White people are white people's biggest competition. There are a lot of dysfunctional psychological processes behind it and that's one of them.
If you want to know why the left constantly go on about Nazis it's because they're at the core left wing, socialists versus communists, fighting over the same audience very much.
Spot on, that is also exactly why National Socialists go on perpetually about Jews. Once a socialist group identifies another group as their oppressor, they will be merciless to the death unless that group can defend itself, like Israel. White people: do NOT give up your guns, the left is insane.
Actually some of that is more from certain social effects but also pseudointellectualism leading to things like racial classism. Socialists are also sociologists. For some reason biological sciences get the blame but not social sciences which was a core ideological component of national socialists that borrowed from the biology books to incorporate other things into their structure of social classism.
The left like to see themselves all as geniuses of the Carpathians.
Personally, I'm not at all impartial to functionalism, technocracy, looking at things coldly, pragmatically, etc but I can tell you it's always a lot harder than it looks and no matter how smart you are you're probably wrong about something or missed something.
The reality is that despite their self perception they are what they are and can't stop that. They're often grossly incompetent and to the point of being unaware of their incompetence or the way things really fail.
They messed up with things like concentration camps, etc and of course they have an emotional response like someone messing up with a scalpel and no no one is allowed to have it not even a skilled surgeon, a rare beast that can actually do something with things other than do harm.
The left are sort of like disarming themselves in a way after getting burnt yet the one thing that never goes away is their false sense of superiority and that will always play out in one way or another.
Modern national socialists are the left. They're at least smart enough to know that if you're a nazi don't go out in uniform. Then you have another weird branch that are open, more visible and they follow quite a different methodology. They're an odd type that's more half way broken or half baked still clinging to some of the ways in which national socialists did things wrong but also given legitimitimacy compensating for getting right a lot of things the rest of society gets wrong.
Like being triggered by people cosplaying as nazis and other dumb stuff or the right to have both sides represented in an argument (yes, it might not be popular but the Nazis and the Germans have a right to representation as well for there to be a balance of judgement). They are also right about society being uneven when it comes to the excessive and often counter productive defence of the Jews and the right being hypocritical in that regard. Also at least being more true to themselves in a sense.
I mean at least you know they're nazis. They're no where near the danger of people who are in the closet entirely and hiding it to the point they may have deceived themselves that they're not racist like you see on the left all the time where they insist they're not racist but they blatantly are (ironically ultimately self deception can lift the veil). It's easy to deal with those upfront than the ones who are walking around posing as normal people.
The ones you can deal with face to face are more justified in their existence as they tend not to use force and you can bounce ideas off them or at least discuss things in territories other people are too cowardly to explore. They're largely self contained.
By counter productive, I mean that for example the history denial to save face for Israel doesn't make it look good if that's what you have to do to justify the country. There are better arguments than ones made to try to justify its existence that then confirm its existence is unjust if you follow the logic of those arguments and then correct the variables.
The left represents national socialists obsessed with not doing what they did last when they lost. They screwed up nationalism for example when trying that now no one is allowed to have it in part because they also don't like anyone else having a chance to succeed where they failed. The thing is they don't understand is they're also going to screw up globalism just as bad. They can't acknowledge that they can't do anything right. They keep insisting on doing something and that's the problem.
If they had a bit of humility that would go along way. Look at how they are now with anti-racism. All saying everyone has to be anti-racist. Most people aren't qualified. That's an absolutely idiotic notion and not something you should call for others to have to do.
At the moment the mainstream national socialists, the ones smart enough to know that if you're a national socialist you don't go out announcing it, aren't all that obsessed with Jews. It's black people as a minority they're going absolutely nuts about. That can change however.
I see no reason why people shouldn't criticise Jews rationally and proportionately. What people object to is when Jews are blamed disproportionately for things like the evils of globalism and its inherent anti-white agenda - which is very real. Globalism was founded by a non Jew, and has massive following from all racial groupings - massive amongst self loathing whites for example.
Also, when Jews do nationalism, people respond as if it is different from their own nationalism.
You could level a pretty serious criticism of muslims, with full legitimacy - that all jihadists are muslim. When French people suddenly find themselves scraping their loved ones off of the sidewalk, nobody suspects the hindus.
