Yes, and surgery has no role in treating mental illness
Body dysmorphic disorder!
I think he just GAINED followers! Call a spade a spade. Call a sick tranny a sick tranny!
I wouldn't hate on someone because they had cancer. I wouldn't celebrate their cancer or urge people to purposefully give their kids their kids cancer either. Lots of people are unhappy with their body or parts of their body. We will all eventually get wrinkles (Chicago anti-aging by gunfire trend exempted). Swapping genders isn't the answer, at least according to 41% of the people who did so.
TBH, they are better off becoming a cat, than swapping genders https://olatorera.com/analysis-on-continuous-global-growth-of-cosmetic-surgeries-top-5-worst-before-and-after-botched-cases/ .
I thought Ric Grennel was going to run for CA governor, he is gay, but at least he's not a tranny
8 years from now...
"Yeah shes a transgender, but at least shes not a minor attracted person"
Another 8 years
"Yeah he might be a kindersexual, but at least hes not an adrenochrome immortal sacrificing aborted fetuses to moloch"
Republicans are just progressives going the speed limit
And that's better? We've come to the point where we now embrace homos? Lmao.
Hey, Scott Pressler is a based faggot and I'm glad he's on our team.
I don't embrace his gayness, I embrace his politics and especially leadership. I don't support gay marriage, but I also don't support any government recognized marriage.
Why do we need the governments permission in the form of a marriage license to document our bonds of love anyway? Is it not supposed to be an oath taken in the eyes of God.
That is my view as well.
But to actually answer your question, government made a legal version of "marriage" originally to give tax breaks in order to incentivize nuclear families and to increase birth rates. Seeing as the overwhelming majority of the country at the time personally defined "marriage" as "man+woman" (still do), that is how the legal definition of "marriage" was written into law.
Fast forward some decades later and the LGBTBBQASAURUS movement demands the same tax incentives for themselves.
We don't "need" the government's permission for an actual religious marriage at all. You can have a religious marriage (actual marriage) whenever you want. You just won't get those sweet, sweet financial benefits from the government if you only go that route.
Honestly, from a sheer risk/reward standpoint, the average man probably loses more from divorce than the couple would gain from the cumulative sum of all tax incentives anyways. I don't know what there is to do about that. Maybe the government shouldn't dick people around like they do. Take the arbitration out of marriage and divorce and just grant the tax breaks based on people living together. Is that so hard?
This so much
The left can have the faggots I prefer hanging around normal people.
Then you’re an idiot
No, you’re an idiot
"based faggot" yeah that makes alot of sense. Especially since being a conservative is first and foremost being anti-Christian and openly homosexual. Lmao what a joke we've become as a nation.
i really dont care what ppl do in their homes as long as they keep it private....they will have to answer for it when they die...its our job to set the example and show love to everyone..doesnt mean we have to celebrate or condone their lifestyle
You are 100% correct. Being gay is in opposition to Christian values.
But the people who hate Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, etc. Will be "BUT HE'S BASED THOUGH!!!!"
God created people and being gay isn’t a choice so it’s kinda his fault
Homosexuality is sin. You choose to be gay. Just as one chooses to murder. All sin is equal in the eyes of God. Your only salvation is to accept Christ and repent.
Nah, it isn’t. And being gay is not the same as murdering. That’s retarded. Have you ever heard of the concept of “punishment fits the crime”? If all sins are equal, does that mean you think our justice system should dole out life sentences for jaywalking?
Where do you get the idea Scott pressler is anti Christian?
You might be in the closet bud.
What a stupid response. You fag lovers are not conservatives.
Your branch of conservatism lost the fucking culture war. Those like me believe the government shouldn't even be involved in marriage and we certainly aren't willing to focus all our energy on attacking homosexuals. Return to Bush era bullshit if you want faggot, you lost and your branch will never gain majority power with the conservative movement ever again.
Keep kissing up to faggots. It’s not going to work out.
I mean, who cares as long as it’s not the basis of your personality lmfao.
You can push trad values and still become allies w/ those who do the same while in their private lives falling short.
Like every Christian here w/ countless other sins.
Because theyre snakes, that’s why.
Why do idiots like you claim to be conservative while supporting things that aren’t conservative?
What have I supported that’s not conservative?
If it wasn't the basis of his personality he wouldn't be wearing gay hats, openly talking about his homosexuality, and endorsing other gays. Not to mention even without his gayness he is terrible in general.
No way bud. Grenell is solid. He’s okay with us disagreeing w/ his choices, and he doesn’t flaunt it generally speaking.
It’s a reasonable compromise promotes our values while having a badass gay to push back against the groupthink. What’s the negative here?
Keep making new accounts to downvote you dumb faggot they are just internet points. Have fun.
