From tiny minority to tiny minority you eventually get a majority.
Think McCain, why should we exclude him?
For the same reason we should exclude anyone.
Some people really need to be excluded, but remember to chose function over "form".
And they will keep owning a majority of the sheepish population is you keep doing exactly what they want, conceding in valueless bullshit like the violence against women act, and rejecting crucial useful shit, like valuing the individual and it's contributions over "cosmetic" shit, like identitarianism.
They don't own the majority, we do. And they own identity politics, not us. Flakes don't look at themselves like it's just cosmetic; it is their identity. And none of the flakes have anything to contribute, because they are selfish, and it's " all about them"
You cannot judge character ... you just can’t ... flush that out of your head ... you barely get to know the person you share a bed with ... and that takes years
Exactly ... you fell for it ... your owners would be proud ... they presented a reality were the illusion of choice was tied with virtue and morality ... when in reality there was no choice at all
I find it funny when liberals fantasize about a Al Gore presidency instead of Dubya... they actually think it would’ve made a difference
Maybe I'm missing your point . You're saying we need to include a tiny minority, one that's been steer the country off a cliff, in order to win?
... let’s lose honorably ... that’s what we are good at
That doesn't answer my question
From tiny minority to tiny minority you eventually get a majority.
Think McCain, why should we exclude him? For the same reason we should exclude anyone. Some people really need to be excluded, but remember to chose function over "form".
That makes no sense. Minorities can be majorities? What function? We don't own the flakes, the Left does.
Aggregated minorities can be majorities.
The individual is a minority of one.
And they will keep owning a majority of the sheepish population is you keep doing exactly what they want, conceding in valueless bullshit like the violence against women act, and rejecting crucial useful shit, like valuing the individual and it's contributions over "cosmetic" shit, like identitarianism.
They don't own the majority, we do. And they own identity politics, not us. Flakes don't look at themselves like it's just cosmetic; it is their identity. And none of the flakes have anything to contribute, because they are selfish, and it's " all about them"
But if you keep cutting out "minorities" eventually you don't own the majority. And stop saying it's "theirs" when you do the same.
"And it's their identity" you didn't put that requisite in the premisse.
First....it's "break" tradition.
Second, I don't discriminate against ANYONE, so long as they share my conservative values. I'll gladly welcome to our side with open arms.
One man values is another man’s vices
You cannot judge character ... you just can’t ... flush that out of your head ... you barely get to know the person you share a bed with ... and that takes years
Of COURSE you can judge someone's character. I do it, literally, every day.
Im not doubting your capacity, but your results ... I bet you voted for Romney 🤣
Voted for Romney over Obama.....yes.
Exactly ... you fell for it ... your owners would be proud ... they presented a reality were the illusion of choice was tied with virtue and morality ... when in reality there was no choice at all
I find it funny when liberals fantasize about a Al Gore presidency instead of Dubya... they actually think it would’ve made a difference
What about metro-sexuals and confused-sexuals?
As long as they vote for the right guy and don’t do anything illegal ... I couldn’t care less
Yep, it's all about Content of Character.
Romney has entered the chat