4047
Comments (298)
sorted by:
420
CloudNine 420 points ago +426 / -6

BLACK LIGHT MATTERS!

174
basedvirginian 174 points ago +176 / -2

WE WUZ BULBZ

116
leakmouth 116 points ago +118 / -2

N SHEEIT

16
deleted 16 points ago +18 / -2
60
runonce 60 points ago +62 / -2

very low wattage, not too bright., very accurate.

24
10
Tbonius45maximus 10 points ago +12 / -2

Eff guy the Donald has the absolute wittiest fellows..

10
MAGA_Skull 10 points ago +12 / -2

RIP incandescent

3
Mister_anonymous 3 points ago +4 / -1

TESLA WUZ BLAKK

0
Joesf23 0 points ago +7 / -7

Bahahahaha! This place still makes me laugh

58
South_Florida_Guy 58 points ago +60 / -2

Muh paperations!

16
ShyRipley 16 points ago +18 / -2

kek

-2
Joesf23 -2 points ago +7 / -9

White paper = racist

35
PocketTurd [S] 35 points ago +37 / -2

🤣

27
FredRedd 27 points ago +29 / -2

Awarding you best KEK of the day, April 24th, 2021.

9
ShyRipley 9 points ago +11 / -2

I second that emotion

12
Randomwaffle 12 points ago +14 / -2

you win

254
Fiddletwinks 254 points ago +259 / -5

You can't do this to a recovering hopium addict.

107
BasedTemplar 107 points ago +109 / -2

Don’t do that.

Don’t give me hope.

0
Carry_Your_Name 0 points ago +8 / -8

There is no hope for any real change, but there's always hope of getting the truth out. Nonetheless, Happiness equals to Reality minus Expectation.

83
ThePatriot_2021 83 points ago +84 / -1

I always keep my expectations as low as possible so that nothing can disappoint me.

59
Barack-Obama2 59 points ago +63 / -4

That's how I feel before I put my butthole up to the glory hole.

20
ViduusMAGA 20 points ago +21 / -1

Such a great song.

6
MICHIGANisRED 6 points ago +7 / -1

That's how I play golf

2
Redpillgirlfrommars 2 points ago +3 / -1

That’s what I tell myself with shit like this but somehow I’m always still deeply disappointed.

16
magaandkag 16 points ago +17 / -1

Do not trust to hope, it has forsaken these lands.

1
Thedaythe_redditdied 1 point ago +2 / -1

If it makes you feel better regardless of the out come nothing will change.

0
HearkenYe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Seriously...

140
TraumaHotel 140 points ago +142 / -2

Clearly Trump won. They shut everything down, kicked everyone out except those in on the steal and four days after the election “called” it for the current piece of shit in DC. Silence anyone questioning results and fight every forensic audit.

Trump Won.

GEOTUS must reclaim his rightful place.

He going to need our help in removing the current treasonous occupation in DC. Even after they can’t hide it anymore, it’s not like they’re just gonna leave. There’s a fence and military guarding DC for when the truth does come out.

10
Afeazo 10 points ago +11 / -1

I have not been able to follow this too closely, but is there really any way they can check for ballots that were destroyed since the election?

1
HearkenYe 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wonder if there is some way for them to know if any ballots were missing? Like maybe each one gets scanned and maybe they also all got scanned before being sent out to people? or at least they all should have like an ID number? But then there's no way to know if it was filled out or if it was one of the very many that certainly didn't get filled out and someone just threw it away or something... Yeah I don't think there's any way to know

-3
iminlovewithtrump -3 points ago +1 / -4

Does it matter? When so many millions are in on it it doesn't matter anymore

5
SomeoneInHouston 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yep. You've got it. If you paid close attention, you know Trump already knew we were heading here. We'll have to rightfully millitarily remove them all in D.C.

1
mulejuicemcquaid 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think a more likely scenario is that successful audits showing Trump won would turn the Biden administration into a lame duck and wake moderates up to the corruption. The 2022 midterms would swing GOP. Election Integrity becomes highly popular and we get many states on board with the idea of paper ballots only, limited mail in ballots, ID verification, etc. 2024 goes to Trump.

