4547
Comments (446)
sorted by:
578
Womp_womp 578 points ago +582 / -4

This guy did chauvin a favor. It will be overturned now for sure.

333
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 333 points ago +335 / -2

These people are not very smart. They have no understanding of how the penal system works.

271
_-Th0r-_ 271 points ago +272 / -1

Most crimes are solved because they just HAD to talk about it.

89
MocksFordComma 89 points ago +90 / -1

Best legal advice you’ll ever get for any situation.

https://youtu.be/sgWHrkDX35o

28
MasklessMarvel 28 points ago +29 / -1

Second best

Here is the best: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx12Rox91ww

22
HeavyVetting 22 points ago +22 / -0

I have to agree... first, don't piss off the police... second, don't try to help them my giving them information either.

29
MasklessMarvel 29 points ago +29 / -0

NOTHING you say to the police will help you

And they can use anything you say even before you are mirandized

Don't fall for that "you're not in trouble, I am just doing an investigation" bullshit. They can use everything

Ever notice how, after you get a ticket, the cop gets in his car and starts writing?

He is recording everything you told him

"Driver said he was in a hurry because he was late for work"

You're paying the ticket

19
MAGApride 19 points ago +19 / -0

It is not just that anything you say can be used against you, it will be used against you. It says it right there in the Miranda Rights: "Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law…”

It is actually illegal for law enforcement to testify on behalf of a defendant. You cannot use law enforcement to help your case, only hurt it.

9
CelesteD 9 points ago +9 / -0

I only know two things: 1.) say nothing 2.) say "I want to speak to a lawyer"

technically, thats supposed to stop the questioning and they can't talk to you at all after that, but fuck, we are living in a lawless country now, so I don't know.

8
DaayTerkErJerbs 8 points ago +9 / -1

If you are stupid enough to talk to police they better be recording it. If they're taking hand notes in this day and age.. it's because they're going to make up shit you never said an you'll never have proof you didn't tell them that.

6
LLchurch 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is true but not entirely. There is a big difference between when you have been read your rights and not. Cops are allowed to lie to you but there are certain things that can't be asked because if they do it'll get the case bounced out of court immediately. There is way too much disinformation on here about police procedure and how policing actually works.

Quick example is a DUI if a cop ask you have you been drinking during the investigation there is an extremely high chance any defense lawyer that isn't half retarded will get the case tossed. All they have to say is "you asked my client of the had been drinking" "so you couldn't tell immediately they had been drinking" "did you read him his rights" "so you interrogated my client without reading him his rights" "case needs to be dismissed" case then gets tossed. Seen it happen probably hundreds of times. Basically it all depends on what level of an encounter you are having with cops.

It varies by area but yeah the amount of people who are dead to rights that get off because of a cop slipping the tiniest is insane.

12
macrolinx 12 points ago +13 / -1

love this video. two guys spitting truth.

9
swimminginthoughts 9 points ago +10 / -1

I always like to fall back on "I don't recall" too: https://youtu.be/n_kbtKL3Z94

18
NomadicKrow2 18 points ago +18 / -0

I learned that one from watching leftist politicians testify and get away with crimes they committed. "Yeah, I don't really recall. And since I don't recall, I'm not in trouble. Checkmate, boys."

4
Chickenbaconpoutine 4 points ago +5 / -1

Lol I knew who they were before even clicking that link

I like this one too

https://youtu.be/uqo5RYOp4nQ

4
current_horror 4 points ago +5 / -1

Michael Rappaport is a leftist retard.

2
Chickenbaconpoutine 2 points ago +2 / -0

The advice he gives in this video is nonetheless sound.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
xBigCoffinHunter 6 points ago +7 / -1

Or buy brand new shovels, tarps and duct tape at the Walmart and leave the receipt on the floorboard the day their victim went missing.

5
RussianBot6969 5 points ago +5 / -0

You see this with government officials and media types, as well. They have to let someone, anyone, know just how clever they are.

152
fthecoup 152 points ago +154 / -2

George Floyd was a piece of shit violent criminal drug addict porn star who was passing counterfeit money. Right before resisting arrest, he ate all of his fentanyl and meth and overdosed on all that. Floyd also had an enlarged heart, hypertension, diabetes and was Covid positive. He died at the hospital of a heart attack and was not killed by Officer Chauvin. There was ZERO injury/bruising to Floyd’s neck, trachea or hyoid bone.

In an armed robbery, George Floyd held a gun to the stomach of pregnant woman while threatening to kill her. During a previous traffic stop, George Floyd ate all his drugs and resisted arrest, requiring a visit to the emergency room for overdose.

