Do you think if I started making 3-4 minute videos on these topics it would be well received? I want something easily digestible, but long enough to paint the picture of real history for normies.
A 3 minute overview / intro video and a 17 min (Ted talk length) for in-depth / deep dive would work too. Once you make them, promote them here, but also share with your fav YT creators, conservative blogs, etc so they might promote them too.
Solid advice. I'm actually wondering if I should do that full time. Could I make a decent living farming for clicks? I'd love to dedicate my life to educating Patriots.
With YT demonetizing every conservative and the alt-platforms having such poor viewership, I don't see a real revenue stream. Even established guys like Mark Dice and the Conservative Twins seem like they're suffering, especially as their videos get effectively shadow banned, even from subscribers. If you managed to make the education "fun", you might have a larger potential audience and maybe you could partner with a site like the Gateway Pundit to be their "patriot educational video creator". But even then, it would be a hobby for the foreseeable future unless you find a way to dramatically monetize your content. Or get a hot naked chick to do the videos and host a Naked Professor channel via Only Fans. (I'm only half kidding)
My thinking has been somewhat similar (although I hadn't considered the hot chick idea). I'm not looking to retire on the idea, but am not allergic to making a few dineros.
I was thinking of just doing Gab and Odysee. I don't even want to play the censorship game.
I'm going to put a couple of test videos together this week. Will DM you to get your opinion.
I hate YT, but they have the most eyeballs. Definitely worth putting up the content on various alt-platforms too. Plus you get extra patriot street cred when YT bans you!
Basically, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall usurped power that the Constitution never intended for SCOTUS to have.
They were supposed to adjudicate existing law, not re-write law from the bench. Marshall was a tyrant for 35 years and the entire legal framework he established is a major reason our system has become so corrupt.
The whole idea of 3 co-equal branches of government is a made up bunch of BS. The Judicial branch was always supposed to be the weakest, and you can see this from the original powers granted to each branch.
This is important today, because people are upset that SCOTUS didn't do anything about the stolen election. I say screw the courts; We the People are the ultimate power and the States can fix this without any interference from a Federal court system.
I think Marbury v. Madison did more to clearly define the role of the court with almost a tacit approval of the legislative branch in its ruling. The court asserted that its Article 3, Section 1, Clause 1 allowed it the ability to settle disputes, but only in a passive way in which cases must first be brought to it.
The court set its own precedent that it could not actively select cases either, which certainly has come into play in the modern era in a few different ways. The strength of the court to review is also its downfall, new laws can just be passed around the new ruling. I think in the modern era and interesting tactic has been to overwhelm the courts with a flurry of laws and social welfare programs that will take months to unwind or longer. Meanwhile those benefits become established, (DACA, ACA) and therefore, become significantly harder to remove...if it's possible at all.
As far as the elections, the cheating was too systematic to just bring a claim of meta data. It's going to need to have hard evidence and overwhelmingly compelling with the ability of the public to understand and see it. The federal bureaucracy wants this Administration, and actively worked on multiple fronts to insure it would happen.
I've been reading up on Marshall all week. The more I read, the more angry I get.
As far as the recent elections, we had 1000's of sworn affidavits. I don't think you can get evidence more overwhelming than that, but no court would hear it.
The kindest explanation I've heard is that SCOTUS was correct in not interfering with the election because it is clearly the purview of the State Legislatures to handle their own electors internally. That explanation requires a belief that SCOTUS has any scruples about weighing in on matters outside their scope, and that' a pretty big ask.
The GA ballot inspection case is based off of 4 affidavits. If those affidavits are correct and they find what I'm hoping. GA will have to flip. I almost think it has a better chance than AZ.
The thing that worries me about NH is that dominion will dispute any and all claims and this might take a long time to play out in court. The GA case doesn't really have anything to do with dominion. Sounds like someone filled out a real ballot. Then made copies of it. GA is also unique b/c of the infamous GA video. I believe its possible that this was done by Ruby and her daughter and these were the ballots they were scanning late that night. If this is true GA has its scapegoat and dominion wouldn't really be involved. Ruby can go down and the senate race would be called into question. SOS might have to resign and a few other ppl but it might over all be easier to over turn based on that evidence.
Going back to Marbury v Madison, the big take away is Chief Justice John Marshall pretty much giving himself the ability to override Congress.
