Comments (284)
sorted by:
BeefyBelisarius 134 points ago +138 / -4

It's not a coincidence that they chose the rainbow.

ghost_of_aswartz 54 points ago +56 / -2


chinajoehasdementia 60 points ago +63 / -3

Everything makes so much more sense when you appreciate the fact that they're a big group of pedophile Lucifarians.

BoatingAccident 39 points ago +42 / -3

Nobody knows about the reason they took the rainbow. Literally nobody I talked to even remembered that the rainbow is such an important symbol to Christians. Even my father, who goes to church every Sunday since I can remember, didn't realize it. "I don't remember that in the Bible".

I tell everyone I know. None of them even realized it.

Isolated_Patriot 25 points ago +27 / -2

That's crazy. The subversion of the Church was so much deeper than any of us realized.

I used to know this guy a decade ago, he was like the fundamentalist Christian version of a conspiracy theorist. Everyone thought he was just a bit nuts, because he talked about the church being filled with liars and cheaters, and only a handful of true Christians to be found in any building.

The same people always marveled at his knowledge of the Word. He wouldn't step foot in a church, but if he knew you were a Christian he would do everything he could to try and talk about the word (and bash on the "churchy-churchy" types and fake churches).

Turned out he was the only one that knew what was really going on.

DogFacedPepeSoldier 5 points ago +6 / -1

Honestly from that portrayal, it sounds like he set his knowledge up as an idol.

The first place the apostles went when they went to a new town was the Jewish Synagogue. And these places were populated by the very people.who rejected Christ to His face.

Jesus says, "You are the salt of the world. But if salt loses its saltiness, what good is it? Nothing but to be thrown out and trampled by men". How can you be salt if you remove yourself from the dish. Or, how can you influence the lost if you remove yourself from those you perceive as lost?

Imo, a believer who eschews the congregation for the sake of the hypocrites therein is one himself for he is rebelling against his mission.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
Isolated_Patriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

if he was so passionate about his faith and so concerned about the direction of the Church, why wouldn't he get involved? Become a priest and start his own Church?

Protestant formation number 60,702? Some people don't actually agree with reforming a new denomination every time there a disagreement. Take a good look at where that's gotten us and tell me it's a good thing?

THE reformation may have been a good thing, but the explosion of denominations in the last 50 years was merely a precursor to the current falling away.

Isolated_Patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imo, a believer who eschews the congregation for the sake of the hypocrites therein is one himself for he is rebelling against his mission.

Interesting interpretation. I didn't tell you much about him at all, but that he didn't go to church buildings. Consider this: how would people have known him if he was "eschewing the congregation?"

My little town of < 2000 had 14 churches, and a "non-denominational" hippy group. This guy was well known among everyone in town, probably more known to the "congregation" than anyone who went to one of those buildings religiously.

conservativefrank 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have a relationship with Dad, God, not with a Church.

Celebrations and holidays such as Christmas and Easter are subversions, incorporating pagan symbols and worship into Christianity. That doesn't mean you can't celebrate Christ's birth and resurrection.

However, don't count on churches. Churches are institutions of man. Like men, churches are imperfect. God is perfect.

Isolated_Patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty darn close to something he would have said, lol.

MastaJoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is exactly where I'm at. I can have a relationship with God, and I can contact him whenever I like. Plus, I don't need someone else to read scriptures and interpret them for me. My comprehension skills are just fine.

I just don't trust the institution as a whole because it's ran by imperfect humans.

Plus, after seeing the yearly church budget/salaries of those in the church, I'm like kiss my poor ass! You're not getting a dime from me. I'll focus on treating others with respect and doing good deeds on my own. I'm not paying to get into Heaven.

MastaJoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bruh... I know exactly what the crazy guy in your story is thinking/feeling. THIS is why I stopped going to church!!!!

It's completely filled with frauds, phonies, and hypocrites... I never thought about the fact that all of those faithless frauds were Democrats...


therighteousdontfear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except by not setting foot in the church, he deprived it of his wisdom and conviction. Thus he left his flock to die in the wilderness.

Isolated_Patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

It may have been excusable by ignorance at first, now you're just lying. It's not a good look. Perhaps you worship the building a bit too much if you can't even realize the flock is not contained by it.

therighteousdontfear 0 points ago +1 / -1

Come on, you don't sound smart. Going to church is not a suggestion it's a duty. The building has nothing to do with it - if your church gathers in an empty field it would be your church. You have an obligation to go there and take your blessings and imperfections there, as difficult as it may be.

Refusing to attend church while denegrating the people who do is quite literally like making fun of Christ's bride's dress on the wedding night without bothering to help fix it and just standing back and laughing in judgement. That is the analogy God gives for his church - his bride.

Granted there are a lot of strange churches in the US but there are also some legendary ones and many smaller, humble local town churches. By not actually going to any of them - it's almost fuelling that leftist generalisation that they are all full of kooks and backwards people. Maybe you are being too harsh on those believers who make themselves most vulnerable?

Juicebusters 11 points ago +12 / -1

That surprises me because the covenant and rainbow symbol might be one of the most commonly remembered biblical stories. Noah, the flood. It was something seen in artwork, those big biblical epic movies from Hollywood but more than anything I can vividly see it on every single Sunday School wall, door and children's book.

I would easily believe it's never shown anywhere every again and media, TV series and surely churches have all but erased it these days.

All the more reason to remind people, now more than ever before.

Frog_Anne 3 points ago +3 / -0

They even had the rainbow in the Noah's Ark story that was in Fantasia 2000. It featured Donald Duck, so obviously it was more Disney-cutesy than Biblical, but the music was Pomp and Circumstance, which is just a fantastic piece.

BloodElfSupporter 6 points ago +7 / -1

New Christian here. Are there specific phrases in the Bible that refers to the rainbow and it’s underlying symbolism? I’d definitely like to learn more about it as it hits home.

