2316
TRUMP WAS RIGHT AGAIN (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Leatherwood ago by Leatherwood +2317 / -1
Comments (63)
sorted by:
82
weAreStillHere 82 points ago +83 / -1

It’s not even that Trump was right. All he was doing was saying, “Hey, let’s take a look at this stuff. There’s solid medical evidence that it might show some promise in treating covid.”

That’s it. That’s all he was doing. The lunatic left responded by outlawing it, destroying the careers of solid medical professionals, and ultimately killing a bunch of people who might have been saved by this treatment.

I consider these people to be dangerously criminally insane. No one is safe with these people amongst us. I’m effin serious. What they’ve done is so far beyond wrong it’s almost impossible to comprehend.

18
OrangeElvis 18 points ago +18 / -0

100% agree.

15
anon09 15 points ago +15 / -0

a ton of good doctors and nurses are now gone. same with the cops, and a ton of other fields. we are getting the worst of the worst in these positions now.

4
bclautz 4 points ago +4 / -0

All the left and deep state care about is POWER! Which I believe is the root of evil 1 Timothy 6:10

0
lordmastern 0 points ago +0 / -0

All by design.

9
Pres_Trump 9 points ago +9 / -0

Buht, buht muh white nationalist.

9
Seruna_Kanus 9 points ago +9 / -0

I feel some of the stronger evidence of this drug combo working against COVID came from Africa, where the drugs were in regular use.

8
residue69 8 points ago +8 / -0

Early on, back on Speddit, we were discussing how limited the spread was in malaria prone areas. Those discussions were soon memory holed and the media started trumpeting that it was out of control in Africa.

2
PhilFoden 2 points ago +2 / -0

But muh Gender blockers..

7
202700000000 7 points ago +7 / -0

All Trump was doing was listening to the doctors that were on the front lines and came up with these solutions.

6
erefernow 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even though it is the top comment, t is still underrated.

23
Beer-_-Belly 23 points ago +23 / -0

Imagine if they were given this BEFORE they were on ventilators.

3
DogFacedPepeSoldier 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine if it was given as a prophylactic for at risk populations.

We might not have even had to lockdown and then how would they have stolen the election?

Dodged a bullet there comrades.

15
WeAreGonnaWin 15 points ago +15 / -0

Trump was right again.

Promises made, promises kept.

Be honest, try it, say it; Trump man good.

14
darkgwalchmei 14 points ago +14 / -0

And several Democrat governors deliberately banned it from being used. Just another day of Democrats literally getting away with murder

12
Mountainous 12 points ago +12 / -0

AntiTrumpers: at least there's no mean tweets. The globohomos did thier job.

3
bclautz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember they also believe that trump said mean things and they never do. They also don't think we are imperfect.

12
Seruna_Kanus 12 points ago +12 / -0

We used to joke that if Trump had a cure for cancer, they'd tell you to get cancer instead.

We used to joke...

9
SordidPontification 9 points ago +9 / -0

Some of us weren't joking...

11
4moreyears 11 points ago +11 / -0

All the "trust the science!" people ignore the fact that they sandbagged the HCQ trials by giving near-lethal doses, not using Z-pack + Zinc, and giving the control group Vitamin C. Then they changed the parameters of the study for Remdesivir half way through when they realized it didn't do shit, from counting how many people got better, to just how quickly the ones who did better, and ignoring the ones who didn't improve. Why? Because HCQ is basically free and Remdesivir is $3,000/dose, for a failed drug they just had sitting around and couldn't sell because it doesn't do anything.

10
ShittersFull 10 points ago +10 / -0

The brain dead idiot sheep don't care. They're masked for life now. Faggots.

10
catvideos3 10 points ago +10 / -0

Didn’t we learn it was the ventilators killing people?

9
ProudWhiteMan 9 points ago +9 / -0

Switzerland was using Hydroxychloroquine then in june they stopped after U.S. media started* hammering it and 2 weeks later they had a spike in covid deaths, after that spike they resumed and it brought the death rate back down.

5
SordidPontification 5 points ago +5 / -0

Gee. Almost like politically-charged treatment regimens leads to death.

4
DebbieinDallas 4 points ago +4 / -0

I saw that chart too last summer!!!!

8
Dialectic 8 points ago +8 / -0

Probably has absolutely nothing to do with ventilation lmao. It’s literally impossible for articles to be written without propaganda

7
monkadelic 7 points ago +7 / -0

One day covid will just disappear. Seeing it already.

4
DebbieinDallas 4 points ago +4 / -0

When it s no longer politically needs by the commie dems

3
RiverFenix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Faster than you can say Pussy Hat Russian Collusion

4
jshelton5 4 points ago +4 / -0

What if i told you that the establishment sacrificed half a million or more americans, and potentially millions more in the medical profession, on the gamble that it would oust donald trump from the presidency?

if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....it's a fucking duck.

3
upvotechamp 3 points ago +3 / -0

Treatment options have been limited in the ongoing coronavirus disease

‘Limited’ here doesn’t mean quantitatively. It’s being used as a verb. Treatment options were entirely limited to 1 by the federal and state governments. That option was to wait until you were sick enough to not be able to breath properly then having your lungs blown out by ventilators all so you could be used as a statistic for news outlets sound bites. Many people would have easily survived if they hadn’t gotten sick during an election year.

2
CONN_WYNN 2 points ago +2 / -0

These people need to swing

2
ParticleCannon 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a terrible doctor

2
Choppa_Pilot 2 points ago +2 / -0

HCQ was used in 94% of patients within 48 hours of emergency room arrival, while >55% received 2,000-3,000 mg, cumulatively. Of this number, approximately 63% also received AZM. This combination fell out of favor over the study period based on external recommendations.

2
Staatssicherheit 2 points ago +2 / -0

The study was carried out on patients at Saint Barnabas Medical Center, New Jersey, with just over 1% having been clinically diagnosed to have COVID-19. Of the 255 patients, almost 80% died during the study period.

With every log increase in the cumulative dose of HCQ, the mortality rate fell by 1.12 times, such that at 3 g HCQ, survival odds rose by 2.5 times.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.28.21258012v1

Who decided who gets a higher cumulative dose? Is that the reason and HCQ was correlative factor? Need further trials.

1
TGNX 1 point ago +1 / -0

We knew this a year ago!

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump suggested we take a closer look at HCQ. Nothing much more.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
2
KennethsFrequency 2 points ago +3 / -1

Google Faucis 2005 study by his in house group,

, “We report...that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
dixond 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ahh, so now we've moved the goalposts from 'peer reviewed' to 'immune to ad hominem attacks'.

OK then, stick this one in your pipe and smoke it.

You might have to use your brain a little and join the dots as you read it.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
dixond 1 point ago +2 / -1

I see that thinking isn't your strong suit. Cool.

1
dixond 1 point ago +2 / -1

The same dumb tactics over and over. Tell your handlers that they need to update their playbook, it's twenty years out of date.