I just really doubt military action when Biden's already been confirmed by state legislators, governors, congress, SCOTUS, and VP Pence through a Constitutional process. You could impeach him I guess if the GOP swept midterms, but he wasn't directly involved in the local pockets of mobilized election fraud.

1
iminlovewithtrump 1 point ago +6 / -5

We'll have to rightfully millitarily remove them all in D.C.

Yeah any day now, aaaaany day now. Just wait the plan is here soon!!!

1
HearkenYe 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yup just clutchin our guns... waitin fer the day...

1
HearkenYe 1 point ago +2 / -1

I haven't heard him called GEOTUS in so long

99
StartAgain 99 points ago +100 / -1

love this meme

41
basedvirginian 41 points ago +43 / -2

It’s a v high energy meme 👌🏻

76
Here_we_go 76 points ago +93 / -17

Remember that bs story on here about the ballot paper and watermarks right after the election. Hopium was everywhere and sadly so was nonsense.

41
Iranhasnukes 41 points ago +54 / -13

I don’t know how you can with certainty call any reported malfeasance on11/3/2020 “nonsense”

No one knows shit cause China scrubbed all of internet

So you don’t know sh*t and neither does anyone else - but I trust Powell and Lin Wood vs China technocrats deleting every backstory that contradicts their narrative

48
BoostPower 48 points ago +49 / -1

You can't scrub the internet but you can flood it with disinformation.

20
Here_we_go 20 points ago +20 / -0

Exactly

5
Afeazo 5 points ago +5 / -0

It is extremely difficult to find information from the past. Even if you use popular search engine date filter, you still sometimes get more recent results, not so bad on DuckDuckGo but on Google that filter is next to useless. But even on DDG if you search say "Trump" and only look for information before 2005 you still get news articles of him in office.

2
Tbonius45maximus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hot the search with trump -cnn -msnbc -fox - every other news outlet and see what happens

1
HearkenYe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this because present proves past

10
bootsy_two_scoops 10 points ago +10 / -0

They really cranked the forum sliding up to 11. So much “happening”

2
Guruchild 2 points ago +3 / -1

Disinformation, misinformation, made up words. It’s all data. Interpretation is the key

7
BoostPower 7 points ago +7 / -0

No. Absolutely not. Fake information is not data. I do understand where you're coming from though. "Figures don't lie but liars figure."

0
Guruchild 0 points ago +1 / -1

You proved my point. Thank you.

1
HearkenYe 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's all bullshit, misinterpretation is the key

10
giantrabbit1 10 points ago +27 / -17

I don't trust Powell & Wood at all. They spread the CIA Server Raid in Germany where Gina Haspel died in a shootout with the army crap.

Secondly, Wood is a registered Democrat who voted for 0bama in 2012 and Abrams for 2018. Kyle Rittenhouse's mom also said Lin Wood stole money from them and did nothing.

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1379034041219964931

They are grifters.

18
Leftish 18 points ago +19 / -1

Always be wary of any wealthy person asking regular people for money

-1
deleted -1 points ago +5 / -6
4
giantrabbit1 4 points ago +7 / -3

Trump proved himself.

-4
A_Russian_Wall -4 points ago +8 / -12

By cucking out at the last moment

-4
Londonrain -4 points ago +2 / -6

Indeed.

1
Leftish 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone.

13
RStroud 13 points ago +13 / -0

I'm not sure I'd completely lump Wood & Powell together. The Powell - Patrick Byrne connection is more interesting.

5
NormaJeanRocks 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agree, not sure what you're talking about here. But I saw Lin post several photoshopped pics of John Robert's on Twitter with the black eye, think I even made a post about it at the time. That and his claims of "big arrests" in 2 weeks shut me off for him. Had hope too

7
NadlerShartWaddle 7 points ago +7 / -0

It looked to me like Lin liked to drink, browse 4chan, and repost whatever amused him at 3 am.

3
Redpillgirlfrommars 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not 4chan-he seemed to definitely be browsing Q-related sites/channels/etc.

However he has said several times for these people to sue him if he’s wrong and that’s big talk for a bullshitter so I don’t even know what to think with him.