The world is a better place without the piece of shit monster, George Floyd. Officer Chauvin was railroaded in an absolutely disgusting political circus trial

59
MustBeTrump 59 points ago +59 / -0

You've put in some effort to make sure you're stating all the facts about good boy George but your whole comment could be debunked because the woman apparently wasn't pregnant. Crowder looked into this and it seems he threatened her in front of her toddler instead.

Feel free to look into it yourself but one false fact can easily lead to idiots dismissing everything else you just said.

27
Chick-Fil-A 27 points ago +29 / -2

Also he didn’t “die” at the hospital. He was pronounced dead there after attempts at resuscitation. When the ambulance arrived he had no pulse.

12
fthecoup 12 points ago +12 / -0

Asked for Floyd's oxygen saturation levels, Tobin told the court: 'It was 98 percent saturated with oxygen when they measured it at Hennepin County Medical Center and that was 9.16pm.'

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +2 / -1

You can measure oxygen saturation without the person being alive, I’m pretty sure.

1
fthecoup 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah — and it’s somewhere between -1 and 1.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
4
BidensWetNurse 4 points ago +4 / -0

With what witchcraft? I've got a Dad that wants to know. Also, even if you could, why would you?

1
fthecoup 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah — with a heart lung machine NOT just a ventilator

Otherwise BUllshit

0
cmndr_pepe_spacefrce 0 points ago +1 / -1

that’s not how dead lungs work

3
MustBeTrump 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah, I remember a post here a while back showing a video of good boy George being jolted in the back of an ambulance and occasionally the heart monitor would show a pulse for a brief second and I made a joke about how "look he's alive!" lol

He died on the street like the cockroach he is.

-7
Mraboman3 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Yea, people don’t understand physics. You can say he died from an overdose, but the timing of his death was under Dereks knee. Besides “fag, commie, shill” I’ve never heard a intelligent rebuttal. Floyd’s pulse what checked on the ground. No pulse. Medics were unable to regain a pulse. That means he died were he lost pulse. I don’t see where the confusion lies. I would love for someone to explain it to me

4
magol 4 points ago +4 / -0

dr.baker said if circumstance were different and he was found alone then he would've concluded that it was an overdose

-1
Mraboman3 -1 points ago +1 / -2

What does that mean? I didn’t mention cause of death

2
RichardNoggin 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is true

1
MotherOf13Furbabies 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only when our side does it tthough.

3
MustBeTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately so, which is why I try to make sure to fact check fellow patriots when given the chance because if that was posted to Facebook you'd see an immediate fact check debunking the entire thing just because of one minor error.

I've also had arguments with lefties where 99% of the things I've said are correct but because I said something like "half of trannies are suicidal" and they fact check me to find that it's actually only 49%, then they reject my entire premise.

22
feraxil 22 points ago +23 / -1

Whoa. Whoa there buddy.

He was not a star. He had a backroom low budget appearance in one film.

8
thisguy883 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Habbib show, in case anyone was wondering.

The guy goes around Houston and hires strippers and crack heads to make cheap pornos.

5
stvrap79 5 points ago +5 / -0

Him and Hunter should have started a business.

2
easyonthefiber 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you know they weren't in business together already?

1
fakewhiterage 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would explain so much

1
feraxil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gross

21
_Sully_ 21 points ago +22 / -1

Just to add a little bit more to the political nature of this. Chauvin's fellow officers immediately denounced his actions even though they participated in holding Floyd down. They did not object during the incident. There was no thin blue line with the department either. The police department did not defend Chauvin like you'd typically expect. Chauvin was charged with murder prior to internals affairs having the opportunity to even investigate the case. This doesn't happen. Internal affairs is to do an initial investigation to determine if charges even need to by filed. This is weird af.

There is something called the felon murder rule. If you are a participant in an incident that results in someone's murder, even though your participation is minimal, such as what Chauvin's fellow officers might be considered, you can be charged with murder too. That doesn't seem to be the case at the moment for the other officers.

The felon murder rule must also be considered in regards to each passenger, chiefly, Floyds drug dealer friend. Floyd was not passing that counterfeit bill for shits and giggles. He was doing that on the behalf of the drug dealer. The drug dealer was using Floyd because Floyd was a deadbeat and couldn't pay for the drugs he was getting. Floyd was ordered to commit a federal crime by the drug dealer. This makes the drug dealer a perfect candidate for the felony murder rule but only if the drugs were directly connected to his death. So here we see a mutually exclusive situation. If they intend to charge the drug dealer with felon murder then they needed to establish that Floyd died as a result of overdose. If they did that then there was a potential of exonerating Chauvin. We know which way the wind blew on that one.