BoatingAccident 18 points ago +19 / -1

In the Bible's Genesis flood narrative, after creating a flood to wash away humanity's corruption, God put the rainbow in the sky as the sign of his promise that he would never again destroy the earth with flood (Genesis 9:13–17):[2]

I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.

Juicebusters 8 points ago +9 / -1

Someone pointed out an interesting thing many never really noticed but in an earlier part of Genesis it has an aside:

"But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground."

It seems like some irrelevant thing until you get to the idea of a rainbow being what might be a new sight, a new phenom in a new destroyed but now renewed ecology.

Not a big thing but just a curious thing that seems to square with the rainbow indicating a new weather system from then onward.

Vino 3 points ago +3 / -0

The earth was a totally different place before the flood. There was water surrounding the earth. Scientifically, this would have amazing impacts on the earth. For one, the sun's damaging rays would be filtered out. Kent Hovind has amazing videos on YouTube.

Vino 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you play wow classic?

Stanwyk74 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the sin of PRIDE. So obvious to me.

DogFacedPepeSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

What denomination is your father? Clearly someone is dropping the ball on Bible study there.

Major_the_Maga_Dog 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not surprising since gays have pre subverted and perverted the priesthood of the Catholic Church. These guys have been pedophiles for centuries.

Forgotmypass666 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lucifer isn't gay.

BloodElfSupporter 16 points ago +19 / -3

As someone who’s gay, I never understood and was never into rainbow flag. Now that the symbolism is clear I’ve become even more disgusted with the LGBT community. God is my lord and everything is secondary.

FreedomFan1975 0 points ago +8 / -8

:) It is so refreshing to hear you say that you are gay and have a relationship with God. Thank you - it's inspiring to me. We are all His children - God bless you!

deleted 12 points ago +14 / -2
FreedomFan1975 1 point ago +1 / -0

I owe you an apology. I shouldn't have said what I said to you and I'm sorry. I have a hard time understanding God's plan for gay people, to be honest. When I hear of one who has a relationship with God, even though their lifestyle is in contradiction with the Bible, I am happy about it because they are closer to redemption than someone who has no relationship with God whatsoever. There are also a lot of studies which have shown that people are indeed born with a desire for the same sex. I'm no scientist and I don't know how true that is, but the idea that God would make someone with those kind of urges and then say, "no, don't do that" I guess I have a hard time understanding why He'd want that for anyone. My husband and I have gay friends. They're good people. They'd give you the shirt off their backs and are ready and willing to help whenever they can. They're in a relationship and they genuinely love each other. I compare that to some hetero married couples who hate each other and are ruining their kids' lives, and I wonder which is really worse? So I guess I have to work a little harder at understanding the whole scheme of things in this regard. I sincerely apologize for lashing out at you and hope you will accept my apology.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
FreedomFan1975 0 points ago +6 / -6

It's really not a matter of ignoring or condoning. There's a lot more to it than that, including the idea that we are supposed to hate the sin rather than the sinner. Don't forget about the passage that states "thou shalt not judge, lest ye be judged thyself." But hey, cast the first stone if you think you can. Are you perfect? Have you lived your whole life never having sinned even once?

Gaudrius 9 points ago +10 / -1

Those passages all have a context, and you’re not keeping them in it. Read the whole segment, Matthew 7:1-3:

“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?

You can’t just cut it off. What measure did Husky use? The Bible categorically rejects homosexuality as an abomination. Apply that measure to Husky - is he doing what he is judging others of doing?

How about a bit more of the section, verses 4-5:

“Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ and behold, the log is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.

Hypocrisy is the obvious concern and context of the command. If Husky isn’t engaging in gay behavior, then he’s not being a hypocrite, and this does not apply.

A text without a context is a pretext for a proof text, and this text is used out of context almost 100% of the time to make the very argument you just used to say that we should not correct sinful behavior, which is directly opposed to very clear biblical teaching on how we should encourage and reprove our brothers. If this fellow is engaging in a homosexual lifestyle, it’s time to repent. If he is not engaging that sin and is fleeing the temptation, then I commend him, and I want him to keep running his race well!

coffeeisbitter 10 points ago +10 / -0


So many Bible quotes get taken out of context and twisted to subvert Christianity into impotent cuckoldry.

BloodElfSupporter mentioned he is new to Christianity in a comment above, so it's important we make it clear that homosexuality is unequivocally wrong; and that is not to condemn him, rather, we say it with hope and prayer that he will find the strength to turn away from the sinful ways.

Frog_Anne 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is exactly right. We should not be ignoring, much less encouraging sin in our brothers, and we should not be ignoring our own sins. So many churches are busy preaching "don't judge, just accept everyone as-is" that they're not even preaching about the sins that are taking over their own flock. There's plenty of fornication and adultery beams that need to be taken out of heterosexual eyes as well.

FreedomFan1975 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't argue with that. Thanks for providing the verse I needed. I owe Husky an apology.

America1stAndOnly 9 points ago +9 / -0

The rainbow is also typically represented by 7 colors while their rainbow flag only uses 6. Also not a coincidence.

Quixotic 7 points ago +7 / -0

God gave us the rainbow as a sign of his promise that he would never flood the earth again to punish it for its wickedness.

Homosexuals: “Ah-ah-ah! You promised!”

God: “Yes, it says here I would not FLOOD the earth.”

Angel of Death: “You called?”

MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +5 / -1

the hail was busy?

TexasPiper 63 points ago +66 / -3

He only said He wouldn’t flood the Earth again.

Armageddon will still come to punish the heathens.

MAGAllDayLong 44 points ago +47 / -3

Correct. He will destroy the Earth with fire. Kind of fitting...