8
NadlerShartWaddle 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, he gave a speech a few days ago where he definitively said "q is real".

That's the part that is weird. He very publicly accused the Vice President of the United States and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of being child molesters and they haven't sent a dozen lawyers over with a big ass libel suit.

TLDR: I have no clue what the hell is going on.

4
RStroud 4 points ago +4 / -0

Patrick Byrne has a lengthy set of blog posts about his supposed involvement in the aftermath of the election with Powell (and to a lesser extent with Guliani and Trump). Byrne is an interesting character, is ambivalent on Trump, and sort of hangs out in the background of a lot of weird happenings. I wouldn't be surprised if he glows some color.

1
Sting 1 point ago +2 / -1

Anyone who still trustS him is part of the problem. He has been right about almost nothing. He claims to have proof that he has never shared while children are supposedly dying. He’s got names, locations, pictures, videos, all of the stuff he supposedly has and has produced none of it while children are dying?

He has produced a couple of videos of liars lying, people who were even ostracized by gullible faggots who believe almost everything.

That’s all he has? Then he has been lying or sitting on vital, life-saving information. Those are the only two options. Lying, or holding information that could save lives.

How could there be a third option? He is produced none of it. None. Of. It. He has, however, been caught repeatedly posting pictures and theories that are proven almost immediately to be false. Photoshops of black eyes, misleading videos of stolen, missing or fake ballots that turn out to be bullshit, everyone who has ever worked with him absolutely hates him. Former clients turning on him, the writing is on the goddamn fucking wall.

Anyone, and I mean this, anyone who still trusts him should have absolutely no place here or anywhere else that we discuss what we need to do to take back our country because those people are hurting us. They are dumb or they are treacherous.

It’s not a coincidence that those are the same dumb motherfuckers they told us to sit down and shut up when we had concerns about the election being stolen, we had concerns about the lack of arrests of deep state operatives, poor nominations, bad appointments, awful advisors, and ON AND ON AND ON.

The people who trust Mr. Wood are the same motherfuckers that told you arrests were coming any day now and to relax and to just shut up about it. They are the ones who fucked us when some of us had plans to pressure the White House into doing what we needed them to do, these are the fuckers that make sure millions of people sat on their thumbs.

They deserve everything that’s coming to them. When liberals finally round them up to put holes in their heads, I will not help them. I can’t wait, actually, until they are fucking dead. We will all be better off.

They are paranoid schizophrenics who believe in shoot outs in Germany and secret superagent superspy double agents on the Internet giving secret Ovaltine message to grown adults. These people need to be put down like dumb rabid mongrels.

1
Londonrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed

10
BlaineBug 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wow that's despicable. However didn't Lin Wood represent that Covington Catholic boy against CNN?

10
doug2 10 points ago +12 / -2

We know Anaconda, you also don't understand the basic facts and constantly twist their words. You were on here months after saying "the general in the room with Chavez was never in the military!"

You linked a fucking daily mail article saying he was never in us intelligence. Except by that time it was widely known he had been a high ranking official in the VENEZUELAN army. You have no clue what's going on and just post hot takes. It's pathetic and you switching accounts does nothing to change your reputation, you're still the same obvious faggot.

-16
giantrabbit1 -16 points ago +5 / -21

fuck off Q-tard. lin and sydney are Q-tard grifters who love to talk tough, but don't do anything of worth to the maga movement.

lin wood sucks so much ass that he STOLE money from kyle rittenhouse's legal fund and used it all for himself instead of helping kyle. those 2 are LARPers and snake oil salesman.

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1379034041219964931

10
SkeletorsTeeth 10 points ago +11 / -1

Man you are a bitter person

-1
WU_HAN_FRU -1 points ago +2 / -3

I would say he's more desperate than bitter.

3
Redpillgirlfrommars 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only point I’d argue is who Wood supported in the past. So many people went from democrat to Trump supporter. I don’t think it’s fair to hold that agains people.