Jewish people used to dominate the diamond industry, but now it is Hindu's. Oil is dominated by westerners and Arabs. Westerners got there first because they built the modern world, propelled by some extent by Jewish money, but also by their own smarts and ingenuity. Arabs are also there because they won the zip code lottery.
Jewish people have dominated the media, but it is not Jewishness that causes the harm of that, it is globalism, self appointed aristocrats. It is an ideology, which has no genetic basis. Self appointed aristocrats grifting on left wing tendency to attack an undefended "oppressor". This is why I strongly advocate that white men keep their guns. Also target institutions - the very idea that someone can be disadvantaged in the job market, for example, due to being a white male - this must be attacked by countering communist infestation of all institutions.
People also have the right to make bad criticisms as well. At least up until a certain point until it's actionable so long as it's the subject to review, debate, criticism and rejection or acceptance without having to resort to force over discourse.
Traditionally in social encounters the first thing each party would do is reveal each of their assumptions and stereotypes about each other and just get it out in the open up front. Say if it's like that or not, have a laugh about it then get on with business.
People don't realise that anti-defamation really means anti-blasphemy and things like the ADL are an anti 1A organisation from inception. The problem is that even anti-defamation isn't necessarily a good thing. It very much depends on the venue, the error or potential error and the realistic implications. There is an odd effect where if you deny your opponent battle you deny yourself victory.
People get things wrong all the time about absolutely everything and while it's an important battle to fight that the moment your tool is purely one of authority and not trial by fire then you revoke your legitimate right to authority. Have an arena, but get rid of the fighters and merely keep the guy who announced the victor.
There aren't always single reasons for it. Sometimes Jews are racist just like everyone else is and have a natural tendency to hire those like them. It's a human tendency in general to associate with those you have common ground with, speak the same language, have the same references to draw from, follow similar codes, etc. Less impediment, more stream line.
In some cases it's because people assume everyone with a German/Jewish name is Jewish or follow a one drop rule not realising there are major cities with a significant founder effect of Germans in the USA and Jews as well that represent the hiring pool and Jews have long been well versus in advanced society, literacy, education, etc while Europe proper (not the Mediterranean, white Europe, the basin of France, Germany through Russia, Britain, Ireland, Scandinavia, etc) was a backwater being poked and prodded by the Romans still emerging from cataclysm due to huge turmoil in the shifting of terrain and biomes while also having enough vibrant land popping out from under the ice and snow after to stave off the need for advancement.
Genetically Jews appear to have a similar suitability to civilisation and biomes as Europeans making them relatively adept though they also appear to maintain good genetic intelligence as well possibly due to strong selection in their lineage and cultural procedures (basically self selective breeding). Jews have also always had their fingers in the pie being able to offer more higher level skills from an prior experience in more advanced nations getting there first to some degree and this was further enhanced by differences in moral codes as well as various forms of relativism (if you're a muslim you can't gamble but if you have westerners facilitate them gambling among each other and charge a service fee). They've got their foot in the door so to speak.
These details are really academic because what matters is in those positions anyone can be a problem. However you may need to approach it slightly differently for how human folly might play out for each group which each has its base cultural operating system installed and identity format. Some are going to be worse than others. We absolutely cannot allow Islam to dominate for example.
People have a simplistic view of Jews playing around with others using things like the Holocaust to always get the sympathy vote but that's only a small portion of reality that sometimes happens. It's the same thing with BLM. Some people only see the bit where it's saying white people you have to feel sorry for black people. They miss the psychological impact on black people, a kind of terrorism, terrorising them exploiting them psychologically and their racial fear of racism with fake reports of racist police brutality against them.
There's often the failure for people to evaluate absolutely everything from every angle and why wouldn't there be? We're only evolved to have as much as we need which is to be able to see things from our position and our viewpoint.
Though it's not obvious Jews themselves are among the most heavily targeted with this kind of psychological manipulation and exploitation. I mean why do I need to care about being a Nazi? I'm not a German. We smashed them to smithereens. We rapes a million of their women and carpet bombed their cities. Psychologically they really mean very little to us. It's a bit of a joke to bring up archaic Nazis a bit like it would be saying that Vikings are real and we have to fight the threat of their return in everything we do. The psychological manipulation of black people vote for us or the police will get you or Jews vote for us or the Nazis will get you is really just stupid.