Also, just a little issue, I think the part about the pregnant woman is wrong. That little factoid got thrown around early on and may be incorrect. I believe the woman was not pregnant but rather had a very young child at the time. Probably not important.

7
rossiFan 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe the woman was not pregnant but rather had a very young child at the time.

See? George is a nice guy, after all!

/ESS

13
Hanging_Chad 13 points ago +14 / -1

Based af

7
Bel-6863 7 points ago +7 / -0

Saint George Kirby died for the Sins of Justice. A sacrifice for all who hold him in their hearts. Take a knee for this Martyr of the SJW movement.

All Hail George Floyd of The Hood!! Praise Him, be Thy Name!!

He Da Kang in Heben Na!!! In Fentanyl We Trust!!!

11
basedvirginian 11 points ago +11 / -0

Our jogger, who art in heaven; Hallowed be they Name; They riots come; They will be dun on erf as it be heaven. Gib us dis day our daily guilt; And forgive us our white privilege, As we forgive joggers who trespass against us; And lead us not into truth, But deliver us from reality. Awoman.

1
Junkevil 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope pope francis doesn't see this or he's going to replace the whole rosary!

3
rossiFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saint George DINDUNUFFIN!

3
bill_in_texas 3 points ago +3 / -0

I read that in Nancy Pelosi's voice.

25
FAQ-REDDIT 25 points ago +27 / -2

Only when bubba said bend over, did the full force of penal understanding sink in deep.

18
basedvirginian 18 points ago +20 / -2

Average 85 IQ be like that for this BLM activist

11
GregToday 11 points ago +11 / -0

IQ test for Jurors??

15
TrumpInAus 15 points ago +15 / -0

Lawyers actually want low IQ jurors as they are easier to sway

6
Pepe-Meme 6 points ago +6 / -0

and criminal background checks too

3
Darkheartisland 3 points ago +3 / -0

and for the FBI

2
Pepe-Meme 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think it ever reaches that high!

-4
randomusers239874 -4 points ago +13 / -17

Wow, almost like if you have a large non-white population, you get a non-white justice system. I'm sure it's just a coincidence though, the civic nationalists told me that race and ethnicity are just social constructs, and we're all Americans!

6
BloodyWolf 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sargon wants you to know that they have just been reading French philosophers too much.

Seriously, isn't the prospect of beimg involved in a liberal/black justice system distasteful? I've been around these people. The Law is crazy in general, to be fair, but these people dial it up.

15
Omnes_Omnibus 15 points ago +15 / -0

People like that only understand the penile system.

8
SkeletorsTeeth 8 points ago +8 / -0

So they are pianists?

4
Hanging_Chad 4 points ago +4 / -0

Therapists

2
thisguy883 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh you mean Full On Rapist.

2
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 2 points ago +3 / -1

Analrapists

51
Pinochet_Was_Right 51 points ago +51 / -0

Either way, it is about to get bogged down in the legal system for years...

Who wants to put money on Chauvin 'epsteining' himself in prison?

27
Klandathu 27 points ago +27 / -0

I’ll take that bet. It’s a shame the cameras weren’t working that day either.

5
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wow he hanged himself with a bedsheet as thin as paper by doing a somersault from 3ft.

Truly amazing skill.

4
UpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly, even if it gets overturned it could take up to 10-15 years

30
Novus 30 points ago +30 / -0

Would be amazed if that was the case because I don't think the law works anymore.

13
guitarmastershredder 13 points ago +13 / -0

Absolutely Hopefully for Sure

31
OPsMom 31 points ago +31 / -0

Activist Judge Enters the Chat

10
AmericanJawa 10 points ago +10 / -0

You'd think so, you'd hope so, but in this environment I wouldn't call anything a sure thing. The deep state is determined to make a human sacrifice out of him.

149
basedvirginian 149 points ago +151 / -2

This is literally illegal. Do these fucks not know about perjury or jury nullification implications?

God I hate that laws don’t fucking matter in this place anymore.

95
Space_Force [S] 95 points ago +96 / -1

Welcome to post-justice America.

35
randomusers239874 35 points ago +63 / -28

Welcome to post-white America. 3rd world ethnic groups == 3rd world justice system.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
-2
NerBolanski -2 points ago +10 / -12

some retarded pedes and civnats here would come with "it is not race or color but values" without realizing that values are created by people of a given race.

2
siliconia 2 points ago +3 / -1

This goes for everyone, you're either MAGA or you're the enemy. If you're trying to prop up your group(s) versus the MAGA group, you're not on team MAGA, you're an infiltrator. That doesn't just go for your group either, it goes for the groups you (you personally) supposedly hate too. Pick a side and go play on that side or get fucked. If one more fucking tard tells me about their "other" group they're trying to sell.

