715
Comments (25)
sorted by:
31
GIJ0E 31 points ago +31 / -0

He also mentioned Soros on Fox and the host just about flipped out.

13
AmazinKrackin2 [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

GIJOE --- That was rather shocking to behold. It was like they were looking for the dump button because he just cursed and then there was this abrupt exchange and Newt was like "well I guess it is verbotin" and that was it. I have never heard anyone, from Tucker on down, ever take on Soros. He probably has a death squad somewhere outside DC that everyone knows about but never talks about. Welcome to 1933 Germany if that is the case.

1
tgwbd 1 point ago +1 / -0

O’Reilly used to take on Soros all the time. All the hosts know how well that went.

6
labajada 6 points ago +6 / -0

VERBOTEN!!!

9
Tweedlethree 9 points ago +9 / -0

I will reserve judgement. I think he is uni-party.

4
DebbieinDallas 4 points ago +4 / -0

Newt is the sole reason Republicans were able to take the House in 1994 because he nationalized what had heretofore been local elections, as in all politics is local. The Dems had solid control for most of everybody’s lifetime. 40 fucking years.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
5
Staatssicherheit 5 points ago +6 / -1

Nothing to lose? Have you not noticed that we are in a Cold Civil War with these people? The DOJ actually went after AG Paxton with fake charges of bribery at the exact same time he filed the original jurisdiction lawsuit. Don't think that they wouldn't go Newt in a similar manner just to try to discredit a former speaker of the house.

1
tgwbd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gingrich has been one of the few consistently based establishment Republicans for years now. He speaks softly and he deftly turns attention away after making taboo but not wrong statements like this.

7
snuggs316 7 points ago +7 / -0

i'd have been more impressed if he'd said it 4 months ago.

i just read something re: newt that was shocking, something having to do with california/legislation or voting there...and damned if i can find the brain cell that it's on. anyone?

4
TheGreenDragon 4 points ago +4 / -0

As his Mom use to say "My Newty is a good boy", she had a really deep raspy voice and I will never for get how she said that when he was speaker of the house. I think I remember she was sick and the MSM was trying to do a hit piece on Newt and they got her on the street asking her questions and she said "My Newty is a good boy" he was upset they were bothering his mom.

2
DebbieinDallas 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was Connie Chung. And the backlash ended her career.

4
MAGAMight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Newt is politically smart and wouldn't take an untenable position. It tells me we are winning and have an excellent chance of ultimately prevailing.

2
Tw0d 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally agree

4
AmazinKrackin2 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

From what I can tell and what he says he is base. He has no reason to and he could remain quiet but he is out there, writing op-eds and speaking out. He knows all the dirty players and backdoor deals so for him to lay it out there and not fear repercussions says a lot about the man.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BasedNtruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lmao bullshit. Controlled opposition or he wouldnt be on ANY networks at all

2
Japan4Salt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe you're right Krackin. I've taken him for a guy who has been in politics for too long. Figured him for a Lindsey Graham type. I do not know his whole history.

3
AmazinKrackin2 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's an apt comparison but he has been pretty active lately, writing op eds, Fox, etc. If you are part of the swamp, then he is dangerously breaking ranks. He might be controlled opposition but I don't think so because he is no longer a household name so I don't think he is. I'm at the point where if they are speaking the truth I'm going to embrace him because we need as many voices as possible. If the whole Congress for the last 25 years are Deep State than damn, we don't have much hope. But hope is all I have so I pray that there are some left that have moral, courage, and integrity left in politics. thanks fren

2
DebbieinDallas 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is just kinda the whole goddamn fucking reason the Republicans took control of the House in 1994 after 40 fucking years of solid Dem control. The Gingrich Revolution. He was a backbencher with no following.

1
crash7863 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm, seems like Liz is toast.

1
WindyCityBluez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its been 6 months.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Hades440 1 point ago +2 / -1

How does it prove anything for him to say it when it doesn't matter anymore? Anyone and everyone who stood there and denied the steal while it was happening is a self-serving piece of shit, regardless of what they come back later and say once it's safe.

1
Shalomtoyou 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine if he was the nominee in 2012 instead of Romney.