Spot on, I agree that left wing victim ideology is a psy op, or terrorism as you put it, against those they profess to help. I would query if Nazism really went away though. I refer not to teenage activists on fringe social media sites - what I am talking about is Globalism.
It is rather like Nazism ditched all the things that didnt work for them in WW2, and have come back again. Germany owns the EU for starters. There is also the underlying principle of the unarmed "oppressor" to be attacked, no longer Jews, white males are now perceived as the viable target. Hitlers Germany wasnt attacked because he victimised people, they were attacked because they violently invaded other peoples countries. The Globalists do that by coercion and consent. Globalism is essentially Nazism in a womans dress, from a number of perspectives. Hitlers obsession with art is transposed into Globalist obsession with dominating the internet, as another example.
The fundamental problem right now is globalism, and in that I include Jihadism - Hitlers allies of WW2 are now a full proxy for the things Globalists do not want to be blamed for. Globalists even pretend kindness is behind their open borders policies in Europe, while indigenous citizens are subject to the horrors of jihad. The analogy between Nazism and Globalism is in fact reasonably profound.
I find one frustrating thing that people tend to focus on is purely the ideological side of things and the superficial or symbolic. Though some ideologies are better than others what's ignored is that there is something about human history and the ways things play out that is integral to the humans and are not magically imported by any ideology. Whatever ideology you have fundamentally beneath that is always the person. No ideology can make a person kill who doesn't want to kill no matter what.
It is a resurgence of human error that is simply displaced onto other opposite extremes. Though there are other processes driving it. In theory you can accomplish great things with global governance. In a sense we really kind of needed it.
In practice, as a species, it's impossible to have that level of enablement for not only human greatness but human folly with the latter being near guaranteed. A lot of people can only imagine great things if you make anything possible.
Fascism tends to be one side of two coins, to extremes the left has played with. Favour the weak or favour the strong. They flipped that coin. Germany's fascism as it goes wasn't entirely misplaced. It has just lost a war and was in the doldrums. The natural response to that is the need to become stronger. That can go too far sometimes when people have things hard especially if it's a shock dropping down from a relatively high level of advancement. The same can happen in reverse if things are too easy.
The modern left wing is merely a collection of axis's with certain settings like on an old TV or tuner with dials all the way up or down like they're switches even though they're sliders. You can have fascist globalism. In fact this is what we're getting but more of the favour totalitarian part and not the favour the strong part. I think that's why it's confusing and in a woman's dress, effeminate like France, because of the favour the weak component, though I think that's actually circumspect. White people fall for that but for non-white people they're favouring themselves and wish to establish a position of strength. Stuff like this really undermines any genuine attempt at moving closer to equality. It really is just the whip in the other hand. They're proving that certain ideals are not possible.
White supremacy specifically from a globalist perspective is actually a war against the strong, white super nations, that's white supremacy on the global scale. Things are going to get quite interesting with Russia on that front because thus far it's ideologically impenetrable and is maintaining its defences against anti-white racism from the rest of the non-white world.
Most leftists are too stupid to even realise that about WWII. Germany crossed the line when it attacked others nations. Now you're a Nazi if you defend your nation? At least with Israel there's a little more ambiguity as its formation is a modern and messy emergence though that said Germany's war at the time is a little more complex than that because it also lost territory. Though it is very often the case that a war of restoration exceeds its boundaries. Such as the USSR and the American intervention in South Korea.
If you think that they're so stupid as to conflate the victim with the oppressor based on learnings from history like that you might grasp we have a real problem with many people in our society who are good for nothing loudmouths speaking way above their station. So many people seem to believe that they are equipped to solve all of the world's problems yet lack the both basic fundamental intelligence such as to understand basic concepts such as the importance of nation.
Animals don't understand what a nation is either. Or money. Or laws other than perhaps the most basic. These people want to drag everyone else down to their level and I think the world has bigger problems to worry about than the things they say we need to stop getting in the way from them fixing. The world needs to be saved from common people who think they can save the world.
Common people thinking they can save the world often believe they are on the side of equality of outcome. Globalist leftism was never about equality, it is about empire. It's in the name.
*edit : I am not suggesting to target institutions with the guns. I mean take action against them, also infiltrate them in order to have a say. The ruling against Biden for racial and sexual discrimination is great news, it sets precedent.
