2799
Comments (297)
sorted by:
239
BabbleRabble 239 points ago +245 / -6

just because i see two faggots doesn't make them gay. also doesn't change the fact that all I see are two faggots.

81
JamesBond007 81 points ago +84 / -3

Packing his Luntz

59
Dr0neRec0very 59 points ago +89 / -30

1, McCarthy is leading the effort to oust Chaney.
2, Fox News begins attacking McCarthy based on petty claims instead of POLICY.

Not a coincidence.

McCarthy has been pretty consistently a friend of MAGA and shows it through his votes. Where have we seen this bullshit game before? Only about a thousand times. Four years of seeing this done to President Trump and our team is STILL getting baited by Fucking Fox News. Lame.

65
RuralRedPill 65 points ago +68 / -3

McCarthy is GOP Inc, he's just doing what he needs to maintain leadership (just like all GOP when not in power) so he can pull Paul Ryan 2.0 to fuck Trump when gets reelected in 2024. We need Jim Jordon for Majority Leader.

34
1775Concord 34 points ago +35 / -1

Right on the money ! Jim Jorden for Speaker .

1
BasedInvestor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jim was gonna be speaker if we won in 2018, so why is McCarthy the minority leader at all. I think he's only ousting Cheney to stay in the MAGA crowd's good graces as per usual

-7
Dr0neRec0very -7 points ago +12 / -19

Cite the voting record or save it. I would trust Freddy Kruger before I would trust Fox News. Nearly everything I hear from McCarthy and see in his votes is pro-MAGA. "Paul Ryan 2.0" kek Liz Chaney is the person you're trying to describe here, in every fucking way. McCarthy hasn't shown any sign of trying "fuck Trump", BUT Fux News sure has!!!

32
QuickHands 32 points ago +36 / -4

McCarthy could have made it crystal clear that ANY vote for impeachment would mean ZERO DOLLARS from the RCCC in 2022. He didn't do that because he's ANTI TRUMP

So take his dick out of your mouth you paid fuckin shill

15
NoCoupForYou 15 points ago +16 / -1

McCarthy is a quasi-RINO who will go along with MAGA to save his skin, but at heart he wants to make personal enrichment deals. Many GOP'ers are this way.

He stood up for Cheney because she is one of his stalwart allies. Now he's gonna throw her under the bus to save his ass. But he's next on the chopping block.

No more Hasterts, Boneheads, Ryans...

0
MemeWarBoot 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stop fighting each other and just wait for Trumps endorsements.

1
QuickHands 1 point ago +1 / -0

No.

When you know the game you don't need to wait. The game that so many of these assholes don't understand, because they're toddlers, is all RCCC/RSCC and other PAC money they need for reelection.

The Party most against "socialism" looooooves Socialism when it comes to redistributing nationwide GOP donations to their local or state election.

-4
Dr0neRec0very -4 points ago +8 / -12

Let's leave the goalposts where they belong. McCarthy doesn't have a psychic link to your personal strategy, but he's a fuck ton more worthy of trust than Fux News or the warmongering, never Trump hag Liz Chaney they're currently trying to keep in power.

12
Deadpoolnormiefan271 12 points ago +13 / -1

McCarthy is another establishment RINO trying not to get purged.

5
morememesplz 5 points ago +5 / -0

He isn't pro-MAGA. He condemned the Jan 6 protestors and blasted Trump for "inciting" his supporters. He's backtracking now about the phone call with Trump because he sees what's going on with Liz and other Never Trumpers. You are giving him too much morality credit. P.S. Most people here don't trust Fox News anyway so you needn't worry

2
ebuy123 2 points ago +2 / -0

i too would trust Freddy Kruger or pinhead before i would trust fox

22
giantrabbit1 22 points ago +37 / -15

Yep. This right here. Cucker Carlson is only doing this to smear McCarthy because his masters in the GOPe Paul Ryan/Liz Cheney told him to do it.

Paul Ryan sits on Fux Noose's board of directors. Don't trust Cucker the snake.

43
Dr0neRec0very 43 points ago +44 / -1

I'm extremely shocked our boys have gone all in for a Fux News smear campaign just six months after they HELPED RIG THE FUCKING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. This is our leadership's fucking fault for CONTINUING to cite Fox and share Fox every damn day: even THE BEST of them do this and it's absolutely stupid.

18
Whatyougotson 18 points ago +18 / -0

I had to scroll down for this. Shouldnt have to.

7
SordidPontification 7 points ago +7 / -0

Doesn't necessarily have to be "our boys."