During his 35 years presiding over SCOTUS, he did not allow anyone else to write an opinion for whichever side he voted for. He kept that privilege for himself. He was a tyrant.
Yes, to be honest I'm glad it's flying under the radar b/c I don't want the crazies to jump on. During the Nov hand recount in GA. Some election officials found suspect ballots. The ballots looked counterfeit to them. They didn't seem to be on the same kind of paper and the markings didn't look to be done with a pencil or pen. But stamped or printed with toner ink. These were election officials who had been doing this for 15-20 years and they had never seen anything like this. When they tried to raise concerns they were ignored basically. They made affidavits that night and gave them to Lindwood who did nothing with them (not surprising he was probably to busy tweeting crazy shit). VoterGA a independent org decided to take the affidavits and sue. They finally got access to the ballot images and will go back to court May 21 for a finally ruling on the actual ballots. I'm more hopeful for this case than I am about AZ at the moment to be honest b/c of how strong the evidence is. There's more to it but I don't want to ramble.
Bush v. Gore for all the talk of the SCOTUS choosing the President really seemed like it just deferred back to the State for its ruling, thus upholding tossing the ballots out of the recount and closing the election. So there is some precedent for reviewing the election, but only through challenges at the lower courts.
The lower courts refused to take up the big court cases, and the SCOTUS is never obligated to take up any case, but for 'national importance' they ruled moot because State courts didn't act? It all seemed like it was hustled / ignored or deferred in such a way, you could clearly see there was no real effort to explore into it.
Going back to Marbury v Madison, the biggest take away for me was the establishment of Judicial Review. That was not part of the Constitution and put SCOTUS on the same level as the other branches of government, perhaps even above them, and this was not the FF's intent.
Excellent thread. Thank you War Hamster!
Glad you appreciate it.
Do you think if I started making 3-4 minute videos on these topics it would be well received? I want something easily digestible, but long enough to paint the picture of real history for normies.
A 3 minute overview / intro video and a 17 min (Ted talk length) for in-depth / deep dive would work too. Once you make them, promote them here, but also share with your fav YT creators, conservative blogs, etc so they might promote them too.
Solid advice. I'm actually wondering if I should do that full time. Could I make a decent living farming for clicks? I'd love to dedicate my life to educating Patriots.
With YT demonetizing every conservative and the alt-platforms having such poor viewership, I don't see a real revenue stream. Even established guys like Mark Dice and the Conservative Twins seem like they're suffering, especially as their videos get effectively shadow banned, even from subscribers. If you managed to make the education "fun", you might have a larger potential audience and maybe you could partner with a site like the Gateway Pundit to be their "patriot educational video creator". But even then, it would be a hobby for the foreseeable future unless you find a way to dramatically monetize your content. Or get a hot naked chick to do the videos and host a Naked Professor channel via Only Fans. (I'm only half kidding)
My thinking has been somewhat similar (although I hadn't considered the hot chick idea). I'm not looking to retire on the idea, but am not allergic to making a few dineros.
I was thinking of just doing Gab and Odysee. I don't even want to play the censorship game.
I'm going to put a couple of test videos together this week. Will DM you to get your opinion.
I hate YT, but they have the most eyeballs. Definitely worth putting up the content on various alt-platforms too. Plus you get extra patriot street cred when YT bans you!
Given the nature of my content, I'd be kicked off by YT before I could even get my first subscriber.
I can parse my words well enough to dance around their rules, but the message I have to share is very much a threat to everything they hold dear.
I'm not exactly sure what happened in 1803. Care to explain?
Marbury v Madison.
Basically, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall usurped power that the Constitution never intended for SCOTUS to have.
They were supposed to adjudicate existing law, not re-write law from the bench. Marshall was a tyrant for 35 years and the entire legal framework he established is a major reason our system has become so corrupt.
The whole idea of 3 co-equal branches of government is a made up bunch of BS. The Judicial branch was always supposed to be the weakest, and you can see this from the original powers granted to each branch.
This is important today, because people are upset that SCOTUS didn't do anything about the stolen election. I say screw the courts; We the People are the ultimate power and the States can fix this without any interference from a Federal court system.
I think Marbury v. Madison did more to clearly define the role of the court with almost a tacit approval of the legislative branch in its ruling. The court asserted that its Article 3, Section 1, Clause 1 allowed it the ability to settle disputes, but only in a passive way in which cases must first be brought to it.