Pepbrandt 19 points ago +20 / -1

So the promise really is that when the fire comes, there won't be a flood to put it out. And who says God doesn't have a sense of humor? He's a galactic comedian!

Taqiyya_Mockingbird 5 points ago +6 / -1

He and I definitely find the same things funny.

Aoikaze2000 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well... better get the marshmallows then....

Vox_Dobad -22 points ago +16 / -38

This idea of God makes him sound like a vain dickhead, honestly.

"Worship me in this specific way, love me, bow to me, and you escape hellfire. I'll pull you out when the world goes to shit."

"Good person? Lived a moral life? Tried his best? Oh....wait....you didn't 'take my son into your heart'? Sorry. You burn."

I mean...I get the lessons in the Bible. And there are many, many legitimate lessons in it that we should all learn from.

But when it comes right down to it, if I (who was created in His image, supposedly) cannot honestly believe in the manner he demands, I'm screwed?

Doesn't compute.

cnn_can_dox_my_balls [S] 34 points ago +36 / -2

With all due respect, this sounds like someone who has spent very little time learning the Christian faith. I do not mean that as an insult but rather as an invitation.

The message of Christianity is sacrifice, acknowledgment of imperfection, and submission to greater purpose. Man alone cannot overcome his inherent selfishness and self-deceit through deeds, thoughts, or words. Only through faith in Christ do we find a solution and salvation.

Grace is a gift, not a reward. That is the great news. Of course, you can reject it if you wish, and pursue meaning in your own private way. But if you want to reject the Christian faith, take some time to understand it as Christians do.

Vox_Dobad -5 points ago +9 / -14

I've spent enough time to know that my mind doesn't work the way Christianity tells me it should.

I appreciate Christianity and its teachings. I admire people who have absolute faith, it seems to give them strength and a very solid moral compass. I have relatives who absolutely thrive because of their faith.

What I don't appreciate is that, apparently, me questioning Christian doctrine and not having that faith is grounds to condemn me to hell for all eternity. I just don't buy it.

deleted 16 points ago +19 / -3
DomTullipso 5 points ago +5 / -0

That would be won't "No one comes to the Father except through Me". "Honestly seeing God" doesn't atone for sin. Only the blood of Christ does

krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are only two things you must do, believe in Christ and forgive. That’s all that is asked of us.

Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +5 / -4

Why should anyone (yes, anyone) be damned for eternity for what they did or didn't do in a lifetime of 75-odd years?

This is the crux of my issue. Isn't redemption a pillar of Christianity? Why should anyone be condemned to eternal torture, regardless of what they did in this life?

And no, being a good person isn't "kindergarten level shit". It's a lifestyle. And if that isn't enough for God Almighty, then I want nothing to do with him.

But I just so happen to believe that it isn't true.

Antisocialdilemma 9 points ago +10 / -1

You don't believe because you love darkness. We all did at one point. God will not be impressed with your righteousness no matter how loudly or angrily you proclaim it. He gave his only son to die for you and you throw it in his face. The door is open to you. The other path is open as well. You are already on it and it is the easier path by far. That's why most choose it. They love darkness more than light.

America1stAndOnly 8 points ago +8 / -0

And if that isn't enough for God Almighty, then I want nothing to do with him.

This is the crux of it right here. God is not damning you to hell. You are choosing to go there.

Staki 5 points ago +6 / -1

There are a few important things to understand. What is hell in the first place? Hell is the place prepared to punish Satan and the fallen angels who followed him. Hell is also where God isn't. The most apt way to view Hell is complete separation from God. Throughout the bible it is expounded upon that God is love, God is healing, God is peace, and more. These attributes require God to be present. Without God, hell, you have none of these traits. Hell is a place devoid of any presence of God. The punishment of Hell is simply the exact opposite of what it means to be with God.

The reason an unsaved person goes to hell is because, regardless of how moralistic someone looks, if they have sinned and not chosen Jesus they have rejected God. If people refuse to stop sinning, and sinning is rebellion against God, why would God force them into heaven? It is clear from their actions they do not want to be with God. As a result he sends them away from him.

Salvation by Grace is not done by works. Good works do not remove sin. Sin requires an eternal punishment, thus eternal damnation. Every person on Earth sins because we are born with a cursed flesh that loves to sin. If a person who has never sinned and is eternal comes along he can die in our place, in effect he has paid our punishment on himself. That is what Jesus did. That is why you need to believe on Jesus to escape the condemnation of hell which sits on us all.

People dont go to hell because you didn't believe in Jesus. They go to hell because they sinned which is a desire to separate themselves from God. Jesus provided a bridge back to be reconciled with God again.

CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +5 / -4

The truth is that you are correct. The best way to live is to be culturally Christian (for its benevolent teachings), but listen to your personal logic and conscience and do things the way you think makes all well, else you'd live in dissonance. If something is telling you that there is something very wrong with this dogma that persons of authority are telling you to never question, then it's probably worth listening to that voice.

And the rainbow is neither a gay symbol nor God's covenant. It's light fracturing in water droplets according to the laws of physics. Are you telling me that before the "flood" there were a different set of laws regarding refraction? For all the "facts and logic" aspect of the Christian Right, they believe in some deeply asinine canon.

They question the mainstream narratives and scientific consensus despite many figures of authority asserting them (and they question in rightly so!), yet they believe in literally impossible and supernatural events because of nothing but a bunch of scrolls from ages ago. Where's the same healthy skepticism that you apply to fake news CNN when it comes to Muh Bayble? These people are just like the Left, who ridicule religion, yet lap up Fredo Cuomo's subversion. Is it so hard to call out both flavors of bullshit as bullshit?