There are disinformation agents posting shit on this site. It's our job to oust them.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

There sure as hell are. Many of them will TELL YOU they aren't even Trump supporters, if you press them. "It's our job to oust them." I don't know about that, considering they're still here day after day after day. They never lose their accounts or anything, unless they're straight-up blue hairs.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Dr0neRec0very 1 point ago +2 / -1

I expect people who routinely talk about 'going to war' to (at the very fucking least) control information and exercise some self discipline.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
9
Tejas_Pepe 9 points ago +10 / -1

Tucker went just as hard at Liz Cheney.

9
Dr0neRec0very 9 points ago +13 / -4

"Tucker went just as hard at Liz Cheney." So what? If I tell you some things you want to hear but then CON YOU on every tenth statement, you're still the sucker.

TURN OFF CUCKER.

TURN OFF FUX NEWS.

They helped rig the fucking election, FFS!

1
BasedInvestor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tucker's not all bad, so you have to take some good with bad at Fox. That bad is there though, for sure. The election rigging that you can't talk about is beating under the floorboards and everyone can hear it.

1
Dr0neRec0very 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Tucker's not all bad," Yea, it's ok to get conned 20% of the time by elite spokesman Cucker Carlson, because he's pretty ok the other 80% of the time. Very stupid. "you have to take some good with bad at Fox." The fuck, I do! I haven't turned that mind-bending shit back on since they helped rig the 2020 election and I WILL NOT turn that shit back on. Anyone still watching Fux News today, after what they did, is a damned fool.

8
SupremeDearLeader2 8 points ago +10 / -2

Only thing Tucker goes hard at is spending his uniparty paycheck$$$

-1
MAGA-Fett -1 points ago +15 / -16

Bullshit, Tucker called out the warmongers in the GOP who wanted Trump to invade Syria and get rid of Assad.

Liz Cheney is toast and nothing can stop that.

12
Dr0neRec0very 12 points ago +15 / -3

"Liz Cheney is toast and nothing can stop that." Hey, great, but Cucker Carlson is still a makeup slathered celebrity who CONNED YOU and helped MISINFORM millions of people regarding THE BIG LIE in 2020. I guess you enjoy the abuse and need that talking head real bad.

3
Nellie_the_Beaut 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol! Funny you mentioned his makeup game. Saw him last night, and was so distracted by the caked-on, terra cotta foundation, including over his lips so it was all cracked with a weird line down the center, I could hardly pay attention to his daily vitriol attack. Fox News needs better makeup people, lighting, or just better talent.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +2 / -0

hahaha That's exactly what was on my mind. Pancake makeup and it looked like he had received a beat-down.

7
Staatssicherheit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Tucker also backed Mueller and Sessions even though Trump wanted to fire both of thier asses.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
20
BluesPower 20 points ago +22 / -2

"it shows through his votes"

What a load of crap! The entire GOP Establishment spent Trump's first two years in "we have to take the Mueller report very seriously" mode.

Then all these cuck Congressmen purposely retired before the midterms, in order to throw control back to the Democrats. Once that was accomplished, the GOPe could spend the next 2 years going along with Trump, in order to fool us, while the plans for the big steal were being laid.

You want to talk voting records? Kelly Loeffler had a pretty good MAGA voting record during Trump's last 2 years. Means shit!

Where was McCarthy 4 years ago when Trump wanted to build the wall, when we had control over all 3 branches?

0
giantrabbit1 0 points ago +5 / -5

Because you need 60% in the Senate to pass border wall legislation. They needed like 8 Democrats in the Senate to sign on to be able to pass it.

People routinely blame Rs for shit not passing during Trump’s 1st 2 years, but forget that you need 60% to get anything through the Senate, except for 1 reconciliation bill per fiscal year that can pass with a simple majority.

Even then you had cucks like McCain, Murkowsky, and Flake which meant that you could only lose 3 votes before the bill failed in the Senate.

  • Obamacare repeal failed (FY17 Reconciliation bill)
  • Tax Cuts passed (FY18 bill)
  • The third one(FY19) was supposed to be for the GOP healthcare plan, but they never got around to it. That one could’ve contained border wall funding on a simple majority, but they sent everyone home to campaign for the Midterms and didn’t have time to pass it in the lame duck session. Reconciliation bills are a pain in the ass and take forever to pass.
3
itswood 3 points ago +3 / -0

this guy knows his recent congressional history

0
Dr0neRec0very 0 points ago +5 / -5

Come back after you've compared Liz Chaney's voting record to McCarthey's voting record. Then, get a time machine, and warn Fux News (AND Cucker Carlson) not to engage in a HISTORIC betrayal of conservatives through information gate-keeping and misinformation regarding 2020's BIG LIE. Everything else you've written there amounts to muddying the waters/ false dilemma.

15
Prudentwait 15 points ago +16 / -1

Are you serious? McCarthy lead the charge to get MTG stripped of her assignments, shot down the America First Caucus, and has connections to several never-Trumpers. You're insane to trust an establishment California career politician of 15 years.