This is my only account bud
Im not a new account and i downvoted you. You are the one with a new account talking retard shit. If you were a true conservative, you would give zero shits what someone does in their bedroom as long as its between two consensual adults. If you want to police who someone wants to love, date or marry, you are far from being a conservative who wants less policing and less government overreach.
Dude imagine thinking that gay ppl are the cause of everything wrong with America. Talk about being back in the 2000s with shitty Bush lvl era conservatism
Cuckservatism is what is causing nationalism to lose lol. Being a lolbert or cuckservative will not save you from the commies, you will just sit on your asses until they try and send you to the gulags or take your guns but the thing is they could just import in millions of low iq savages and give them guns to force you to comply. Lolbertarianism and cuckservatism both mean accepting that you will lose and letting it happen because you don't want to "police who someone loves". There is no love in a relationship between faggots, just like no one can have love for a pedo or tranny. Quit kidding yourselves.
You sure have done a lot of research into this. Sure sounds like you got this knowledge from personal experience!
They are free gifts to the globalists.
You don’t understand compromise or strategic allies so you’ll always fail, loser.
You are a slave to international jewry.
Funny because I don’t see you calling them out or focusing on the bigger threat which is the financial systems, credit scores, and centralized banks. Instead you’re whining about gays.
I'm not going to cast the first stone here. I've got my own problems.
That said, if you're reveling in your sin, pouring the filth all over yourself and encouraging other to join you, nope, I'm out. Pull your shit together. Learn virtue and self control, or condemn yourself to hell.
Nah he's a flaming faggot, just look at his twitter. Gay first people are not "based and trad" and they never will be you cuck losers.
Kek you’re pathetic
Oh he isn't? Why is he wearing gay hats and using gay flags and talking about his gay self?
You’re really obsessed with gays.
This is why America First needs to take over the GOP, who are a ton of Democrats in disguise
Precinct Project.
So glad to hear that California now has precinct avaialble
CA is one of the states where the precincts work a bit differently. We actually have to go one level up instead of filling the precinct chairs, but it's still a worthy endeavor.
I'm still gathering the details but will post them here when I've got them.
i never would've thought that commiefornia would have them open to begin with
Our establishment GOP is pretty bad. That's why I'm constantly calling for Ric Grenell.
California pedes, it's time to take big steps in taking your state back!
No, you kill corruption (GOP and the whole uniparty) with a new party. Otherwise the controlled opposition show continues.
The big question is: How do you get political power when your votes doesn't count anymore? I would like to know peaceful answer to that, because in history it hasn't worked once without a bloodshed.
why the fuck are people still clinging on to the GOP here? after all the years they fucked us at the exact same rate the DEMS did?
this site is shills but don't let it make you think the GOP will EVER, EVER work for you.
if you want to pull an Alien and burst out of its chest killing the host and forming an entirely different organism, well ok but that's a different top. That's the BNP nigga, the Brand New Party.
Because the infrastructure is in place and we've got a good chance of taking over the GOP.
I'd much rather be part of a MAGA Party, but that's not happening, so this is the path forward with the best chance of electoral success.
Maybe we can be the Alien?
seems like a good compromise between the young and old that want the same thing.
I just really want no quarter for the corrupt GOP in power now.
RINO hunting season is already open. Primaries appear to be making progress.
They need to be driven out from within. New party will go the way of the libertarians or greens: doomed to oblivion but useful enough to pull votes from the strong contenders so all the races are close enough for fraud...
The GOP doesn’t exist any longer.
Tranny Republicans have no appeal, the only demographic that loves trannies are hardcore liberals, and they'd never vote for a Republican. Black and latinos in California certainly aren't going to vote for that abomination.
Trans=mental. Gotta be level headed and cool not a nut bag that thinks they want a dick and some tits
Or a nut bag that thinks the government should endorse homo unions or adoptions...oh wait
Yep, no trannies, no pedos, fuck off!
Bruce Jenner will never be governor of California.
No gays either.
Nah, our gays are way more based than you are. We’d sooner get rid of you than them.
OP must be from Somalia.
Palestine.
Palestine is based.it was once the home of brave indo-Europeans.
Move there.
Nope. I am sure the ayatollah would soon ally with them in order to poke Israel. Israel poked the bear called Iran and Iran re waiting for an opportunity to laugh at the incompetence of the USA's mid-east strategy and Israel.
Fuck off faggot lover
Oops I think someone’s feelings got hurt. Are you triggered?
Oh no somebody doesn't like muh based faggerinos! Deploy downdoots my fellow pedes! WE HAVE THE BEST FAGGOTS DON'T WE FOLKS!!!
Oh no the destruction of America, quick blame all muh gays, they’re all totally so powerful and evil and in control of everything
Yeah I would not vote for Caitlyn Jenner.