2
BlaineBug 2 points ago +10 / -8

Sidney Powell said it herself in a February or March interview that she was put on the spot and used the term "Release the Kraken" without knowing that it was connected to any branch of the military. She said that it does NOT have anything to do with any military operation. So I say that she, Lin Wood, Mike Powell, and the rest are all equal frauds too.

-18
giantrabbit1 -18 points ago +8 / -26

yep. sydney literally told a judge that 'nobody would believe [her] claims' when dominion sued her ass. it proved she was just larping like a Q-tard grifter.

31
Barbs 31 points ago +36 / -5

Of course that isn’t what she said at all you fucknut.

She said “no reasonable person would believe these are definitive statements of fact, but rather they’re strong allegations waiting to be proven in court.”

You’re the fucking retard grifter with a leftist’s sense of reality here.

-6
Pinochet_Was_Right -6 points ago +3 / -9

Favorite was how she was trying to dodge being disbarred by saying 'electronic signing' of documents doesn't count haha

-7
BlaineBug -7 points ago +4 / -11

Unforgivable. She is worse than an enemy, as a traitor is an unexpected backstabber.

However what good did any of the lying do for her financially? Now her and Lin Wood are getting sued themselves. What money did they make short term that only lasted for a couple of months? And now they will never be trusted or respected by ANYONE for the remainder of their lives.

1
mikepence123 1 point ago +8 / -7

Their goal wasn't to be respected by anyone. It was to discredit and derail Trump's lawsuits and smear them in the court of public opinion so nobody would believe Trump. Their only purpose was to sow discord and division.

1
BlaineBug 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, I never heard anyone discredit her all throughout November or December.

0
BlaineBug 0 points ago +2 / -2

I suppose, but then why get sued? All a big show and the lawsuit really doesn't matter and is only an act?

9
texas4ever 9 points ago +9 / -0

If what Pulitzer is saying is in fact correct, his technology is actually way better than just detecting watermarks. It can detect what type of ink, where and how the ballots were printed, folded (or not) and a whole lot more.

11
Palmertabs 11 points ago +11 / -0

I want every single ballot running through whatever the fuck that machine is.

Every. Single. One.

2
AwareNonCompliant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately, they won’t let him use the scanners. He’ll have to do what he can using high resolution photos. If they used his tech they’d be done in days.

2
Here_we_go 2 points ago +2 / -0

But he has the physical ballots, no?

8
Formerlurker92 8 points ago +12 / -4

Always is

2
therighteousdontfear 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember that story, so what's with the image and sticky?

1
HearkenYe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait what story?

60
seilgu 60 points ago +60 / -0

Please God.

66
Formerlurker92 66 points ago +66 / -0

Let one of our checks and balances work as intended

43
BasedTemplar 43 points ago +44 / -1

Let all of the fraud come to light and be exposed.

27
Kalom69 27 points ago +27 / -0

Let all of the commies be thrown out of a chopper

16
BasedTemplar 16 points ago +17 / -1

And all his people said, amen.

3
basedvirginian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s aMA’AM!

0
BBQ_boomer 0 points ago +9 / -9

then everyone clapped

9
TraumaHotel 9 points ago +9 / -0

And ate hamburgers

2
BBQ_boomer 2 points ago +8 / -6

i want extra cheese and bacon on mine!

54
stagolee 54 points ago +55 / -1

I’m pretty sure the fraud was done with real ballots. Mail in voting produced gobs of ballots, and the election officials were in on it. I hope they’re doing signature and address validation, cause I think that’s where a big portion of the scam is - fake people and fake addresses.

34
NC_patriot 34 points ago +35 / -1

But apparently some of the supposed mail-in ballots don't have creases, which means they weren't mailed.

10
lordvon 10 points ago +11 / -1

if the republic hangs on creases....

14
lordvon 14 points ago +14 / -0

and theyve had months to put in creases.

7
texas4ever 7 points ago +8 / -1

Pulitzer's technology is pretty sophisticated, might be able to detect when the creases were made for example.

8
lordvon 8 points ago +8 / -0

you are right, I forgot about that. Pulitzer detailed how he could tell the difference between hand creases and machine-generated creases.

5
NC_patriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Even if they put in creases, they would still have to have an envelope with a matching signature.