-32
Barbs -32 points ago +11 / -43

Then move back to Europe. Scandinavia is the level of whiteness you desire.

1
NerBolanski 1 point ago +7 / -6

Dude, I am American, not European. Europe is also being invaded. I will stand and fight against the invasion here.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
12
JohnCalhoun 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is what made me wary of civic nationalism. It's so cynical seeing Rashid Tliab having nothing but contempt and disdain for the white people who built and founded the country she immigrated to.

6
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 6 points ago +6 / -0

Her dirty rag is a fire hazard.

-36
Barbs -36 points ago +8 / -44

She’s just a leftist piece of shit, and is even married to a white dude. Her race and ethnicity has nothing to do with it.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
basedvirginian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah because you see so many Hispanic people going out and committing jihadi terrorist attacks in the name of Catholicism 🙄

11
anon1011101 11 points ago +11 / -0

We need to use the Left's tactics on these people. This guy? He should have his house burned down and live in fear for the rest of his life.

1
basedvirginian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. I’m tired of taking the high ground when it comes to these evil bastards.

33
stealthboy 33 points ago +34 / -1

We are living in a post-law society.

22
buckiemohawk 22 points ago +24 / -2

its happened in tons of trials. West Memphis three, for a bigger example, a juror went and talked to a lawyer about the case which is no-no. They were going to have to overturn on just that when the state gave them an alford plea.

6
MasklessMarvel 6 points ago +7 / -1

they only got that because of the documentary which stirred up a lot of anger

those kids were set up big time

3
buckiemohawk 3 points ago +3 / -0

They were... thats why when people say trust the system I say no

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

small towns with despot leaders are like that

watch "Making a Murderer"

3
GiveMe1776 3 points ago +4 / -1

They only matter when backed by a bullet

2
LLchurch 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were multiple times to declare a mistrial during the trial 3 if I remember correctly. The judge didn't because blm terrorist. Dems won thanks to low IQ clowns

118
TheAmbulance 118 points ago +120 / -2

watch how the acquittal comes mid winter.. few less protest below freezing...

122
Meddlesom 122 points ago +123 / -1

It'll probably happen during the 2022 midterms. Gotta get the orcs all riled up for votin' season.

23
booblitchutz 23 points ago +25 / -2

Fucking guaranteed

10
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 10 points ago +11 / -1

"We wants dem shinys! All de loots, boss!!"

1
orcwordlaugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Dem slanty ones got too much dakka!"

4
rossiFan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dems are so predictable.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
EMP2024 13 points ago +14 / -1

That's a brilliant way to keep BLM burning things

9
TRUTHinGA21 9 points ago +10 / -1

the way to stop them from burning things would be to put them in jail for a long time. Well that's how it use to work, until China helped get the leftists placed in positions of power, to team up with these groups and cause as much destruction in every way as possible.

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +5 / -0

by the time they let him go, the klan with a tan won't care because they will have a new St Thug to worship

2
TheAmbulance 2 points ago +2 / -0

True.

77
OG_Phantom_ 77 points ago +78 / -1

is this illegal

71
Johnrgalt 71 points ago +72 / -1

Not sure, he obviously lied during the screening questions. Maybe a legal pede will answer your question.

82
basedvirginian 82 points ago +83 / -1

It’s perjury to lie during jury selection with the intent to go on the jury for jury nullification purposes

CGPGrey did a video about jury nullification a few years back that’s p good

https://youtu.be/uqH_Y1TupoQ

41
iorek 41 points ago +42 / -1

Of course, jury nullification means finding them innocent despite being obviously guilty; as the government can't appeal a finding of innocence. The defendant can appeal a guilty verdict.

Also, be aware that double jeopardy is still very real because if you are found innocent under state law, the federal prosecution can still come after you and try you again for the same incident if it also broke fed law.

23
PraiseBeToScience 23 points ago +25 / -2

Jury nullification can mean finding them guilty, too. Jury nullification just means you're going to ignore the instructions and evidence for some external reason.

Every retard pretends that jury nullification is some kind of incredible tool for good and the evil legal system is suppressing the people by not instructing them on it, but Chauvin is the direct result of jury nullification.

2
DespiteNegativePress 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought jury nullification was when a jury believes a defendant is guilty of law X, but refuses to provide a verdict based on their interpretation of law X as inhumane, unjust, etc. Is that incorrect? Genuinely curious how it looks in practice and whether I’m misunderstanding it in the context of this trial.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jury nullification is effectively any jury deciding to make a verdict for political reasons. All white juries in antebellum south letting white people free for murdering a black guy was also nullification.