There’s many more qualified people who don’t backhandedly legitimize the institutions destroying America.
Transgenderism is a mental illness, it has nothing to do with faith
GOP proved it was unredeemable trash in the fallout of the Nov 3 2020 election
Part of me wants to say if they do the job well who cares. The other side says, because parading people who are deeply mentally disturbed around as successful examples to follow is just another means of destroying sanity and what is right.
It's the forcing of the issue that really grinds my gears. If there is such a massive contingent of trans people waiting to make public office then it is what it is but none of it seems organic. It seems like a push to support illegitimate people for the purpose of control. The argument has nothing to do with not wanting transgender people (I mean it is but that's not my point) it's about using "progress" to wedge.
Vote the person not the party. Primaries. We dont need to fracture now.
Son, there has been no place for people of faith in politics for a long time now. You have to get off your bun and make a place for people of faith in politics.
Personally LGBT people don't bother me when they do their own thing, live their own life, and don't force their way of living on kids. Beyond that I just see them as troubled people still capable of being decent folk.
Still, no way in hell would I want even their best as my representative, as a friend? Coworker? Sure. But sorry LGBT folks, you don't represent normal people nor are you mentally ready to handle thr stresses of governing.
TAKE OVER THE LOCAL GOP BY BECOMING A PRECINCT COMMITTEEMAN! KICK THE RHINOS OUT! https://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com/
Jenner can call himself whatever he wants. That doesn’t mean the GOP “supports” him.
GOP IS TRAITORS
You’re not alone. I don’t support those with mental illness in office either.
I’m right there with ya Bryson
Lol you’re funny. You still supported them up until that point?!
At this point I couldn't give a shit is a mental patient gets elected because it's far better than ANY D could ever be.
Better mentally ill then retarded.
Most people are incredibly tired of homosexual crap being pushed on people 24/7.
I support everybnody in govenrment white balck asian trans gay lesbian christina jew atheist
as long as they live by principles like liberty freedom of speech gunrights etc etc
It's not even a faith thing.
It's not that I care if a grown ass man wants to dress up like a woman and play make believe, it's that they push it on children and at an age where it's basically a death sentence, or at least a sterilization sentence. As a matter of genetic survival when something with that aggressive of a probability of ending your line comes along you push back or cease to exist.
Viruses are to genes as propaganda is to memes. You don't have to be a christian to have an immune response to this attack.
I was raised Catholic but I am not a man that believes in religion. I am a man of science and respect those that have religious beliefs.
I am, however, vehemently against the mentally ill being in any role that can affect me in any way, shape, or form.
I'm happy for it. Quicker to allow California to burn itself to the ground.
100% FACTS
Good. Your faith shouldn't be in my politics.
What's a follower?
I think most transsexuals actually just have mental problems and will sort themselves out in time.
That being said i don't want any restrictions on my speech, or other rights, to accommodate transsexuals. Don't want them protected from hate speech or whatever, i don't want any preferential treatment of them compared to any other group.
But i can't say that i agree in legislation to keep these poor confused deviant dumbasses out of government employment. If they have the qualifications for the job then the other stuff isn't important. We can't discriminate based on sexual preference. And it's definitely not a winning issue.
People of faith=normal people
Personally, I think we shouldn't say being gay is normal. It's not. It may be accepted socially, but it's not a natural thing. I put it up there with bestiality and other forms of abnormal sexual intercourse. I don't think we should chastise these people, however, I would never put these types of behavior as something to strive for. The problem now is when you say that, you are looked as a bigot or homophobic. I am merely looking at it as "What is the best for my family and society as in general." Right now our society is being degraded and we are dumbing down our people to the lowest common dominator. If a society EVER wants to strive to get better, you need high goals to strive for. Bottom line, our society has made working for a higher purpose, mentally and physically a sin. Societies like Sodom and Gomorrah will be the result.
It happens in nature therefore it is natural.
Deformities happen in nature also, but I don't find it normal.
I said natural, not normal.
Natural is not the same as normal.
Natural means occurring in nature, not man made. Normal means falling within the normal distribution.
You know what else isn’t normal? Homeschooling. Are you going to argue that we shouldn’t do that?
Homeschooling isn't normal? What a stupid statement.
Blocked moronic idiot.
Yeah, I was homeschooled btw. You can’t even make an argument so you block me like a typical leftie.
Are you seriously arguing that homeschooling is the most common form of schooling?
“We shouldn’t say whether being gay is normal or not”
Then you aren’t a conservative.
In two years time: “Just because someone’s a pedophile doesn’t mean they can’t be a conservative.” I'll put money on it.
I 100% agree. But, people will try to convince you it's normal. It's already happening in our society.