-3
Dr0neRec0very -3 points ago +2 / -5

"You're insane" '... but please trust Fux News with their highly convenient pee tape thrown at someone who is PRESENTLY doing exactly what President Trump said should be done to Chaney.' So, firstly, fuck you for stooping to personal attacks just like Fox News is doing, faggot. Secondly, I didn't say I "trust" McCarthy. I did, however, listen to him consistently defend President Trump FOR YEARS and HE DID THAT. Where were you? How did you miss that, genius?

7
Prudentwait 7 points ago +9 / -2

Frank Luntz is one of the worst never-Trumpers and the fact that our minority leader lives with him isn't concerning to you? Fox News is compromised as an institution, but Tucker has made good use of his platform within what they allow him to talk about. He's able to push the envelope because of his sheer popularity. I wasn't a fan of how he handled the stolen election, but to be fair, Trump's legal team was a joke. Anyone with a brain could tell it wasn't going anywhere. That was on Trump and the people he trusted to get his message out.

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Frank Luntz is one of the worst never-Trumpers..." Can you point to a policy that McCarthy helped vote in that appears to be a favor to Luntz? Probably not, because that was the quiet part in this Fux News pee tape. If that meat existed, Fux News would've harped on it endlessly.

"our minority leader lives with him" That's not even what the Fux News pee tape claimed. They insinuated it and claimed they found out otherwise. I wouldn't be surprised to find out the entire thing is bullshit. Like I said, we've seen this scam a thousand times from the fake news. This is, after all, the network that lost HALF ITS AUDIENCE after helping to rig the 2020 presidential election. They should be forced to display a warning label for the gullible.

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +5 / -2

"Trump's legal team was a joke." Fuck you. Which court even HEARD one of those cases? Fuckin' RINO shill.

0
Prudentwait 0 points ago +2 / -2

The courts refused to hear any cases because Trump's legal team kept making sloppy technical errors that let them be dismissed. We knew there was going to be election fraud since April of last year, why wasn't there a comprehensive plan?

Seems like everyone scrambled last minute after the election was already stolen to throw whatever they had at the wall. The result was a confusing mess with no chance of succeeding.

2
Deadpoolnormiefan271 2 points ago +4 / -2

Bro you Kevin McCarthy’s side piece or something? Do you let Kevin and Frank take turns on you?

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Bro you Kevin McCarthy’s side piece or something? Do you let Kevin and Frank take turns on you?" So we're "bros" already, with your fucking six day old account? Are you Liz Chaney's tampon or something? Is your first name Cucker, the Murdoch family dog by chance?

-1
Deadpoolnormiefan271 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lol chaffed ass of yours really got you riled up.

3
Angerisagift 3 points ago +3 / -0

This pic just made me think of two characters from Boogie Nights. Philip Seymour Hoffman plays an acquaintance to Mark Wahlberg. Finally the homely and obsessed Hoffman makes his move...

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +3 / -1

This pic reminded me of how Fux News is run by communist faggots who don't want their warmongering hag Liz Chaney to lose power.

13
GodKingHarambe 13 points ago +13 / -0

Looks like the Supreme Court ain't the only thing down for packin'

2
giantrabbit1 2 points ago +15 / -13

fuck cucker. he is only doing this story to try to get viewers back after he said "no election fraud" on 11/4 and because his masters in the GOPe told him to smear McCarthy to scare him into not firing Liz Cheney in a month as was reported.

cucker carlson is a cuck who is friends with crackhead hunter and gets chicom money. fuck him.

12
War_Hamster 12 points ago +12 / -0

Luntz is absolutely a cuck though.

5
scyenceFiction 5 points ago +5 / -0

And oddly enough was friends with Hunter, too.

Makes ya wonder at what other names are in Hunter's laptop, huh?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't know that little factoid.

-1
Sting -1 points ago +8 / -9

Tucker handled the hunter Biden story exactly the way a real journalist is supposed to, but I see people are still taking his comments about Hunter Biden’s wife completely out of context.

Only a fucking retard doesn’t understand what he meant by what he said. He felt bad for Hunter’s wife because he knew Hunter’s wife. He didn’t want to attack Hunter personally because that’s what liberals do. AND HE LOSES HIS CREDIBILITY IF HE DOES. You complain when they do it but you want Tucker to do it? You’re a hypocrite. Tucker was doing his job. He’s not a crusader, he’s not “on our side” he’s a fucking journalist.

He reported on it barely. The way he is supposed to. Thoroughly and fairly.

He has made that exact same comment about a number of people caught in controversial stories. That is his standard response, to not make it personal, and that’s all he meant by that. And you know it, you fucking liar.

But I know what this is really about.