17
basedvirginian 17 points ago +18 / -1

It can work in both ways. Einstein over here didn’t account for the fact that these types of decisions don’t tend to hold up on appeal

But that’s back when laws mattered so god knows anymore

3
rossiFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine being an attorney. Something you've strived for and went into debt for just to find out it doesn't mean shit.

2
basedvirginian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m glad that I’m not an attorney 😂

1
LLchurch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also can be retired if the find new evidence down the line if I remember correctly.

12
dr_gonzo 12 points ago +13 / -1

Yes but that only matters in the old America when we didn't decide guilt or innocence by group affiliation. This guy will never see any negative ramifications from this.

4
thisguy883 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yea but the guy is black, so it wont go anywhere or actually lead to anything.

Our system is too woke to convict this guy for lying. BLM would have a riot, again.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

i can't help because I am an illegal pede

39
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 39 points ago +40 / -1

Only if the juror lied under oath when being questioned about his knowledge of the case, prior to being chosen for the jury. That would be perjury. Regardless, he basically just guaranteed that Chauvin gets off on appeal. (Especially when combined with Biden and Waters' public comments.)

20
308win 20 points ago +21 / -1

Well he did lie about his knowledge of the case so..yeah. He fucked up.

21
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 21 points ago +22 / -1

Is there a prosecutor willing to go after him? (Do they think they could win at trial?) Would the DOJ even let them? This is the reality of how the criminal justice system so often fails. It's all about somebody's score card.

16
308win 16 points ago +17 / -1

I agree. There will be no prosecutor that will grow a spine and do their job. And the DOJ...they are anything but the department of justice now. More like impartial justice department. But if we had a justice system worth its weight, then the juror would be charged and Chauvin should have his case ruled as a mistrial. The jury was tainted. They admit the jury was tainted.

6
thisguy883 6 points ago +7 / -1

Man I should have been in law because I love to argue.

Has anyone ever seen that movie Cousin Vinnie?

My family is the same way. We love to argue.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
25
_-Th0r-_ 25 points ago +26 / -1

IIRC he told the court he had never seen the video, and pics surfaced of him with a knee on the neck t-shirt.

4
TheMadManDidItAgain 4 points ago +5 / -1

Curious... could the juror be charged with a crime? I'm assuming perjury, if anything. This seems more egregious than just perjury though.

4
booblitchutz 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's perjury for sure and potentially fraud. The former would be far easier to prosecute.

9
concealedaces 9 points ago +10 / -1

Yes.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
63
spezisacuckold 63 points ago +66 / -3

The irony is that BLM is diametrically opposed to what MLK believed in on race.

27
Space_Force [S] 27 points ago +28 / -1

Polar opposites.

11
MasklessMarvel 11 points ago +11 / -0

MLK has always been touted as the god of black people although they don't do anything he says

The guys spends his whole public life calling for peace and unity

He gets shot

Cities are turned into literal war zones with the blacks using snipers and explosives while the NatGuard was authorized to shoot rioters

I think they missed the point

Once, for fun, I posted an MLK quote without attribution. Of course, he used the word "negro" in his speeches

the woke jokes saw the quote and swarmed me, calling me a "racist" because I said "negro"

when I told them who the quote was from, they just went away

13
TankerD18 13 points ago +13 / -0

On a related note I think it's insane how they call black people who don't toe the Democrat's line "Uncle Toms." They have no fucking clue that Uncle Tom in the novel wasn't a sellout, he wound up getting killed to save his friends who had escaped. I understand it's a matter of perception, and perception is reality, but I guarantee the people calling blacks who question the liberal narrative "Uncle Toms" haven't read the book.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +3 / -1

blacks using snipers and explosives

You misspelled "white communists"

-2
NerBolanski -2 points ago +4 / -6

if MLK was alive today, he would tell BLM"Mission accomplished".MLK didn't believe in what he said; he was a communist who also advocated for gay rights. His speechwriter was Stanley Levinson; one of the top communist officials in America at that time.MLK was also a philanderer and a plagiarizer. I don't know why people worship him over a speech. Malcolm X was 10* the man he was and he was more honest. watch this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKxny3F22so

The civil rights act was a sham used to destroy freedom of association in America. Blacks before the civil rights act had a more orderly society and were afraid of doing crime in white areas because whites didn't mess around with them. The civil rights act was forced at gunpoint.

I judge a man by his actions, not his ethnic group and race. through that, MLK was a fraud, and the civil rights act killed freedom of association in America.