The court set its own precedent that it could not actively select cases either, which certainly has come into play in the modern era in a few different ways. The strength of the court to review is also its downfall, new laws can just be passed around the new ruling. I think in the modern era and interesting tactic has been to overwhelm the courts with a flurry of laws and social welfare programs that will take months to unwind or longer. Meanwhile those benefits become established, (DACA, ACA) and therefore, become significantly harder to remove...if it's possible at all.
As far as the elections, the cheating was too systematic to just bring a claim of meta data. It's going to need to have hard evidence and overwhelmingly compelling with the ability of the public to understand and see it. The federal bureaucracy wants this Administration, and actively worked on multiple fronts to insure it would happen.
I've been reading up on Marshall all week. The more I read, the more angry I get.
As far as the recent elections, we had 1000's of sworn affidavits. I don't think you can get evidence more overwhelming than that, but no court would hear it.
The kindest explanation I've heard is that SCOTUS was correct in not interfering with the election because it is clearly the purview of the State Legislatures to handle their own electors internally. That explanation requires a belief that SCOTUS has any scruples about weighing in on matters outside their scope, and that' a pretty big ask.
The GA ballot inspection case is based off of 4 affidavits. If those affidavits are correct and they find what I'm hoping. GA will have to flip. I almost think it has a better chance than AZ.
Hope so.
I wouldn't be surprised if NH beats them all.
The thing that worries me about NH is that dominion will dispute any and all claims and this might take a long time to play out in court. The GA case doesn't really have anything to do with dominion. Sounds like someone filled out a real ballot. Then made copies of it. GA is also unique b/c of the infamous GA video. I believe its possible that this was done by Ruby and her daughter and these were the ballots they were scanning late that night. If this is true GA has its scapegoat and dominion wouldn't really be involved. Ruby can go down and the senate race would be called into question. SOS might have to resign and a few other ppl but it might over all be easier to over turn based on that evidence.
We just need that first domino to fall.
Going back to Marbury v Madison, the big take away is Chief Justice John Marshall pretty much giving himself the ability to override Congress.
During his 35 years presiding over SCOTUS, he did not allow anyone else to write an opinion for whichever side he voted for. He kept that privilege for himself. He was a tyrant.
there's a GA ballot inspection going on?
Yes, to be honest I'm glad it's flying under the radar b/c I don't want the crazies to jump on. During the Nov hand recount in GA. Some election officials found suspect ballots. The ballots looked counterfeit to them. They didn't seem to be on the same kind of paper and the markings didn't look to be done with a pencil or pen. But stamped or printed with toner ink. These were election officials who had been doing this for 15-20 years and they had never seen anything like this. When they tried to raise concerns they were ignored basically. They made affidavits that night and gave them to Lindwood who did nothing with them (not surprising he was probably to busy tweeting crazy shit). VoterGA a independent org decided to take the affidavits and sue. They finally got access to the ballot images and will go back to court May 21 for a finally ruling on the actual ballots. I'm more hopeful for this case than I am about AZ at the moment to be honest b/c of how strong the evidence is. There's more to it but I don't want to ramble.
Bush v. Gore for all the talk of the SCOTUS choosing the President really seemed like it just deferred back to the State for its ruling, thus upholding tossing the ballots out of the recount and closing the election. So there is some precedent for reviewing the election, but only through challenges at the lower courts.
The lower courts refused to take up the big court cases, and the SCOTUS is never obligated to take up any case, but for 'national importance' they ruled moot because State courts didn't act? It all seemed like it was hustled / ignored or deferred in such a way, you could clearly see there was no real effort to explore into it.
I found this video that sums up Marbury v Madison pretty well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grotkv-m3LY&t=613s
Going back to Marbury v Madison, the biggest take away for me was the establishment of Judicial Review. That was not part of the Constitution and put SCOTUS on the same level as the other branches of government, perhaps even above them, and this was not the FF's intent.
Okay this is very interesting. I will read up on this. Another reason why I want a CoS. So much needs to be scaled back when it comes to the feds.
My litmus test for any candidate for office is: "Do you favor shrinking the Federal Gov't?" That can only be done by a CoS.
Here's a good video I just found that does a pretty good job of describing the issues at hand:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grotkv-m3LY&t=613s
Thank you I'm listening now!
I guess posting this on a Sunday morning isn't the recipe for generating discussion about something that's at the core of today's issues.