Yes, but the judge recused himself. They said on the Warroom today that this isn't necessarily a bad sign and that the new judges usually don't change the previous judges rulings..
They hired a law clerk that used to work for him, got that clerk to file paperwork in that judges court and then asked the judge to recuse himself, because that law clerk used to work for him. Pretty creative.
One of the lawyers for the auditors used to intern for the judge.
So they got the judge thrown out due to a conflict of interest?
Yes, but the judge recused himself. They said on the Warroom today that this isn't necessarily a bad sign and that the new judges usually don't change the previous judges rulings..
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/boris-epshteyn-says-weekend-developments-likely-good-news-az-senate-republicans-running-forensic-audit-arizona-video/
Interesting. This article seems line up with the comment from FreeSpeechMaster. It appears the auditors wanted the other judge to recuse himself
They hired a law clerk that used to work for him, got that clerk to file paperwork in that judges court and then asked the judge to recuse himself, because that law clerk used to work for him. Pretty creative.
Weird. That sounds like the auditors wanted the previous judge removed
The auditors didn't ask for his recusal. It was the people filing the lawsuit to stop the audit.
All of a sudden, I’m much less optimistic
You and me both.
A former law clerk for the judge was hired by the group doing the auditing.