Are you still butt hurt when he was going to ask tough questions to Powell and she melted down like a pussy?

Then I don’t ever wanna hear you complain about liberals giving softball questions to the the Democrats. Hypocrite. Tucker was doing his job. Fuck her. She exposed herself for who she was and then proved it again and again. He was under no obligation whatsoever for him or his team to warn her about what question she was going to get an advance, he actually did her a favor by giving her time to prepare, but she wanted to walk into a softball environment and he wasn’t going to have it. He never does. He asked questions of everybody all the time. That is fucking job you dolt.

She was making big, broad, damning accusations and she better back them up. He was going to give her that chance to do it, she could’ve hit it out of the park and even knew the questions in advance… And bailed out. Do the math. That’s her fault, not his.

Having good intentions isn’t enough.

He isn’t perfect but Tucker is a journalist. He acted appropriately with the Biden story, he was one of the only people who talked about the contents of the hard drive, but that’s still not good enough for you. He needs to personally attack a man whose wife he had been friends with at one point. For what? To destroy his credibility in reporting the story? He makes it personal he loses credibility, don’t you understand that? Dumb motherfucker.

ReLeAsE tEH KraKen!!!!

And while you are releasing it, fold before you could ask any tough questions you might have to answer. There’s a reason she failed you fucking idiot.

5
marvinthehaggler 5 points ago +5 / -0

He went back to the apartment at noon every day for the Free Hot Luntz.

3
joefreed2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol-- best line of the day...

3
BloodDe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trey Gowdy gave McCarthy a reach around. Heard that one

18
Imransgarage 18 points ago +20 / -2

They can be homo all they want - just please God don't be Globohomo.

9
giantrabbit1 9 points ago +23 / -14

fuck cucker carlson and fuck the cucks here for jacking off to him and still watching faux noise

he said "no election fraud" on 11/4 like a little beta bitch and now wants to do these puff piece nothingburgers to get viewers back.

cucker is best friends with crackhead hunter too. what a faggot.

don't fall for it. turn off faux noise and switch to OAN.

2
Sting 2 points ago +8 / -6

He was wrong about election fraud.

But our side did a horrible job of making their case. He gave several of them multiple chances to come on and answer tough questions and they all refused. You don’t find that suspicious? If I were a journalist I would find that very suspicious.

He is not “best friends” with Hunter Biden, he knew his wife, and he tried to treat the story with respect so he could maintain his credibility. HE’S A JOURNALIST. When liberals do the opposite of that, it pisses you off. He did what you want liberal journalists to do for MUH joUrnAlIsTiC inTegRity and you hate him for it. He did his job the way you want him to and you hate him for it. Fuck you you idiot. Fucking hypocrite. Intellectually dishonest piece of shit.

If he attacks Biden in a personal way he has no credibility. He’s the only journalist that reported the story fairly. The only one. He was wrong about election fraud, we all know that here. And? So he isn’t perfect. The hate for him is ridiculous and unwarranted.

And I know where it’s coming from. He didn’t baby Sidney Powell or Trump’s legal team and you hate him for it. He was going to ask the real questions, they backed out, and you blame him for it. It wasn’t just Powell, most of Trump’s team and allies ran away from tough questions. Probably because half of them were smashed most of the day. Or do you not know that? Or is that news to you?Drinking with the money we gave them to fund their efforts to bring fraud to light. That’s right, your money, they were drinking on it.

He did his fucking job. It’s not his fault that Trump’s drunk, incompetent pussy lawyers and their allies who were supposed to prove the case for election fraud wouldn’t go on to answer tough questions. It’s not his fault Powell melted down and ran away even though he actually provided the questions in advance!

He was giving them a chance to sell their case to the American people on live, international cable television and they ran away. You don’t find that suspicious?

There were a number of people from trumps team that refused to appear because the questions were too tough. Holy fucking shit. Of course he’s skeptical. He’s going to give them a chance to answer the tough questions that everyone wanted to know. And they ran away? Hell, it makes me skeptical and I believe that the election was stolen.

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +7 / -4

Cucker wasn't "wrong", there, Wordy Rappinghood: He was fucking COMPLICIT. His Disinformation and gate-keeping DO NOT stop at 2020's BIG LIE, but that in itself SHOULD be enough to turn away anyone who isn't a cuck for TV celebrities!

1
kung-flu-fighting 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have a source where he said 'no election fraud'? I remember him saying not enough to change the result.

5
MSG1000 5 points ago +10 / -5

👌

4
Gulleyfoyleismyname 4 points ago +4 / -0

All faggots are not necessarily gay and not all gay folk are faggots.

72
ChinaAreNazis 72 points ago +78 / -6

Look at the source of everything wrong with America and you will find globohomo. Every. Single. Time.