FreedomFan1975 1 point ago +2 / -1

You haven't found the right church (just my opinion, of course). You should be able to question it all you need to until your understanding is firm on the matter. I'm hoping you will keep looking - as you stated, you personally know people for whom Christianity gives strength and a very solid moral compass; they thrive because of their faith. Obviously typing/reading doesn't allow for tone or inflection, but the way you write that seems like it's something you might not mind having for yourself too. I can tell you that my faith hasn't always been as strong as it should be, but you can always get to that point if the conditions are right. And finding the right church makes a huge difference. If you have questions, and someone tells you asking those questions isn't allowed or will somehow condemn you to hell for simply asking, then no wonder you're discouraged! I can seriously picture the pastor at my church taking any and all questions you have and asking if you have anymore when you're done. I'm lucky though; I found an awesome church. I'm uplifted after a service there. That's how you should feel. I wish you the best and hope you find your answers.

OnlyCaleb 7 points ago +9 / -2

Questioning Christian doctrine doesn't condemn you to hell for all eternity. Rejection of the savior, the center of Christianity, does. And we don't go to hell because we didn't believe, we go to hell for our sins, and if we don't turn to the only doctor with the cure for the spiritual cancer we have (Jesus' death for our sins) then it's us who is to blame.

The world was condemned ever since Adam rebelled. Jesus came to save the world, not condemn it. Anyone who rejects Jesus experiences the fate natural to our fallen species, or in other words, we just get what was already coming to us. Jesus is the cure, not the means of our condemnation. Our sin was that to us.

But to the point about questioning Christian doctrine; many Christians struggle with and question certain Christian doctrines. Myself and many other Christians hold God's word to be absolutely authoritative meaning it is 100% true, but we still struggle with how to interpret certain things because we're dealing with an infinite God and every human has an incredibly small mind in comparison.

And also even just believing at all can be a long process before you have faith. C.S Lewis who was a former atheist called himself the world's most reluctant convert. I wouldn't ever say I was a full on atheist, but I was having huge doubts and my faith wavered a lot during my teens through mid 20s. There were points where I wasn't believing Christianity and the Bible, and it took a long time to get to the point in faith that I'm at now, where I see through faith the unseen, and the Bible's account I see it as absolutely true. But I still struggle with trusting God often times and obeying Him. And while I 100% believe He exists now, my lack of faith comes in to play when it comes to the practical nitty gritty of life. The struggle comes in trusting Him in all circumstances.

But back to being condemned for not having faith. A couple things.

  1. The Bible is clear that the reason we don't believe is because of our hardness of heart. Because all of creation declares the glory of God. Through all that's seen in nature, the attributes of God are known and so we all are accountable to that information before us every day and have no excuse. It's not lack of evidence that we don't believe, but lack of desire to submit to God and humble ourselves before Him. This isn't meant to discourage you, as we're all in this position before salvation, so being there now doesn't mean you can't be saved, otherwise none of us would be. It's just a call to seek Him without delay since we're not guaranteed tomorrow.

  2. Jesus says if you even have the faith the size of a mustard seed, you could tell a mountain to move and it will move. That tells me that humanity does not have very strong faith and that the most faithful of us still have woefully less faith than we realize. It's not the amount of faith we have that saves, it's where we put the faith that we do have. Are you putting it in yourself, or in Christ? That's the question. Faith can grow, but only when it's connected to the vine, when the source is right, aka Jesus. A person who naturally possesses little faith but places that faith in Christ is saved, and a person who naturally possesses a lot of faith, but places it in themselves or other false places (such as government) is not saved. So yeah, it's where it's placed, not how much.

  3. Speaking earlier of seeking Him, the Bible says "You will seek Me and find Me, when you seek Me with all your heart." So I'd implore you to earnestly pray to find Him and to earnestly seek Him. He desires you to be with Him. He doesn't want anyone to go to hell. It's not like He's delighting in sending people to hell. Hell is unavoidable since He is a righteous judge that must punish evil, but He didn't want us to be separated from Him and He made a way that we could be reconciled to Him, by sending His Son to die on our behalf, a perfect atoning sacrifice. He lived perfectly and His perfect life covered our many, many sins when He died for us and was raised.

Vino 1 point ago +1 / -0

Question the doctrine all you want, that won't condemn you. Not acknowledging the sacrifice will. Roman crucifixion was one of the worst ways to die imaginable. God loved us so much he allowed himself to be publicly humiliated and tortured to pay for all of our sins.

RedPilledPreacher 16 points ago +20 / -4

Short answer: yes.

There's a bit more to it than that if you're interested.

Ultimately, he is your God and your King. He decides what's good and what is right. It is our place to humble ourselves to His will, especially when it conflicts with our own personal sense of morality.

EdgeGuy 13 points ago +14 / -1

The flood story is a lot deeper. The short answer is God was more than justified. Much like today. Look around. It's going to get worse. At what point do you say enough? At what point do you save all who should be saved and wipe out the rest? IDK the point but we obviously haven't hit it yet.

Imransgarage 8 points ago +10 / -2

I'm sure you'd be a great ruler of your universe.

WhyIsThisSOHard 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand how we are supposed to be ok with God killing his son??? I never asked you to do that! That was the ONLY way to give us salvation? You're GOD, you can do anything!

Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point was that Jesus allowed himself to be persecuted and crucified because he refused to renounce God. It's a good lesson. Stand on principle, and don't allow fallible men to compromise those principles, even unto death.

There are many precepts of Christianity that I wholeheartedly embrace. But one that I simply cannot believe in is "Do this, or you suffer forever." It runs counter to the entire idea of redemption.

