Good tech writing. I love concise writing, conciseness being the core of the art of tech writing. It takes so much more effort for me to write concisely than this lazy stream of consciousness internet writing I usually do these days. Your document is perhaps even a bit too concise, which is the first time that I have said that particular criticism. That was a compliment.
Suggest replacing numeric list type with bulleted list. Alternately, just use plain tab indentation without bullets etc.
Fixed-width (console) fonts are appealing to us computer junkies, but from a typography and readability perspective, they are strictly inferior to variable-width fonts (save for a handful of specialized use cases). I suggest replacing the console font with a variable width font such as Arial.
If you're* sick
Good tech writing. I love concise writing, conciseness being the core of the art of tech writing. It takes so much more effort for me to write concisely than this lazy stream of consciousness internet writing I usually do these days. Your document is perhaps even a bit too concise, which is the first time that I have said that particular criticism. That was a compliment.
Suggest replacing numeric list type with bulleted list. Alternately, just use plain tab indentation without bullets etc.
Fixed-width (console) fonts are appealing to us computer junkies, but from a typography and readability perspective, they are strictly inferior to variable-width fonts (save for a handful of specialized use cases). I suggest replacing the console font with a variable width font such as Arial.
Unclear/redundant section titles:
"Information", "General Factors", "Public Mitigation Failures"
Sections that are best combined:
Names, Information
Testing, Detection
Transmission, General Factors, Public Mitigation Failures
Suggest using comma separated lists instead of a fourth indentation level
I could figure out other suggestions, probably, but at some point all I am doing is replacing the inquirer's document with my own writing.
Happy writing!