6
FreedomStuff 6 points ago +27 / -21

Globohomo refers to Global Homogeneity , not homosexuality like some are now using it

36
doug2 36 points ago +40 / -4

Something a globofag would say

13
ChinaAreNazis 13 points ago +20 / -7

Lol.No it doesn’t. When Andrew Torba of gab talks about it trying to destroy gab it is a hacker group of trans globohomo. Literally no one uses the way you claim.

8
StronklikeBull 8 points ago +14 / -6

Being surrounded by stupid people saying stupid things and agreeing with them doesn’t make you correct.

It’s just makes you as bad as any liberal who lives in an echo chamber or any other dumb herd animal.

-3
Sting -3 points ago +6 / -9

There’s a lot of that shit around here. There are at least four or five completely fake and phony news articles from “news “agencies posted here and on Twitter every single fucking day and gullible Trump supporters eat it up, re-post it, spread it everywhere, and humiliate themselves when it invariably turns out to be complete bullshit.

We have absolutely no credibility and there’s a reason why. Too many Qtards, for one, and there are many others just as gullible.

I mean the people who literally predicted exactly what was going to happen are still getting shit on for being right. Can you even imagine that?

Literally the smart ones, the ones who were right, the ones who nailed it, the one who told you exactly what was gonna happen and how to stop it - they are the pariahs here and not the idiots who believe every dumb doctor and stupid researcher and moronic TruThEr!!!! that says anything they want to hear.

Oh please tell me more about raids in Germany and gun fights in Syria to save servers to prove the case of election fraud! Please tell me about what planes are flying in the air right now and how that means Democrats are going to be in prison any minute now! Oh, please! Please tell me more!

It’s embarrassing. Embarrassing. Half of them are liberals just here to tank the reputation of Trump supporters. Have to be. They have to be.

Dumb faggots talking about “shedding” who don’t even know what it is but they read an article by a doctor who got his degree out of a cereal box.

The accuse liberals of selectively believing only the doctors who tell them what they want to hear but then they go and do the same damn thing themselves and completely miss the irony!

Do you know how difficult it is to sell people on the truth that this vaccine is dangerous when most of the people who are against it don’t even understand the science behind it? They have to be fake. Look at the damage they are doing to our credibility. This is a dangerous vaccine and the people who are RIGHT about that are incredibly ignorant as to WHY.

But they aren’t afraid to show their ignorance because, again, they read something on Gateway Pundit or Natural News or some other bullshit website, in an article that got absolutely everything wrong, and they just embarrass the shit out of themselves. Wait. I take that back. They aren’t embarrassed. They lack of self-awareness to understand how fucking stupid they look.

The same dumb cunts that thought it was hilarious for the president to make fun of people on Twitter for four fucking years without realizing he would have to go back to the same goddamn people four years later to try to rescue the election from fraud.

Then they make the Pikachu face when they refused to help the guy that called them communists or dumb or incompetent for four fucking years on social media.

But they clapped like seals every time he did it because everything he did was great. Right? Oh everything he did was super Duper. Dumb motherfuckers. They act the same way liberals do they’re just on the “other team.” I hate dishonest fuckers. I hate them.

2
fasbin 2 points ago +2 / -0

With posts like this I wish we could up/down doot on a sentence-by-sentence basis. As it stands, although tempted to updoot for some interesting points, and overall passion level, I must abstain.

-1
BidensAdvocate -1 points ago +2 / -3

Well said. I also hate it when I see people taking up the same tactics we decry e.g. "Look at what this guy said, time to get him cancelled!".

-6
doug2 -6 points ago +3 / -9

Globohomo isn't a real word lol

2
MSG1000 2 points ago +6 / -4

I’ve seen plenty of people use it the way he says. And while Urban Dictionary is hardly an authority on anything, the fact his definition is listed as the top definition means many people use it that way (top means most user votes).

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Globohomo

2
80960KA 2 points ago +7 / -5

UrbanDictionary is less reliable than Snopes.

5
Sting 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t know about that let me run it by Snopes.

4
feraxil 4 points ago +5 / -1

Whoa. Thats a big claim.

-1
MSG1000 -1 points ago +0 / -1

Like I said, hardly an authority. But it proves that a good chunk of people don’t use it to refer to a global hacker group. My other piece of evidence was my own anecdotal experience.

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

By "less reliable" I mean they were shilling anti-Trump merch every time you loaded the page for all 4 years.

1
MSG1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh, had no idea.

2
FreedomStuff 2 points ago +6 / -4

someone just wrote that on April 26 2021

Lots of stupid people , probably followers of Torba .

1
MSG1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m confused by your comment. The other person is claiming that Torba says Globohomo is a hacker group. The other guy and I were contending it means “global homogeneity”. While the top def on that site is very recent, yes, there is another similar one from November 2020. Either way, the hyperbole of “no one uses it that way” is quite untrue. It’s such a niche new term it’s not surprising its definition isn’t settled.