3
ThurstonHowell3rd 3 points ago +3 / -0

At this point you can't correlate individual ballots to the envelope in which it was mailed.

You could count the total number of mail-in ballots and see if that matched the total number of envelopes, but if the two counts don't match you have no way to know which ballots arrived in an envelope and which did not. Perhaps this crease analysis can help with that?

23
Frog_Anne 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yes, and they've been committing fraud with mail-in ballots for years. There have been stories about people seeing a huge stack of ballots delivered to one address, all supposedly for different people, when they know only one person lives there. When they go through voter rolls, they always find lots of ballots going to places like empty lots, churches, PO Boxes, all kinds of bogus addresses. It's so the Democrats can gather up extra ballots and have them ready to feed in when they're counting.

We should not allow mail-in ballots at all. Absentee is only for military and first responders scheduled for voting day. Everyone else, show up with your valid ID and vote in person. I'd even rather have a special voting ID prevent "motor voters" from Guatemala or wherever having a say, or purple fingers to prevent multiple IDs. Finally, when the polls close they should have the total votes reported first so they don't "find" an extra box or two in the middle of the night. Also, red/rural areas should stop reporting earlier than the corrupt cities. You're just giving those cheats a chance to figure out how many fake votes they need to put Democrats in office.

9
Snerdley 9 points ago +9 / -0

In Madison, WI, they collected "mail in" and "drop off" ballots (which they mixed, obfuscating absent postmarks) at the Dane County Clerks office. Then they ensured each name received was added to the voting records if it was not, or cured those with incomplete information. New Poll Book updates were printed for each ward, and the ballots were shipped to the ward corresponding to the address.

During voting on Nov 3rd, the waiting ballots were opened 5 at a time by poll workers, assigned a voter number (with an "A" Suffix), and fed though the voting machines during the day (turnout was light in Madison). They completed ~900 absentee ballots in my ward by about 2pm on election day.

The key was the clerks ADDING additional names to the roles prior to shipping the ballots to the ward.

11
BillGall2 11 points ago +11 / -0

One of the things that needs to be done in this audit is to separate out the illegal ballots. In the end the only thing some people will understand is "Here is the stack of illegal ballots that should not be counted, here is the stack of legal Trump ballots and here is the (smaller) stack of legal Biden Ballots." Trump won.

7
JuneofOz17 7 points ago +7 / -0

They did a lot of fraud with the adjudicated ballots. They “corrected” those to the wrong candidate.......

5
Snerdley 5 points ago +5 / -0

remember the Sharpies? Bleed though the ballot and cause "errors" which need adjudication (without the voter aware). Errors were usually <2%, but this time they were over 11% in M.C. Az.

3
Joe_Snow 3 points ago +3 / -0

I heard some places had INSANE numbers of ballots requiring adjudication. Like 67%

1
lordvon 1 point ago +1 / -0

in AZ?

5
ShinAkuma 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes the vast majority of fraud was via mail in ballots, however on election night Trump was getting so many votes that the mails in were not enough. Queue the CCP ballots.

They will identify the phony ballots, which will be more than the margin of victory.

1
stagolee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I agree. I was trying to suggest that there were plenty of extra official ballots printed that they could use for the fraud, including on election night.

1
Joe_Snow 1 point ago +1 / -0

God, let's hope so. Let's also hope they were bad enough to stick out, or they were the shredded ballots in the yellow bags in that dumpster.

29
10
FinishTheBorderWall 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is very good news. On serious topics like this, we should not be photoshopping the thumbnail. It could lead to people thinking it’s just a meme post.

7
WU_HAN_FRU 7 points ago +7 / -0

That’s what I thought at first.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
doug2 3 points ago +3 / -0

No shit?

23
DotA-Life3 23 points ago +24 / -1

So Dr. Steve Pieczenik was right then?

10
fat50 10 points ago +10 / -0

Apparently.

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. Not confirmed. could be any kind of invisible watermark. not some kind of QFS mark

1
fat50 1 point ago +2 / -1

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/apparently

While apparently can mean "plainly" — like, duh — it can also mean "seemingly," which is almost "evidently" or "obviously," but not quite. There's a certain amount of guessing involved, based on appearances. The park ranger who shows up in the morning to examine the path of destruction through your campsite might say that it was "apparently the work of a hungry bear," not because he's totally sure, but because it definitely looks like something the bears around here would do.

