Comments (109)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Dictator_Bob 4 points ago +5 / -1

Can we get the link to this and not the twatter shit?

Dictator_Bob 7 points ago +9 / -2

The core issue is two parts:

  1. People are skeptical or disagree with their version of truth, as they see it.
  2. They are using real science to show their work.

This is laughable horseshit. They are claiming a priesthood and admonishing anyone who applies science as a method for themselves, and considers anyone aside from their realm a peer to review with.

To resolve this they insist on new versions of their truth. We call this propaganda as it is not scientific in its intent.

peruvianhat 4 points ago +4 / -0

I kept reading and thinking to myself: there are so many nuggets here, you can't come across a better advertisement for getting involved in these "anti-mask" discussion groups.

They keep saying things that should objectively be seen as good, yet it's clear they see it as an impediment to "consensus." It's lunacy

leo-bulero 3 points ago +3 / -0

How have we regressed back to the era of Galileo being arrested and imprisoned for daring to suggest that the earth revolves around the sun?

Dictator_Bob 2 points ago +4 / -2

Yes, this is dogmatic persecution. Their paper is written as "settled science" and "what to do about the peasantry" at the same time. Literally, it is a "study" built for political operations. There is nothing scientific about it except in it's analysis on how their like-minded network and political allies can launch a political opposition to a grassroots utilization of scientific method.

This is bullshit.