Gaudrius 1 point ago +1 / -0

God gives ample opportunity. He is long suffering, as in he suffers their rejection and injustice far beyond what should be just. He shows great mercy and kindness. Read Romans 1. Seriously - read it. Everyone knows that God exists, but instead of giving thanks they spit in his face. He still shows mercy. At the end of the day, every single sin is punished. Either Jesus takes the punishment for your sin and you receive his righteousness, becoming a child of God, or you suffer the punishment for your own sin. The wages of sin is death. This is why Jesus had to die. EVERY SIN IS PUNISHED. God is just, but he is also deeply merciful in revealing himself to all men and paying the punishment himself on our behalf. Romans 5:8 - “ But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” The standard isn’t “good life”, it’s the perfect life of Jesus, which he offered to anyone that would believe. A good life can never be good enough. Once the debt of sin is incurred, you can never undo the wrong. The only way is for someone else, someone without a debt, to pay the debt on your behalf.

MikesBigJockstrap 17 points ago +19 / -2

Sodom and Gomorrah

Brooklyn_Patriot_76 4 points ago +5 / -1

Those were just two cities, we have a much bigger problem on our hands now frens...

AutisticSchizo 5 points ago +7 / -2

We're talking Weimar Republic levels here, if not worse...

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
FoTeeFy 1 point ago +1 / -0

He only said He wouldn’t flood the Earth again.

someone should tell the pedo-enabler at the vatican.

deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
big_tuna_14 44 points ago +46 / -2

Steal a positive symbol and bastardize it's meaning, classic leftist technique just like the swastika

IroWide 20 points ago +20 / -0

I believe this is my time to let everyone know that God's rainbow has seven colors, while the homosexual flag has six. Six has always been the number of man, so it's funny how that happened.

basedvirginian 8 points ago +8 / -0

What’s the OG meaning of the swastika anyway? I’ve heard various answers so I’m genuinely curious

big_tuna_14 17 points ago +17 / -0

In the western world it used to be a symbol of good luck. In Hinduism and Buddhism it was a religious symbol for their gods

Creepy_Ginger 11 points ago +11 / -0

Which is why Japanese people will have Nazi Parades and such.

Its not so bad to them, in reality. It never meant what it was changed to, thanks liberals.

AmannamedRJ 7 points ago +7 / -0

Speaking of Japan they have to remove it from their maps this year. The manji and reverse manji (swastika) is the sign if buddhist temples.

Retard westerners who go to japan for the olympics are probably gonna complain so they decided to remove them. It's temporary because of the Olympics but it's a microcosm Mass and sudden immigration. People who don't know your culture and customs or traditions people who don't care and just want to be offended and Destroy things. Honestly, it's very enlightening.

NoCoupForYou 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sun Wheel, the rays of the sun.

MasklessMarvel -5 points ago +4 / -9


it's an atmospheric phenomenon

TakenusernameA 5 points ago +7 / -2

The Swastika is an atmospheric phenomenon?

novanleon 8 points ago +8 / -0

If you throw it far enough, I guess.

Isolated_Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

The secret Sonic Boomerang project. Would have turned the tide of the war if they had ever figured out how to catch it.

TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine if the Nazis just launched a giant Swastika into the moon.

Pinochet_Was_Right -7 points ago +6 / -13

Bible Thumpers are out in force today...

Isolated_Patriot 10 points ago +13 / -3

If only. Country might actually stand a chance if there were enough of them.

MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +3 / -2

and they don't get the damage they do

Winner2020 16 points ago +17 / -1

We need to take this back somehow. The way it is being used today is pure sacrilege.

Athena86 15 points ago +16 / -1

It’s not that hard. Get a rainbow flag and put the words A SYMBOL OF GOD’S COVENANT TO BELIEVERS on it. Get thousands of people to carry the flag, make stickers, etc. Reclaim it as Christian.

Isolated_Patriot 10 points ago +11 / -1

Some tips:

  • The sinners use a Six color flag.
  • The sinner flag is straight lines.
  • The sinner flag has no other Christian symbiology on it.

If there were enough people actually interested in fighting this war, we'd declare June "Humility Month" and change our profiles to an actual rainbow and post Bible verses about the penalties of degeneracy and the need for forgiveness of sins all month long.

JoePCool14 1 point ago +1 / -0

June is actually the month dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. We should just go with that!

GuerillaYourDreams 6 points ago +7 / -1


Winner2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice! I'm going to dedicate an hour of prayer to all the downvoters in this thread.

Pepbrandt 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's getting its own post. I'm on it.

sander9702 15 points ago +16 / -1

"PRIDE" movement, it's in the name.

10gauge 12 points ago +14 / -2

Proving a bullseye for God's wrath.

MasklessMarvel -13 points ago +7 / -20

Bad news

The Apostle Paul was gay

GuerillaYourDreams 15 points ago +16 / -1

Where do you psychos get this crap???

Isolated_Patriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

Propaganda R Us, has a clearance sale every year around this time. Always some knew BS being thrown around.

off_teh_copium -2 points ago +3 / -5

Jesus didn't marry and hung around with 12 sailors, I'm calling sus.

MasklessMarvel -3 points ago +3 / -6

the Bible

TakenusernameA 5 points ago +6 / -1

Or he just didnt feel like having a family because he thought the world was going to end in a year, like most Christians of his time.

Drewski1138 5 points ago +6 / -1

*citation needed

Imransgarage 10 points ago +11 / -1

Netflix prob.

MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

The Bible

start with "thorn in my side"

Drewski1138 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol sure, you can read anything you want into Paul’s thorn in the flesh as referenced in 2 Corinthians, because it’s never explicitly stated what it was. To so adamantly state that it was him being gay is just as gross mishandling of scripture as it would be for me to definitively say that it was a problem with his eyes (maybe as a long-term result of the Damascus road incident).

The only difference there is I would have the actual words of Scripture backing me up and you would just have...reading between the lines to soothe your own conscience about homosexuality. See...Paul did write a bit on the subject: Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 6:11, etc. He was pretty clear that the gay lifestyle is the end result of completely rejecting God as Creator and Savior, but the Holy Spirit has the power to redeem anyone from it.

MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

you can read anything you want into Paul’s thorn in the flesh as referenced in 2 Corinthians

just like xians read the whole bible

"Therefore, in order to keep me from becoming conceited, I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me"

there are historical references too but xians don't believe in history

A thorn in his flesh

I still love how the bible says that Paul tortured and murdered xians and xians be like "Oh, that's cool"

But say he was gay and EVERYONE LOSES HIS MIND

Drewski1138 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bro. Christian here (and I just love how you recoil at the name of Christ so bad you can't even write it lol) and I read through the Bible an average of twice a year. Not sure what you're implying with that first statement but whatever. Thanks for quoting the portion of scripture from 2 Corinthians that I mentioned anyways.

It's literally mentioned as a thorn in the flesh, an infirmity or physical weakness. You repeatedly quoting the one verse and making wild, baseless claims about it is getting you nowhere. I said I could make a stronger case for it being an eye problem from the actual words of Scripture so here goes:

Galatians 4:15 "Where is then the blessedness ye spake of? For I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and have given them to me."

Why would they pluck out their own eyes for him unless he had a debilitating issue that was causing him grief on a daily basis? In fact, going back to his conversion experience, he was blinded on the road to Damascus, so much so that it caused a thick buildup over his eyes that fell off days later. God could have healed him of that at any time, yet He kept that issue there.

Galatians 6:11 "Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand." -Galatians by word count is one of his smaller epistles that he wrote, so why apologize for it being a large letter? He wrote this one with his own hand, whereas many others he dictated to a companion who wrote for him. This is yet more evidence that strongly suggests he had to write with large letters just to be able to see what he wrote.

I could go on. I mean...the guy lists that he was stoned and left for dead, whipped, beaten, shipwrecked....he was probably a walking medical textbook. It's no wonder that he had to have a doctor accompany him on his later journeys.

Yes, Paul murdered people. Yes he tortured Christians. Yes, he was a persecutor of the church, but he was forgiven and redeemed, and he became the most effective missionary of the 1st Century. That is the power of the Gospel, the power of Christ to redeem the vilest sinner and change their heart completely. I hope and pray that you can see that power for yourself some day.

MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

Bro. Christian here

not an xian. if you practiced the actual religion instead of what self serving preachers pound into your head, I might be

(and I just love how you recoil at the name of Christ so bad you can't even write it lol)

LOL! Yeah I recoil

Iesous Xristos Theou Yios Sotare

You repeatedly quoting the one verse and making wild, baseless claims about it is getting you nowhere

more ignorance of true biblical history

Yeah I have heard all of the moral imaginings about the thorn in his side. Epilepsy is a fave

I said I could make a stronger case for it being an eye problem from the actual words of Scripture so here goes:

I can make a stronger one

Acts 9

17 Then Ananias went to the house and entered it. Placing his hands on Saul, he said, "Brother Saul, the Lord--Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here--has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit."

he was blinded on the road to Damascus, so much so that it caused a thick buildup over his eyes that fell off days later. God could have healed him of that at any time, yet He kept that issue there.


18 Immediately, something like scales fell from Saul's eyes, and he could see again. He got up and was baptized

So much for the eye thing

More verses

2 Cor 12

Therefore, so that I would not become arrogant, a thorn in the flesh was given to me, a messenger of Satan to trouble me—so that I would not become arrogant. 8 I asked the Lord three times about this, that it would depart from me. 9 But he said to me, “My grace is enough[k] for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” So then, I will boast most gladly about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may reside in me.

I mean...the guy lists that he was stoned and left for dead, whipped, beaten, shipwrecked....he was probably a walking medical textbook.

he lists the weakness separately from the persecution

10 Therefore I am content with weaknesses, with insults, with troubles, with persecutions and difficulties for the sake of Christ, for whenever I am weak, then I am strong.

So his weakness was in his flesh (body)

It was a messenger of Satan- which means it tempted him to use his body to sin

In fact there are several places where he talks about the war raging inside himself fighting against the temptation.

So God sent Satan to tempt Paul with something he could do with his body. He called it a weakness. fought it and said it humiliated him.

Yes, Paul murdered people. Yes he tortured Christians.

Hmmm, why would he hate xians so much?

He mentioned that he received insults and was humiliated. Maybe that's it

Sorry pal but this does not add up to anything but the fact that Paul was gay

If it makes you feel better, God helped Paul resist so he was celibate

You xians need to read your whole book straight through (you can skip the begats) and get the whole story

Instead of listening to some preacher pick and choose verses here and there to back up scaring people into being xians (and paying tithes)

Oh and read some history as well

Paul is nothing. Xians' wack view of Jesus goes way beyond that

Pepbrandt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll counter that with Brian Stelter is gay.

MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

i don't think xians care about Brian Stelter

actually no one cares about Brian Stelter

sordfysh 1 point ago +3 / -2

More importantly, Paul killed a lot of Christians.

MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

he crucified some of them upside down

sordfysh 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. Still redeemed tho.

It's like anyone can be saved. Who is this Jesus where he redeems even the most horrific of sinners?

TakenusernameA 1 point ago +2 / -1

There is a long list of Christians who killed a lot of Christians before converting.

sordfysh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. And they were redeemed by Christ.

The people who say Paul was gay as a way to discredit him are speaking with serpent tongues. The devil accuses people with false accusations to discredit them and to discourage them.

intolerant_patriot 11 points ago +12 / -1

The real rainbow has seven colors.... Some say to represent the seven Noahide laws that were established after the flood. I wonder which law the gay flag left out?