7
lordvon 7 points ago +8 / -1

his specific claim was QFS blockchain watermarks. dunno if that is what is going on here.

3
Snerdley 3 points ago +3 / -0

qfs blockchain watermark would not be visually readable. I think QFS was denied, but that doesn't preclude a traditional watermark.

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I imagine that a QFS watermark would look very much like a bitcoin paper wallet, which is a 3D barcode

18
Fervent_winning 18 points ago +18 / -0

Lots of faggot doomers in the comments. High energy got us to this point and audit. Lets keep it going!

-2
FLYWHEEL_PRIME -2 points ago +3 / -5

🤣 "high energy" got your dick chopped off and shoved down your throat last November

Some of us "doomers" called almost every single play along the steal game, and once Jan 20 rolled around and it was actually time to do something........ where was the leadership?

16
Pinochet_Was_Right 16 points ago +17 / -1

What are the chances this reveals fraud... say, in comparison to they just rigged it ‘properly’ over last few months?

10
SurfingUSA 10 points ago +10 / -0

6000 percent (my back of the envelope calculation)

5
bighomiebeenchillin 5 points ago +11 / -6

there is a way higher chance that fraud will be revealed and proven, but nothing being done about it legally. there is simply no mechanism in da constitution that has an answer this.

10
WildRiot 10 points ago +12 / -2

Sure there is. Its in the bill of rights, 2nd amendment

5
lordvon 5 points ago +5 / -0

exactly

1
emjayt 1 point ago +2 / -1

You go first

3
BillGall2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes there is. Once we uncover the evidence of fraud, it will lead to the fraudsters. We, the people can demand the arrest of those involved and initiate lawsuits against those who funded it, Begin prosecuting the felons and convince the legislature to overturn the results.

2
Snerdley 2 points ago +2 / -0

we tried proving criminality with the protected elite before, but no-one in spygate, email-gate, uranium1-gate, or anything got put in jail. I can't hold my breath this will lead to that outcome.

-2
bighomiebeenchillin -2 points ago +1 / -3

sure you can arrest da fraudsters. you can even impeach and remove biden and that one ho. but there is literally no legal mechanism in our republic to replace biden with Trump, even if fraud is proved beyond a reasonable doubt to da point that it’s proven that Trump was da true winner. this is just facts brah there are specific rules set up in da constitution on how da whole process works. da last constitutional legal mechanism to replace biden with Trump was for congress to object da elector votes and choose Trump instead on jan 6.

once congress officially counted and confirmed da EC votes for biden, all legal remedies were used up.

constitutionally there is no other way to place someone in office for president. nobody has da power to actually select a specific person to become president. if biden and da ho are impeached, then da next person on da list is automatically sworn in as prez. there is nobody in da govt that can just pick Trump to replace biden for prez. it dont work like that.

0
Yeeticus 0 points ago +1 / -1

the

0
ThurstonHowell3rd 0 points ago +1 / -1

You remove Biden and Harris, then Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House becomes President.

-1
bighomiebeenchillin -1 points ago +1 / -2

yeh. is pelosi Trump brah?

1
ThurstonHowell3rd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never was. Never is. Never will be. Brah.

1
bighomiebeenchillin 1 point ago +1 / -0

fisho

1
ThebigLMAOski17 1 point ago +1 / -0

11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, etc, etc, etc...

1
Redpillgirlfrommars 1 point ago +2 / -1

There’s no precedent. We create the precedent.

Also stop using “da”, it makes you look retarded.

0
maganify 0 points ago +1 / -1

The mechanism in the Construction to answer this was Mike Pence. He fucked us.

3
UndercoverSpez 3 points ago +8 / -5

They will come out with "irregularities" and say the victory of Arizona is "inconclusive". That's best case.

8
Orangelightsinwindow 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah. The only strange thing is that the media is already front loading the story as if they know something will be found. You'd think they'd just ignore it. But as a former hopium junky I can't be trusted with these predictions anymore.