-14
randomusers239874 -14 points ago +14 / -28

What MLK believed was actually Communism. The denial of the biological underpinnings of race, and the effect of genes on intelligence and behavior, is actually a cornerstone of Communism (i.e. blank slate theory). Ironically, most modern conservatives today would have been considered communists in the early 1900s as they also deny the biological basis of race.

15
spezisacuckold 15 points ago +16 / -1

I’m not denying there’s a large biological aspect to race. That’s 100% science. Taboo science, but science nonetheless.

I’m saying that you can acknowledge that AND want the government to treat people equally.

The current left wants the government and corporations to forcefully MAKE people equal in outcome, not equal in treatment.

-16
randomusers239874 -16 points ago +8 / -24

Well, we're mostly on the same page, but I have to point out a flaw in your logic. The government is not some abstract and external entity. We tend to act like the government is some cabalistic group that exists independent of the average person, and perhaps that's true in the upper echelons, but most of the government is made up of normal people. As the country becomes less white, the day to day operations of the country do as well. This means that a government will stop treating people equally because that is an aspect of a white government, and there will be no checks in place to prevent that from happening, because the people who are supposed to keep the government in check will also be non-white.

0
spezisacuckold 0 points ago +4 / -4

Yeah we’re just going to disagree with the determinative aspect here. Strong, overwhelming correlation still does NOT equal causation.

-17
randomusers239874 -17 points ago +6 / -23

Are there any African countries that have justice systems better than any White ones? Your citation of correlation vs causation is an incorrect one; given a strong correlation combined with a one way logical link, one can infer causation. In this case, the two logical options are "low IQ societies create governments that do not treat people equally" and "Governments that do not treat people equally create low IQ societies". The second proposition is nonsensical since IQ is mostly genetic (which we know from twin studies).

2
MustBeTrump 2 points ago +4 / -2

let's just say that you're accurate with your observation. Would you rather support MLK's beliefs or BLM?

-19
randomusers239874 -19 points ago +9 / -28

Neither, both are inaccurate and untenable world views. People are not born equal, we're born with the evolutionary baggage of our ancestors, and we need to accept that.

-2
MustBeTrump -2 points ago +4 / -6

It's a shame you couldn't just answer the question.

I'll try again.

Should people be judged on their character and abilities and competence or should they be employed, rewarded, promoted, worshipped because of uncontrollable characteristics like their skin color?

-18
randomusers239874 -18 points ago +7 / -25

If I handed you a bowl of M&Ms and told you 56% of the brown ones had been shoved up someone's asshole, how many of the brown ones would you feel comfortable eating? Race and skin color have absolutely nothing to do with each other, skin color is just a convenient, but inaccurate, proxy. The last common ancestor between Africans and non-Africans was 60,000 years ago. That's a long time for divergent evolution, which we see the effects of in African populations today. So a better question is, what percentage of a population has to be detrimental to a society before it becomes reasonable to exclude all persons of that population, including the non-detrimental ones?

0
MustBeTrump 0 points ago +3 / -3

You think that you're convincing some naïve anti-racist into believing your black pill narrative and you're refusing to answer simple questions.

MLK said “Judge a man not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character.”

I don't care for the guy, I don't know much else about what he had to say but I've not heard anything ridiculous.

You made a conscious effort to spread the message that MLK is a commie and so are most of us. So I'm asking, would you rather be an MLK commie or a BLM commie?

-16
randomusers239874 -16 points ago +6 / -22

I did answer that, neither. Restricting it to the two choices is a false dichotomy.

34
honk_honk_honk 34 points ago +35 / -1

We need to do the same. I don't think the system can be saved, not as it is, but I'll be damned if we can't deadlock it.

18
projectfreedom 18 points ago +19 / -1

Deadlocked system is second best to a system based on liberty and personal responsibility.

18
Tramsec 18 points ago +19 / -1

The two sweetest words in the English language are 'government shutdown'.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

we pay the government employees to do as little as possible when they go to work

now you want to pay therm for doing nothing at all?

7
honk_honk_honk 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nothing at all is an improvement over using our money to fuck us over harder. Burning money is a better way to spend it than letting the federal government take it at this point.

They shouldn't be getting our money in the first place but right now they're getting our money and ruining us.

6
MasklessMarvel 6 points ago +6 / -0

the Declaration of Independence says that, when this happens, we need to build a new system

-3
PickleSticks -3 points ago +6 / -9

No, we need to start either getting educated to become judges and lawyers or push our children too while keeping them grounded in conservative values. Not be on some SJW bullshit.

18
BingusCombat 18 points ago +20 / -2

Nah, we won't win being moral.

11
OranjeBlanjeBlou 11 points ago +12 / -1

Yeah, those days are done. We have to win before we can make this place moral again.