-3
Master_Wyatt_Gurp -3 points ago +3 / -6

Torba is a chode, that we know.

6
KarenKarenKaren 6 points ago +10 / -4

Same thing if you think about it. What’s exceptional about giving in to base desires?

4
NateBedfordForrest 4 points ago +5 / -1

Username approved.

1
BranchCovidian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Based

3
feraxil 3 points ago +4 / -1

Whats the polar opposite of exceptional?

4
Sting 4 points ago +4 / -0

AOC.

1
feraxil 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol brutal. save some of that wit for the rest of us!

1
BranchCovidian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Affirmative action hires

4
80960KA 4 points ago +9 / -5

No dude it refers to fag flags flying wherever globohomo is in control. It's about fags.

-2
FreedomStuff -2 points ago +8 / -10

Gab's Torba has been using it that way , and now every dummy thinks that is what it means.

It doesnt refer to homosexuality, it refers to the New World Order, and lterally a term the NWO uses in their writings.

8
80960KA 8 points ago +11 / -3

"globohomo" was in use on Twitter in the sense of "globalism is full of literal fags" in like at least 2015 before Gab even existed.

4
FreedomStuff 4 points ago +11 / -7

Global homogeneity is the term for Globohomo , and its been used since 1992 .

Stupid people on twitter is your source ?

1
80960KA 1 point ago +5 / -4

I like how you just made that up on the spot.

1
TwoWords 1 point ago +3 / -2

He didn’t

0
FreedomStuff 0 points ago +4 / -4

Ever since George HW Bush used the term New World Order.

Ask Alex Jones.

-3
Sting -3 points ago +2 / -5

What you are saying is 100% true. Try to remember this next time these people try to convince you of something. They honestly don’t know what they’re talking about on most subjects. Jesus fucking Christ I’m on their team and I hate them.

Many people here are very bright and very smart and very open minded, half of them make up their minds about things before they can finish an article about it written by a retard who doesn’t even know what he’s saying.

Remember it’s from this group that the people emerged who think that Gary Sinise executed Katy Perry and Lady Gaga at GITMO and Joe Biden is a fully formed human clone, who came out of the test tube with formed thoughts and language skills.

And no, I’m not making that up. Any of it. I got into an argument days ago with a fucking retard who thinks Elvis Presley is not only alive, but living with Princess Diana and JFK Jr and are PART OF THE PLAN.

Watching an entire collection of otherwise intelligent people immediately grasp onto that narrative and take it as truth and gospel should’ve been disturbing, but they’ve been doing it since 2015.

Not taking conspiracy retards out of this community was the biggest mistake we ever made. I can’t wait until they are hunted down and thrown into camps. They cost this nation dearly. They deserve to pay for what they’ve done.

6
PKShadilay 6 points ago +7 / -1

Oh for fucks sake. Words can have multiple meanings. Do you also sperg out over the usage of faggot to describe gays?

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

homogeneous meaning asexual robots? seems pretty homo to me.

-3
FreedomStuff -3 points ago +3 / -6

homogeniety , Global homogeniety is One World Order , New World Order ect.

Its why catholics and queers are for it.

3
geebeext 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy holocaust batman

2
MustangManny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Low T or no T

1
BranchCovidian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, and GloboHomo is run by the tribe of Shlomos that has been kicked out of 109 countries already for their subversion, manipulation of governments, financial dishonesty, spreading harmful ideas, and genocide when they have enough power to get away with it, e.g. as in the Soviet Union.

43
TrumpWonByALandslide 43 points ago +46 / -3

Let's ask the important questions here:

Who takes and who gives?

26
Barack-Obama2 26 points ago +27 / -1

I am never the giver unless it’s a RINO male.

13
deleted 13 points ago +16 / -3
5
TrumpWonByALandslide 5 points ago +7 / -2

They've tied us up, gagged us, fucked us, and then sold us to the highest bidder.

2
Hubble 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hint: If they're fucking each other they're most likely fucking the country too. They should just announce they're switching over to the Democrat party.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
1
Cacciali_Via 1 point ago +3 / -2

We didn't decide homosexuality was wrong. God did.

1
Hubble 1 point ago +2 / -1

And most of them happen to vote Democrat. Just a fact of life. Maybe you should go join up with the Dems, too. You'd be more likely to find a "buddy" over there.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
giantrabbit1 1 point ago +10 / -9

nobody. cucker the cuck is only pushing this story because he got orders from paul ryan and liz cheney.

the rumor is that McCarthy was gonna fire Cheney by the end of this month, so they got Fucker Carlson to try to smear McCarthy to get him to back down.

don't trust the ratfuckers at faux noise...they are doing this story to help out their GOPe/RINO friends.