1
Robiscore98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same with me. Me and my friend were discussing what will happen when AZ exposes the fraud and we both said there will be no legal remedy and it might be time to take up arms. I am sad that it has come to this but if one group of people does something then it will give the rest of the people confidence to do something.

But that is when and only when the fraud is found and if there is no way forward in the legal system

3
spezisacuckold 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yup. Which should spur the other swing states to hold the same kind of audit. And then show the same "inconclusive" results. Which then should lead to huge public outrage.

3
WildRiot 3 points ago +3 / -0

A huge public outrage of boomers clocking back in to work and posting online during lunch breaks

1
CyclopticErotica 1 point ago +2 / -1

Headline will be "Republicans Pounce!"

0
kratomlol 0 points ago +2 / -2

Pretty much.

15
Pinochet_Was_Right 15 points ago +15 / -0

Let’s hope this reveals the truth

14
TheNightJanitor 14 points ago +16 / -2

Fuck it I'll just say it.

THIS MAKES MY DICK HARD

yall know you're thinking it. I'm just sayin it for all of us.

3
NC_patriot 3 points ago +4 / -1

Almonds activated.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
lordvon 1 point ago +3 / -2

reddit faggotry....

1
TheNightJanitor 1 point ago +3 / -2

You got a purdy mouth

-1
iminlovewithtrump -1 points ago +1 / -2

cringe

14
NormaJeanRocks 14 points ago +14 / -0

Can we trust the people that are doing this, or is this another blm operation?

9
WildRiot 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yea i loved BLM doing the vote counting in GA that was super legit

7
NC_patriot 7 points ago +8 / -1

Jovan Pulitzer is leading the whole thing, so yes, we can trust them.

0
doug2 0 points ago +2 / -2

No, no he's not.

4
NC_patriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, yes he is.

1
Robiscore98 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not involved but apparently his technology is

2
Redpillgirlfrommars 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its his company.

12
lordvon 12 points ago +12 / -0

Oh, hi watermark

2
Jefferson 2 points ago +2 / -0

you're tearing me apart, creases!

11
TraumaHotel 11 points ago +11 / -0

YYYYUUUUUGGGGEEEEE

9
chris82tk 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wait is that...no couldn't be...it looks like the AZ election was counted incorrectly. Preliminary results show it was actually a landslide for Jeb!

5
Unbent 5 points ago +5 / -0

I clapped

1
1
NPC11011110000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guac!

8
Meseems 8 points ago +8 / -0

UV light, the perfect disinfectant.

7
givethismanacoat 7 points ago +8 / -1

Watch the water.

3
lordvon 3 points ago +6 / -3

greatawakening.win is down the hall and to the left. --Q+

7
TerraHertz 7 points ago +7 / -0

Please, please let this be real. Remember the story that Trump had anticipated 2020 mass election fraud, and had the DSS print all the legitimate ballots with encrypted hidden watermarks?

It seemed a realistic story at the time, but then after the election, even though there were obviously huge numbers of fake ballots being injected into the system, nothing more was heard about watermarks.

Imagine the implications if this audit finds that a large percentage of the ballot papers are definitely counterfeit. Leading to investigation of where they came from, who organized and paid for that, and which other states received more of the counterfeits. (Hint: all Dem-run states and some R states.)

Meanwhile FBI investigating... nothing much.

3
Robiscore98 3 points ago +3 / -0

He tweeted back in June that they were shipping millions of ballots from China. He said during one of the debates there was going to be fraud.

He knew. Not sure how much but he knew

6
penguinjay1212 6 points ago +6 / -0

oh man, this is where we find out if our past admin was playing 4d chess foreal.

Not to say if it's bunk, they didn't. But if that 2nd hidden watermark thing is real, then holy shitballs.

5
1776DeusVult 5 points ago +5 / -0

So you’re telling me Q was right all along?

7
Barbs 7 points ago +10 / -3

They’re scanning the ballots with UV. That’s all we know. We have no idea what they’re looking for, and it could be as simple as the weave in the paper.