-1
AmericanJawa -1 points ago +6 / -7

We won't win by being evil, either.

2
honk_honk_honk 2 points ago +3 / -1

When the laws turn evil abiding by and defending them makes you evil too.

California has already altered theirs to drop intentionally infecting someone with HIV from a felony to a misdemeanor and they've steadily been softening the penalties for pedophilia.

In what world is upholding such a system the moral highground?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
31
24601 31 points ago +32 / -1

Any ethical court --> Mistrial

But that is not the expected result from the USSA's corrupt Uniparty rubberstamp court system.

10
MasklessMarvel 10 points ago +10 / -0

the judge said he would not declare a mistrial because it would incite further conflict

IOW, mob justice has taken over

too bad we don't have the balls to do the same for Kyle Rittenhouse

4
anon1011101 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think we should. Threaten every single juror and prosecutor into declaring him innocent. If it works for the Left then we fight dirty too.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

can I throw the blood on someone's house like BLM did?

2
anon1011101 2 points ago +2 / -0

The limit is your imagination!

29
ThebigLMAOski17 29 points ago +30 / -1

Yeah we now have the mistrial trifecta...

  • Mockingbird media doxing jurors prior to ruling
  • Politicians (including the "resident") inciting mob violence via known domestic terrorist groups if they didn't get the verdict they wanted
  • And now a juror admits they were not impartial and were in fact an activist who tampered with the jury

This is a half court windmill slam dunk mistrial ruling.

8
MasklessMarvel 8 points ago +8 / -0

it is too late. the judge already ruled that there would be no mistrial after Mad Maxines call for violence

He did not want to cause "further conflict"

it will go to the appeals court now

4
mintyfresh 4 points ago +4 / -0

That makes it the "overturned on appeal" trifecta.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's a definite trifecta:

city agrees to $27M settlement with the family before the trial even started

powerful government official calls for his conviction. So the the Resident

This guy announces that he sabotaged the jusry

17
Meddlesom 17 points ago +18 / -1

I hadn't seen the picture before... but this isn't just a BLM shirt, as previously mentioned... it's a case specific shirt.

14
bingbong69420 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is where the actual collapse of our nation starts.

I've feared this for a while. You take an oath to be impartial and to rule considering only the facts presented. Our nation has lost its sense of morals and honor for quite a while. Calling out to openly infiltrate juries is dumping jet fuel on the fire. Without a fair justice system, this country has lost. Obviously there are instances where the justice system fails, but compare it to what existed at the time of this countries formation, and to what some other countries have now. It is not and never will be perfect, but it's been damn good.

I give the United States 10 years or less until the actual constitution is literally burned and an entire new government structure is put in place. And FYI, it won't be better than what we have/had.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
bingbong69420 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just as many dipshit whites that will contribute ot the problem too.

But I agree, different races should have different countries. We have different cultures and ways of life.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

and we are going to sit in our La-Z-Boys clutching our pearls and whining about the death of our country

11
NutterButter 11 points ago +12 / -1

Good advice for the Rittenhouse trial

11
Jibideen 11 points ago +12 / -1

Sooooo perjury?

9
CommunismIsForLosers 9 points ago +9 / -0

If anyone on the left ever gets tried and convicted for perjury, I'll eat my shoe.

5
Patriots_dont_kneel 5 points ago +5 / -0

They'd have to prove he let his biases affect his decision. A bit hard to make this point when it was an unanimous decision after only 1 hour of deliberation.

11
BingusCombat 11 points ago +12 / -1

So glad we let these violent hominids into society. It's going great!

And guys, when they protest, it's because they DEFINITELY know how to make a better society than us! We should learn from them! I mean look at Africa! These people know what it takes to build a functioning civilization!

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

can I be a pirate?

i always wanted to be a pirate

8
SpezLovesHisBull 8 points ago +8 / -0

Instinctively tribalists people don't care about being impartial. They care about their tribe. Stupid whypipo!

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

and how to they deal with opposing tribes?

7
Jaunty_Haul 7 points ago +7 / -0

IF this doesn't result in a mistrial, the Justice System is officially over.

It's become a Social Justice System, and those of us not in the "privileged" caste are simply fucked.

White privilege my ass.

7
PickleSticks 7 points ago +9 / -2

Im not sure how people can 'get on juries' when youre called for duty..lol

3
cryptoa 3 points ago +4 / -1

These are Democrats.

Same way Joe Bai-Den can get 81 million votes with 4 AM dumps.

Dems gonna call jury duty racist because not enough blacks do Jury duty and it requires an ID LOL.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
Counterforce1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why wait for 12 of these BLM fuckers to Judge you? Why not go out and judge 12 of them?