2
clownworld30330 2 points ago +2 / -0

True, but fuck McCarthy anyways.

1
Prudentwait 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're a retard if you think Tucker is taking orders from Liz Cheney. Imagine thinking McCarthy or any establishment politician is on your side.

4
Dr0neRec0very 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're a retard if you think Cucker isn't a puppet for elite families like the Chaney's. Imagine getting a shiny new pee tape at the very moment President Trump, and McCarthy agree about Cheney needing to go, but then getting online to defend the network that lost half its audience for helping to rig the presidential election. Retarded as fuck.

1
SFgayDude4Trump 1 point ago +2 / -1

Indeed

12
basedvirginian 12 points ago +14 / -2

Fang Fang.

6
BloodElfSupporter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fart boy can attest

2
NateBedfordForrest 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am afraid that obama is waaayyy past the point in her livelihood to trust any flatulence from her lower pressure relief valve.

It just bleeds on by.

9
RobezTobez 9 points ago +9 / -0

Luntz is a total bottom

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
clownworld30330 1 point ago +1 / -0

We give. They take. Money. That's how it's been. We get fucked.

29
regollyek 29 points ago +31 / -2

They've been invited to FBI parties, so I think we know the answer.

14
South_Florida_Guy 14 points ago +15 / -1

The entire hiring process for the FBI consists of demonstrating the ability to suck two cocks at the same time. Now we know whose cocks were being provided.

25
V2021 25 points ago +27 / -2

They might or might not be gay, but they're definitely faggots.

18
South_Florida_Guy 18 points ago +19 / -1

Their denials have been DEBONKED. it's settled science. They are science deniers.

16
Ben_dover 16 points ago +16 / -0

Don’t know about Kevin but Frank is clearly gay

7
NotAQTardFgtt 7 points ago +8 / -1

It’s obvious if you’ve ever heard him speak. Biggest fruitcake in the gop

7
Sting 7 points ago +7 / -0

Even bigger than Lindsey Graham?

3
TDAF 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is he in the GOP, or is the GOP in him?

2
NotAQTardFgtt 2 points ago +3 / -1

People don’t get into positions of power unless they are preapproved by the ruling class.

It’s no coincidence Bush, Cheney, Boehner, Ryan, McConnell and McCarthy are where they are/were.

Even Burr and Rubio running SSCI. Chosen because they won’t go nuclear on the deep state for their crimes.

3
Toughsky_Shitsky 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lindsey Graham would scratch your eyes out for making such a claim.

3
FitOfficial 3 points ago +4 / -1

*would write a sternly-worded letter about how if you don't shape up you'll eventually be subject to investigation with possible consequences of eye-scratchies

1
Pearls_Swine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I definitely get gay vibes from Luntz.

-23
Olds77 -23 points ago +4 / -27

It wouldn't surprise me if Luntz has ways of sneaking in people for Kevin to have sex with. As you saw with Epstein and G. Maxwell some of the most powerful people are the ones arranging sex for others and likely creating blackmail material in the process, but if these creepy politicians playball the bad guys are happy to provide whatever excesses the politicians want.

12
GodKingHarambe 12 points ago +13 / -1

The Big Lie, Pt. 2: "Renting a room"

10
GOPkilledTHEMSELVES 10 points ago +10 / -0

They are faggots for sure

8
FreedomStuff 8 points ago +8 / -0

Couple of sexual perverts, Well that explains alot.

8
el-martillo 8 points ago +8 / -0

You cant have a just society with a morally corrupt population.

8
Afeazo 8 points ago +8 / -0

You know how sometimes you can just look at someone and get the vibe that they are gay? Frank Luntz has always had that vibe.

4
charbatch 4 points ago +4 / -0

So has McCarthy. I thought he was openly gay.

1
zerk0021 1 point ago +1 / -0

McCarthy has been married for 29 years and has a 27 year old son and a 25 year old daughter.

https://archive.vn/ZCQPG

-20
Olds77 -20 points ago +7 / -27

And Bruce Jenner was married 3 times and had 6 kids. Lots of gay men have what appear to be normal families.

7
Recyclops 7 points ago +7 / -0

Luntz definitely putts from the rough. McCarthy is BuySexual.

7
KoofasaForTrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’m from California and encountered voter suppression of republicans last year. They we’re changing republicans to no party preference. I called McCarthy’s office and got a so-what type answer after explaining this meant these people could not vote in the primaries. McCarthy is a snake from the swamp.

7
z89101 7 points ago +8 / -1

Double Scoop of RINO Ass to Mockingbird mouth..🤔

5
Yeti2 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't watch Fox anyways.

5
17MAGA76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kevin McCarthy’s handmade toupee glue?