Darkheartisland 8 points ago +9 / -1

Butt sex? Oh, that's nasty.

lash 7 points ago +8 / -1

The real rainbow is seven colors, obviously they hate that so they cut it down to their symbolic number (6) in ther fag-flag

try4gain 7 points ago +9 / -2

MAGA movement was never anti-gay

MAGA movement is anti-woke

  • There are LGBT people who are not woke

  • There are LGBT people who vote for Trump

  • There are LGBT people who are outspoke for Trump and MAGA

RiverFenix 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are LGBT people who are responsible for dealing with the LGBT and what have they done/where have they been so far? It's out of fucking control.

If you're LGBT and not actively fighting the LGBT then you're part of the problem. Why not be American instead of identifying with bum sex allies pushing marxism and pedophilia

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
RiverFenix 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah, I think we can at this point. No more time left for fence sitters

TangoMike 3 points ago +3 / -0

Strong families are what make great communities and nations. Gay culture is an attack on that essential foundation--one created by God Himself.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
MixedBlacknWhite 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can do without the T people. I mean, they are mentally imbalanced and most of them are going to end up regretting their phony decisions, and/or offing themselves after they realize that pretending to be the other gender isn't the fix for their failures. We should be talking to those people to help them not make a piss poor decision.

bobobob 1 point ago +1 / -0

It should be against the LGBT political group along with all of the other groups that the Democrats have set up. We should always be advocating for the rights of the individual over the collective.

TakenusernameA 1 point ago +2 / -1

If they truly want America great again, they all need to get back in the closet.

Leatherwood 7 points ago +8 / -1

Kinda like waving a red flag under the nose of the bull, and then stupidly standing there to see if he reacts.

sir_rockness 7 points ago +8 / -1

next time is fire

FutileConundrum 7 points ago +8 / -1

12 And God said: “This is the sign of the covenant which I make between Me and you, and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: 13 I set My rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be for the sign of the covenant between Me and the earth. 14 It shall be, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the rainbow shall be seen in the cloud; 15 and I will remember My covenant which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh. 16 The rainbow shall be in the cloud, and I will look on it to remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is on the earth.” 17 And God said to Noah, “This is the sign of the covenant which I have established between Me and all flesh that is on the earth.”

Genesis 9:12-17

God's pretty clear that the rainbow is His promise not mankinds prideful perversion.

ivana-humpalot 7 points ago +8 / -1

As long as I live I will never comprehend how Robin Williams kitch suspenders became anyone’s idea of cool

PowTimesTwo 6 points ago +7 / -1

The first time the word "bow" is in the Bible it's describing God's covenant with man not to judge the world with a flood again. The last time the word "bow" appears, it's the antichrist coming to make a covenant with man, uniting the world and preparing it for final judgment with fire.

ColonelHughes 6 points ago +7 / -1

I have been thinking about selling rainbow flags with the verse written in just to fuck with folks tbh

NoMoRedditYo 8 points ago +9 / -1

Do it. The Creation Museum in Kentucky has been selling shirts for a long time. https://answersingenesis.org/store/product/taking-back-rainbow-t-shirt/?sku=28-3-AMB

cnn_can_dox_my_balls [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

Mahalia Jackson says it best: God Put A Rainbow In The Sky


deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
cnn_can_dox_my_balls [S] 7 points ago +8 / -1

Mahalia was based AF. Granddaughter of slaves. Self-taught singer. Never sold out. Never did pop. Fought for civil rights when there was actual discrimination. Never became bitter. Sang the national anthem at JFK’s inaugural ball.

ghost_of_aswartz 3 points ago +4 / -1

Rainbow is a symbol of disunity....the colors may be there together, but they are all separate. Separate but equal. Standing "apart"

WHITE is the color of unity, if you truly believe in science. White light is all the colors combined. But so is BLACK. Either one is a symbol of unity. Black is all the colors of paint combined. White is all the colors of LIGHT combined. GREY could be a symbol of unity also, because it's black and white combined, so its a neutral version of unity

Color is racist

Absence of color is unity


Juicebusters 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yes this annoys them but I have long since made similar memes and info-graphics because I don't believe there is any coincidence. Add to this: the rainbow was nearly synonymous with children's Sunday school books, movies and walls.

It's even more vile when you see the original ideas of various colors representing various vile degrading sexual depravity including one is actual sado-masochism, representing the human slave rape people.

Even crazier, an entire culture so hypnotized and brainwashed they accepted that, somehow, this specific Marxist political org of gays was 'THE Gays'. As if that makes any sense.

ghost_of_aswartz 3 points ago +4 / -1

The gay rainbow is a racist cultural appropriation of Nordic mythological bitfrost


Gays are literal anti-Thor bigots

ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Asgard becomes ASS-guard. But not like guarding ass but more like 'right and left' guard in football, crouched on all fours and ready like 'were comin for that ass' comma guard.

Yes I'm also saying american football is gay

Pepbrandt 3 points ago +4 / -1

I remember when this happened and how pissed everyone in the Christian community was. At least that's how it was where I grew up. Of course even back then there were all the usual excuse makers, telling us why the slippery slope was a fallacy. Making empty promises that the gay community wasn't "stealing" the rainbow. And on an on. I hope the younger generation is waking up.

OneBigMaga 3 points ago +8 / -5

Just a reminder that most libertarians voted for gays to have special rights which have been used to destroy this country.

novanleon 7 points ago +8 / -1

Most of the country was still opposed to gay marriage in 2015 when the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling was made, as a significant number of states were passing laws to guard against gay marriage.

As usual, it's the federal government (and specifically the supreme court) overriding the democratic process and state's rights to inflict it's perverse judgements on the rest of the country. They did the same thing with the Jim Crow laws a hundred years ago and they did it with Roe v. Wade in the 70's.

NoCoupForYou 6 points ago +7 / -1

Libertarians don't understand nature abhors a vaccuum.

