Comments (15)
sorted by:
DeusVultIntensifies 16 points ago +16 / -0

I thought maybe this was a story in which he was found guilty of a lesser crime. But no. He shot an unarmed man 8 times because he wanted his truck and the jury let him walk away without any consequences. Now he is free to murder again.

MySidesGoUp 9 points ago +9 / -0

<Despite Dunham’s confession to the slaying and 19 witnesses taking the stand against him, a jury decided to find him ‘not guilty’ because of ‘racism.’

Yes, really.

According to Dunham’s lawyer, an armed Dunham “wanted a ride” from Stevens and approached him while he was sitting in his Ford F-150 in a parking lot “but felt threatened” when he saw him “reach for something” so he decided to unload all 8 rounds of his 9 mm handgun into Stevens before running away.>

MySidesGoUp 10 points ago +10 / -0

The jury and judge should be charged. Accessory to murder and hang the defense attorney.

The article can’t help but try to justify dindu. Of course there was ‘raycism’ involved. The scumbag wasn’t happy with ‘no’ and did what he was gonna do.

There’s no justice- there’s just us.

CovfefeVideo 4 points ago +4 / -0

A jury of his peers?

JuanTitor 4 points ago +4 / -0

Live by the sword die by the sword; he'll likely be gunned down within a few years. Would have been better for his soul if he was convicted, now he'll likely go on unrepentant until he dies violent death.

deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
mytummyhurts 11 points ago +11 / -0

I served on a jury about 10 years ago. Trust me, you'd rather be carried by 6.

If only you knew how bad things really are.

MakeAmericaVapeAgain 3 points ago +3 / -0

how bad was it?

RussianBlyat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey, as much as this is terrible, we should be happy that people are starting to understand how jury nullification works. That swings both ways, we should use it to our every advantage.

Hilareeeee 3 points ago +3 / -0


AsianAnalParty 3 points ago +3 / -0

And when his family sues him in a wrongful death suit this guy still won’t ultimately pay shit. They won’t get anything even resembling justice

Juzeza 3 points ago +3 / -0

Terrible precedence

snuggs316 3 points ago +3 / -0

doesn't the judge have the power to reverse a jury? never mind; can overturn if the facts/evidence don't support the guilty verdict, can't overturn an acquittal. jury nullification is now a tool. it was flexed during the oj trial, but i think it's going to become A Thing.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dead by dawn.