White people are white people's biggest competition. There are a lot of dysfunctional psychological processes behind it and that's one of them.
If you want to know why the left constantly go on about Nazis it's because they're at the core left wing, socialists versus communists, fighting over the same audience very much.
Spot on, that is also exactly why National Socialists go on perpetually about Jews. Once a socialist group identifies another group as their oppressor, they will be merciless to the death unless that group can defend itself, like Israel. White people: do NOT give up your guns, the left is insane.
Actually some of that is more from certain social effects but also pseudointellectualism leading to things like racial classism. Socialists are also sociologists. For some reason biological sciences get the blame but not social sciences which was a core ideological component of national socialists that borrowed from the biology books to incorporate other things into their structure of social classism.
The left like to see themselves all as geniuses of the Carpathians.
Personally, I'm not at all impartial to functionalism, technocracy, looking at things coldly, pragmatically, etc but I can tell you it's always a lot harder than it looks and no matter how smart you are you're probably wrong about something or missed something.
The reality is that despite their self perception they are what they are and can't stop that. They're often grossly incompetent and to the point of being unaware of their incompetence or the way things really fail.
They messed up with things like concentration camps, etc and of course they have an emotional response like someone messing up with a scalpel and no no one is allowed to have it not even a skilled surgeon, a rare beast that can actually do something with things other than do harm.
The left are sort of like disarming themselves in a way after getting burnt yet the one thing that never goes away is their false sense of superiority and that will always play out in one way or another.
Modern national socialists are the left. They're at least smart enough to know that if you're a nazi don't go out in uniform. Then you have another weird branch that are open, more visible and they follow quite a different methodology. They're an odd type that's more half way broken or half baked still clinging to some of the ways in which national socialists did things wrong but also given legitimitimacy compensating for getting right a lot of things the rest of society gets wrong.
Like being triggered by people cosplaying as nazis and other dumb stuff or the right to have both sides represented in an argument (yes, it might not be popular but the Nazis and the Germans have a right to representation as well for there to be a balance of judgement). They are also right about society being uneven when it comes to the excessive and often counter productive defence of the Jews and the right being hypocritical in that regard. Also at least being more true to themselves in a sense.
I mean at least you know they're nazis. They're no where near the danger of people who are in the closet entirely and hiding it to the point they may have deceived themselves that they're not racist like you see on the left all the time where they insist they're not racist but they blatantly are (ironically ultimately self deception can lift the veil). It's easy to deal with those upfront than the ones who are walking around posing as normal people.
The ones you can deal with face to face are more justified in their existence as they tend not to use force and you can bounce ideas off them or at least discuss things in territories other people are too cowardly to explore. They're largely self contained.
By counter productive, I mean that for example the history denial to save face for Israel doesn't make it look good if that's what you have to do to justify the country. There are better arguments than ones made to try to justify its existence that then confirm its existence is unjust if you follow the logic of those arguments and then correct the variables.
The left represents national socialists obsessed with not doing what they did last when they lost. They screwed up nationalism for example when trying that now no one is allowed to have it in part because they also don't like anyone else having a chance to succeed where they failed. The thing is they don't understand is they're also going to screw up globalism just as bad. They can't acknowledge that they can't do anything right. They keep insisting on doing something and that's the problem.
If they had a bit of humility that would go along way. Look at how they are now with anti-racism. All saying everyone has to be anti-racist. Most people aren't qualified. That's an absolutely idiotic notion and not something you should call for others to have to do.
At the moment the mainstream national socialists, the ones smart enough to know that if you're a national socialist you don't go out announcing it, aren't all that obsessed with Jews. It's black people as a minority they're going absolutely nuts about. That can change however.
I see no reason why people shouldn't criticise Jews rationally and proportionately. What people object to is when Jews are blamed disproportionately for things like the evils of globalism and its inherent anti-white agenda - which is very real. Globalism was founded by a non Jew, and has massive following from all racial groupings - massive amongst self loathing whites for example.
Also, when Jews do nationalism, people respond as if it is different from their own nationalism.
You could level a pretty serious criticism of muslims, with full legitimacy - that all jihadists are muslim. When French people suddenly find themselves scraping their loved ones off of the sidewalk, nobody suspects the hindus.