6
LtPatterson 6 points ago +6 / -0

Jury of his peers my ass.

6
UsurperJoe 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is not a serious country anymore

6
Marielle_Redclaw 6 points ago +6 / -0

And the memory hole opens...

6
cryptoa 6 points ago +6 / -0

Doesn't matter.

He is going to jail. We already know that the Feds were going to re arrest him at the court if he was not guilty and now they are taking a civil rights case to the grand jury.

Even if there is an appeal it will get struck down somewhere by an activist judge or judge worried about riots. And if not the Feds will come up with another crime.

They want this guy behind bars and Bai-Den is going to make sure that happens no matter what.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bei Jing Den?

3
cryptoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Xao Bai-Den.

Xi Chinafied his name after the he popped Joe anal cherry.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am sure Corn Pop did that decades ago

6
Psykohot 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the juror that all other jurors were scared of being doxxed by and their homes/families destroyed by the mob.

6
randomusename 6 points ago +6 / -0

He just inspired me to return the jury duty survey I have sitting in front of me right now

6
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh so we jog through courtrooms now?

6
Pepbrandt 6 points ago +6 / -0

MLK would be disgusted to be on a BLM shirt.

-5
NerBolanski -5 points ago +1 / -6

He was a communist.I am sure he would be happy to be there. he also led violent protests under the "non-violence" tag.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
BilRoGar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Say good bye to Kyle Rittenhouse

5
zooty 5 points ago +5 / -0

Clearly "Jury of his peers" needs another look.

5
Chaotikizm 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wonder if he will ever get justice, or will be we forever subjected to muh truth until we're all in jail?

7
Space_Force [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Probably not, seeing as the feds were ready to arrest Chauvin in the courthouse if he walked. They will make an example out of him.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

we will get justice when we stand up and take it

5
Waco419 5 points ago +5 / -0

Jury Nullification (https://fija.org/library-and-resources/library/jury-nullification-faq/what-is-jury-nullification.html) is the only legitimate form of jury activism.

It's the last non-violent means to protect defendants from unjust laws.

5
chahn1138 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Rule of Law seems to have been one of the main targets of the "movement".

2
chahn1138 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anything to destroy who we are!

5
NecessaryOcelot 5 points ago +5 / -0

this should be the easiest appeal ever. One even Ted from Scrubs could win.

5
TheFountainhead 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I was Chauvin. I would file appeal immediately, on emergency, and get my ass out. Then I would taunt the fuckers and watch them burn down their cities out of spite.

Because how can a man endure this injustice and not be spiteful as hell?

5
Orangelightsinwindow 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah. Having been on a jury it's always one guy in the room that takes charge and others fall in line. There's no letting this genie out of the bottle. Normies will do whatever they can to avoid jury duty. Activists will lie their way onto one

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having been on a jury it's always one guy in the room that takes charge and others fall in line.

and it is always Juror Number 8

5
BloodyWolf 5 points ago +5 / -0

These people are f*cking shameless. And that is why we lose. If someone on our side began chanting "White Power", we'd distance ourselves from them like a plague. But these people get away with crap like this. Self-policing has gotten us nowhere. Ah, whatever. 😒

4
Cbllbc 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's a really long way to spell 'mistrial'.

4
Pumpitrealgood 4 points ago +4 / -0

mistrial, the jury was tainted, I would go for appeal on that alone

4
Omgwtfbbq 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like true crime, but damn that’s pathetic! He deserves a fair trial.

4
Indianapede 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, there’s a mistrial.

4
Ladyped1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Isn't this grounds for a mistrial? The other jurors probably felt "shamed" into agreement with this man. You know all that double speak these people use to get ppl to silently agree.

4
CentipedeDemon 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wouldn't be surprised if George Soros was on the jury.

4
Brownwaterboys 4 points ago +4 / -0

so im guessing the decision will be overturned now?

4
trex554 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mistrial this guy was probably intimidating jurors to a guilty verdict.

4
RememberKosciuszko 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was at this moment that he knew...

He fucked up.

4
DonJr2032 4 points ago +4 / -0

This seem fair

4
gillonba 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doesn't the defense attorney get to veto the appointment of any juror? Why was he not vetted better? Unless losing this trial and winning an appeal is part of the strategy?

3
Nunyo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lawyers can only challenge so many potential jurors with either "peremptory challenges" and "challenges for cause." It is not unlimited.

4
Priopism 4 points ago +4 / -0

The dumbest people in the world want to be on juries while the intelligent do whatever they can do to avoid jury duty. We're pretty fucked.

3
mateus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reprehensible. This guy even contradicted himself as to whether he'd ever heard of the case when being questioned before he was seated.