So it’s quite a leap of logic to think this “proves Q right,” when there’s no evidence yet that they’re looking for whatever they said was on them. That’s not to say that it’s wrong, we just don’t know if it’s right yet either.

1
Londonrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q didn’t say this. Qanon did

5
UNITED_WE_STAND1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

You watch, there is gonna be a mass shooting or a bombing to distract. I feel for those that will die because the dems are scared shitless.

4
BlaineBug 4 points ago +4 / -0

They ARE NOT SCARED and never were. However they will use propaganda regardless.

5
JMaN 5 points ago +5 / -0

BIGLY is one of my favorite words! BIGLY! It BIGLY gets the job done!

5
Qualityproduct 5 points ago +5 / -0

Alright... I'm watching . Clock me in

4
Hadit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Boy the disinformation creators are out big time!!! A little worried about what we are going to find????

4
Socialismsuckz 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope this is something only Trump and a few others knew about...

4
texas4ever 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hilarious. This is a long road and with all the BS we need a sense of humor.

4
MagaHippie88 4 points ago +4 / -0

Very very very BIGLY!!! <3 MAGA2021

4
WowStrongWinning 4 points ago +4 / -0

Regardless of the outcome. I appreciate the effort done by Arizona. It restores faith in the integrity of our constitutional republic and I will respect the outcome from Arizona.

4
Azukas 4 points ago +4 / -0

No more hopium

3
you_HO 3 points ago +3 / -0

Take THAT Chy-Nah and your fuckin' fake ballots!

3
TrumpyOldMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuvk yes. I cant wait for the results to set the precedent for upcoming lawsuits. Lets see what kind of mental gymnastics Maddow will try to pull off.

2
Robiscore98 2 points ago +2 / -0

She already discredited anything that comes out of this as bs to her sheeple audience

3
SteelWolf87 3 points ago +3 / -0

The bigliest of wins

3
Vyse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ain’t no audit like an Arizona audit cause an Arizona audit don’t stop.

3
WU_HAN_FRU 3 points ago +3 / -0

Readers: Note well the explosion of REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEs from the shills.

3
JuneofOz17 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is great. Hope they find all the adjudicated ballots and put them right. That alone will give the vote to the rightful candidate TRUMP.

3
RocketSprocket 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is Arizona the State that had shredded ballots burned in a dumpster?

2
Robiscore98 2 points ago +2 / -0

They weren't burned but yes

2
MAGADUDE 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the amount of tabulated votes don't equal the number of legit ballots what do we have?

2
maganify 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have fraudulent replacement ballots that they had 5 months to carefully produce.

3
Spawnlingman 3 points ago +3 / -0

So say they got rid of whatever fraud they could. Say they threw away bad biden down ballets and dead people and all that shit. Wont a recount show trump won with whats left? Its not like they invented real life people that voted for biden and they didnt redo all the fake ballots with watermarked ones.

3
kfunny91 3 points ago +3 / -0

Broke the algorithm!

3
BloodDe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is Pocketturd related to Catturd?

1
PocketTurd [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

🤷‍♂️

3
anon09 3 points ago +3 / -0

now why weren't all of the counts done like this? no, instead, everyone had to stay 6 ft apart from eachother, no cameras, no media, no witnesses, etc.

3
1776ThereIsaidIt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most relevant watermarks by Arizona since Pearl Harbor.

3
OMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

So when do we know how many ballots they find without the watermark?

2
NC_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole process is going to take six weeks.

3
DJT_MFer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pocket Turd, got that shit right!

3
TheSaltyVet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ballots Lives Matter!

2
farstriderr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Many such cases.

2
Robiscore98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only thing that worries me is when the fraud is revealed what will happen. The Dems would sue automatically and drag it all out but its basically turning into a never ending Russia investigation.

The process is as transparent and secure as can be unlike the two previous audits and the election itself.

Sorry to be a doomer at this time but makes me sick to my stomach to think they've been doing this for a while

2
TGNX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fact check: True.

2
TerraHertz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like the light shield box. Cut out of random cardboard, tuped together with black gaffa tape.

Improvised on the spot. All the better to surprise your enemy.