Jewish people used to dominate the diamond industry, but now it is Hindu's. Oil is dominated by westerners and Arabs. Westerners got there first because they built the modern world, propelled by some extent by Jewish money, but also by their own smarts and ingenuity. Arabs are also there because they won the zip code lottery.
Jewish people have dominated the media, but it is not Jewishness that causes the harm of that, it is globalism, self appointed aristocrats. It is an ideology, which has no genetic basis. Self appointed aristocrats grifting on left wing tendency to attack an undefended "oppressor". This is why I strongly advocate that white men keep their guns. Also target institutions - the very idea that someone can be disadvantaged in the job market, for example, due to being a white male - this must be attacked by countering communist infestation of all institutions.
People also have the right to make bad criticisms as well. At least up until a certain point until it's actionable so long as it's the subject to review, debate, criticism and rejection or acceptance without having to resort to force over discourse.
Traditionally in social encounters the first thing each party would do is reveal each of their assumptions and stereotypes about each other and just get it out in the open up front. Say if it's like that or not, have a laugh about it then get on with business.
People don't realise that anti-defamation really means anti-blasphemy and things like the ADL are an anti 1A organisation from inception. The problem is that even anti-defamation isn't necessarily a good thing. It very much depends on the venue, the error or potential error and the realistic implications. There is an odd effect where if you deny your opponent battle you deny yourself victory.
People get things wrong all the time about absolutely everything and while it's an important battle to fight that the moment your tool is purely one of authority and not trial by fire then you revoke your legitimate right to authority. Have an arena, but get rid of the fighters and merely keep the guy who announced the victor.
There aren't always single reasons for it. Sometimes Jews are racist just like everyone else is and have a natural tendency to hire those like them. It's a human tendency in general to associate with those you have common ground with, speak the same language, have the same references to draw from, follow similar codes, etc. Less impediment, more stream line.
In some cases it's because people assume everyone with a German/Jewish name is Jewish or follow a one drop rule not realising there are major cities with a significant founder effect of Germans in the USA and Jews as well that represent the hiring pool and Jews have long been well versus in advanced society, literacy, education, etc while Europe proper (not the Mediterranean, white Europe, the basin of France, Germany through Russia, Britain, Ireland, Scandinavia, etc) was a backwater being poked and prodded by the Romans still emerging from cataclysm due to huge turmoil in the shifting of terrain and biomes while also having enough vibrant land popping out from under the ice and snow after to stave off the need for advancement.
Genetically Jews appear to have a similar suitability to civilisation and biomes as Europeans making them relatively adept though they also appear to maintain good genetic intelligence as well possibly due to strong selection in their lineage and cultural procedures (basically self selective breeding). Jews have also always had their fingers in the pie being able to offer more higher level skills from an prior experience in more advanced nations getting there first to some degree and this was further enhanced by differences in moral codes as well as various forms of relativism (if you're a muslim you can't gamble but if you have westerners facilitate them gambling among each other and charge a service fee). They've got their foot in the door so to speak.
These details are really academic because what matters is in those positions anyone can be a problem. However you may need to approach it slightly differently for how human folly might play out for each group which each has its base cultural operating system installed and identity format. Some are going to be worse than others. We absolutely cannot allow Islam to dominate for example.
People have a simplistic view of Jews playing around with others using things like the Holocaust to always get the sympathy vote but that's only a small portion of reality that sometimes happens. It's the same thing with BLM. Some people only see the bit where it's saying white people you have to feel sorry for black people. They miss the psychological impact on black people, a kind of terrorism, terrorising them exploiting them psychologically and their racial fear of racism with fake reports of racist police brutality against them.
There's often the failure for people to evaluate absolutely everything from every angle and why wouldn't there be? We're only evolved to have as much as we need which is to be able to see things from our position and our viewpoint.
Though it's not obvious Jews themselves are among the most heavily targeted with this kind of psychological manipulation and exploitation. I mean why do I need to care about being a Nazi? I'm not a German. We smashed them to smithereens. We rapes a million of their women and carpet bombed their cities. Psychologically they really mean very little to us. It's a bit of a joke to bring up archaic Nazis a bit like it would be saying that Vikings are real and we have to fight the threat of their return in everything we do. The psychological manipulation of black people vote for us or the police will get you or Jews vote for us or the Nazis will get you is really just stupid.
