It says right in there near the end that the adverse affects require careful consideration when administering these vaccines.
For those who have a high risk of succumbing to the virus these vaccines appear phenomenal.
But it seems clear that no one should be forced or coerced to have one of these vaccines administered.
We have everything we need now to put covid-19 in the rear view mirror. I believe this was Donald Trump’s vision when he got on board over a year ago and started to help drive the rapid development of these vaccines.
For all the fear and draconian responses to covid-19 to be gone. And not to have those replaced with a new round of draconian policies centered on the vaccines.
I could raise a couple of potentially major problems with this:
Nobody can detail the 10 year effect of mRNA injection. They cannot tell you the 5 year effects, nor can they even tell you the 2 year effects.
Same with injecting Nano technology. Nobody can detail the 10 year effect. They cannot tell you the 5 year effects, nor can they even tell you the 2 year effects.
The Nuremburg Code of Ethics is being violated, on a global scale to combat an illness that you have to be tested for to see if you have it. They also do not know even the 2 year effects, therefore how can they justify experimental mRNA vaccine and experimental nano-tech injection?? It is against the code to compel anyone to take part in experiments.
The contributing scientists made a declaration of "no conflict of interests", but there is no declaration of how the paper was funded, which disables a full analysis of the paper - the first thing we should look at is who funded it, they have disabled this ability.
There has been little exploration of nano tech injections outside of cancer research, compounding the effect of these being experimental vaccines.
The entire "vaccine" propulsion is well shielded by an aggressive media including big tech so that no other points of view on the effects or efficacy of the jabs is permitted to be seen by the public, and in fact are quickly scrubbed when found online.
There is a boatload of money to be made by the proponents of population reduction.
I have collected 13 pages of links to matters of negative outcomes of having the jab, including death, physician conferences, analyses of the intricate workings of the mRNA components, ingredients, alternate treatments completely effective against Covid (obviating the jabs), potential antidotes for those who've taken it, and so on.
That is the burning question, you got to the heart of it right there. It is a possibility that non-conformists are being singled out in a detectable way - this is not confirmed, but must be part of any serious analysis.
I saw Steve Bannon stating that the globalists do have a religion, and that it is Transhumanism - that we will "rise above humanity" by incorporating ourselves with technology. His idea is supported by everything in your comment, and the article attached too.
Big tech consider themselves gods. This may be what we are facing at this point. Alternative theories are very welcome.
I understand. I was trying to make a point that the goal of Operation Warp Speed was to try to get covid out of the picture so that we can move forward like it was never a thing.
If someone is in a high risk group for the virus and has educated themselves about the vaccines, including the things you’re mentioning, they may still feel a lot safer getting the vaccine. And if enough people in the high risk groups do that, then the virus is really no longer a thing.
I feel like nobody else should be wanting to get the shot. And nobody else needs to get the shot to put this all behind us. For me it’s the people trying to force it on us while suppressing the things you mentioned, that are the problem, not necessarily the vaccines themselves.
And in that regard I’m completely on board with you. The info you’re putting out should be out there for everyone to see, and it’s not. Nobody should be forcing anyone to get the vaccine, and they are. This is bad and we absolutely need to be fighting it.
It says right in there near the end that the adverse affects require careful consideration when administering these vaccines.
For those who have a high risk of succumbing to the virus these vaccines appear phenomenal.
But it seems clear that no one should be forced or coerced to have one of these vaccines administered.
We have everything we need now to put covid-19 in the rear view mirror. I believe this was Donald Trump’s vision when he got on board over a year ago and started to help drive the rapid development of these vaccines.
For all the fear and draconian responses to covid-19 to be gone. And not to have those replaced with a new round of draconian policies centered on the vaccines.
I could raise a couple of potentially major problems with this:
Nobody can detail the 10 year effect of mRNA injection. They cannot tell you the 5 year effects, nor can they even tell you the 2 year effects.
Same with injecting Nano technology. Nobody can detail the 10 year effect. They cannot tell you the 5 year effects, nor can they even tell you the 2 year effects.
The Nuremburg Code of Ethics is being violated, on a global scale to combat an illness that you have to be tested for to see if you have it. They also do not know even the 2 year effects, therefore how can they justify experimental mRNA vaccine and experimental nano-tech injection?? It is against the code to compel anyone to take part in experiments.
The contributing scientists made a declaration of "no conflict of interests", but there is no declaration of how the paper was funded, which disables a full analysis of the paper - the first thing we should look at is who funded it, they have disabled this ability.
There has been little exploration of nano tech injections outside of cancer research, compounding the effect of these being experimental vaccines.
Good points.
The entire "vaccine" propulsion is well shielded by an aggressive media including big tech so that no other points of view on the effects or efficacy of the jabs is permitted to be seen by the public, and in fact are quickly scrubbed when found online.
There is a boatload of money to be made by the proponents of population reduction.
I have collected 13 pages of links to matters of negative outcomes of having the jab, including death, physician conferences, analyses of the intricate workings of the mRNA components, ingredients, alternate treatments completely effective against Covid (obviating the jabs), potential antidotes for those who've taken it, and so on.
These have been hidden from the public. Why?
That is the burning question, you got to the heart of it right there. It is a possibility that non-conformists are being singled out in a detectable way - this is not confirmed, but must be part of any serious analysis.
I saw Steve Bannon stating that the globalists do have a religion, and that it is Transhumanism - that we will "rise above humanity" by incorporating ourselves with technology. His idea is supported by everything in your comment, and the article attached too.
Big tech consider themselves gods. This may be what we are facing at this point. Alternative theories are very welcome.
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/stop-damage-mrna-vaccines/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qmaqx4LwuOQF/ New--Dr.Tenpenny-warning
ANTIDOTE https://bestnewshere.com/anitdote-to-the-contagion-must-read-must-do-everyone-heres-an-effective-way-to-guard-against-the-spike-protein-contagion-caused-by-the-covid-vaccinated/
https://bestnewshere.com/bombshell-connecticut-govt-secretly-tells-health-care-workers-covid-vaccines-are-deadly-but-withholds-the-same-information-from-the-public-video/
I understand. I was trying to make a point that the goal of Operation Warp Speed was to try to get covid out of the picture so that we can move forward like it was never a thing.
If someone is in a high risk group for the virus and has educated themselves about the vaccines, including the things you’re mentioning, they may still feel a lot safer getting the vaccine. And if enough people in the high risk groups do that, then the virus is really no longer a thing.
I feel like nobody else should be wanting to get the shot. And nobody else needs to get the shot to put this all behind us. For me it’s the people trying to force it on us while suppressing the things you mentioned, that are the problem, not necessarily the vaccines themselves.
And in that regard I’m completely on board with you. The info you’re putting out should be out there for everyone to see, and it’s not. Nobody should be forcing anyone to get the vaccine, and they are. This is bad and we absolutely need to be fighting it.
Agree. I think you are right, yes, Trump would have seen the potential for communists to hijack this from the word go.