The replacement to "Annoying born agains pesting me and labelling my Aerosmith Album" wasn't "Everybody minds their own business", it was "Learn my pronouns bigot, and your kids will be going to the mandatory Buttsex 'education' course for 10 year olds run by Drag Queens"

Isolated_Patriot 4 points ago +5 / -1

Any functioning society requires a social order, and a social order requires making a pariah of anything alien to that order. You can't just 'dismantle' a social order and expect everything to get better.

Pro-tip for the lolberterians: Check the most prominent names and organizations who were pushing the so called "puritanical" moral panic and then check what those names and organizations are doing today. You got played.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
RiverFenix 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the way.

"Nice Jesus Flag, Man!"

DefKon1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but the Fag Flag has 6 stripes and God's Bow has 7...Fag Flag is a Deception. Of course!...🐸🇺🇲

Mr_MysteryCake 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not God's rainbow though. God's rainbow has 7 colors. The homosexual rainbow has the number of man for its colors: 6

DefKon1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Came here to say that, good job Pede! 🎶Gotta' keep'em seperated!🎶...🐸🇺🇲

GuerillaYourDreams 2 points ago +3 / -1

This was the communist movement’s idea in the first place.

Slugbert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Humanity needs a hard reset. Then those that cry oppression will truly learn the meaning of the word as each day will be a struggle to survive. No time to be confused about which gender you are when your life is constantly on the line.

boomerbutnotOKBoomer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good comment. Love it

Ogcarvattack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats why i bought a rainbow maga hat.

Seamonkey2010 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been engaging people online, saying that i respect their faith and love for god's conenant when they post a rainbow flag. the rage is really fun lol

jsphere256 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the inverted rainbow for a reason.

Itateeverybody 2 points ago +4 / -2

AIDs was their punishment. Now we await a treatment resistant version.

off_teh_copium 2 points ago +2 / -0

so circle jerking is fine right, asking for... a different group.

anon291 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean... in some sense it's a testing of God. God promised never to again destroy humanity. However, they're attempting to tempt him to do so. But he won't. The christians cower waiting for Christ to strike down Sodom. When he doesn't we get upset and question where God is. But God told us he wouldn't do this anymore.

They're trying God. This is how you know they're from Satan.

cnn_can_dox_my_balls [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes, And prudent in their own sight!

Isaiah 5:20

How much of this do we see everywhere? This inversion of good and evil, and the absolute certainty of the people who call it virtue?

BigFreedomBoner 2 points ago +2 / -0

there is light; there is darkness.

they employ color to contrive shades of gray.

TangoMike 2 points ago +2 / -0

Surely, God is more patient and gracious than I would be.

CoffeeNComplicated 2 points ago +2 / -0

The LGBT flag rainbow have only 6 colors. The actual Rainbow has 7 colors. Often, what do the number 6 and 7 symbolize in the Bible? Coincidence? I think not.

AmericanJawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the end, God still won.

Neonlightdistrict 2 points ago +3 / -1

It looks ugly as a flag.

Gays ruin everything.

TakenusernameA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because their flag isnt actually a rainbow. Its six separate colors in a line.

Neonlightdistrict 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh youre right. I always wondered why it looked like shit.

You nailed it.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
lul_cheto 2 points ago +2 / -0

its only a promise not to flood... meteor is still open game

p1ll 1 point ago +2 / -1

ouch! totally on point. they took muh rainbow!

fistful-of-hollers 1 point ago +1 / -0

what? can someone explain this?

JoseyMontana 2 points ago +2 / -0

After the Great Flood God caused the rainbow to appear in the sky, telling Noah it was the everlasting symbol of his promise (covenant) never again to destroy the world by flood. You see, it rained forty days and forty nights; rainbows only shine when the rain has stopped.

The homos appropriated it in the 1960s, most likely, but my awareness of its misuse came in the late 1980s when they started blabbering about Jesse Jackson's "Rainbow Coalition" soon to be latched onto by the homos.

off_teh_copium 1 point ago +1 / -0

big man had 10 commandants.

“I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me.” “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.” “Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day.”

Solid rules for starting a franchise there, we are head office, don't talk shit about us, you get one day off a week and thank head office for the day off.

“Honor thy father and mother.” “Thou shalt not kill.” “Thou shalt not steal.” “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”

solid bit of civilizational building there by the big man. can't fault him.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife.” “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s goods.”

well Lord got to pull you on thiese two, if I agree to the previous commandments, not to steal or adulterise, then you kind of wasted 2 commandments, I can covert all day, so long as I don't steal what's the problem? I like my neighbours motor, I want it [covert it]. well I could provide a cash offer. like wise "neighbor’s wife" she has has free will, isn't it up to her?

2 commandments wasted big man, If you said "thou shall not bugger children" I could get along with that, like wise the "gays" thing, nothing solid from you on that, for the really important stuff the decree has to come from head office, don't leave it to the franchisees, seems like a dereliction of duty.

Spezcuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

God keeps threatening to burn down California. Looks like he is keeping his promise.

JoseyMontana 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for calling us by our true name, Mankind or, "The Children of Men."

HiddenDekuScrub 1 point ago +2 / -1

In ancient mesoamerican religions it was a symbol of love between a husband and wife.

Doesn't make it feel any better, does it?

therighteousdontfear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love between a husband and a wife is a symbol of love between Christ and his church.

cook_does 1 point ago +2 / -1

They should have taken pillars of salt.

paramour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lightning bolts. Incoming.

SomeBloodyMinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate LGBT for fucking up the legacy of the rainbow. It’ll forever be burned in history as pro-degeneracy and leftist propaganda now. So fucking pissed off about that shit.

Beenz 1 point ago +1 / -0


Greg_the_Grim_Doctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

That covenant sounds pretty gay. We should "straighten" it out.

GaTechGrad 1 point ago +1 / -0

ROY G BIV is sexist because Roy is a guy's name.