Spot on, I agree that left wing victim ideology is a psy op, or terrorism as you put it, against those they profess to help. I would query if Nazism really went away though. I refer not to teenage activists on fringe social media sites - what I am talking about is Globalism.
It is rather like Nazism ditched all the things that didnt work for them in WW2, and have come back again. Germany owns the EU for starters. There is also the underlying principle of the unarmed "oppressor" to be attacked, no longer Jews, white males are now perceived as the viable target. Hitlers Germany wasnt attacked because he victimised people, they were attacked because they violently invaded other peoples countries. The Globalists do that by coercion and consent. Globalism is essentially Nazism in a womans dress, from a number of perspectives. Hitlers obsession with art is transposed into Globalist obsession with dominating the internet, as another example.
The fundamental problem right now is globalism, and in that I include Jihadism - Hitlers allies of WW2 are now a full proxy for the things Globalists do not want to be blamed for. Globalists even pretend kindness is behind their open borders policies in Europe, while indigenous citizens are subject to the horrors of jihad. The analogy between Nazism and Globalism is in fact reasonably profound.
I find one frustrating thing that people tend to focus on is purely the ideological side of things and the superficial or symbolic. Though some ideologies are better than others what's ignored is that there is something about human history and the ways things play out that is integral to the humans and are not magically imported by any ideology. Whatever ideology you have fundamentally beneath that is always the person. No ideology can make a person kill who doesn't want to kill no matter what.
It is a resurgence of human error that is simply displaced onto other opposite extremes. Though there are other processes driving it. In theory you can accomplish great things with global governance. In a sense we really kind of needed it.
In practice, as a species, it's impossible to have that level of enablement for not only human greatness but human folly with the latter being near guaranteed. A lot of people can only imagine great things if you make anything possible.
Fascism tends to be one side of two coins, to extremes the left has played with. Favour the weak or favour the strong. They flipped that coin. Germany's fascism as it goes wasn't entirely misplaced. It has just lost a war and was in the doldrums. The natural response to that is the need to become stronger. That can go too far sometimes when people have things hard especially if it's a shock dropping down from a relatively high level of advancement. The same can happen in reverse if things are too easy.
The modern left wing is merely a collection of axis's with certain settings like on an old TV or tuner with dials all the way up or down like they're switches even though they're sliders. You can have fascist globalism. In fact this is what we're getting but more of the favour totalitarian part and not the favour the strong part. I think that's why it's confusing and in a woman's dress, effeminate like France, because of the favour the weak component, though I think that's actually circumspect. White people fall for that but for non-white people they're favouring themselves and wish to establish a position of strength. Stuff like this really undermines any genuine attempt at moving closer to equality. It really is just the whip in the other hand. They're proving that certain ideals are not possible.
White supremacy specifically from a globalist perspective is actually a war against the strong, white super nations, that's white supremacy on the global scale. Things are going to get quite interesting with Russia on that front because thus far it's ideologically impenetrable and is maintaining its defences against anti-white racism from the rest of the non-white world.
Most leftists are too stupid to even realise that about WWII. Germany crossed the line when it attacked others nations. Now you're a Nazi if you defend your nation? At least with Israel there's a little more ambiguity as its formation is a modern and messy emergence though that said Germany's war at the time is a little more complex than that because it also lost territory. Though it is very often the case that a war of restoration exceeds its boundaries. Such as the USSR and the American intervention in South Korea.
If you think that they're so stupid as to conflate the victim with the oppressor based on learnings from history like that you might grasp we have a real problem with many people in our society who are good for nothing loudmouths speaking way above their station. So many people seem to believe that they are equipped to solve all of the world's problems yet lack the both basic fundamental intelligence such as to understand basic concepts such as the importance of nation.
Animals don't understand what a nation is either. Or money. Or laws other than perhaps the most basic. These people want to drag everyone else down to their level and I think the world has bigger problems to worry about than the things they say we need to stop getting in the way from them fixing. The world needs to be saved from common people who think they can save the world.
Common people thinking they can save the world often believe they are on the side of equality of outcome. Globalist leftism was never about equality, it is about empire. It's in the name.
*edit : I am not suggesting to target institutions with the guns. I mean take action against them, also infiltrate them in order to have a say. The ruling against Biden for racial and sexual discrimination is great news, it sets precedent.