7
President_Elect_Marx 7 points ago +7 / -0

Now we know why Luntz’ hair piece always looks so fucking shabby. It’s glued on with baby batter.

1
Logan051361 1 point ago +1 / -0

HAHAHAHA

4
tucker2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

oh ya, they're gay.

4
454evr 4 points ago +5 / -1

McCarthy looks way too much like Epstein in this picture. I would listen to that hunch

4
VarusSPQR 4 points ago +4 / -0

Two never Trump faggots.

4
Ronpaulblican2 4 points ago +4 / -0

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 well done

4
RBFace 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think all Democrats, RINOs and the elite are all homosexuals. I think that's why Bill gates is getting divorced, he doesn't need to put up the facade anymore. Gates gives off that homo vibe.

1
ah_hell 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's leaving now because he's about to be outed for kid banging.

4
keepamericagreat102 4 points ago +4 / -0

One of those guys is complete open border leftist fuck. Don’t know second one.

4
Ocineaa 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've been saying McCarthy was a piece of shit for 2 years now but when bringing it up in here I'm called a shill.

4
ExileOnRedditStreet 4 points ago +4 / -0

An anonymous source came out to confirm.

3
peterthegreen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Q(ueer)Anon?

4
flopperdog 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wouldn't mind if they were simply roommates, but they were roommates working on a cucked globalist agenda.

4
yurimodin 4 points ago +4 / -0

hey its Bert & Ernie....

4
Shaffro 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't trust any Republicans. The whole government on both sides are traitors until they prove otherwise to me.

4
MAGACountryResident 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see two faggots but I have no idea who they are and why we should care?

4
Rodger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who cares if they're homosexual or not. Luntz is a bad pollster and McCarthy's not much better of a congressman.

4
Dr0neRec0very 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fox News (run by a family of limo communists) is attacking McCarthy because McCarthy is leading the effort to REMOVE LIZ CHANEY. If you want to know about McCarthy, check his voting record, not Fux News. We've only seen this fucking game a thousand times before, patriots. Turn off Fox news!!!

4
AJoeDD 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who cares about gayness in this situation? What raises flags is the close relationship with a neo-con-ish lobbyist who has been trying to drive Republicans from Trump and who does business with the Bidens (emails of Luntz and Hunter on the laptop).

3
Whimpy13 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Kevin, are you a fag?"

"No Frank. Why do you ask that?"

"Your dick tastes like shit Kevin."

3
DickAllcocks 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t always roommate with another man, but when I do it is before I was at that age when you normally have a woman and your own place with your family.

0
Cacciali_Via 0 points ago +1 / -1

Congressmen all have two homes. Their families stay in their home states but they need a place to live in DC while congress is in session. It is not uncommon for them to share an apartment with another person to save money.

I know nothing of McCarthy's life to know if he is wealthy or not.

1
zerk0021 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fairly sure McCarthy is not wealthy. His father was a fireman. He and his wife attended Bakersfield HS. He worked on the staff of Congressman Bill Thomas from before he graduated from college till he sought political office in 2002. His wife's father worked for National Cement. He graduated from Cal state Bakersfield. Their children attended Bakersfield high school.

However, there has been a issue with his brother in law getting no bid minority contracts worth millions...

https://archive.vn/dQ0M9

3
Awakened 3 points ago +3 / -0

Air Supply reunion.

2
peterthegreen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now there's a couple 'Lost in Love' 😂

2
Awakened 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh snap.

3
jsphere256 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just threw up a little

3
marvinthehaggler 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're an Uncle Fucker yes it's true. Nobody fucks uncles quite like you.

3
Tweedlethree 3 points ago +3 / -0

If this is a smear campaign it is probably going to work.

3
suburban_woman 3 points ago +3 / -0

They just probably binge on pizza together.

3
froggos 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn't Hannity have a weird obsession with Luntz?

4
NotAQTardFgtt 4 points ago +5 / -1

Their moms probably work together in the prison

4
froggos 4 points ago +4 / -0

I bet they practice martial arts together.

3
ARCWELD 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is that why McCarthy is staying at his apartment in DC

3
LibertarianXian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Old Ron Paul supporters remember Luntz from back in his poll fraud days

"F**k Frank Luntz!"

Nothing really changes, apparently....

3
remember1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t see no hover hand

3
BurtMcGirt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Way too old for each other.

3
e_pluribus_unum9 3 points ago +3 / -0

Omg, I don't even wanna go there. Just no

3
ProVoice 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're not homosexuals they just like sucking each others dicks.

3
me-no-likely3 3 points ago +3 / -0

He gay

2
BoSnerdly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their love is beautiful

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Wolverines556 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do you say this? Because they are butt fucking the GOP?